Go Back   UG Community @ Ultimate-Guitar.Com > Instruments > Electric Guitar
User Name  
Password
Search:

Reply
Old 02-26-2013, 06:48 AM   #41
gerrywm
Registered User
 
gerrywm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Limerick, Ireland
I never bought into the whole vintage thing UNTIL.......
I was getting some gear serviced at a local Luther and he let me play some proper vintage acoustics, I'm talking 1946 0018 Martin acoustics, 1907 french gypsy jazz guitars up to early 70's jap yamaha's - my god there is some difference....His opinion, with acoustics anyway the wood just has to age, the guitar will become more resonant and a LOT louder, as the guitars age a lot of factors change and a good guitar will get better and a badly made guitar will warp and degrade... His opinion as well, even with his own guitars (which are collectors items now in Ireland as he has retired) that it takes about 10 years for a guitar to find its own voice and its tone should really start improving from then on....

Now I am not sure how this translates with electrics, there should be a difference but how much? its really obvious with acoustics. I think a lot of the hype around vintage stems from the hand built aspect. Quality was more variable, the good were really good but stinkers were possibly more common and probably haven't survived this long resulting the cream surviving and thus the notion of vintage = better being put around
__________________
07 Gibson Les Paul LE
06 Fender Mex Strat - SDJb Jr, duckbucker, lil 59
Floor
Cry Baby 95Q-> Digitech Whammy -> DD3 -> MXR Micro Amp-> TU 2
Loop
Holy Grail ->Boss Rc20 Loop Station
Amp
Laney GH50 with Zilla Fatboy 2x12 (celestion g12-65)
gerrywm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 06:51 AM   #42
gerrywm
Registered User
 
gerrywm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Limerick, Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregs1020
this thread is funny.

a lot of vintage guitars were made from woods that can't be sourced today.

hand crafted guitars made from old growth are very desirable.

and it you know where to look and what to look for you can get that for much less than £2000 - £3000.


This is true, the guy I mentioned fixed a lot of vintage guitars sent to him from around the world as he (being building guitars since the 60's) had small supplies of these timbers left in stock - just enough for repairs and patch up jobs not for new builds
__________________
07 Gibson Les Paul LE
06 Fender Mex Strat - SDJb Jr, duckbucker, lil 59
Floor
Cry Baby 95Q-> Digitech Whammy -> DD3 -> MXR Micro Amp-> TU 2
Loop
Holy Grail ->Boss Rc20 Loop Station
Amp
Laney GH50 with Zilla Fatboy 2x12 (celestion g12-65)
gerrywm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 10:39 PM   #43
Ruark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Sometimes a certain line of guitars was made in different countries in different times. Maybe from 60 to 68, they were made in one country, from 69 to 75, made in another country, and so on, with sometimes dramatic differences.
__________________
------------------------------
Ibanez Artstar AS80
Yamaha CG151C
Yamaha YPG225
Yamaha FG720S
Peavey Special 212
Vox Pathfinder 15
DR Pure Blues .010s, Dunlop Gel Heavys
Ruark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 01:38 PM   #44
marjoriefish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Without sound samples, any claims about vintage guitars are unfalsifiable and can be disregarded.

"Old growth wood" sounds like bullshit to me. In a solidbody electric guitar, the wood just doesn't matter that much. Basswood might sound different from alder to the trained ear. But different degrees of alder? No way. I'm convinced that if you blindfolded a good player and handed him a real vintage 62'Jazzmaster and an AVRI Jazzmaster, he couldn't tell the difference.

The value of a vintage guitar is that it's vintage. Some people are willing to pay more -- sometimes a lot more --for oldness or perceived genuineness. Others aren't. That's fine.
marjoriefish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 01:57 PM   #45
gregs1020
Ka-chow!
 
gregs1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by marjoriefish
1 - Without sound samples, any claims about vintage guitars are unfalsifiable and can be disregarded.

2 - "Old growth wood" sounds like bullshit to me. In a solidbody electric guitar, the wood just doesn't matter that much. Basswood might sound different from alder to the trained ear. But different degrees of alder? No way. I'm convinced that if you blindfolded a good player and handed him a real vintage 62'Jazzmaster and an AVRI Jazzmaster, he couldn't tell the difference.

3 - The value of a vintage guitar is that it's vintage. Some people are willing to pay more -- sometimes a lot more --for oldness or perceived genuineness. Others aren't. That's fine.

1 - have you not heard or played any vintage instruments?

2 - if your answer to #1 is no then you're speculating here. what does someone being able to tell the difference matter? tighter grained wood that's long dried can be more resonant and lighter weight. both of which people find desirable, at least i do.


3 - totally agree. like roc8995 said, they aren't making any more original '57 strats or '59 les pauls for that matter. so it's a supply/demand thing.
gregs1020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 02:20 PM   #46
marjoriefish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Yes, I've played lots of vintage instruments. I've played 50's Strats that sound great and 50's Strats that sound awful. Just like today's instruments, some have it, some don't. Regarding long-dried, the wood is already dry when they make the guitar. Not sure how it can get any drier, especially under paint and laquer.

And since someone compared it to Stradivarius violins, here's what happens if you mix up some Strads in a pile with some new violins and give them to some world class players. They can't tell the difference. http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivec...-pick-the-strad

The term to sum up this whole thread is Confirmation Bias. If you're convinced that there's magic in a 1959 Stratocaster, you'll find magic. It's like the Virgin Mary in a piece of toast.
marjoriefish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 02:27 PM   #47
Axe Murderer
Registered User
 
Axe Murderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by marjoriefish
Yes, I've played lots of vintage instruments. I've played 50's Strats that sound great and 50's Strats that sound awful. Just like today's instruments, some have it, some don't. Regarding long-dried, the wood is already dry when they make the guitar. Not sure how it can get any drier, especially under paint and laquer.And since someone compared it to Stradivarius violins, here's what happens if you mix up some Strads in a pile with some new violins and give them to some world class players. They can't tell the difference. http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivec...-pick-the-strad

The term to sum up this whole thread is Confirmation Bias. If you're convinced that there's magic in a 1959 Stratocaster, you'll find magic. It's like the Virgin Mary in a piece of toast.


They dry the wood enough for working/building purposes. The wood continues to dry after that. Wood takes a very long time to dry out. Older guitars are usually lighter as a result of continuing drying. Also,as the wood dries, it shrinks, so a lot of older guitars have "damaged" finishes due to the paint not being able to flex or shink with the wood, so you get cracking, flaking etc. on some older guitar finishes.
Axe Murderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 02:55 PM   #48
gregs1020
Ka-chow!
 
gregs1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
it's funny how a person can post a couple things and you're like, i'm not going to waste any more of my day with this.

que Ron White.
gregs1020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 03:01 PM   #49
marjoriefish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Sure. Older Fenders have a nitro finish which checks and cracks over time. Are 50's and 60's Fenders really lighter on average than new ones? I'd have to see some well-collected data to believe that. And why would condensation only leave the wood and not enter it? Seems to me that unless the guitar was stored in a dehumidifying chamber it would go both ways, if it goes at all.

And anyway, the real question is, would it make a difference in the sound? To be sure we'd need a sample of a hundred old Strats and a hundred new ones, professional recordings of the guitar through the same amp under the same conditions played by a robot in order to even begin to tell. Anything else is just idle rambling and bullshitting.

Find a guitar you like. If that's a vintage guitar, great. If that's a new guitar, also great. But making broad pseudo-scientific claims about special woods and wood density and dehydration based on your own human perceptions of guitars you've heard or played which are necessarily filtered through your own expectations and hazy memories... This is juju. Superstition. Flim-flam. Show me some science and I'll be interested.

Last edited by marjoriefish : 02-27-2013 at 03:02 PM.
marjoriefish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Forum Archives / About / Terms of Use / Advertise / Contact / Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2013
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.