Originally Posted by Pat_s1t

You know I only quoted Fox as saying that the chemicals have about 60 days before the expire, right? The rest is from NBC.

Originally Posted by ChrisBW

Maybe replace it with Wikipedia. The length of time before Sarin degrades also depends on the quality of the chemicals used to make it, but there are missiles made to mix the chemicals while in flight reducing the need to create the Sarin gas until the missiles are actually launched.

Originally Posted by blake1221

Well, according to Ali, who I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt, nothing's going to happen so intervention won't be necessary at all.

Let's see this one through, and just see what happens.

Originally Posted by airbrendie

Hey guys in the last 3 weeks I ****ed all the girls in this picture, what do you think?

Originally Posted by Hydra150

From heaven.

;__;

Originally Posted by daytripper75

I don't like the idea of intervention, but if chemical weapons are used I think it's necessary.


Assad is assuring that he won't use them. I tend to think he's telling the truth. If he truly wants to remain in power, it would be a foolish move. There is no chance he keeps his office if he uses those weapons.

I think his chances of retaining office are slim in the long run, but a decision like that would end it immediately.

Originally Posted by leeb rocks

I guess that does technically make you the Che to my Fidel if it makes you feel better

Originally Posted by barden1069

A "tubescreamer" is a person paid by a guitarist to stand behind the amp and scream at the tubes. This terrifies the tubes into overdriving and delivers a thick, harmonic-rich tone.

Originally Posted by Todd Hart

inb4 ultra-liberal non-interventionalist ****tards.

Originally Posted by Todd Hart

inb4 ultra-liberal non-interventionalist ****tards.

Originally Posted by leeb rocks

I guess that does technically make you the Che to my Fidel if it makes you feel better

Originally Posted by gabcd86

What does intervention here achieve, exactly? It's all very well bleating about how we should help, but what exactly is the plan? Blow up the presidential palace and just hope that all the chemical weapons disappear?

Originally Posted by Todd Hart

Well it potentially prevents him from slaughtering thousands of civilians.

And I was more talking about post-inevitable slaughter - people will still be crying that we shouldn't intervene, just as they did after Saddam and his goons explicitly committed genocide on thousands of Kurds.

Originally Posted by raoooos

Assad state of affairs.

Originally Posted by willT08

"Nah see Saddam was a pretty bad guy, but we should never have gone there"

Originally Posted by Todd Hart

inb4 ultra-liberal non-interventionalist ****tards.

Originally Posted by VanTheKraut

Your post reeks of seriousness when Ali is obviously being sarcastic, just giving you a heads up.

Originally Posted by Todd Hart

inb4 ultra-liberal non-interventionalist ****tards.

Originally Posted by blake1221

See, I was hoping he was sarcastic, but he's kept up that attitude across multiple threads, and he got seriously butthurt over a comment I made and has been kind of on edge with me, so I was just trying to see this out.

Thank God he was being sarcastic. He was coming across as a North Korean with his blind faith in his government.

And the post you quoted was also sarcasm.

Originally Posted by willT08

"Nah see Saddam was a pretty bad guy, but we should never have gone there"

Originally Posted by leeb rocks

I guess that does technically make you the Che to my Fidel if it makes you feel better