11-28-2012, 01:37 AM
|
#21 |
|
MWAHAHAHAHA!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Frozen North! (read: Northern Wisconsin)
|
So, let's just get this out there...
WHY DIDN'T THEY BAN THIS SOONER?! |
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:38 AM
|
#22 | |
|
Not caring no more
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: On a Small Ugly Rock In Space, Surrounded By Over 7,000,000,000 Ignorant Cunts And Retąrds....... Status: If I Just Posted This Then I Probably Have Too Much Spare Time.....
|
Quote:
That's how WWII started. Because those damn jews didn't let Hitler fuck that goat.
__________________
I put my sig in a spoiler because i view UG sigless anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:43 AM
|
#23 | |
|
gg microsoft
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: York, UK.
|
Quote:
That proves it, it's British propaganda  |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:48 AM
|
#24 | |
|
hai
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NSW, Australia
|
Quote:
AND WHERE IS IT STILL LEGAL?!
__________________
West Ham United
show
Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:50 AM
|
#25 | |
|
Cockblockatoo
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law Quite a few places. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:52 AM
|
#26 | ||
|
Six Foot Twenty
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
|
I don't really understand why people shouldn't be able to fuck animals if that's what they're into. I'm not, but if you are, in what sense do I have the right to tell you what you're turned on by is wrong?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:52 AM
|
#27 | |
|
hai
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NSW, Australia
|
^Because it's... animals?
Quote:
That's fucked up. You'd think it would just be rundown 3rd world countries but nope.
__________________
West Ham United
show
Cheers. Last edited by King Donkey : 11-28-2012 at 01:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:53 AM
|
#28 | |
|
UG's Carl Cox
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hertford/Coventry
|
Quote:
Because they're hurting and abusing another living animal that can't consent. By your standard raping babies is perfectly fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:02 AM
|
#29 | |||
|
Six Foot Twenty
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
No, raping babies isn't perfectly fine. Can having sex with (not necessarily raping) an animal be considered abuse? How do we know the animal doesn't like it? We can't. Talking about animals consenting or not is unquantifiable. We know babies don't like to be raped because they cry and scream when you try, (not that I know from experience or anything >.>) do animals do the same thing? I mean, if, say, a donkey, really felt threatened by your attempted fucking of it, couldn't it just kick you off?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by cho0onger : 11-28-2012 at 02:03 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:04 AM
|
#30 | ||||
|
UG's Carl Cox
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hertford/Coventry
|
Quote:
Yes. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah probably. A lamb probably couldn't, or a fox (Ian...) or whatever else. EDIT: Also, even if we can't determine consent, you assume there is none given. Otherwise it's okay for me to lick out a baby as long as it doesn't scream (unless in pleasure) and doesn't cry. |
||||
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:04 AM
|
#31 |
|
IWTCIRD
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Carousel Boutique
|
Hahahahaha, well finland, and sweden did the opposite in the last century, it was illegal and then legalized.
In the united states, it's on a state level, going anywhere from "un-inforced," to felony.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:06 AM
|
#32 | |
|
Bassist Ordinaire
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denton, TX
|
Quote:
What if the baby enjoys it?
__________________
Check out my Youtube channel!  Solo bass stuff mostly. http://www.youtube.com/user/TheoTheBassist |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:07 AM
|
#33 | ||
|
pink octopus
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Absurdistan
|
Quote:
Quote:
how do you ban one but allow the other and i'd like to know the lobbyist group(s) that is fighting for people's rights to **** animals Last edited by Cianyx : 11-28-2012 at 02:09 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:09 AM
|
#35 | |
|
----
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Quote:
Seriously? You've got some issues man, I hope you don't have any pets. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:10 AM
|
#36 | |
|
Vintage Edition
Join Date: Jul 2011
|
Lot of uh, interesting mental images in this thread.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:14 AM
|
#38 | |
|
IWTCIRD
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Carousel Boutique
|
Quote:
They have laws covering animal abuse, they could just rule in court it's animal abuse if they wanted probably. Abuse can be a broad term, if they specifically say sex with it is illegal, it probably only implies you'll get a different (probably worst) punishment then say beating/killing it. Really they can't be asked to make specific laws for this and enforce something unless it really needs to be addressed. Which is probably why Germany is only now doing it, if there's been an outbreak of animal hookers with pimp farmers. No lobbyist group would fight for peoples right to have intercourse with animals. If they wanted that it'd probably be wiser not to bring the laws attention to it at all. In the US as a whole (some states have more specific laws) owning animal porn isn't illegal, internet distribution is questionable, taking it across state lines even for personal use is breaking the law. Really they just have more important shit to worry about, at least I like to think they would.
__________________
Last edited by stratkat : 11-28-2012 at 02:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:15 AM
|
#39 | |
|
UGs sitcom character
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: syndication
|
Quote:
It's nice sig-fodder. Still less embarrassing than the Trowzaa quote I had though.
__________________
Blinded by your cyber-love |
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 02:21 AM
|
#40 | ||||
|
Six Foot Twenty
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I'll agree with this much, assumed consent is ******ed, as seen in the recent case of a guy getting off after raping a mute/paralyzed woman or whatever it was. My main point wasn't supposed to be about the determination of the consent of the animal. It was supposed to be this: does the government have the right to legislate morality? I don't think so, and I'm uncompromising in this even when things get weird like now. Quote:
 Find yourself.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Rate This Thread | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 PM.