guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
WhoFluence. Part 1: A Bigger Sound, date: may 27, 2006
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

WhoFluence. Part 1: A Bigger Sound

author: americanmovie23 date: 05/27/2006 category: artists' discussions
rating: 6.7 / votes: 20 
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 03:46 am
print
share
More americanmovie23's columns:
+ WhoFluence. Part 3: The Who And An Early Form Of Punk artists' discussions 06/17/2006
+ WhoFluence. Part 2: Radio Stations And Rock Operas artists' discussions 06/03/2006
+ The History Of Everclear. 4 the history of 11/13/2004
+ The History Of: Everclear. 3 the history of 11/01/2004
+ The History Of: Everclear. Part 2 the history of 10/29/2004
+ view all
 42 
 comments posted, 1 removed | this article is 98% spam-free
RIP Dime :
Cool!
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 04:23 am / quote |
Jackolas :
Talk about pro american.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 05:29 am / quote |
Dale_kerigan :
why do people feel the need to put billie joe's name in things, you know your going to flamed. there are so many others that use marshalls, why billie
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 06:01 am / quote |
dimebag7 :
agreerd ^
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 07:56 am / quote |
Neon Knight :
well written however the back ground info on marshall was a little unnessary
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 08:06 am / quote |
Feel bad inc. :
why shouldnt he use billie he is a popular artist now days just because you dont like them doesnt mean other people cant mention him
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 08:19 am / quote |
Bodah68 :
You use the word "however" way too much.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 08:36 am / quote |
!@#$ :
No need to flame Ringo at the end though
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 08:53 am / quote |
cefasnacht :
i think this guy would like to be tea-bagged by keith moon. the writer must a drummer too! and has one big hard-on for keith
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 09:56 am / quote |
power1 :
what a pointless waste wanking over a drum kit
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 10:55 am / quote |
Kadaj :
says that all you need to do is ?plug in your Les Paul [guitar] and the marshals and let it rip? (Guitar Legends #81).


LOL

Because everybody has their own les paul (Person)to plug into their marshall's...

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 11:05 am / quote |
thelastdeath :
good article but the beginning is exactly why i h8 americans, they're so arrogant and think of nothing but themselves.

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 11:24 am / quote |
StratEnRegalia :
^
Just shut up.

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 11:37 am / quote |
Scott O :
Not bad, but an article discussing the 'big sound' of The Who needs to include "Live at Leeds" and the live performances of Tommy.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 12:47 pm / quote |
GoodCharloteSux :
eh, I hope theres a mention of Black Sabbath!
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 12:54 pm / quote |
Crookedjon :
cefasnacht :
i think this guy would like to be tea-bagged by keith moon. the writer must a drummer too! and has one big hard-on for keith


And who wouldn't? Those guys were rock gods in their time.

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 01:48 pm / quote |
StratRat13 :
good article but the beginning is exactly why i h8 americans, they're so arrogant and think of nothing but themselves.


wow that was pretty hypocrytical.

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 02:09 pm / quote |
Pink_blood :
when four boys from London made it big.

London? the beatles were from Liverpool.
Its a pretty big difference really..

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 02:45 pm / quote |
Iruleeverything :
Ummm.... You left out a lot of stuff, how about Tommy or Quadrophenia, did you mention those once, no, I think not. Tommy was the VERY FIRST rock opera and you didn't mention it in one sentence!!!!! And you didn't mention their live performances, you could have at least said that part of the reason why they got famous was because of their live performances, and you didn't mention Pete Townshend's little habit of destroying guitars at shows, which he's famous for!!!!! I give you a 2 for effort.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 02:59 pm / quote |
americanmovie23 :
Tommy And The Guitar Smashing are all coming in later in parts 2 and 3! Notice how it says PART 1. Be patient.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 03:09 pm / quote |
civildp1 :

Your view of the musical instruments of the 50s is pretty uneducated. The modern drum set of bass drum, floor, tom, rack tom, and snare has exsisted since the 20s and drummers in Duke Ellington's band used a double bass drum set up as early as the 40s. And drummers like Buddy Rich were doing crazy fills and solos long before Keith moon even picked up a pair of sticks. Also, guitar players have been recording with amplified guitars since the 40s. Any old blues record can testify to that. With the release of the fender precision bass in 1951, many bass players started phasing out the double bass, and by the time of Elvis records like 'jailhouse rock,' they were souly using the P-bass which was recorded via amplifier.

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 04:25 pm / quote |
Jammer39 :
gotta mention the beatniks
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 04:37 pm / quote |
crazynickman :
good but no mention of tommy, quad, or live at leeds (ok; coming in part 2). And i dont understand the anti-american things in the comments, the who were british and the author is condemning the simple rock of 50s america. The beginning part about American change was a bit unnecessary, but at this time rock made a bigger impact in America than Britain.
Pink_blood wrote:

when four boys from London made it big.

London? the beatles were from Liverpool.
Its a pretty big difference really..


He's talking about the Who; they were from Acton (or Sheperd's Bush), which im pretty sure is a suburb or part of London. Read the whole thing- "1964"; The Beatles formed in 1958. The Who formed in '63-'64

POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 07:08 pm / quote |
rubberbullets :
Pete Townshend is a pedophile, what an *******
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 05:55 am / quote |
MATTTHEMOP :
^i thought that was because he was sexually abused as a kid, and wanted to understand a bit more about wot that was about, and looked at some pictures.
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 07:54 am / quote |
rubberbullets :
yeah great excuse, "research", lol


POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 08:17 am / quote |
Pinkfloydguy :
you two probably fiddle with kids yourselfs....
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 09:21 am / quote |
incubusomaniac :
****, not one of the most influential bands, thee influential band
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 11:19 am / quote |
ChordMonger :
the Who are needlessly overrated. if any of you younguns have listened through tommy, youve heard the song 'fiddle about', and you know what i mean
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 09:28 pm / quote |
HelpMeImHungry :
You say that the who were the first to change popular music and make it have meaning beneath the surface, the who are good but come on, they didnt invent rock and roll, artists like Johnny Cash had deep meaninggul music long before them. And how can you give credit to any one guitarist credit for use of the power chord? Thats just a natural evolution of the instrument.
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 10:54 pm / quote |
Steph Bets :
civildp1 wrote:


Your view of the musical instruments of the 50s is pretty uneducated. The modern drum set of bass drum, floor, tom, rack tom, and snare has exsisted since the 20s and drummers in Duke Ellington's band used a double bass drum set up as early as the 40s. And drummers like Buddy Rich were doing crazy fills and solos long before Keith moon even picked up a pair of sticks. Also, guitar players have been recording with amplified guitars since the 40s. Any old blues record can testify to that. With the release of the fender precision bass in 1951, many bass players started phasing out the double bass, and by the time of Elvis records like 'jailhouse rock,' they were souly using the P-bass which was recorded via amplifier.


Amen brother. I was gonna mention that, but you've wrapped it up rather nicely.

People- get into jazz. Music with depth long before the rock n roll revolution.

POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 06:59 am / quote |
frigginjerk :
My Generation? Tommy? Quadrophenia? Keith & John's legendary antics? Woodstock? Smashing guitars to bits?

All that stuff needed to be mentioned for sure. Plus, some notes on their pop sensibility and ability to interveave that with rock could have helped.

POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 09:17 am / quote |
sicformyage :
billy joe armstrong... not the best example of a guitarist
POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 01:19 pm / quote |
which ones pink :
frigginjerk wrote:

My Generation? Tommy? Quadrophenia? Keith & John's legendary antics? Woodstock? Smashing guitars to bits?

All that stuff needed to be mentioned for sure. Plus, some notes on their pop sensibility and ability to interveave that with rock could have helped.


Dude, did you even read the title? PART 1!!! The rest is coming.

POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 03:37 pm / quote |
which ones pink :
Great article btw.
POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 03:40 pm / quote |
Jack Dony :
Wow, i thought the french were arrogant.
POSTED: 05/29/2006 - 10:42 pm / quote |
rpguitardude :
cool !! the who is a great band
POSTED: 05/30/2006 - 02:49 am / quote |
frusciante_man1 :
yeh thats kl im goin 2 see the Who in july!!! ROCK ON
POSTED: 05/30/2006 - 06:27 am / quote |
forsaknazrael :
Steph Bets wrote:

civildp1 wrote:


Your view of the musical instruments of the 50s is pretty uneducated. The modern drum set of bass drum, floor, tom, rack tom, and snare has exsisted since the 20s and drummers in Duke Ellington's band used a double bass drum set up as early as the 40s. And drummers like Buddy Rich were doing crazy fills and solos long before Keith moon even picked up a pair of sticks. Also, guitar players have been recording with amplified guitars since the 40s. Any old blues record can testify to that. With the release of the fender precision bass in 1951, many bass players started phasing out the double bass, and by the time of Elvis records like 'jailhouse rock,' they were souly using the P-bass which was recorded via amplifier.

Amen brother. I was gonna mention that, but you've wrapped it up rather nicely.

People- get into jazz. Music with depth long before the rock n roll revolution.


Maybe. But rock is what brought it to the masses.

POSTED: 05/30/2006 - 08:39 am / quote |
The_Elitist :
sicformyage wrote:

billy joe armstrong... not the best example of a guitarist


what i was thinking. i don't read the magazine, but what would he be doing on a magazine called guitar legends. :P

POSTED: 05/30/2006 - 08:46 am / quote |
Fuzzz :
rubberbullets wrote:

Pete Townshend is a pedophile, what an *****

Is it really necessary to post those kinds of comments here... the don't really have anything to do with the column itself (I think)

I got alot of information off this column, and even more from the commetns. The column did seem very very amateur-like with all the typos, but great that someone had the energy and patience to write all of that down...

...and no, Billie Joe Armstrong is not at all a guitar legend!

POSTED: 06/12/2006 - 04:54 pm / quote |
Strat_Monkey :
He also pioneered the use of power chords which became the basis of rock ‘n roll even to this day


Link Wray's song Rumble was the first song to use powerchords and distortion in the modern rock way that Ray Davies (The Kinks) and Pete Townshend did, in that the chords were used to play the melody; the rhythm guitar being the lead instrument. And Ray Davies did it before Pete Townshend, so he was the third big guitarist to use that style, hardly a "pioneer".

POSTED: 06/17/2006 - 06:15 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009