Go Back   UG Community @ Ultimate-Guitar.Com > Instruments > Electric Guitar
User Name  
Password
Search:

Reply
Old 09-30-2008, 09:15 PM   #1
thelax
Registered User
 
thelax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
real difference between bolt on and set neck??

what's the real difference in sound between bolt on and set neck??
when talking about les paul or PRS, people seem to consider set neck as superior

but most of fenders and ibanez are bolt ons

i've heard from many that set necks have longer sustain... but is that it?
what's the real difference and why do les paul or prs users prefer it more than bolt ons?

I'm mainly a strat guy so i have shallow experiences with set necks
thelax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:17 PM   #2
Lordbob
wat
 
Lordbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
People think there is longer sustain in set necks and neckthroughs, but there really isn't.
__________________
Gear:

-Guitars-
Esp/LTD JH-200
Ibanez RG2EX2
Yamaha FD01

-Amps-
Marshall MGDFX250 (It was a Gift)
Peavey Vypyr 15 watt

-Effects-
Digitech DF-7
Lordbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:18 PM   #3
blue_strat
UG Amplified Editor
 
blue_strat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
It depends. A well-put-together bolt-on can give better sustain than a poorly-done set neck.
blue_strat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:20 PM   #4
J Son K
Registered User
 
J Son K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
the real tonal difference is in the pickups and wood selection....
J Son K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:20 PM   #5
thelax
Registered User
 
thelax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
so it's just sustain? no real difference in sound?
given that all other factors are the same, that is
(i mean, i cant really think of a big reason why there would be a noticeable difference in sound)
thelax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:24 PM   #6
Trinitron
I love you
 
Trinitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_strat
It depends. A well-put-together bolt-on can give better sustain than a poorly-done set neck.


So basically the better made guitar has better sustain and is better overall, which is basically how it always is.
__________________
bands/artists I've seen: Protest the Hero, LIGHTS, Andrew Bird, Flight of the Conchords, Incubus, Nine Inch Nails, Between the Buried and Me, Guthrie Govan, Cynic, The Devin Townsend Project, Scale the Summit, The Dillinger Escape Plan, Darkest Hour
Trinitron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:27 PM   #7
AngelOfHatred
Is Raping Your Churches
 
AngelOfHatred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
They say that set necks get better sustain, but I don't think it's true. My strat sustains for ages, and it's a bolt on.

I find set necks more comfortable, though. They don't have that chunk of the body that connects to the neck sticking out.
__________________
My crappy profile. Add me?
Ibanez Artcore AS73
Fender MIM HSS Stratocaster
1974 Gibson SG Special
Epiphone G-400 Faded
Line 6 Spider III 75
Fender De Ville 412
Dunlop Heil Talkbox
Digitech Whammy
SG Commando #64
AngelOfHatred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:33 PM   #8
ironman1478
Registered User
 
ironman1478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
there was a study that proved that bolt-on's have the MOST sustain and neck thru's have the LEAST sustain. set neck is really just a bolt on, but with a little better fret access and instead of being bolted on it is glued.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meths
If there were 12th century popes alive today they'd be telling Rick Santorum to get out of the fucking dark ages already.
ironman1478 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:53 PM   #9
.:Darkness:.
Stiny, Get me a danish!
 
.:Darkness:.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Junee, NSW, Australia
There's another thread on this EXACT issue. There is no need for this thread..

http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/foru...ad.php?t=968362
__________________
For those who care.
Current Gear
Cort Zenox Z42
Flextone II
Charvel USA So-Cal
Farida M2 Parlour Acoustic
Admira Hand-built Spanish Acoustic
Blackstar HT-5H
Line 6 M13
.:Darkness:. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:56 PM   #10
nekromantic
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento
personally i like set necks more, but its really all opinion, just like some people like passive pickups and others like active pickups
i really just dont like the way they look
but i like the fact that if you break the neck you can just order a new neck instead of having to pay a fortune to get it fixed
__________________
GUITAR: Gibson Les Paul Special
AMP:Fender Vibro Champ XD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC
nekromantic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:04 PM   #11
daryle_goh
none
 
daryle_goh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
i can't comment about sustain or anything

for a bolt-on, if the neck breaks, you can order a new one

but for a set neck, if the neck breaks, you can order a new guitar
daryle_goh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:05 PM   #12
nekromantic
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento
Quote:
Originally Posted by daryle_goh
i can't comment about sustain or anything

for a bolt-on, if the neck breaks, you can order a new one

but for a set neck, if the neck breaks, you can order a new guitar

hahaha
about the breaking is what i was trying to say
__________________
GUITAR: Gibson Les Paul Special
AMP:Fender Vibro Champ XD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC
nekromantic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:09 PM   #13
MrFlibble
Puts a bangin' donk on it
 
MrFlibble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire
Indeed, in terms of sustain, bolt-on has proven to be the best, while neck-throughs have proven to be the worst. Bolt-ons also offer better dynamic response, while neck-throughs take a huge hit to their responsiveness.
The upshot of that though is neck-throughs can have far better fret access than a bolt-on. For some people, fret access isn't a problem anyway (personally I can reach fret 24 on a bolt-on Les Paul... but then I know others who struggle to get to fret 18 on a neck-through LP, so it can vary wildly depending just on the size of your hands and fingers basically).

Set necks sit somewhere in the middle. Fret access is usually quite good with set necks, and they don't murder responsiveness and sustain as much as neck-throughs (though they do harm it a bit).


The key is though, this is assuming the bolt-on join is a good one. A bad bolt-on join kills tone, sustain and responsiveness more than anything else.
__________________
Yes, I know everything. No, I can't play worth a damn.
A child is trafficked and sold for sex slavery every 30 seconds. Support Love146.
MrFlibble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:14 PM   #14
ironman1478
Registered User
 
ironman1478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlibble
Indeed, in terms of sustain, bolt-on has proven to be the best, while neck-throughs have proven to be the worst. Bolt-ons also offer better dynamic response, while neck-throughs take a huge hit to their responsiveness.
The upshot of that though is neck-throughs can have far better fret access than a bolt-on. For some people, fret access isn't a problem anyway (personally I can reach fret 24 on a bolt-on Les Paul... but then I know others who struggle to get to fret 18 on a neck-through LP, so it can vary wildly depending just on the size of your hands and fingers basically).

some set neck(i don't think there are any normal neck thru les pauls) les pauls have that huge ass heel in the back and
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meths
If there were 12th century popes alive today they'd be telling Rick Santorum to get out of the fucking dark ages already.
ironman1478 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:15 PM   #15
I am wet
Registered User of Water
 
I am wet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arizona
It's kind of what you like, i just have issues when going onto a Fender necks on the upper frets.
__________________
Lets jump in a pool





_____________________________________________
Last edited by I am wet : Today at 03:26 XM.
I am wet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 05:48 PM   #16
Metallilmeister
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
The tone and feel of a set neck is very different.

Bolt ons are usually bright and piercing. Set necks have a warmer fuller tone.

I personally, would only use a set neck or a Neck through.
Metallilmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 06:04 PM   #17
SteveHOC
Used Register
 
SteveHOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
This thread is from 2008
__________________
OffsetOffset
SteveHOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 07:54 PM   #18
marko jawornick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Set necks found on gibsons and afew others
Bolt on necks found on like fenders and a few others
And it all depends on how you think which looks best and which is most comfortable when playing at high frets. but i guess sustain is the only thing that really gives the difference
marko jawornick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Forum Archives / About / Terms of Use / Advertise / Contact / Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2014
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.