|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Weymouth
|
Trying to work out a cadence
I'm trying to work out a cadence for these chord progressions:
Bmin7 (VIm) - G9sus (IV) In the key of D Major Amin (VIm) - F (IV) - C Major I cannot work this out for the life of me. The progressions for the first "cadence" is: Dsus2 - G9sus - Bmin7 - G9sus Dsus2 - Asus2 - Bmin7 - G9sus A - Bmin - G And the progression for the second on is: C - G11 - Amin - F I don't get it as you're landing on the sub dominant, so it's not really a cadence...
__________________
Mark Tremonti: I have my own mixer on stage so I can alter my volmes while on stage Myles Kennedy: And why's that Mark? Mark Tremonti:....I have trust issues with the sound guy Selling a Marshall DSL401! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Weymouth
|
Sorry, I'm being an idiot. Forgot the progression resolve to a 1st...
__________________
Mark Tremonti: I have my own mixer on stage so I can alter my volmes while on stage Myles Kennedy: And why's that Mark? Mark Tremonti:....I have trust issues with the sound guy Selling a Marshall DSL401! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Nobody says you have to have proper cadences. Since there's no dominant or IV-I pattern, there's not really a cadence.
But a cadence isn't necessary here because you never left the Tonic harmony, really. I V vi patterns are usually heard as Tonic sequences, not actual harmonic progressions. Your progression is just a I V vi IV in both tunes - probably the most common chord sequence in all of popular music. It's worked for like a million other musicians, I see no reason you'd need to change it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
|
The second one has 2 cadences IMO.
The V - vi is a deceptive one. The vi functions as a tonic substitute only differing from the tonic by the A instead of G. The IV at the end probably leads back to the tonic C I presume which is a plagal cadance.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Weymouth
|
Quote:
I was just writing an essay about progressions and cadences. But like I said before, I forgot that it resolves to a Dsus2 which makes it a plagal cadence. Thanks for you advice any way ![]()
__________________
Mark Tremonti: I have my own mixer on stage so I can alter my volmes while on stage Myles Kennedy: And why's that Mark? Mark Tremonti:....I have trust issues with the sound guy Selling a Marshall DSL401! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MWAHAHAHAHA!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Frozen North! (read: Northern Wisconsin)
|
Think of it this way, what does it sounded like? It may not be "proper cadence", but what does it sound like?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Quote:
I'd call it a resolution rather than a cadence. Cadence comes at the end of the phrase. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate This Thread | |
|
|