guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Apple Vs. Beatles, date: september 13, 2004
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Apple Vs. Beatles

artist: beatles date: 09/13/2004 category: general music news
POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 07:31 am
print
share
subscribe to
More Beatles news:
+ Website Illegally Selling Beatles Mp3s Launches Unusual Defence general music news 11/10/2009
+ EMI Wins Injunction Over Beatles Tracks general music news 11/06/2009
+ The Beatles To Release Apple USB Stick With Remastered Albums upcoming releases 11/04/2009
+ Beatles To Release Companion Books For Remastered Catalogue upcoming releases 10/14/2009
+ Beatles Set For $1.6 Billion Pay Day upcoming releases 09/08/2009
+ view all
 13 
 comments posted
Fozz! :
Simple explanaton - Apple Music, the Beatle's Label, once tried to sue Apple computers because they had used the same name, as thus customers might be confused. The court, quite rightly, said that the two companies were in totally different markets and thus confusion was highly unlikely.

Now however, as Apple computers is in the business of selling music (via the iTunes store) Apple the label is having another pop at sueing them.

Old news, this first kicked off a few months ago...

POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 11:16 am / quote |
Karl1569 :
stupid apple music. they made billions off he beatles. they should stop being greedy. i hate greedy people.
POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 12:13 pm / quote |
americanxidiot :
its not like their trying to dig on the beatles companys money. They just happen to be selling music type stuff which is what the other company does. Its not actually about money... Well, It kinda is but thats not what Apple(the computer company)is doing it for. Its just confusion about who is who.
POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 03:53 pm / quote |
Fozz! :
Hi to everyone who got here from the macrumors.com linky BTW
POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 05:24 pm / quote |
Ender605 :
It's Yoko Ono who's usually behind and law action in Apple. She's very touchy about anything John was involved in, and she's brought up suits in the past.

I seriously doubt Paul McCartney would become a board member. I think that's just a hopeful rumor.

POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 05:39 pm / quote |
ChurchNSkate :
what the *** karl...stupid apple music? greedy? how is it greedy...they just want to make money, theres nothing wrong with that. and, its a differant business type. alright, theyre both in the music business now, but apple computers is in selling music, and apple music is in recording music, and producing it. who cares...one's famous, the other isnt. you know which is which.
macs>everyone else.

POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 06:26 pm / quote |
 
 m 
  :
spam deleted.
POSTED: 09/13/2004 - 06:45 pm / quote |
ad_lib_oz :
what the *** karl...stupid apple music? greedy? how is it greedy...they just want to make money, theres nothing wrong with that. and, its a differant business type. alright, theyre both in the music business now, but apple computers is in selling music, and apple music is in recording music, and producing it. who cares...one's famous, the other isnt. you know which is which.
macs>everyone else.


Man, he was talking about the Apple Music Corporation not Apple Computer...

jeezus...

POSTED: 09/14/2004 - 07:30 am / quote |
ad_lib_oz :
PS I use a mac too so I understand. I have been using them since I was born too so I'm pretty attached to them (as much as one can be attached to a company!)
POSTED: 09/14/2004 - 07:32 am / quote |
soundrock31 :
although
stupid apple music. they made billions off he beatles. they should stop being greedy. i hate greedy people.


How can they be steeling money of the beatles when they're owned by the beatles?

POSTED: 10/03/2004 - 09:24 am / quote |
Idiota :
Apple music was founded in the 60s and Apple computer much later... why should they use the same name? Why screwing Apple music over, they were the first to have the name. How would you like to have a big firm and it's name very recognisable and then some other company uses the same name for it's own advertisment (because the name is already big)?!

It should be Macintosh and that's it!

POSTED: 10/13/2004 - 12:51 pm / quote |
JLJohnson_21 :
Idiota:It should be Macintosh and that's it!

No man, it should be Macintrash!

POSTED: 10/13/2004 - 09:13 pm / quote |
fruit23 :
I think that Apple Corp. shouldn't even fight, because they wouldn't have come up with the idea of ITunes.. and I also think that it shouldn't matter becuase they weren't putting the logo onto any cd case it was only on the internet... and i really dont believe that people are going to confuse apple corp and Apple computer with each other
POSTED: 04/02/2006 - 08:05 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009