|
|
#41 | |
|
My muscles sure are mean!
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Quote:
Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me this is the sort of thing that would appeal more to someone on a budget or a noob who doesn't want to buy a bunh of pedals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
But it's too pricey for that.
It has to be for the guy who has $$$$, but does not want to fool around getting a variety of pedals or amps.
__________________
Sturgeon's 2nd Law, a.k.a. Sturgeon's Revelation: “Ninety percent of everything is crap.” Why, yes, I am a lawyer- thanks for asking! |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Make all the shapes you want in the end, its still going to have 6 strings etc.
How bout a real advance or leap forward and instead of steel strings, the are 6 beams of laser light that players manipulate to make music? The more I think about it, the more it could actually work! |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Plays a Fake
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
|
I think more needs to be looked into in terms of true temperament and the like, though at the end of the day, humans are human shaped so there is a limitation to practical and comfortable designs.
__________________
Quote:
2012 Suhr Modern
1977 Burny FLG70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
My muscles sure are mean!
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Quote:
That wouldn't really be a guitar, though. Call it a laser harp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
My muscles sure are mean!
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Some company should do a "classic reissue" of this
http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/...guitar_back.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Used Register
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
I like the Gibson Corvus, kind of an odd shape for a company with such a recognizable line of guitars. Also the Gibson RD, which looks like a splattered Firebird.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Here's just a few that I know of- there are more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CnR...be_gdata_player http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sgd...be_gdata_player http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md7q...be_gdata_player
__________________
Sturgeon's 2nd Law, a.k.a. Sturgeon's Revelation: “Ninety percent of everything is crap.” Why, yes, I am a lawyer- thanks for asking! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
The shape does not really matter,its the wood used to make it and the crafts man,what worries me is all the electronic suff added these days, and that goes wiht amps as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Exactly. With more refinement and better technology, it could be future replacment for "traditional" guitars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Well, maybe, maybe not. I imagine a tremolo on one of those- after the proper programming and engineering work was done- would NEVER go out of tune, regardless of how many dive-bombs you did. But it would take some super-sophisticated programmiforgo enable you to do natural or pinch harmonics on one of those.
__________________
Sturgeon's 2nd Law, a.k.a. Sturgeon's Revelation: “Ninety percent of everything is crap.” Why, yes, I am a lawyer- thanks for asking! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |||
|
Gita-do O-Sensei
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lost like tears in rain...
|
Quote:
Probably not to be honest, harmonics are a natural function of string length and the node point you choose to deaden the string at to bring the fundamental out. Once you can find out where the finger is along the picking side of the string finding out what note the harmonic would be is relatively simple maths. That said, I really don't see these replacing conventional instruments, at least not any time soon anyway. For a start I think guitarists on the whole are very much set in their (our) ways, and beyond that there's something primal about guitar and actually hitting the strings. I don't think normal guitars will go away any time soon for the same reason we still have real violins, pianos, drums and so on. Hell, some eastern instruments have designs going back hundreds or thousands of years and people still play those...
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
PSN - Zaphod6578
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | ||
|
Prog. Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Quote:
... but it's $6000. That could get you a cheaper robot guitar and an Axe FX. Quote:
Maybe for modelling guitars, but the way the wood responds and resonates with the vibrating strings is a big part of its tone. Stringless instruments cannot replicate this. It'll lead to some interesting playing styles... infinite sustain and fretless for mega slides will be easy, but I can't imagine it being easy to play. It would be quite weird not feeling if you're fretting a string and which string you're picking, and I'd struggle. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
My muscles sure are mean!
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Quote:
Of course! Even Strats and Tele's are pretty much the same as they were in the 50's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Quote:
Yes & no. While it IS a simple function of string length, the laser guitar would have to distinguish the difference between "fretting" and "deadening" the string at a given point. And it's a similar issue with things like palm muting. Namely, the guitar's programs have to understand pressure and location at a very sophisticated and analog level, not just "the beam tuned to G was interrupted at point X, which converts into _____ note." When is a partial eclipse of the beam a harmonic or a muting action? The Kitara does an excellent job of figuring out stuff in the axis of movement "along the string," but the axis of movement corresponding to depressing the string still seems more like a keyboard.
__________________
Sturgeon's 2nd Law, a.k.a. Sturgeon's Revelation: “Ninety percent of everything is crap.” Why, yes, I am a lawyer- thanks for asking! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate This Thread | |
|
|