Maet
04-19-2006, 07:05 PM
Two threads in two days (sue me).
Anyway, as far as I know (and I'm fairly sure most people would agree with me on this), your average discussion in the classic rock forum consists of:
n00b1 - _______ r0xorzz!!1 _______ sux!1
n00b2 - n0, _______ sux!!21 _______ r0x12
(So on and so forth in this manner for a few posts)
Mod - (witty comment) *closed* (or in rare cases, the thread gets back on track)
That's an exaggeration of course, but you get the idea.
What I would **like** to try to do is give this forum a booster of intelligence by actually attempting to set up a designated thread (like oh... say... This One!!) for educated debates and arguements.
And having said that, I present to you, the fine CRF (classic rock forum) Goers...
The Great Debate!(aka: The Organized Classic Rock Bickering Thread)
Your basic debate would have a topic, two sides discussing that topic (affirmative and negative), a mediator/moderator, a limit, judges and rebuttle. Of course this would be bloody hard, so I'm thinking of setting it up like so...
Sample
Topic: Is Jimmy Page a "Great" Guitarist?
Affirmative: UGer#1, UGer#2, UGer#3
Negative: UGerA. UGerB. UGerC
Panel/Judges/Jury: CRexpert#1, CRexpert#2, CRexpert#3
**Designated Mediator/Moderator to step in when necessary **
Limit: 35 Posts in which the teams will present and cross examine arguments before the Panel/Judges/Jury decide which team wins.
A new topic.
I know this may seem a bit weird and people may not like it, but for the time being, I would like to leave this thread for comments, suggestions, support and tweaking. And hopefully if this seems like a good idea in the eyes of the powers that be (*cough*MODS*cough*), I would like to know if I have the go ahead to make this wild crazy e-dream of mine a reality from one of you fine gents with actual power.
Thanks. :cheers:
~Maet
EDIT -- Does anyone else think it's cool how italics actually correct the natural slant of the pound sign? :p:
Anyway, as far as I know (and I'm fairly sure most people would agree with me on this), your average discussion in the classic rock forum consists of:
n00b1 - _______ r0xorzz!!1 _______ sux!1
n00b2 - n0, _______ sux!!21 _______ r0x12
(So on and so forth in this manner for a few posts)
Mod - (witty comment) *closed* (or in rare cases, the thread gets back on track)
That's an exaggeration of course, but you get the idea.
What I would **like** to try to do is give this forum a booster of intelligence by actually attempting to set up a designated thread (like oh... say... This One!!) for educated debates and arguements.
And having said that, I present to you, the fine CRF (classic rock forum) Goers...
The Great Debate!(aka: The Organized Classic Rock Bickering Thread)
Your basic debate would have a topic, two sides discussing that topic (affirmative and negative), a mediator/moderator, a limit, judges and rebuttle. Of course this would be bloody hard, so I'm thinking of setting it up like so...
Sample
Topic: Is Jimmy Page a "Great" Guitarist?
Affirmative: UGer#1, UGer#2, UGer#3
Negative: UGerA. UGerB. UGerC
Panel/Judges/Jury: CRexpert#1, CRexpert#2, CRexpert#3
**Designated Mediator/Moderator to step in when necessary **
Limit: 35 Posts in which the teams will present and cross examine arguments before the Panel/Judges/Jury decide which team wins.
A new topic.
I know this may seem a bit weird and people may not like it, but for the time being, I would like to leave this thread for comments, suggestions, support and tweaking. And hopefully if this seems like a good idea in the eyes of the powers that be (*cough*MODS*cough*), I would like to know if I have the go ahead to make this wild crazy e-dream of mine a reality from one of you fine gents with actual power.
Thanks. :cheers:
~Maet
EDIT -- Does anyone else think it's cool how italics actually correct the natural slant of the pound sign? :p: