Slash's solo album or Appetite for Destruction


PDA

View Full Version : Slash's solo album or Appetite for Destruction


YorkieBar147
08-01-2010, 02:57 PM
Slash's solo album o Appetite for Destructon - i cant decide which is better. What do you guys think?

Modern Aliens
08-01-2010, 03:01 PM
Appetite no doubt

digman50
08-01-2010, 03:03 PM
appetite for destruction everytime. not too many albums can stand up to it

MXFNCK
08-01-2010, 03:03 PM
uh

Duffman123
08-01-2010, 03:05 PM
A generic rock album vs One of the best hard rock albums of all time

Hm.........?

Modern Aliens
08-01-2010, 03:09 PM
Appetite for Destruction is one of the best albums ever, its a masterpiece, Slash's solo is good but it doesn't makes history

JonteMetal
08-01-2010, 03:13 PM
they both suck :facepalm:

Modern Aliens
08-01-2010, 03:14 PM
they both suck :facepalm:

a metal fan right?

MagicsDevil
08-01-2010, 03:16 PM
a metal fan right?

Naw.

Just trollin'.

richie7410
08-01-2010, 03:16 PM
stupid question, appetite is one of the best albums ever made, and slash's solo work is good, just that there are no stand out tracks that make it a great album.

appetite has three of the best classic/hard rock songs ever in sweet child, welcome to the jungle and paradise city, as well as many other great songs that never got the recognition which they deserved because they were over shadowed by them three. songs like nightrain and mr. brownstone are great songs, and some be more well-known. unfortunately for them, they came off the same album as them big three hitters.

slash has a load of good, solid songs, infact i personally find that there is only about one or two bad songs on the entire album, its just that it doesn't have any stand out songs which can carry it to the hights appetite acheived.

BrainDamage
08-01-2010, 04:02 PM
Wrong forum, read the rules.

***CLOSED***

:)