|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
|
7 string or 8 string?
So most of the bands I listen to use 7 strings. However, many of them use 8 strings as well. Most of the songs I want to learn are on 7 strings though, though it would be nice to have the 8 for when I want it... So my question would be, to those of you who have 7's and 8's, is does the 8th string get in the way playing 7 string songs? Is it worth the extra string? Or should I just go for a 7?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jackson Fanboy!
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Do what you want to do.
Really, it comes down what you want. If you need all 8 strings, get an 8. If you don't, you could also, if you wish, down tune a 7. It's really down to what you need and what you want.
__________________
Legion! Original 1969 Fender Jazzmaster Jackson JS32R Dinky with EMG-ALX "Curry" Ibanez RGD7421 "Stella" Ibanez S470 "Haley" MiM Fender Jazz Bass "Pancho" Schecter Stiletto Elite "Kimmy" Peavey 6505+ 112 Line 6 POD HD500 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
UG's Clueless Guitarist
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Recreational Meth Vehicle
|
piano
__________________
7 STRING LEGION Watch Breaking Bad? Come share your crazy ass theories Quote:
Tribal Purple Agile 727 Interceptor pro ![]() Ibanez RG370DX Fender Squier Strat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Future Breed Machine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Asgaard
|
I vote for 7. I'm biased though, I can't stand 8s.
__________________
-Dave The benefits of a metal speaker grill: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Resu Deretsiger
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
|
I vote for 7 simply because you aren't really sure what you want.
8 string guitars are a different beast. Save it for when you know you want it and can really get some great riffs out of it. But really, you can get what you want.
__________________
Gear: Peavey Grind 5 string ESP LTD AW-7 Schecter Loomis NT Peavey 5150 212 ProTone DeadHorse OD |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lord of the Strings
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
I have both a 7 and an 8 and I vote 8. I find myself reaching for my 8 more just because its more fun to play. Playing 7 string songs on an 8 isn't bad, you just gotta get used to reading 7 string tabs while omitting the top string. To be fair though most guitar tab software doesn't even have an 8 string option yet so you'll have to get used to that anyway,
__________________
What gives me wood: Gibson Les Paul Custom Ibanez S5470F Schecter Hellraiser C-7 FR Ibanez RGA8 Axe FX II |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Amnesia!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SLC, Utah
|
I'd say start on a seven, and if you want to afterwards, progress to an eight. As Mr. lemur said, eights are a completely different beast in the wonderful world of guitars.
__________________
Join the 7 String Legion! Carvin CT7 Carvin SC90 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
|
I prefer 7's personally, 8 string guitars are just way too bulky for my taste. I can get enough range with my 7's to play 8 string songs by down tuning, so I've never felt the need to get an 8 string. It's all taste, though- if you happen to like enormous guitars, the 8 string would definitely be handier to have than down tuning your 7 string all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Perth, Australia.
|
7 string with thicker strings, so you can downtune to an 8 string tuning.
__________________
"I think, as a musician, you should practice your technique to be as good as you need to be to facilitate whatever ideas come into your head." - Devin Townsend |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Eris!
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Well, an 8 contains a built-in 7....
It mostly depends on intended tuning, whether or not you like the 27" (or more) scale inherent in almost all 8s, and if you need a tremolo. IF you don't want to go down to F# (let's say you want to tune up), there s a HARD LIMIT on the high E string at 27". You won't be able to go above high G due to string breakage, and even then bending can be problematic. However, if you want to tune a 7 string down below G, you'll run into tuning problems on shorter than 27" if you're a hard picker, to say nothing of the negative affects on tone wrought by huge strings on a shorter scale (inharmonicity). Factor in Drop Tunings, and things can get wierd... If you have small hands, 27" can be a beast. There are a few 26.5" 8s from Schecter, and a few 25.5" 8s from ESP/LTD, which makes no sense at all. If you need a trem, your options are limited to Schecter for the time being unless you're willing to have the guitar modded heavily to add an aftermarket Floyd 8-string OFR. [EDIT] forgot about Kahler's 8-string trem included on several Agiles (but who wants to play something with a neck that bad?) They also come on Ran guitars, which are pretty boss...[EDIT] I'd say drop $400 on an Ibanez RG8 just to see if you like 8s. Yes, it's made in Indonesia (MII), and Ibanez pickups are almost always abysmal, but I've heard good things on Sevenstring.org G# is low enough for me, so an 8 tuned up is doable, as is a 7 tuned down. I'd rather have the 8 for added range, but the comfort of a normal 25.5" scale and a TREM are more important IMHO. Last edited by k3v1n shr3dz : 01-21-2013 at 04:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
Have a look at the schecter omen 8, or the website Thomann do this 8 string for under 200 euro, could b a good way to see if u like 8 strings without spending a fortune
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
I would suggest 7 string since downtuning 8 string is just a NOPE. Why tune whole octave E , d or C...? & string can do all the crap, got mine 25,5 downtuned two steps or one down and its totally fine.
Or accordion? Last edited by rockstar256 : 01-21-2013 at 06:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Quote:
25.5" scale allows an additional high and low string, instead of two lower strings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hail Eris!
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Tru dat, and I should have included that in my post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Please, call me Pig.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
|
I find a low 8th string to be largely useless. I am, however, very intrigued by the idea of an 8 string with a high A instead of a low F#.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hail Eris!
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
You may find this thread interesting From what I've HEARD, no one has properly done A4 on a 27" scale yet. The Octave4Plus strings can do it, but you can't bend more than 1/2 step, and it takes quite some time for the string to stretch enough to attain the high A without breaking outright. Locking bridges/nuts, and long headstocks and string-thru bridges can exacerbate string breakage.... not what I'd call "proper". If you're willing to tune it down a whole step (A, D, G, C, F, A, D, high G) you can do it on a 27", but many of the problems still persist albeit to a lesser degree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
I have owned both high end 7's and 8's...personally I find 8's and their excessive low end a little useless. I like what others do with them though, but for the love of god, if you plan on playing nothing but breakdowns on an 8...buy a baritone 6 and tune it down lol
__________________
Want to Buy: UV7PWH |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
If you're having a high A/Ab/G string then a 25.5" scale is probably the better idea. At some point I want to get a 25.5" 8 string to tune to drop G (with a high G), although with O4P strings a 25.5" can handle drop A/B standard with a high A string.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Ibanez Recommender
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
|
I'd just pick up a 7 string and down tune it for the occasional times when you would want to play an 8 string song. It's not that I have anything against 8 strings, it's just that, like others have said, an 8 string is a totally different beast and, to me at least, feels like a much further jump from a 7 string than a 7 string does from a 6. It's almost an entirely new way to approach playing whereas a 7 string feels, to me at least, like a regular 6 string with an added low B. I know that sounds ridiculous, as an 8 string is just a 7 with an added low F#, but it comes off feeling as if it is a whole new experience. Perhaps it's just that the lowest 8th string is so low, it's hard for me to utilize it traditionally for metal and such, but I end up rethinking how to go about writing songs (not focusing on utilizing the lowest string's tuning as the root, for example, or re-learning not to chug on the lowest string for rhythmic affect, which is quite disappointing on the lowest F# without proper amp setup in my opinion).
That may be a good thing though. It helps spurn new writing ideas and originality. That said, if you're just trying to play songs and enjoy a traditional experience, go for a 7.
__________________
Ibanez S2170FB Prestige + Crunch Lab Ibanez RG1570MRR Prestige + Crunch Lab Ibanez RG2EX1 Peavey 5150 + TS9 + ISP Decimator + MXR 10-Band EQ Watch and subscribe to my guitar ventures! Search Nick Catelli on YouTube
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New Jersey
|
I'd go 7 first. It took a couple of months to get the transition down with a 6 to 7, skipping right to 8 doesn't seem like a good idea, and like you said, you don't even want the 8th string right now. I've had my 8 string about 7 months now with the idea that it'd be great for experimenting things, but I never even touch the 8th string when I play it.
__________________
ERG's ![]() Ibanez Universe UV777 Signed by Steve Vai Schecter Damien Elite-8 Schecter Omen-7 with X2N and D-Thing Douglas Scope 727 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate This Thread | |
|
|