Go Back   UG Community @ Ultimate-Guitar.Com > Music > Bands & Artists > Alternative & Indie
User Name  
Password
Search:

Reply
Old 02-14-2014, 08:55 PM   #1
vanitybinge
Vanity Binge
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
What the **** is Indie?

How do you define 'indie' music? Is it a sound? an aesthetic? A deliberately un-pop band? Or just an artist that takes themselves way too seriously?

I hear some bands and I think wow that's a good rock song and they're listed as 'indie'. But I could never pin down what it was that made them fit this stupid little category.

I've heard it was the same as independent/non-major label music, but that's bullshit because I've seen plenty of bands on Capitol Records listed as 'indie'. "Oh but the Decemberists are so indie". Why? Because they sound like something that was recorded in my mom's ******* after a book club meeting? Don't try to give me that underground-to-cool-to-be-popular shit.


Sludge off, what the **** is Indie?



vanitybinge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2014, 03:45 AM   #2
jiminizzle
Lost Pilot
 
jiminizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Coming Down, Cleveland Avenue
i think the perception is that a lot of pop/rock music (structurally, not aesthetically) that you hear on the radio/at the grammys and such is heavily influenced by managerial interests in it's production, so a lot of music that is (or appears to be) created without too much external input and mostly because the artists like it or think their peers (and eventually once they get them, their fans) will like it gets called indie. (I guess it should be noted that some people do just like making straight up pop music and don't need coran capshaw or sony telling them how to do it.)
The term is pretty far removed from actually being independent of record labels, but i think people often feel like they can tell when certain bands are making music with a) top-40 fans in mind and are catering to what is extremely popular or b) the popular blogs and blog-readership-types as their intended audience or c) something else like just their friends or a certain local scene or something like that, and the latter two tend to be associated with the term 'indie' which is why picaresque (kil rock stars) might get called an indie album while the king is dead (capitol) might not. The type of record label still doesn't necessarily determine what the music will sound like, but it can be an indicator. It's not entirely about sales/popularity though, The National are band that are extremely popular at the moment and charted near the top of the billboard 200 with their last album but they still get called indie by most people, likely because the songwriting doesn't appear to be aimed at a specifically large consumer base (despite reaching one) and is largely consistent with their past music in that it doesn't often attempt the immediate faux-universal appeal that something like 'we are young' by fun attempts. there are increasingly more bands in the past few years who appear to be recorded and marketed with top-40 level success in mind but with some production tricks and songwriting tropes (sorry for sounding like a douche, i just can't think of a better word) associated with non-major-label acts so that they can seem cool to a certain crowd and provide a small sense of the satisfaction that some people feel from things like your 'i saw a band in an underground room' picture. this would be like foster the people or imagine dragons on the "this is definitely pop music from the start..." side of things, or vampire weekend or death cab from from a "this is a band that has a widely accessible sound and has gotten really popular with that sound (and that may or may not be affecting their new music)" side of things.

i don't know if you were actually looking for a serious answer, but i hope this helps you not feel like you don't know what people are talking about anymore.

This is just my current take on it though. It all usually says more about the person bringing it up's perspective than the music itself.
__________________
Anatomy Anatomy
Whale Blue Review

Park that car
Drop that phone
Sleep on the floor
Dream about me
jiminizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2014, 04:07 AM   #3
iwannabesedated
King Sombrero
 
iwannabesedated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Columbusish, Ohio
"Indie" is a lot like "Alternative," it really doesn't mean anything at all anymore.
iwannabesedated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2014, 12:12 PM   #4
roushsn95
Registered User
 
roushsn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
"Indie", is just a label for "non-mainstream" music. Though musically, I think there is a very fine line between "indie" and mainstream music.
roushsn95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:37 PM   #5
Mark_Ram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
I think the term really was just used as a buzzword for bands that were on independent labels. (I mean if we divulge into genres, what the hell is something "Grunge" or "Britpop" really?")

However, many bands became too large for indie labels and somehow managed to still be attached the title of "Indie band". I think because of that indie became a term for bands who sounded similar.

Metric, The National, Interpol etc. etc.

Furthermore, I'm not going to sit here and say that Wilco and The Smiths sound the same, but for whatever reason they are both considered Indie. Maybe humanity just likes buzzwords.
Mark_Ram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 10:26 PM   #6
solo123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
"indie" bands are not associated with any major record labels, indie is a broad genre, it can go from rap to rock to pop to jazz. Imo any band who's out there playing music for the sake of playing music is indie. Don't worry about what songs are pinned under what genre. like everyone else said, it doesn't really mean much.
solo123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2014, 12:23 PM   #7
niklasgrindbo
Registered User
 
niklasgrindbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Indie once meant something, but nowaydays it's overused to the point of being completely meaningless. Rock & Roll and to a large degree punk and metal (at least for some of us) is the music our dads listened to, so now bands call themselves Indie to be perceived as underground or counter culture. I really think it's more about image tahn actual music.

Anyway, if you like the way it sounds, listen to it, and to hell with what people choose to call it
niklasgrindbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2014, 01:28 PM   #8
AccountAttempt4
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
It's probably on its way out as a genre definition, basically there was alternative music which was any rock music that wasn't mainstream. However Nirvana turned alternative music into the mainstream, rendering the term useless. "Indie" was then coined as a replacement for alternative, I've noticed more and more stuff that I would consider "indie" becoming mainstream, so it's likely that a new phrase will be introduced soon enough.
AccountAttempt4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2014, 11:43 PM   #9
Big-Faced-Child
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Indie is short for Independent, meaning bands on independent record labels ie not majors. Originally it was never a genre. The indie charts would have a huge range of music represented not just jangly guitar music.

It doesn't mean the same thing now,if it means anything at all.
Big-Faced-Child is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2014, 11:56 PM   #10
bradulator
through being cool
 
bradulator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
That one Real Estate band is the most generic indie band in a while.
bradulator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 01:16 PM   #11
Zack Young
Registered User
 
Zack Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
I agree with many of these previous posts that INDIE has recently just became a catch all term for music that doesn't fit nicely into the main big genres. Essentially a replacement for ALTERNATIVE. For me, i feel it is very easy to become educated about specific niche genres if you care enough about them. For instance, bands such as Dinosaur Jr. and Yo La Tengo and even more aggressive groups such as scratch acid could be considered Indie even though a more correct nomenclature would be Shoegaze and Noise Rock respectively.
Zack Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2014, 04:24 PM   #12
Fallenoath
My minds playin' tricks
 
Fallenoath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Centralia WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by roushsn95
"Indie", is just a label for "non-mainstream" music. Though musically, I think there is a very fine line between "indie" and mainstream music.


This is the way I've always thought.
__________________
Just another Sheep in the design of the Almighty Machine.


-GEAR-
Gibson 60s Les Paul Tribute
1999 Ibanez RG470 (MIJ)
Peavey 6505+
Egnater Tweaker 15 (Yeah, I tweak)
Fallenoath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2014, 08:54 AM   #13
twebasenoi
Tweba Senoi
 
Join Date: May 2014
Indie music is just awesome. Period
twebasenoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2014, 09:14 AM   #14
rootsofmy
Registered User
 
rootsofmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Short for Indiana. Don't tell me your never saw any of the movies
rootsofmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2014, 03:34 PM   #15
roushsn95
Registered User
 
roushsn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by AccountAttempt4
It's probably on its way out as a genre definition, basically there was alternative music which was any rock music that wasn't mainstream. However Nirvana turned alternative music into the mainstream, rendering the term useless. "Indie" was then coined as a replacement for alternative, I've noticed more and more stuff that I would consider "indie" becoming mainstream, so it's likely that a new phrase will be introduced soon enough.


I disagree, because Nirvana never rendered the term useless after they went mainstream. If anything, they turned it into a mainstream genre that any band like them were to then be labeled as. That's where current Alternative music is. It's a label and they categorize bands that sound that way to fit into mainstream music.

Now, there is a difference between Alternative and Indie. Where I get this from is listening to the radio, specifically seriusxm. There is a major difference in the type of music that is played between seriusXMU, the "indie" channel and ALTnation, the alternative channel. However, I don't listen to the regular radio (because I think it sucks) so I don't know what the alternative stations out there are playing.
roushsn95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 08:01 PM   #16
thrash17
Metallica
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Yorktown Heights, New York
I always thought an in indie band was a band that was on an independent label. As long as you were on an indie label, whether you were metal, folk, jazz etc you were "indie". obviously the word has changed but I don't get too into it. Idc about labels and I even tell my band we don't have to be limited to genres.
thrash17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2014, 02:51 PM   #17
Jagmaster33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Technically, it's just a band on an independent label. Not genre-specific.

But in practical terms, 'indie' is used most often to describe a genre of rock... usually fashion-rockers who are so concerned about following hipster fashion trends that they don't realize how generic and bland their music actually is.

As someone once said, the only real difference between mainstream rock and most indie rock is the clothes... and the amount of pretense.
Jagmaster33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2014, 06:02 PM   #18
Saint78
julian wells
 
Saint78's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: feels like i only go backwards
it's a music or two
__________________
you're a stone fox
Saint78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 05:59 PM   #19
Stildawn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
I feel this way with a lot of the genres to be honest.

If there isnt a definitive musical difference/characteristics/compositions/structure then its not a genre in my opinion.

Indie would fall under this, so would a lot of the metal genres also. As well as a lot of the Modern RnB (another hate term for me) and Hip Hop.
Stildawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 06:19 PM   #20
Of_Wolves
Silver Satellite Eyes
 
Of_Wolves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England!
The way the term is most often used around me is: pop-influenced, guitar-based, rockish music. I just call it rock, but most of it gets labeled indie.

There's no point raging against genre terms. Meaning changes so quickly. I remember a time when a post-hardcore band wasn't just some generic relabeled metalcore-sounding band, but something more like AtDI... People get tired of one label or it gathers too much stigma, so they move onto calling it something else. Like how emo went from Midwest-style progressive stuff to MCR/The Used. Ironically when emo became a derogatory term, they picked up the alternative tag again.

You'll be labeled with whatever the public thinks fits. That's not something you can control. Just as you can't really predict what'll be popular a couple of months from now.

Don't get me wrong sometimes the work of record labels to influence people pays off, but sometimes it doesn't. We only ever hear of the success stories, not the failures. That's media bias right there.

It's best to just deal with it, guys.

Last edited by Of_Wolves : 06-11-2014 at 06:20 PM.
Of_Wolves is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Forum Archives / About / Terms of Use / Advertise / Contact / Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2014
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.