search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Deep Purple Ordered To Pay Royalty To Themselves

artist: deep purple date: 07/03/2009 category: general music news
rating: 0 / votes: 0 

A Russian court has fined Deep Purple for "illegally" performing their own songs. Bloggers have already called the decision "fantastic in its idiocy".

The concert in question took place on October 19, 2008 in Russia’s southern city of Rostov-on-Don.

According to the court’s ruling, the musicians – Ian Gillan, Ian Paice and Roger Glover – should have obtained a license from the all-Russian NGO, "Russian Authors’ Society" for the public performance of any of their songs. The organization represents the rights of foreign performers in Russia – even without these performers giving the NGO permission to represent them.

For every "unlicensed" song, the court imposed a penalty of 30,000 roubles (about 1,000 dollars) on the organizers of the concert for payment to the "Russian Authors’ Society" which, in its turn, is supposed to make payments to the authors – Gillan, Paice and Glover.

Lawyers say the real reason for the suit might be that the "Russian Authors’ Society" receives revenues from those royalties received.

The blogospere has been quick to react to the ruling, and is mostly critical of it.

Read more at Russia Today.com.

POSTED: 07/03/2009 - 09:31 am
print
share
subscribe to
More Deep Purple news:
+ Ian Gillan On Deep Purple Album Progress: We're Useless general music news 08/04/2011
+ Rare Deep Purple Footage Surfaces upcoming releases 06/21/2011
+ Deep Purple Guitarist Talks North American Orchestral Tour upcoming tours 06/10/2011
+ Will Deep Purple Stop Making Albums? general music news 06/03/2011
+ Deep Purple Plan Summer Tour With Orchestra upcoming tours 03/29/2011
+ view all
comments policy  29  comments posted, 1 removed | this article is 97% spam-free
     
Jari wrote on 07/03/2009 - 10:29 am / quote |
An act of idiocy at its greatest!
     
pawnshopguitars wrote on 07/03/2009 - 10:48 am / quote |
In Soviet Russia, you pay royalties to yourself!

I know what you're thinking. How did I come up with something so original? This is brilliant, though xD
     
artnotapathy wrote on 07/03/2009 - 11:08 am / quote |
wat
     
 Colohue   m   wrote on 07/03/2009 - 11:12 am / quote |
Actually, I believe that the NGO is the primary reason that Ultimate-Guitar stayed in business when many other tab sites were shut down. Also, since when did Blackmore and Lord relinquish their rights to the song writing royalties?
     
Axl_Explosion wrote on 07/03/2009 - 11:16 am / quote |
I'm not sure if I exactly understand what the hell is going on here, lol. The NGO is accusing Deep Purple of illegally playing their own songs, and are responsible for collecting royalites to artists that have that happen, when their songs are played illegally. So since Deep Purple technically performed their own songs illegally, this company is essentially suing Deep Purple, and then paying royalties to... Deep Purple?

-eyes cross, collapses into a heap on the floor-
     
Kotie wrote on 07/03/2009 - 12:19 pm / quote |
What a world.
     
Cheeseman Jay wrote on 07/03/2009 - 01:13 pm / quote |
The stupidity of this article made my day. Yeah it's been an allright day. Nothing much.
     
Higgzy wrote on 07/03/2009 - 02:09 pm / quote |
Lol at the fail...
     
palace wrote on 07/03/2009 - 03:07 pm / quote |
It's a common practise on Latvian Author Society called Akka/Laa, they make us pay for songs we have performed in concert so they can pay us ''royalties'' afterward. But the truth is we have never recieved the money we paid them in royalties
     
Metalic Demon wrote on 07/03/2009 - 05:12 pm / quote |
well done russia, youve gone and confused me....
     
Baby Joel wrote on 07/03/2009 - 05:59 pm / quote |
What Russia is doing makes sense. It's just useless, in my eyes.
What's happening (This is what it looks like to me, please correct me if I'm wrong), is that Russia wants foreign performers to get a ' license', per se, which will give them the legal right to perform their songs.
It's basically a complicated way for Russia to allow, or to say they approve of, performers to perform.
     
Mootallica wrote on 07/03/2009 - 09:00 pm / quote |
Baby Joel wrote:

What Russia is doing makes sense. It's just useless, in my eyes.
What's happening (This is what it looks like to me, please correct me if I'm wrong), is that Russia wants foreign performers to get a ' license', per se, which will give them the legal right to perform their songs.
It's basically a complicated way for Russia to allow, or to say they approve of, performers to perform.


In doing so, they take a percentage of the commission from the license (The Russian Authority), as was stated in the article, that they could be doing it for some of the royalties.

Either way, it's pretty screwed up, but I still did get a bit of a chuckle out of it.
     
farfaraway wrote on 07/04/2009 - 03:10 am / quote |
Time paradox, head explodes.
     
PurpleDinosaur wrote on 07/04/2009 - 03:23 am / quote |
what is this i dont even
     
joud_c. wrote on 07/04/2009 - 03:48 am / quote |
This is the stupidest thing i've ever heard.
     
Niiko wrote on 07/04/2009 - 07:08 am / quote |
Wow.... LOL!!
     
kalamari wrote on 07/04/2009 - 07:22 am / quote |
For every "unlicensed" song, the court imposed a penalty of 30,000 roubles (about 1,000 dollars) on the organizers of the concert
So is it not the 'organizers of the concert' (ie their tour company or perhaps the owners of the venue?) that have to pay Deep Purple, not Purple paying themselves?
     
JazzNick67 wrote on 07/04/2009 - 11:35 am / quote |
i laughed so hard
     
kryzay311 wrote on 07/04/2009 - 12:10 pm / quote |
...what?
     
crocoscar wrote on 07/04/2009 - 03:58 pm / quote |
This is completely normal.
     
Bassist #5 wrote on 07/04/2009 - 11:16 pm / quote |
Kotie wrote:

What a world.


oh no not a world. apparently its "their world" so they do their own thing. which usually involves them looking stupid as usual. ya. go america
     
jess2112 wrote on 07/04/2009 - 11:41 pm / quote |
I've heard of something along the lines of this happening before - I'm pretty sure that I read once that Cheap Trick had to have their setlist approved by Japan before they performed there. Some countries, obviously, have different types of governments, thus the speech freedom level will differ. So they probably just needed their setlist approved by the Russian government and the article writer just worded it wrong.

Or it's just an act of idiocy. Either way. =P
     
Whip It wrote on 07/05/2009 - 05:12 am / quote |
Bands should get together and boycott playing in Russia until they give in, eventually the people will get their way.
     
Serial Rocker wrote on 07/05/2009 - 11:50 am / quote |
As the band will not receive all the fine money back, this case is just a legal racket.
     
southern_stylin wrote on 07/05/2009 - 01:07 pm / quote |
Higgzy :
Lol at the fail...


Dude... everyone here else is speaking English, please follow suit, you're just being rude.
     
nfrench7fold wrote on 07/05/2009 - 07:59 pm / quote |
...what?!
     
ggggtarded wrote on 07/05/2009 - 08:05 pm / quote |
this is funny
     
Santeria420 wrote on 07/05/2009 - 10:51 pm / quote |
southern_stylin wrote:

Higgzy :
Lol at the fail...

Dude... everyone here else is speaking English, please follow suit, you're just being rude.


everyone here else?

the russians just want to control what music is played in their country and skim a little profit off the top. not unusual, methinks.
     
tom1thomas1 wrote on 07/06/2009 - 05:34 am / quote |
im guessing that the NGO will make a profit somewhere along the lines
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register and read comments policy first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2012