search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Alice In Chains: 'We All Have Very High Standards For Ourselves'

artist: alice in chains date: 09/25/2009 category: interviews
rating: 0 / votes: 0 
Alice In Chains: 'We All Have Very High Standards For Ourselves'

The Alice In Chains story has been told and re-told link by link. Back in 1994, the Seattle grunge hipsters released their self-titled album. Eight years later lead singer Layne Stayley would be gone. That’s the tale in a nutshell. AIC were laid to rest. But there were various sightings in these intervening 14 years. Alice guitarist Jerry Cantrell brought together the original rhythm section of Sean Kinney and Mike Inez to perform at a function here and there and usually the guy handling vocal duties was Comes With The Fall singer William DuVall. Comes With The Fall was actually Cantrell’s backing band as well as opening act back in the early 2000s for the guitar player’s Degradation Trip tour.

So, the relationship between DuVall and Cantrell goes back many years. And born from this organic chemistry that flowered between them comes the new Alice In Chains album. Black Gives Way To Blue is the singer’s debut and what he brings to the band is completely different than what the group created back in the Staley days. Produced by Shadows Fall and Foo Fighters craftsman Nick Raskulinecz, the album has resonatged with hardcore Alice fans. The first single, "A Looking In View" lashes together burning guitar licks by both William and Jerry (DuVall also brings a second guitar to the previously single guitar AIC sound) and the second single, "Check My Brain," a strange and typically twisted AIChains track, climbed all the way to Number One on the Billboard Rock Songs chart.

Here, William talks about how he and Jerry first connected and ultimately ended up reforming the legendary Alice In Chains band. There were bumps and hiccups along the way but at the end of the day, the pair triumphed over what must have been seriously daunting odds to record a new album and re-capture an audience that hadn’t heard any new music for a very long time.

UG: Back on July 14, 2009, Alice in Chains premiered Black Gives Way to Blue for the very first time. You also did an acoustic gig after the listening and played two new songs from the album – “Your Decision” and the title track. What did that feel like? Was that moment one that was a long time in coming?

William DuVall: That felt pretty good. They’re just very sort of delicate songs and you’re in an acoustic setting and it’s very revealing. Just us being together and on the same wavelength was very important and we also had an extra musician (Jordan Rudess), a keyboard player, who was a friend of a friend of mine to add to that particular event and kind of flesh things out a little bit more. I think we did really well and it felt good to get through that ‘cause it could be nerve wracking. But it was good; it was really good. We actually listened back to the recordings of that night and found it to be good enough to actually see the light of day in some way, shape or form. In fact, the version of “Your Decision” that we did that night is one of the extra tracks on the iTunes version of the new album. So that gives you some indication of how we felt about the night.

Talk about nerve wracking, Black Gives Way to Blue was the first Alice in Chains album in 14 years. Was there some unspoken burden placed upon you to really step up to the plate and create something monumental in terms of the past legacy of the band?

At the end of the day, all I can do is just be me. I think when you just rely on your own instincts and your own wherewithal, you usually end up OK. I kinda got into this band under circumstances where it wasn’t like there was some master plan in early 2006 when they asked me to do those initial shows (ReEvolution Tour) that eventually led to a full year of touring. At that point, it was really kind of one event at a time. And so the very first thing I did with them was the VH1 show honoring Heart (Decades Live). That was filmed in an arena for television and it’s like it doesn’t get any deeper than that. The water doesn’t get any deeper and you just have to swim.

I think from that moment, it was just kind of a thing of, “Look, I’m gonna go out here and I’m just gonna be myself.” That’s all you can do and let the chips fall where they may.

Then a week after that VH1 show, we were standing on a stage in front of 40,000 people in Portugal. And I was like, “Wow, how did we get here? OK, just go out and do this.”

And that’s kind of been the approach every day. We all have very high standards for ourselves. I set sometimes unbearably high standards for myself [laughs]. But that’s how you excel in anything and that’s how you grow as a person. And this experience has taught all of us a lot about personal growth individually and collectively.

Do you think everyone in the band felt the weight of the world in making the album?

Were we aware of expectations or of the tall order that we were writing for ourselves? Sure! But if we didn’t think that we could meet or exceed those expectations – particularly our own because we’re our own worst critics – then we wouldn’t be doing this. But the fact that the album is coming out on September 29th is itself the best indicator of how we feel. And the fact that we’re playing shows and introducing new material from the new album into the set before it’s out, all of those things I think speaks for itself.

"I go back 10 years with Cantrell; we have a long back-story that leads us to where we are now."

What were some of the early sessions for the new album like? Were they smooth and seamless or did it take some tugging and pulling to get the music in shape?

We did three years of touring before we ever set foot in the studio. You know what I mean? And that set the tone for everything. That is the only way the whole thing would have worked because like I said there was no master plan or grand scheme in early 2006. It was just Jerry saying, “We’d like to go and play some shows and celebrate this music from my past and we’d like to share it one last time with the fans and give the circle some closure. Would you like to help us do that?” I go back 10 years with Cantrell; we have a long back-story that leads us to where we are now.

In ’06, it was like, “Sure, man, let’s go out and do it.” Was there a lot of weight on me? Yeah, of course and I was aware of it. And it’s just, well, the part that I can control is what I actually do; I can’t legislate anybody else’s reaction.

To get to your question, that was the beginning of a really long, sometimes difficult, but more often amazing gelling period; a kind of a baking in period. All those shows back-to- back-to-back in Europe and then the United States and Canada and then Japan. By the beginning of ’07, we’d done 23 countries and I think that is the difference between this album being something that I think has a lot more resonance for us and hopefully other people. Because it’s actually kind of a snapshot of our journey to get to this place. If we had started and frontloaded the whole thing with, “We’re gonna get Alice in Chains back together and we’re gonna make a new album and then we’re gonna tour,” if we had done that in ’06, well then it would have tipped it over into something that none of us really … that’s not how we think. You know what I mean? At that point, it would have become something that doesn’t reflect any of our values.

The way it happened was we started playing these shows with kind of a, not necessarily a finite end point, but an undefined end point. And that led organically to new ideas. Because you get four musicians together for that length of time traveling over that many months in close quarters and new ideas are gonna happen. Go figure. There are guitars laying around, there are soundchecks, there are hotel rooms, and there are long bus rides. So when we got home from all that touring in ’06, there was a nice pile of new riffs and things.

Can you talk about what you bring to AIC that is different than what Layne brought?

One thing is Alice basically become sort of a two-guitar band whenever we want to be. I started out as a guitar player; I never started playing music with the idea of being a singer. That came much, much later in the game. And so that sensibility of me being a guitar player first in my mind and the interaction that that creates with Cantrell and (Mike) Inez and Sean (Kinney), I think lends itself to a different kind of jamming than they perhaps used to be able to do. Just the other day, we finished soundcheck and Kinney and I just didn’t want to stop. We went into a frickin’ Band of Gypsys-meets-White Stripes jam. Those are the kinds of things that happen night-after-night.

You get home from the tours that you do and you assess what you have. We actually had enough at the end of ’06 that we were considering taking all of 2007 off and then Velvet Revolver asked us to go out. We said, “Sure” and once again you’re on tour and there’s stuff happening. And that tour we actually took one step further and had a dedicated jam room backstage every night. Because we were playing these sheds with Velvet Revolver and so there’s enough backstage area there where you can have your dressing room and you can have your tuning room. So we had a full-on setup everyday; you could just roll off the bus in your pajamas and go rock if you wanted to. And it was cool; sometimes only one of us would be in there; sometimes all four of us would be in there; and sometimes any combination of two or three; and sometimes Duff would show up or Slash. It was just a rolling musical circus every day.

So, if we go backwards a bit, what happened after the Velvet Revolver tour?

That takes us into the holidays of 2007; we’ve got another mountain of ideas to add to the previous mountain. Then at the end of ’07 is when it really got to like, “OK, we should go into a studio and at least see what we really have here.”

That kind of led to meeting producers and then finally choosing Nick Raskulinecz who was just a great guy. He brought a lot of enthusiasm and light and humor to the whole process. Obviously he could have been a very emotional thing and it was some days; of course it is. But he helped to diffuse a lot of that.

And again, that’s how it evolved; it was an organic thing that happened step-by-step and at each stage of the game. At the end of each leg of a tour, we’d say, “OK, do we want to go out and do more shows?” And then at the whole year of touring, it would be, “OK, well we have some new ideas – do we want to rent a room somewhere and explore some of these? OK, now do we want to go into the studio? Do we want to start meeting producers and seeing what happens?”

And the beauty of this is that this was all self-directed; we weren’t contractually obligated to anyone. There’s no label, there’s no nothing. So this is all happening on our own time and on our own dime and that liberated us from feeling any more pressure from anywhere than we already would anyway; just because of how we are. And we were able to go in and work at our own pace and bring people in to help us as we wanted and when we wanted. At any point in all of this, the plug could have been pulled. I mean we could have literally got to the end of the last mixing session for this album and decided, “You know what? I don’t know.” You know what I mean? But we didn’t. We got through this whole thing and it was, “Wow, this is pretty cool; let’s start engaging the business end. We’ll start interfacing with the business and see if we can find a home for this thing.” And we ended up going with Virgin/EMI obviously.

Let’s dive into the album and have you comment on some of the songs. “A Looking In View” will be the first single and it was written by all four members. A pretty big rock tune.

We thought that was a good one because it immediately sort of throws down a gauntlet: “Here’s a seven minute-plus hunk of metal to chew on – take that!” That’s kind of how we looked at it. This is gonna sorta separate the wheat from the chaff as it were in terms of who’s with us and who isn’t. It’s a real sort of test of endurance to play the thing and I think it also, as I say, you’re definitely not going for radio friendly when you choose that as your opening salvo. It just kind of made what we thought was a cool statement that reflected our mind set. Like, “Here it is; it’s about as undiluted as you can get. And if you guys dig this, then you’re liable to kind of be in for the ride, you know?” And what’s interesting about it is we really figured radio is not gonna touch that. And sure enough the thing went Top 15 or Top 10 like Active Rock in America; stations all over the nation were playing the thing. No edit and no call for an edit; if anybody had asked, we would have refused (laughs). You know? And it got such a great reception and we see people sing along to it every night.

That song is really loaded with guitars.

That’s a really cool one because that’s one where I was saying about the two-guitar interaction, that’s one where Cantrell and I pretty much go riff for riff and line for line vocally and melody for melody in terms of ideas. That’s part of why the thing is so darn long.

Did you play guitar on the actual track or are you talking about live?

On the record? Yeah, I do play some guitars on the record. And that’s one that came out of a lot of jams that were happening on the road.

When you’re working on guitar parts with Jerry, will he show you specific inversions or a certain riff? Does it get that focused? Or is it more trial and error?

It depends; we’re both capable of taking the lead. If he’s got something that’s got multiple, there’s times I’ll get shown a part. But with a thing like “A Looking In View,” that’s more like he had a riff, I had a riff, he had a riff, I had a riff, and we glued them together. And it’s, “Oh, man, check it out, this part goes really great into this one!” You’ve got piles of riffs laying around. “Remember that one thing you were doing in upstate New York a month ago?” So there’s a lot of that kind of stuff. And again, I’m sure there’s gonna even be more of that; this is only the beginning.

"Alice basically become sort of a two-guitar band whenever we want to be."

What is your guitar and amp rig?

Right now my main guitar is a 1960 VOS sunburst Paul that I’ve been rockin’ for almost a year now. I was never a Les Paul guy; I came up through punk rock. Hendrix is what got me started and then the next biggest influence after that was Greg Ginn from Black Flag and so as a kid I loved the Dan Armstrong (the Black Flag guitarist played an Ampeg Dan Armstrong clear Lucite guitar during much of his career) and the power of that look and the whole thing. I played guitars that were made of anything but wood for a while (laughs). There was a guitar called a Renaissance that was also a see-through plexi-glass thing that a guy put together for me. I got a Dan Armstrong for $250 when I was like 15 in New York. Can’t get ‘em for that now that’s for sure; that’s a stock that rose. I played Jerry Jones guitars and at one point Steinberger made its way in there. I went through a lot of stuff – everybody played Les Pauls and that’s the one thing I’m not gonna do. That’s kinda how I looked at it.

Eventually you just get to this place where you’re so yourself that it doesn’t matter. That you don’t have to try so hard to go out on a limb to do anything; you’re gonna be yourself whatever it is. I was recording the most recent Comes With the Fall album, Beyond the Last Light, and I was recording at this studio in Atlanta, and the guy had a couple of goldtop Deluxes that was all green and gnarly and I ended up using that for like 60 per cent of the guitar tracks. I kept going back to it and it was like, “Man, this maybe cliché, but this Les Paul/Marshall thing sure works.” You gotta go around the world to get across the street sometimes.

I ended up going home and immediately got a couple of goldtop Deluxes for myself and loved those and started using those on the road with Alice when we started touring again in ’07. And then eventually it was like, “If I’m gonna do the Les Paul thing, let’s just do it.” So I started looking at the VOS guitars and I like the slender neck so I went with a 1960 rather than a ’59. Also because you don’t see ‘60s everyday; the market is saturated with ‘59s. I’ve still got a little bit of the collector/rarity geek in me so I went with the 1960.

I love that guitar and I love my goldtops too. I also got a Telecaster Deluxe that Sean Kinney gave me for my birthday in ’06. That’s a cool guitar. Actually Cantrell is using that onstage now for “No Excuses.”

So Cantrell is doing the G&L thing and you have the Gibson end covered.

He’s still a G&L guy but you use different weapons for different mission. We were trying to get “No Excuses” together and he was always having trouble with his sound on that. He said, “Man, you got that Telly?” He’s rockin’ the Keith Richards Telly Deluxe that’s actually mine. It’s fine.

That stuff happens. Again, that’s just part of being a two-guitar band. You get to interface in all these interesting ways.

And your amp rig?

Amp-wise with kind of a Bogner/Matchless deal. I think right now I’m rockin’ the Uberschall and one of the new Matchless Independence heads. I’ve used Matchless forever; I was a huge fan back in the Mark Sampson (company founder) days. I think the C-30 amp is one of the best amps ever made. But the Independence is great too and it more fits the Alice bill.

What about the album’s title, “Black Gives Way to Blue”?

It’s a really beautiful song that Cantrell wrote for Layne. I think I heard that as soon as he did a little demo of it around Christmas time in ’07 after we had finished the Velvet Revolver tour. I heard that and felt like well, “That’s one of those perfect moments of clarity that we all pray for as writers and that come far too infrequently.” You know what I mean? That’s one that happened and when those happen they’re undeniable. It’s like, “Well, there you go. Right on.” It’s great and it’s just so succinct; no wasted motion on that one at all. In and out in two minutes and there you go. It’s a good-bye to Layne but it’s also a hello to the future as is the rest of the record. The reason that is the title track is we felt like it would make a good ending and it also sort of sums the worldview of the record if you will. If the record has a worldview, at least in part it’s about how one bounces back from things in life that knock us down. You’re presented with a choice when you get knocked to your knees: You can lay down and just wither away and die or you can choose to get up and put one foot in front of the other and start walkin’ and see what happens. And even if you get up and start walkin’ and you find yourself in the desert with a sandstorm just trying to beat you back down, eventually if you keep goin’ usually life rewards you. You’ll end up in an oasis of some kind. Just for the simple fact of your refusing to go down. I think we’re all gonna be presented with those kinds of challenges throughout our lives or we already have been.

We’ve all lost people in this band; people that are very dear to us. Layne becomes the focal point for obvious reasons but when you lose somebody it hurts no matter how famous they are; no matter how much of a juicy press angle it makes. It just plain hurts. Layne hurt and so did my grandfather and grandmother and so did my great friend, Sean Costello, who died during pre-production of this record one day before his 29th birthday. Killed himself in a hotel room. They all hurt, man.

So the song is kind of a barometer of where the band is at emotionally?

I think that song kind of sums up where we’re at in terms of the outlook. It’s like we decided to do this thing, put this record out, keep going, and add to the legacy that the band already has. We know that’s a tall order for some people but it felt right to us and so we’re doin’ it. And I think the people who are responding so overwhelmingly positively to it are doing so certainly for the music. But also I think in part a lot of them are responding to the possibilities that this thing represents for their own lives and for whatever challenges they might face that might knock them down. And I do think there’s a little bit of like, “Wow, if Alice can do, maybe I can.” Whatever it might be that’s holding you back.

“Acid Bubble.”

That’s a cool one; that’s a Cantrell deal that I really dig. It came really late in the process; that was actually one of the last ones that got spat out. It came pretty much fully formed and I dig it. That’s one of the ones that we’re playing in the set every night; I always have a great time playing and singing that one. That’s one that I use to try and really fire the folks up.

“Check My Brain” was the second single. Was it meant to represent the other side of “Black Gives Way to Blue” or to bookend the first single in some way?

We kind of came out with the seven-minute chunk of non-diluted, unfiltered metal. And the next one, “Check My Brain” was still heavy and still creepy and it still had a lot of the sonic earmarks that people were familiar with with Alice. But there’s nothing quite like it in the Alice canon and it is also one of those tunes that does the neat trick of being really heavy and a little creepy and seasicky and catchy. And so, the consensus was, “OK, they liked the seven-minute chunk of undiluted metal; now let’s throw this at ‘em and see what happens.” The thing just went Number One the other day on the rock charts so it’s doin’ quite well and we’re really pleased with that. It’s a cool tune.

"I started out as a guitar player; I never started playing music with the idea of being a singer."

Obviously the Black Gives Way to Blue album has really worked as a comeback album for the band and retiring the ghost of Layne Staley. This new combination with you as lead singer and guitar player works. Do you have any sense of what Jerry Cantrell saw in you as a vocalist and a performer? You don’t sound like Layne; you don’t write like Layne; and you don’t look like Layne.

I look nothin’ like him (laughs).

Obviously not. Can you explain the chemistry between Jerry and you and the other guys?

I don’t know, man; that is a tough thing to try to put a fine point on. When I moved with my band from Atlanta to Los Angeles back in 2000, he was one of the first people I met. My band, Comes With the Fall, came out there and we had our first album (Comes With the Fall) that we recorded in Atlanta and we came armed with that to drop a bomb on Hollywood. And we did; we played every dive that would have us. At some point, a mutual point had turned Jerry onto that album and he just flipped out over it and was hanging out with every moment practically after that. He was jumping onstage to play our songs with us. He would learn ‘em and he’d be in our apartment and ask me to show him how this one went or that one went. Or I’d say, “What are you doing on ‘Sickman’?” or whatever.

I don’t know why it happened; I think there are a lot of characteristics that we share in terms of just being really kind of certain of what we’re doing musically. Maybe that was part of it. I really don’t know beyond that. It’s been a much of years; it’s been a lot of personal changes that have gone down over the last decade with both of us. We’ve stuck together and it’s finally led us to this point.

I just think that maybe it was in part what you just said – that I’m not Layne, that I’m not somebody who would try to be Layne. All of those things to me are unthinkable to even attempt – I’m too busy just being me and that’s enough, that’s enough to contend with.

What does go through your head when you sing the old Alice songs that Layne sang on? Are you consciously trying to make them your own or attempting to stay faithful to the original? Is Layne looking over your shoulder?

Yeah, you know, he’s there, looking.

Did you know Layne personally?

No, I didn’t; I only know him through his work. When Cantrell and I met and actually started touring together, my group Comes With the Fall did double duty backing him up and opening for him when he was getting the Degradation Trip record off the ground. And so we were actually the touring band for that as well as the opening act. We did it for two years straight, man, all of 2001 and 2002. We went all over the place and that’s how he and I kind of bonded on the road beyond the initial bonding that took place in Hollywood, right?

So, we’d be on a ride somewhere and he’d have some story or somethin’ from the past about Layne. There were a lot of times where he’d say, “Man, you guys would get along so great.” Of course, Layne was still living for most of that time. When we were on the road during the 2002 run that we did, Layne passed while we were on tour. So I was with him (Cantrell) for all of that.

I didn’t know him but I feel like I do because of the work and because of being around these guys who carry him with them everywhere that we go. And all the stories and the funny stuff. And it just seemed like I would have liked him a whole lot. I certainly loved his work; I loved his singing.

When I’m singing those tunes, I’m just trying to sing ‘em from my own place of truth. Again, that’s all you can do. I’m gonna get inside (the songs) in terms of melodic liberties. I do a little of that occasionally just if it hits me to do it just because I’m inside of it. I don’t do it consciously. In other words, I’m not trying to consciously stray away from it and just putting my stamp on it and getting all American Idol all over it. At the same though, even if I’m faithful completely note-for-note to a certain part of a tune or something like that, it’s still coming from me. I’m in it, you know what I mean?

The fact is, Layne was singing a lot of songs he didn’t write. He did it from his own place of honesty and truth and he was himself and he was amazing so why would I do anything other than that myself? Even songs that he did write that were very much from a personal experience, what’s cool about those songs is the feelings behind those personal experiences are universal feelings. It’s just different shades of the blues. I understand that; I get that, man! So, there’s no problem there, no disconnect there. Just get it done, you know what I mean?

Black Gives Way to Blue is the first step for this new Alice in Chains lineup. The album has the expected Alice rockers and the dark songs but there is also acoustic stuff and modal sounding tracks. And so you’ve allowed yourself a lot of different musical avenues to pursue on the next album. In the same way that Facelift gave the original band an opportunity to pursue different directions on albums like Dirt and Jar of Flies.

Right! Dude, I mean, that is how we look at it. It’s added a whole new wing onto the house; it really has. And we can explore that and explore that and we look forward to it. We’re very excited about that. So, cool …

Interview by Steven Rosen
Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009

POSTED: 09/25/2009 - 10:39 am
print
share
Other Alice In Chains interviews:
+ Alice In Chains Guitarist: 'We Want To Come Out And Have A Good Time' interviews 04/21/2006
comments policy  59  comments posted, 1 removed | this article is 98% spam-free
     
RazorStradlen wrote on 09/25/2009 - 10:45 am / quote |
That's dumb
     
staind_dust87 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 11:41 am / quote |
The Dude sounds cool. Thank god AIC are back!
     
Dabog701 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 01:01 pm / quote |
"Eight years later lead singer Layne Stayley would be gone. That’s the tale in a nutshell."

Pun intended?
     
TSmitty6 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 01:25 pm / quote |
i saw them last night in Seattle for their homecoming show. Duvall has improved leagues compared to when i saw him two years ago. he went from singer, to rockstar imo. tho it is still the Jerry show. They played Check my Brain, Looking in View, Acid Bubble, and Black Gives Way to Blue (Jerry acoustic, 1st time live) off the new album. Looking in View wasn't my favorite new song on the record till i heard it live, the harmonies are amazing. great show, again, they never fail to dissapoint.
     
Luppi wrote on 09/25/2009 - 02:04 pm / quote |
He's a good guy and a good singer. And his attitude towards all this is nothing but great.
     
Jugulator_cro wrote on 09/25/2009 - 02:34 pm / quote |
Cant wait for the album to come out!
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/25/2009 - 02:53 pm / quote |
Yeah I think DuVall was a really good choice. He seems to be quite intelligent and well spoken.
The album is great, although, it lacks some of the darkness that Layne brought to the table. But I don't think that can be reproduced by anyone who isn't walking down a short road to the end of their life. All in all I'm really pleased with the new AiC. Probably listened to the CD a dozen times in the last three days and it just keeps getting better and better. Took a little for the new sound to grow on me though.
     
James_Het_Rules wrote on 09/25/2009 - 03:05 pm / quote |
Duvall sounds like a damn good guy. Say what you will about him being in AIC, yeah it sounds different than the Layne days, but i think the album sounded amazing, and i definately look forward to buying it, and any future efforts this line up makes. So good job to all of em, and keep making ****ing awesome music.
     
nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 03:25 pm / quote |
I guess you can call me a bit of a purist... to me, AiC is Layne Staley, Jerry Cantrell, Mike Starr and Sean Kinney - no more, no less. Mike Inez is OK but the only AiC lineup that I'll ever give a damn about is the aforementioned. Inez is OK but if you put Mike Inez in the mix and remove Layne Staley you have the Jerry Cantrell solo project because, if you do your homework, that is what his solo project was... the rest of the band sans Layne. The AiC song Died was supposed to be a JC solo song but Layne liked it and asked if he could put lyrics and vocals to it. Contrary to what WD said in this interview, though, Layne played 2nd guitar when needed (as well as 2nd guitar in Mad Season) and wrote a lot of the lyrics as well as some of the music (he wrote a majority of the self titled - which, in my opinion, couldn't hold a candle to Dirt mainly due to the mix work... way too much harmonizer machine on the vocals). I don't know where I'm going with this only to say that this new AiC isn't truly AiC... it's the Jerry Cantrell solo project reformed to the Boggy Depot era. Unfortunately, music is business and business is out to make money. As I said, i'm a purist. When Paul D. left tool their sound changed completely - although they still kicked ass, it's still different. If MJK were to leave, I'd hope they wouldn't call the new incarnation Tool because that wouldn't live up to expectations no matter how hard you tried...

Meh... I'll sum it up like this...

Tool without Paul D = Tool

AiC without Mike Starr = AiC

Guns N' Roses without axl = velvet revolver

AiC without Layne = Jerry Cantrell
     
kurtshapedbox wrote on 09/25/2009 - 03:26 pm / quote |
Kickass interview, kickass singer, kickass album, kickass band.
     
Right-Wing Dick wrote on 09/25/2009 - 03:33 pm / quote |
What a hell ride this bands been on. I hope the album has been cathartic
for them. They deserve another chance at happiness.
     
Wolf Dog Moon wrote on 09/25/2009 - 04:13 pm / quote |
digging the new tunes. I saw Alice In Chains live back in 93 at lollapoloza! I like the new tunes.
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/25/2009 - 04:30 pm / quote |
nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote:
Contrary to what WD said in this interview, though, Layne played 2nd guitar when needed (as well as 2nd guitar in Mad Season) and wrote a lot of the lyrics as well as some of the music (he wrote a majority of the self titled


you should try calling yourself a pretentious douche rather than a purist. and most of what you said is false. at least about the impact Layne had on the band. Go buy all of AiC's sheet music (i have it) and look at the song writing credits. Layne never wrote any instrumental music aside from Angry Chair. He probably wrote about 1/3 of the melodies and 1/2 the lyrics. He never played guitar, ever. Have you ever seen AiC live? I have several concerts on my computer. Aside from Angry Chair on their Unplugged performance he never touches a guitar. He didn't play rhythm guitar. If there is rhythm guitar going while Cantrell leads over it that is done by looping, or with a second guitarist for touring.
And the stuff you say about Mad Season is completely false also. Go look at those song writing credits. Layne wrote lyrics and melodies and that is all. Every song is composed by McCready.
I love Layne which should be obvious by my username, but honestly these ****ing people who make shit up about him and praise him like he's a god just cause he's dead are ****ing stupid. Stop giving him credit for shit he didn't do and taking credit away from the places it's rightfully do. AiC from the start was Cantrell's band, always has been always will be.
     
CGB89 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 04:41 pm / quote |
Staley wrote Angry Chair, Hate to Feel, and Head Creeps. All by himself. He also played Angry Chair, Hate to Feel, and I Don't Know Anything. He played Angry Chair and Hate to Feel numerous time from '92-'93. Maybe you should get your facts straight KurdtStaley. How can you claim to love Layne and not know the simple facts about him?
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/25/2009 - 04:50 pm / quote |
Well I don't know whether or not he wrote those songs. Honestly i don't care because the only worth a damn is Angry Chair. I appreciate Stayley for being an exceptional vocalist and decent lyricist. that's really all he was. That's the point I was trying to make. Sorry I was unaware know about the B-sides and album fillers you say he wrote. I wouldn't because I don't think to myself "damn that was AiC's shittiest song i wonder who wrote that?"
     
icbm666 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 05:50 pm / quote |
I saw AIC in '96 when they were the opening act for the KISS reunion tour. It was awesome.
     
kurtshapedbox wrote on 09/25/2009 - 06:17 pm / quote |
Layne and Will are both awesome in their own right. Now need for all the hating on both of em here, everyone has their imperfections.

Layne was just a beginning/budding guitarist during his time in AIC and didn't quite fully develop into a fully capable rhythm guitarist during his time in AIC, and usually only played guitar on Angry Chair live from what I've seen. No need to fault him for this...I know I wouldn't feel comfortable performing in front of thousands of people when I was just starting off...and I imagine that feeling is pretty universal, even to Layne Staley.

Will is a fully capable rhythm guitarist and is able to play guitar on most songs that AIC would request him to live....I think that's what the interviewer was trying to get at without being to long-winded.

I think the band has done enough to prove that they aren't in this for money, and for whatever reason I think adding a new vocalist to this band seems to make more sense than it would to almost any other band. People make all sorts of points about why (myself included, and I don't feel like writing them all over again) but I don't think it's something that can totally be explained...it just seems right. Obviously not everyone will ever be able to agree about everything 100%, that'd be inhuman...but I think most people feel that this is a wise and heart-felt move by AIC (with Layne's own mother included) which is why this comeback seems to have gotten more support than any other situation of the sort that I've ever heard of/seen.

Agree of disagree, it's all dandy with me...just doesn't seem right to be a jerk about your opinions because I don't think anyone will ever embrace and comb through them with an open mind.

Good on AIC...I personally really love BGWTB and think it sounds 100% pure AIC. =]
     
kurtshapedbox wrote on 09/25/2009 - 06:20 pm / quote |
Sorry for the ridiculous amount of grammatical errors in that post^
     
maidenfan15 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 06:25 pm / quote |
He sounds like a great guy and I have nothing but respect for him. He was put in a huge postion and he realizes that. It's not easy to fill Layne's shoes, but he's doing it very well.
     
Right-Wing Dick wrote on 09/25/2009 - 07:18 pm / quote |
KurdtStaley wrote:

nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote:
Contrary to what WD said in this interview, though, Layne played 2nd guitar when needed (as well as 2nd guitar in Mad Season) and wrote a lot of the lyrics as well as some of the music (he wrote a majority of the self titled

you should try calling yourself a pretentious douche rather than a purist. and most of what you said is false. at least about the impact Layne had on the band. Go buy all of AiC's sheet music (i have it) and look at the song writing credits. Layne never wrote any instrumental music aside from Angry Chair. He probably wrote about 1/3 of the melodies and 1/2 the lyrics. He never played guitar, ever. Have you ever seen AiC live? I have several concerts on my computer. Aside from Angry Chair on their Unplugged performance he never touches a guitar. He didn't play rhythm guitar. If there is rhythm guitar going while Cantrell leads over it that is done by looping, or with a second guitarist for touring.
And the stuff you say about Mad Season is completely false also. Go look at those song writing credits. Layne wrote lyrics and melodies and that is all. Every song is composed by McCready.
I love Layne which should be obvious by my username, but honestly these ****ing people who make shit up about him and praise him like he's a god just cause he's dead are ****ing stupid. Stop giving him credit for shit he didn't do and taking credit away from the places it's rightfully do. AiC from the start was Cantrell's band, always has been always will be.


So he never played guitar ever, and then he plays guitar. You are the pretentious douche.
     
jacob911363 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 08:35 pm / quote |
Why does it matter who wrote what? As long as it says Alice in Chains on it, it's a good song regardless of who wrote it.
     
Th6r6a6sH wrote on 09/25/2009 - 08:48 pm / quote |
I saw Duvall on an acoustic set at the Cain's Ballroom here in Tulsa a few years back. I have to say, he's an excellent musician, and a great personality. Hate all you want, he made excellent points about living up to the AiC repertoire and filling Layne's shoes. It comes from within, and that's exactly how I felt listening to him singing my favorite songs. Of course it wasn't Layne, but every sensible person on this here UG knows without a doubt that Jerry could have found a Layne-sound alike on any street corner bar, but he went with the choice of the musician rather than the archetype. Alice is still Alice, and any disbelief will be expelled upon ditching the hypocrisy and actually seeing them play the music they play. It's still the art it was, and it always will be, as long as we keep it as close to us as we always have.
     
Sp00nman94 wrote on 09/25/2009 - 10:31 pm / quote |
He spelled "Staley" wrong
     
FenderMaster wrote on 09/26/2009 - 12:00 am / quote |
Will is awesome, to me, it's like he was always with the band in an alternate reality, love his voice, and his riffs, he really is the best man for the job, it just feels right... and it still feels like AiC.
     
jasonbloss wrote on 09/26/2009 - 01:53 am / quote |
The new songs sound just like old chains but HEAVIER! I am really proud of all these guys and how far they've come. Jerry Cantrell is one of my biggest influences as a writer and a guitar player. It really brings a tear to my eye when I listen to these new songs, because I am so happy that they're back and still kick ass!!
     
nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:05 am / quote |
I think kurdtstaley has sand in his vagina... I bet you didn't know Layne was one hell of a drummer... sure, he never sat behind a kit on tour or anything but I've seen home movie footage and out takes of him playing and he's really good. he was actually a drummer first - oh but wait... i'm a pretentious douche... Oh wait... I just noticed a post from May... you don't even know how to TUNE a guitar... I guess we won't be seeing you play on stage either - much like Layne... oh, no, wait... he does play some songs... and there is video taped proof... i find it funny that the only comment you have in your profile is someone telling you how much of a retard you are... I probably have underwear older than you little boy. go back to 5th grade.
     
flip666sorry wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:25 am / quote |
r u ****ing kidding me did they just call them "grunge Hipsters"? that doesnt make any ****ing sense at all, way to make all the effort you put into your article go for nothing because you made an idiot of yoursef by saying something so ****ing retarded
     
flip666sorry wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:27 am / quote |
yea and too right wing dick, lane never EVER played guitar?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fNcq0JoEY4
     
Chaingarden wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:55 am / quote |
KurdtStaley wrote:

nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote:
Contrary to what WD said in this interview, though, Layne played 2nd guitar when needed (as well as 2nd guitar in Mad Season) and wrote a lot of the lyrics as well as some of the music (he wrote a majority of the self titled

you should try calling yourself a pretentious douche rather than a purist. and most of what you said is false. at least about the impact Layne had on the band. Go buy all of AiC's sheet music (i have it) and look at the song writing credits. Layne never wrote any instrumental music aside from Angry Chair. He probably wrote about 1/3 of the melodies and 1/2 the lyrics. He never played guitar, ever. Have you ever seen AiC live? I have several concerts on my computer. Aside from Angry Chair on their Unplugged performance he never touches a guitar. He didn't play rhythm guitar. If there is rhythm guitar going while Cantrell leads over it that is done by looping, or with a second guitarist for touring.
And the stuff you say about Mad Season is completely false also. Go look at those song writing credits. Layne wrote lyrics and melodies and that is all. Every song is composed by McCready.
I love Layne which should be obvious by my username, but honestly these ****ing people who make shit up about him and praise him like he's a god just cause he's dead are ****ing stupid. Stop giving him credit for shit he didn't do and taking credit away from the places it's rightfully do. AiC from the start was Cantrell's band, always has been always will be.


Hey man, check riteaid.com. I think they're having sale on tampons.
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/26/2009 - 03:02 am / quote |
nuthinbuttrubl8 wrote:
I think kurdtstaley has sand in his vagina... I bet you didn't know Layne was one hell of a drummer... sure, he never sat behind a kit on tour or anything but I've seen home movie footage and out takes of him playing and he's really good. he was actually a drummer first - oh but wait... i'm a pretentious douche... Oh wait... I just noticed a post from May... you don't even know how to TUNE a guitar... I guess we won't be seeing you play on stage either - much like Layne... oh, no, wait... he does play some songs... and there is video taped proof... i find it funny that the only comment you have in your profile is someone telling you how much of a retard you are... I probably have underwear older than you little boy. go back to 5th grade.


Ok so I was being a bit of an ******* when making my previous post. Not really much of an excuse but I was in a rush and put very little thought into it. As is obvious by me contradicting myself in the post.
And yeah I only started playing guitar in March, is that something to be ashamed of? Not at all.
It's funny how you know more about my history on UG than I do. It's also funny how you're just completely full of shit. I didn't go look for that post or anything but I guarantee it's not asking how to put a guitar in tune. Maybe how to put into C# tuning or something, but then here you are putting some extreme bias on it like you obviously do everything else, just to try and make some asinine point which isn't even valid.
Also you're saying things that make no sense. My post said that he played guitar on Angry Chair. Since you claim he plays "some songs" why don't you enlighten me with him playing guitar on something other than Angry Chair since it said in my post he plays on Angry Chair, I don't need you "proving" to me things I obviously already know.

And yes i knew Layne was a drummer. As the story goes I believe he told his band mates he was going to be a singer instead and got laughed out of the room, then sold his drum set for some other more vocally oriented music equipment (maybe a mic, but I'm not sure).

Oh by the way, I just looked at my profile, a Christian calling someone else retarded... couldn't get more ironic.

I apologize for being an ******* in my post but honestly I was just trying to get people to look at things more objectively because obviously your overwhelming love for Staley is tainting your perception. The point was to give credit where credit is do, because DuVall already has enough on his plate without *******s like you giving him no respect purely because he isn't Layne Staley.

Also please leave the immaturity out of your attempted arguments. Try constructing a valid argument, if you even know what that is.
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/26/2009 - 03:10 am / quote |
Chaingarden wrote:
Hey man, check riteaid.com. I think they're having sale on tampons.

lol will do. Already apologized for that post though so you can give it a rest. Hilarious how the subject of flaming is now me, but no one has anything to say to the user talking about how DuVall is unworthy of playing under the AiC name.
     
DavidsonTFP wrote on 09/26/2009 - 04:27 am / quote |
DuVall was the greatest pick they could have had for Alice. can't wait for the new album, looking forward to it.
     
cooljew wrote on 09/26/2009 - 04:40 am / quote |
to kurdtstaley: i'm pretty sure layne wrote hate to feel as well. that song kicks ass.

anywho.... to be honest, the albums not great, last of my kind is definitely the standout (aside from the singles). its loaded with slower type songs that really don't do it for me. I'm really hoping that it'll grow on me. i wish cantrell would let duvall do the majority of the singing on it, he's really got a great voice.
     
RazorStradlen wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:53 pm / quote |
DuVall IS unfit for Alice in Chains. They should've changed the band name. It's no AiC without Layne to me.
     
Chaingarden wrote on 09/26/2009 - 02:55 pm / quote |
KurdtStaley wrote:

Chaingarden wrote:
Hey man, check riteaid.com. I think they're having sale on tampons.
lol will do. Already apologized for that post though so you can give it a rest. Hilarious how the subject of flaming is now me, but no one has anything to say to the user talking about how DuVall is unworthy of playing under the AiC name.


Heh, sorry, I couldn't resist. Meant in jest.
     
trivium036 wrote on 09/26/2009 - 04:09 pm / quote |
ive only recently got into AIC when i seen them at sonisphere last month, but i think duvall is great. looking forward to buying the new album
     
ticklemeemo wrote on 09/26/2009 - 06:30 pm / quote |
cooljew wrote:

to kurdtstaley: i'm pretty sure layne wrote hate to feel as well. that song kicks ass.

anywho.... to be honest, the albums not great, last of my kind is definitely the standout (aside from the singles). its loaded with slower type songs that really don't do it for me. I'm really hoping that it'll grow on me. i wish cantrell would let duvall do the majority of the singing on it, he's really got a great voice.


Have you ever listened to AiC? Their entire sound was the sludgy, grinding slow songs. They have an odd fast song here and there, but songs like Rooster, Rain When I Die, Would?, Angry Chair, and Hate to Feel are the signature Alice sound.
     
Pearl Jamison wrote on 09/26/2009 - 06:40 pm / quote |
mannnnn i dont like duvall at all
     
thegloaming wrote on 09/27/2009 - 12:49 am / quote |
self titled album came out in 95. was just kinda bugging me
     
KurdtStaley wrote on 09/27/2009 - 02:56 am / quote |
cooljew wrote:

to kurdtstaley: i'm pretty sure layne wrote hate to feel as well. that song kicks ass.

anywho.... to be honest, the albums not great, last of my kind is definitely the standout (aside from the singles). its loaded with slower type songs that really don't do it for me. I'm really hoping that it'll grow on me. i wish cantrell would let duvall do the majority of the singing on it, he's really got a great voice.

Yeah he definitely wrote the lyrics and melody to that song. I don't know about the instrumental composition though. That's really all I've been trying to get across, is that practically 100% of the instrumental composition is Cantrell so the sound in it's most simplistic form is still very similar.
And the album will probably grow on you. See the thing is, the vocal delivery has changed quite a bit, but the melody is still there. So regardless of who's voice is behind it, it's still getting stuck in my head. And at first I didn't think DuVall was a great fit either... I thought "damn this is like the Beatles without Paul McCartney, would they still be the Beatles?" but once I learned a little more about the situation he grew on me, and I have a lot of respect for him as a musician. What he's doing has gotta be really hard, with all these people who don't give him any credit at all. It's not like Cantrell went through a label or an agent to find a singer, him and DuVall already had a friendship building while Layne was just being too reclusive to do anything. I think Cantrell showed a lot of faith and respect for Layne by not replacing him earlier. Many bands would have had a new lineup in no time at all. He not only waited for Layne to die, but then waited another 7+ years to move on. It's not like the band name even matters anyways. It's just an arbitrary title by which to call the group.

It's odd how this article has so few comments when BGWTB and AiC are so popular. On the 22nd it took only a few hours for it to be one of the top downloads on thepiratebay, I would expect more people on UG talking about it..
     
IamGod 666 wrote on 09/27/2009 - 03:48 am / quote |
RazorStradlen wrote:

DuVall IS unfit for Alice in Chains. They should've changed the band name. It's no AiC without Layne to me.
Pearl Jamison wrote:

mannnnn i dont like duvall at all
     
maidenfan15 wrote on 09/27/2009 - 01:03 pm / quote |
Why should they change the band name? Only one member is different. Everybiody else is till there. AiC wasn't just Layne, it was the whole band. It's their band, they can do whatever they want with it.

You guys have absolutely no say as to what the band should and shouldn't do.
     
InMyHead_x wrote on 09/27/2009 - 08:52 pm / quote |
Oh shut the f**k up arguing about stuff that isn't important and just enjoy AIC for what they are now!! They've still got what they had all those years ago, apart from Layne obviously, but they're still the same brilliant rock band. Give DuVall a chance!!
     
jod23 wrote on 09/27/2009 - 11:30 pm / quote |
i have read so many opinions on the new outlook for alice in chains. from youtube, music reviews, and ultimate-guitar. i find it interesting and fascinating.

all i can say is i'm glad and respect the surviving members kept the ball rolling after the tragic passing of layne.

i like everything about the new album because i respect the idea of their music. very powerful with emotions. keeping rock and roll alive.
     
Dylan_Guitar93 wrote on 09/27/2009 - 11:39 pm / quote |
KurdtStaley wrote:

Yeah I think DuVall was a really good choice. He seems to be quite intelligent and well spoken.
The album is great, although, it lacks some of the darkness that Layne brought to the table. But I don't think that can be reproduced by anyone who isn't walking down a short road to the end of their life. All in all I'm really pleased with the new AiC. Probably listened to the CD a dozen times in the last three days and it just keeps getting better and better. Took a little for the new sound to grow on me though.


Yeh when i first listened to it i was like "Woah, thats not quiet the same sound as i expected" i still think it's good tho it's gonna take a while to get used to it. but bout ur point of it not being that dark i think musically it is one of the heaviest things they have done
     
Dylan_Guitar93 wrote on 09/28/2009 - 12:05 am / quote |
RazorStradlen wrote:

DuVall IS unfit for Alice in Chains. They should've changed the band name. It's no AiC without Layne to me.


Quiet possiblly personally i don't really mind, but Layne's mother told the band when they got together to stay under the Alice In Chains name
     
Gordy96 wrote on 09/28/2009 - 12:27 am / quote |
i
RazorStradlen wrote:

DuVall IS unfit for Alice in Chains. They should've changed the band name. It's no AiC without Layne to me.


man its the same as when Bon Scott pasted, people were sceptical of brian johnson but then look what has done, ac/dc is still as big as ever
     
RazorStradlen wrote on 09/28/2009 - 11:43 am / quote |
Gordy96 wrote:

iRazorStradlen wrote:

DuVall IS unfit for Alice in Chains. They should've changed the band name. It's no AiC without Layne to me.

man its the same as when Bon Scott pasted, people were sceptical of brian johnson but then look what has done, ac/dc is still as big as ever


Dude, AC/DC sucked after Bon Scott. Brian Johnson just screams, he doesn't sing. But that's not the point. DuVall is a whole other sound from Layne. It's just not the same.
     
Fuzzbox91 wrote on 09/28/2009 - 12:12 pm / quote |
[quote="the dumbass who wrote this article"]Back in 1994, the Seattle grunge hipsters released their self-titled album. Eight years later lead singer Layne Stayley would be gone. That’s the tale in a nutshell.[/quote]

wow there are so many things wrong with this i dont know where to begin, ill begin with calling them "hipsters" WTF ARE YOU SMOKING!!? is all i can say to that. also he didnt meantion the two albums before that, Facelift, and Dirt. you know, the albums that spawned most of their hits and best known songs, not that thats important. Also their selft titled was released in 1995, november of 95 to be exact (so closer to 96) UG really needs to be more selective about who they allow to write about certain bands because this guy doesnt know shit.
     
Fuzzbox91 wrote on 09/28/2009 - 12:20 pm / quote |
anyway flaming aside Duvall is fine for AiC, he has a lot of the same great qualities in his voice that staley did, is he staley? of course not, but hes a valid replacement i say.
     
jj48thechamp wrote on 09/28/2009 - 01:16 pm / quote |
i don't no fellas (and lady fellas) i love alice in chains old stuff.. and im glad there back.. but alice without Stayley??? i don't no that i can handle alice any other way than they were.. rooster.. man in a box..down in a hole.. nutshell.. and now this Duvall kid comes along.. i wish him and alice luck.. but they will never be the same as they were.. RIP Layne. i couldn't agree with razorstradlen more.. maybe not change the name.. but its deffinately no alice without the man that mattered most.. no offense Jerry Cantrell
     
societysphantom wrote on 09/28/2009 - 05:34 pm / quote |
Fuzzbox91 wrote:

[quote="the dumbass who wrote this article"]Back in 1994, the Seattle grunge hipsters released their self-titled album. Eight years later lead singer Layne Stayley would be gone. That’s the tale in a nutshell.


wow there are so many things wrong with this i dont know where to begin, ill begin with calling them "hipsters" WTF ARE YOU SMOKING!!? is all i can say to that. also he didnt meantion the two albums before that, Facelift, and Dirt. you know, the albums that spawned most of their hits and best known songs, not that thats important. Also their selft titled was released in 1995, november of 95 to be exact (so closer to 96) UG really needs to be more selective about who they allow to write about certain bands because this guy doesnt know shit. [/quote]

You took da words right outta my mind haha .. Good call!
     
Tostitos wrote on 09/28/2009 - 07:23 pm / quote |
Duvall's doing a great job. I think its great that AiC's still going, and that they're not trying to be old AiC, that is, they're moving on
     
GoToSleep wrote on 09/29/2009 - 12:52 am / quote |
Isn't anyone else pissed about Check My Brain? Its doesn't sound like Alice at all. I understand the band has changed and grown obviously, but it is a bad representation of the band and frankly sounds like every bad rock song on the radio and I'm pissed because it's like they want it on the radio to get newer fans when they should be trying their best to please the original fans. Everything that I have heard so far is good, minus Check My Brain. I'm not expecting to be blown away, but it's like here we have this great band and they now have this bad song on the radio that sounds way too mainstream and like everything else. Ugh...I'm just surprised no one else is talking about it. They were doing great with a more modern sound but now we got this crapper of a song and it's just so disappointing.
     
tlinville24 wrote on 09/29/2009 - 05:16 pm / quote |
for whoever said this duvall kid steps in, he was born in 67 so that makes him a whopping one year younger than jerry.. personally i love old AIC as much as anyone else but william is still an excellent choice for the band seeing how they have a frontman thats not struggling with an obvious drug addiction and because of that they are able to tour frequently and have been doing so since he has been in the band. Who has a problem with seeing alice in chain more frequently when we are overwhelmed with shit music every where?
     
Riffrocker83 wrote on 09/30/2009 - 11:45 am / quote |
AIC is easily in my top 3 or 4 favorite bands of all time; and I gotta say, I'm pretty disappointed. To me, it sounds like a Jerry Cantrell solo album. I understand that Jerry has always been the chief songwriting force in AIC, but still, does he have to dominate 95% of the vocal mix on the record? Why even bother bringing William Duvall in as a singer if he's barely featured on the record?

Most of the songs were bland. After 14 years, I expected a much bigger bang. However, I do LOVE Acid Bubble, A Looking In View, and Last Of My Kind. Your Decision is okay too. The rest of the album I could do without.

All that said... still looking forward to seeing them live again and glad to see they're back together.
     
walley1078 wrote on 09/30/2009 - 09:11 pm / quote |
Just saw them in concert on Saturday. Amazing. I wasn't sure what to expect as I saw them several times with Layne back in the day. WD was a very good replacement live. I hadn't watched any clips on youtube so that I had an open mind when going in. Been listening to the new album nonstop and I think it's very good. All I gotta say is I don't understand the animosity towards WD. I understand the reverence to LS because I love him and what he brought to the band as much as any other AIC fan. But he's the guy whom you all should be pissed at because he's the one who wasted how many great albums worth of great material by getting him self neck deep in a paralyzing drug addiction. Who cares whether he wrote or played guitar or drums (which he did at a encore I saw in Portland,OR on the Facelift club tour when they all switched instruments to play a made up song). These guys chose to move on 6 or 7 years after his passing and create more music. Hell, that's a lot longer than AC/DC waited when Bon Scott died. If you don't like WD then that's your choice. Don't buy the record, don't see them live because I don't think they care. At the concert, the other night the boys looked so appreciative of the love they got from the crowd. I hate to say it but I'm glad they got back together under the AIC name because I think they are doing it justice.
     
walley1078 wrote on 09/30/2009 - 09:11 pm / quote |
Just saw them in concert on Saturday. Amazing. I wasn't sure what to expect as I saw them several times with Layne back in the day. WD was a very good replacement live. I hadn't watched any clips on youtube so that I had an open mind when going in. Been listening to the new album nonstop and I think it's very good. All I gotta say is I don't understand the animosity towards WD. I understand the reverence to LS because I love him and what he brought to the band as much as any other AIC fan. But he's the guy whom you all should be pissed at because he's the one who wasted how many great albums worth of great material by getting him self neck deep in a paralyzing drug addiction. Who cares whether he wrote or played guitar or drums (which he did at a encore I saw in Portland,OR on the Facelift club tour when they all switched instruments to play a made up song). These guys chose to move on 6 or 7 years after his passing and create more music. Hell, that's a lot longer than AC/DC waited when Bon Scott died. If you don't like WD then that's your choice. Don't buy the record, don't see them live because I don't think they care. At the concert, the other night the boys looked so appreciative of the love they got from the crowd. I hate to say it but I'm glad they got back together under the AIC name because I think they are doing it justice.
     
thirteenburn wrote on 10/09/2009 - 02:56 pm / quote |
Just finished listening to several AIC songs that cover the different flavors throughout their career and then followed that up with a couple of the new songs and to be honest, I don't get where people say that the new AIC is different from the old - they both sound VERY similar to me and not that that's a bad thing, it just is what it is. As for WD NOT sounding like Layne Staley, I have to say I also disagree. Grant it, his register is a bit higher than Layne's, but overall, I always figured they got WD BECAUSE he sounded so much like Layne, to the point where when Jerry and William harmonize, I would swear I was hearing something off of 'Dirt' - to me they sounded that close.

But whatever, it's not really the point. I happen to like AIC a lot - I've seen them back when they were a "bar band" as well as when they were selling out arena's and they've always maintained that "band in a garage" vibe that I've always liked - never pretentious in any way, at least that I've seen.

I'd give the new album, based on what I've heard so far, a solid 8. That could go up or down depending on the overall vibe and sound once I get it, but I have a feeling that 'A Look-In View' won't be the best song on the entire record, as is sadly so often the case with a lot of music. You hear a single from a new band and go out and buy their album only to find out that you just wasted $20 on one song. Nothing is more frustrating and anger inducing.

A quick aside on that topic: that's why the whole "filesharing" thing has taken off the way it did. Well, two reasons, actually, but the main one being that people got tired of purchasing something based only on a couple of songs that turned out to be pure crap. Now, you can download something and if you like it, great. Go out and buy it, which is what I do. But if I don't like it, eh, so be it. I can just delete what I've downloaded and be happy with the money I just saved.

The other reason filesharing has gotten so big is because of the fact that music fans have gotten tired of having to be force-fed whatever garbage that the record companies felt necessary to foist upon us. That's forced a lot of people to the 'net to find the music THEY like, not what the record industry tells us we're supposed to like via the obnoxious forms of promotion they use.

You may agree or disagree with the concept of filesharing but it's a medium that's here to stay and is only going to grow regardless of how much the record compaines try to fight it. They long ago missed the boat on the use of the 'net and they're slowly clawing their way out of a toilet that is pulling them down the drain faster than they can climb out and I say 'Good riddence' to them. They were once important and relevent, but today, er, not so much.

Cheers!
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register and read comments policy first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2012