UG Community @ Ultimate-Guitar.Com The Math/Science Help Thread!
 Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts
Search:

10-08-2012, 10:55 PM   #8921
funkbass369
UG Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Richmond, Va
Quote:
 Originally Posted by MakinLattes (1/4x)*4 = 1/x

how are you getting that and what rules are you using?
__________________
MM Stingray
MIA P Bass
MIM Jazz Bass
GK 410SBX Cab
Sansamp 3 Ch. DI
Crybaby Bass Wah
Bass Big Muff
DD3 Delay

MIA Strat
Nashville Tele
Martin 00015M
Hot Rod Deluxe
Big Muff
DS1
Hendrix Crybaby Wah

Last edited by funkbass369 : 10-08-2012 at 11:01 PM.

 10-08-2012, 11:06 PM #8922 MakinLattes fully retractable     Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: { } It is the chain rule. ln(4x) is like f(g(x)) where f(x) = ln(x) and g(x) = 4x. So, I took the derivative of ln(x), which is 1/x, but instead of x I put 4x in the denominator because I'm treating 4x as just x for the first part of the chain rule. Then I took the derivative of 4x, 4, and multiplied 1/4x by it. All I did was f'(g(x))*g'(x)
10-08-2012, 11:14 PM   #8923
funkbass369
UG Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Richmond, Va
Quote:
 Originally Posted by MakinLattes It is the chain rule. ln(4x) is like f(g(x)) where f(x) = ln(x) and g(x) = 4x. So, I took the derivative of ln(x), which is 1/x, but instead of x I put 4x in the denominator because I'm treating 4x as just x for the first part of the chain rule. Then I took the derivative of 4x, 4, and multiplied 1/4x by it. All I did was f'(g(x))*g'(x)

oh...it was that simple. I don't know why, but i always have trouble with the chain rule.
__________________
MM Stingray
MIA P Bass
MIM Jazz Bass
GK 410SBX Cab
Sansamp 3 Ch. DI
Crybaby Bass Wah
Bass Big Muff
DD3 Delay

MIA Strat
Nashville Tele
Martin 00015M
Hot Rod Deluxe
Big Muff
DS1
Hendrix Crybaby Wah

 10-08-2012, 11:28 PM #8924 MakinLattes fully retractable     Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: { } It takes some getting used to is all
 10-09-2012, 07:53 PM #8925 aerosmithfan95 Call me Billy.     Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: In the pipes Ok, this one problem I have is giving me a ton of trouble. I've been trying to get the correct answer (back of the book says it's 931m), but I honestly can't get it. "A rocket moves upward, starting from rest with an acceleration of +29.4m/s^2 for 3.98s. It runs out of fuel at the end of the 3.98s but does not stop. How high does it rise above the ground?" Any thoughts on this one? __________________ AF95 Guitar --> Pedals --> Amplifier
 10-09-2012, 08:31 PM #8926 In Vein Registered User   Join Date: Mar 2009 The tricky part is that the acceleration changes. Try dividing the flight of the rocket into two parts at the point where the acceleration changes, find how high the rocket rises in each part, and then add these numbers. The first part will be from liftoff (t=0) until the fuel runs out (t=3.98). The second part will be from that point until the rocket hits a maximum height where velocity=0. To find that time, you'll need to use the first acceleration to find the initial velocity at t=3.98. Try using these ideas, and if you can't figure it out I'll post a full solution. __________________ Stuff you should check out: El Ten Eleven Cloudkicker B. M. Sharp Asbestoscape The Glitch Mob
10-09-2012, 08:35 PM   #8927
aerosmithfan95
Call me Billy.

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the pipes
Quote:
 Originally Posted by In Vein The tricky part is that the acceleration changes. Try dividing the flight of the rocket into two parts at the point where the acceleration changes, find how high the rocket rises in each part, and then add these numbers. The first part will be from liftoff (t=0) until the fuel runs out (t=3.98). The second part will be from that point until the rocket hits a maximum height where velocity=0. To find that time, you'll need to use the first acceleration to find the initial velocity at t=3.98. Try using these ideas, and if you can't figure it out I'll post a full solution.

Ok, I'll try and figure it out from here. I knew that the maximum height would include velocity being 0, but I wasn't sure how to go from there.

Edit: I tried a few different ways of approaching it, yet I can't get anywhere close to the 931m that I'm supposed to get.
__________________
AF95

Guitar --> Pedals --> Amplifier

Last edited by aerosmithfan95 : 10-09-2012 at 08:45 PM.

 10-09-2012, 08:39 PM #8928 guitarplaya322 Registered User     Join Date: Dec 2007 Calculus question guys. I have a region that I'm rotating across the y axis. Normally I know how to solve this kind of problem, but the region crosses the Y axis, so I'm confused what would happen to it. __________________ "I wanna see movies of my dreams"
10-09-2012, 08:49 PM   #8929
In Vein
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
 Originally Posted by guitarplaya322 Calculus question guys. I have a region that I'm rotating across the y axis. Normally I know how to solve this kind of problem, but the region crosses the Y axis, so I'm confused what would happen to it.

Interesting, I've never actually encountered a problem like this. As such, I'm not entirely sure, but just visualizing it, it would make sense to separate the figure into two objects at the point where the curve crosses the y-axis. Then, find the volume of each solid separately and add them together.
__________________
Stuff you should check out:
El Ten Eleven
Cloudkicker
B. M. Sharp
Asbestoscape
The Glitch Mob

10-09-2012, 08:51 PM   #8930
guitarplaya322
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
 Originally Posted by In Vein Interesting, I've never actually encountered a problem like this. As such, I'm not entirely sure, but just visualizing it, it would make sense to separate the figure into two objects at the point where the curve crosses the y-axis. Then, find the volume of each solid separately and add them together.

That's what I was thinking too. Just wanted to see if there any known tricks or shortcuts because this will be a pain in the ass.

EDIT: Nope I don't think that will work because some regions on either side cover each other when they're rotated around the axis.
__________________
"I wanna see movies of my dreams"

Last edited by guitarplaya322 : 10-09-2012 at 09:03 PM.

 10-09-2012, 09:06 PM #8931 In Vein Registered User   Join Date: Mar 2009 What's the problem exactly? __________________ Stuff you should check out: El Ten Eleven Cloudkicker B. M. Sharp Asbestoscape The Glitch Mob
10-09-2012, 09:18 PM   #8932
guitarplaya322
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
 Originally Posted by In Vein What's the problem exactly?

Rotate the region enclosed by x=(y^4)/4-(y^2)/2 and x=(y^2)/2 about the y axis.
__________________
"I wanna see movies of my dreams"

 10-09-2012, 10:13 PM #8933 In Vein Registered User   Join Date: Mar 2009 Wow that is a doozy. Here's what I'm thinking though. First, for simplicity, f(y)=x=(y^4)/4-(y^2)/2 and g(y)=x=(y^2)/2 Our problem with this solid is on the interval 0≤y≤sqrt(2), since here is where the regions would overlap when rotated. We know that on 0≤y≤2 |g(y)|≥|f(y)|. So, the curve furthest from x=0 on the interval 0≤y≤sqrt(2) is g(y). So, when we rotate the region about the y-axis, this curve will determine the outer edge of the figure. The only thing I give pause to is what happens to the region between f(y) and x=0 as it gets rotated. It does add volume, but it adds volume that has already been filled. So, I think, but am not sure, that we can just discount it as redundant. For 0≤y≤sqrt(2), find the volume by rotating g(y) around the y-axis. I believe that for sqrt(2)≤y≤2 its pretty straightforward, just g(y)-f(y). __________________ Stuff you should check out: El Ten Eleven Cloudkicker B. M. Sharp Asbestoscape The Glitch Mob Last edited by In Vein : 10-09-2012 at 10:14 PM.
 10-09-2012, 10:29 PM #8934 Avedas UG's Half Asian     Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC check out this plot linky (refresh the page if it doesn't work for whatever reason) if you solve both equations you find the graphs intercept at (0,0) and (2,2) when you rotate about the y-axis, the inner curve (red) becomes your inner radius and the outer curve (blue) becomes your outer radius. if you're calculating volumes using single variable calculus, you can use the cylindrical shell method to calculate this quite easily. actually if you know multivariable methods (double and/or triple integrals, specifically) you can do this even more easily with polar coordinates or cylindrical coordinates. Last edited by Avedas : 10-09-2012 at 10:57 PM.
10-09-2012, 11:08 PM   #8935
cornmancer
Thou mayest

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
 Originally Posted by aerosmithfan95 Ok, this one problem I have is giving me a ton of trouble. I've been trying to get the correct answer (back of the book says it's 931m), but I honestly can't get it. "A rocket moves upward, starting from rest with an acceleration of +29.4m/s^2 for 3.98s. It runs out of fuel at the end of the 3.98s but does not stop. How high does it rise above the ground?" Any thoughts on this one?

If you're still here 2 hours later, I can do this!
If not, well I've been cooped up in the house all day and physics is fun so I'm figuring this out anyway

So you split the problem into two parts, in the first you have these variables, assuming you are using the upwards direction as your reference frame
initial velocity = 0 m/s
acceleration = 29.4 m/s^2
time = 3.98s
and if you have any 3 variables, you can find the other two. What you need is distance up, so you can use the following equation

distance = (initial velocity)(time) + 1/2(accleration)(time^2)

So for the second part we have the variables
acceleration = -9.8 m/s^2 (maybe you forgot to factor gravity in when you were running it before?)
final velocity = 0 m/s (that'll be when the rocket hits its peak and then starts coming down)

What you need then is the initial velocity, which is the final velocity of the first, and of course the up

so

acceleration = [(final velocity) - (initial velocity)] / time
final velocity = (acceleration)(time) - (initial velocity)

and then

(final velocity)^2 = (initial)^2 + 2(a)(distance)
distance = (final^2 - initial^2) / 2a

I got 931 and some change. hope that helps. Soothed me anyway
__________________
Goin' 90 I ain't scary
Long as I got the Virgin Mary
Assurin' me
That I won't go to hell.

10-10-2012, 10:22 AM   #8936
In Vein
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Avedas check out this plot linky (refresh the page if it doesn't work for whatever reason) if you solve both equations you find the graphs intercept at (0,0) and (2,2) when you rotate about the y-axis, the inner curve (red) becomes your inner radius and the outer curve (blue) becomes your outer radius. if you're calculating volumes using single variable calculus, you can use the cylindrical shell method to calculate this quite easily. actually if you know multivariable methods (double and/or triple integrals, specifically) you can do this even more easily with polar coordinates or cylindrical coordinates.

The way it is graphed on Wolfram is misleading. Instead of graphing them on a normal axis orientation, Wolfram just renamed the axes. In the link you provided, you would have to rotate the region around the horizontal axis, since that is the y-axis. The confusing part of this problem is that the region crosses through the axis about which it is being rotated, so some of the parts would overlap. Check out my previous post and see if you agree with the logic.
__________________
Stuff you should check out:
El Ten Eleven
Cloudkicker
B. M. Sharp
Asbestoscape
The Glitch Mob

10-10-2012, 12:22 PM   #8937
Avedas
UG's Half Asian

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Quote:
 Originally Posted by In Vein The way it is graphed on Wolfram is misleading. Instead of graphing them on a normal axis orientation, Wolfram just renamed the axes. In the link you provided, you would have to rotate the region around the horizontal axis, since that is the y-axis. The confusing part of this problem is that the region crosses through the axis about which it is being rotated, so some of the parts would overlap. Check out my previous post and see if you agree with the logic.

Oh you're right. It doesn't really change how the problem is solved though. The outer radius alone would be suitable for volume calculations. Overlapping volumes mean nothing without a density function anyway.

10-10-2012, 01:14 PM   #8938
laid-to-waste
...BlTCH

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
to those studying mathematics at uni, i've a simple question for you:

are you enjoying it?
__________________
Quote:
 Originally Posted by vintage x metal I just looked at your pics; you're very cute

Quote:
 Originally Posted by skylerjames13 you've got the sickest abs i've ever seen and it's enough to turn me gay
Quote:
 Originally Posted by MetalMullet you look pretty curved mate!

complement my abs or physique or general attractiveness for your chance to be quoted right here

10-10-2012, 11:52 PM   #8939
Avedas
UG's Half Asian

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Quote:
 Originally Posted by laid-to-waste to those studying mathematics at uni, i've a simple question for you: are you enjoying it?

I like the idea of learning it and applying it, but pure theoretical math doesn't really do it for me. Also I'd infinitely rather focus on my engineering courses than the math courses. I still have so many more math courses to take

 10-11-2012, 12:11 AM #8940 ticktockboom Registered User     Join Date: Jun 2008 Is there anyone here who knows C++ pretty well? I could really use some help cause i'm struggling right now with some programming assignments

 Thread Tools Rate This Thread Rate This Thread: 5 : Excellent 4 : Good 3 : Average 2 : Bad 1 : Terrible

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump Please select one User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home -------------------- UG Community     New Members Q&A Forum     The Pit     Archives Of The Best Threads         Music Theory Archives         Technique Archives         Bands & Artists Archives         Electric Guitar Archives         Bass Archives         Songwriting & Lyrics Archives         Bandleading Archives         Community Archives Music     Bands & Artists         Classic Rock         Modern Rock         Metal         80s Rock, Shred & Progressive         Punk & Ska         Pop Punk & Emo         Hardcore         Alternative & Indie         Blues & Jazz         Other     Songwriting & Lyrics         Songwriting & Lyrics Contests         Songwriting & Lyrics Techniques     Recordings         Tabs & Chords         Recording Contests         Original Recordings         Cover Songs     Tab Talk     Musician Talk         Bandleading         Singing & Vocals     Promote YOUR Band     Classifieds         Musician Ads         Gear Ads Instruments     Guitar Techniques     Acoustic & Classical Guitar     Electric Guitar     Bass Guitar     Guitar Gear & Accessories     Gear Building & Customizing     Drums Misc     Ultimate Guitar Feedback         Site Suggestions         Mobile Apps Feedback         Tab Pro Service Feedback         Bug Reports         Bad Advertising Reports         General Information & Announcements     UG Contribution

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.

 -- UG Black Style -- UG Classic Style