|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Flying V headstock opinion
Does anyone here think that a non angled back gibson Flying V headstock would look good?
Opinions and alternative shapes are welcome. And please, no trolling or just being a dick in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
There are plenty of shapes out there that work nicely on a Flying-V, and plenty of "non-standard" and/or custom shapes that work well.
Personally I think that the following work with a V shape:
The more angular and sharp shapes will work better with a more modern V shape that also has sharp edges. For a more traditional V shape, like number 37, my personal choice would be 23. But it really depends on what look you're going for ![]() Last edited by manikmunky : 02-11-2013 at 04:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
I love the 19 headstock but my only problem is that I can't angle it back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
Quote:
Aaaand I completely mis-read your first post. Oops. I don't see why it wouldn't look fine without being angled back |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Well also I'm not building a neck I am reshaping a headstock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
#DanTheMan
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Liverpool, UK
|
I don't really think it'll look very good dude. If you offset the headstock face with the rest of the neck (like a Fender neck), it would look pretty ugly.
__________________
Dost thou like Macabre? As do I, my fere! ☮ WPM ☮ PM me for info Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
UG's H&S Manager
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Watching a Doovdé on my lukudeh töv
|
I think the headstock angle is one of the important parts of the flying-v design. if you want to build guitars, learning to do a scarf-joint is a good skill.
__________________
The Bible has predicted the simultaneous legalization of gay marriage and weed:
"Any man who lays with another man as with woman shall surely be stoned" - Leviticus 20:13 - 2013!!! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Quote:
No I mean that I'm going to make the headstock a square blank and then do it that way it's not off set. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
When I do the scarf joint and drill the peg holes would the tuners make the joint stronger because they tighten down like a bolt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
#DanTheMan
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Quote:
So how are you going to stop the strings from jumping out of the nut? String trees are going to look hideous on a V. Quote:
No.
__________________
Dost thou like Macabre? As do I, my fere! ☮ WPM ☮ PM me for info Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
UG's Grammar Stickler
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the middle of Blighty.
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Paddy von Layzonfon! Founder of The Spell it RELICKED Club
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
#DanTheMan
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Quote:
It's just my opinion.
__________________
Dost thou like Macabre? As do I, my fere! ☮ WPM ☮ PM me for info Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
UG's Grammar Stickler
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the middle of Blighty.
|
Quote:
To be fair, if the TS is going to hack off the current 'stock and graft on a new one with a scarf joint then it may as well be angled. But I keep re-reading his posts and I'm still not sure what he's up to. I was rather concerned that he thought the the peg holes would be anywhere near the scarf joint. ![]()
__________________
Quote:
Paddy von Layzonfon! Founder of The Spell it RELICKED Club
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Ok here is my plan cut headstock down to a shape that is able to have pieces glued on to make it a square, then I will cut my final shape and paint it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Quote:
String retainer bar thing. And why would it not make it stronger? It would be like clamping it down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Please, call me Pig.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
|
Quote:
I agree, a string retainer bar would look ok. I don't quite get what you're saying about the tuners reinforcing the scarf joint. The scarf joint doesn't need reinforcement, it's already reinforced with the glue in it. The weakest point in your headstock is going to be the short grain at the truss rod, where the angle begins. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Quote:
Diagram please? I mean that when the tuners holes get re drilled and the tuners put in would it be like running a bolt through it? Also I plan for the scarf joint to half of the head stock length. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Please, call me Pig.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
|
This is a Gibson neck, cut in half. That spot where the wood is only 1/4" thick is the weakest point.
And I don't know if just adding bolts and washers to something makes it stronger, I'm not an engineer, but I do know that you're talking about reinforcing something that doesn't need to be reinforced. In other words, don't worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Quote:
Ok thanks, I decided not to angle it though so alls good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
I can imagine a old school v headstock not angled with a retainer bar. In my minds eye it looks good 'n funky 60's-y
__________________
Danelectro Longhorn guitar build: http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/foru...d.php?t=1564392 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate This Thread | |
|
|