search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Radiohead Make 10 Million From 'In Rainbows'?

artist: radiohead date: 10/16/2007 category: general music news
rating: 0 / votes: 0 
Radiohead Make 10 Million From 'In Rainbows'?

In spite of Radiohead letting fans pay whatever they like for a CD download of their latest release 'In Rainbows', the Oxford-based band has made quite a mint off the album. While fans only paid about half of what new CDs cost in stores, Radiohead has made nearly $10 million dollars (about £4.8 million) in less than a week.

If what is happening is for real, a revolution in the way audiences receive their music may change the music industry forever. A poll made my Gigwise.com had a total of 3,000 participants saying on average they paid £4 for the album. Multiply that by the 1.2 million copies of the album now on fans' computers, and you get £4.8 million pounds!

Because Radiohead is no longer affiliated with a record label, the vast majority of the 'In Rainbows' profit will go to them, with minimal overheads. Compare this to selling it through an online store (iTunes, Snocap, etc), and they could only see as little as 25% of that profit.

POSTED: 10/16/2007 - 03:38 am
print
share
subscribe to
More Radiohead news:
+ Lost Radiohead Track Revealed As A Hoax general music news 01/04/2012
+ Lost 90s Radiohead Track Surfaces online downloads 12/23/2011
+ Radiohead Stream Two New Songs online downloads 12/20/2011
+ Radiohead To Play UK Arena Tour In 2012? upcoming tours 12/15/2011
+ Radiohead To Release New Material Next Week upcoming releases 12/13/2011
+ view all
comments policy  153  comments posted, 2 removed | this article is 99% spam-free
     
tumples wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:28 am / quote |
Deserved, lets hope more artists follow suit.
     
Shazwazza wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:00 am / quote |
Congrats to Radiohead on this great idea, it has payed off immensely
     
recliner33 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:28 am / quote |
I knew they were going to make alot of money from this but I ddin't know it would be this much so fast. If they released this under a record label then I bet they wouldn't have even made one tenth of this in the first week.
     
soapalot wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:40 am / quote |
Far out, I didn't think they'd make that much that quickly
     
cabbaman98 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 07:55 am / quote |
Well im happy for them. Is the album even that good? I dont own it and also do not have any tracks from it. so yeh...
     
michael_ wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:49 am / quote |
This is definitely the way of the future
     
lilboisX3 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:46 am / quote |
i got it for free im not even a fan of their music its not my style but i dont have anything to lose like 14 bucks. its okay i couldnt say if its good i mean i dont really like the music they make but they have talent
     
MoshMaster101 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:47 am / quote |
cabbaman, its a top top album. Fantastic song after fantastic song. Its well worth getting, seeing as you can choose how much you want to pay for it! If you don't like it, then you haven't wasted a lot of money.

Does anyone know if it's actually legible for the charts?
     
registered_user wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:49 am / quote |
amazing, its so refreshing to see the music industry take a positive turn in terms of new ideas
     
codybcool wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:51 am / quote |
It was obvious they'd make a lot of money thanks to cutting out a 3rd party distributor or record label, but damn that is a lot of money to make in a week. I'm happy that it's a really good album as well.

However, another fault on behalf of the writing team is that this is being reported as fact. Only 3,000 people did that poll, so how you can state that they have made 4.8 million is beyond me.
     
Hondo2112 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:54 am / quote |
Does anyone know if it's actually legible for the charts?

Who cares? The new era is here, IMO. This is something that no one's ever done before. The fans are happy, the bands probably happy if they did indeed get that much money, and who's crying? Th only one's that have NOTHING to do with the music itself in he record labels.
     
dimebagsmygod wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:55 am / quote |
Hell yeah! All though I will still buy the cd for the sake of having a hard copy.
     
Reliktunes wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:55 am / quote |
they sure deserved that 10 mil.
     
richwatkinson wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:58 am / quote |
Reliktunes wrote:

they sure deserved that 10 mil.


Hopefully people wont take this article as radiohead being about the money, but they do deserve it for having the nerve to do something like this.
     
HeyStoopid wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:06 am / quote |
to be fair, john wesley (porcupine tree) did this with his solo albums first!

But its a great idea, and a kickass album!
     
CapnKickass wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:20 am / quote |
yeah, this is great..
     
FunkasPuck wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:20 am / quote |
well, well deserved.
just goes to show, bands can still make money without the record labels deciding everything for them. this could be a landmark event in music history.
     
frankv wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:21 am / quote |
The reason they made this much money is because it's a new idea and they're so big, thus have a big diehard fan base. They were sympathised by the idea and might have paid €10 for it. If this becomes the new way of offering cd's it'll make economic sence if everyone just downloaded it for free again. Only the cd buyers will pay, and not as much as for a cd.
     
Psycho Pigeon wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:23 am / quote |
they're music is so whiney, it makes me wana slit my wrists.
     
thedarkblues06 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:27 am / quote |
Even if it WAS about the money, at least this could kick off a whole new project for Radiohead, take their music to heights they have never reached. I applaud them for this awesome idea.

Psycho Pigeon wrote:

they're music is so whiney, it makes me wana slit my wrists.


Do it. Make sure you run down the road to the mortuary, and not across the street to the hospital. We don't want you to whine anymore anyway.
     
Dakin wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:30 am / quote |
Psycho Pigeon :
they're music is so whiney, it makes me wana slit my wrists.

then be my guest and slit away

but seriously though- the evidence seems a bit sketchy, i know loads of people who just payed nothing for it. surveys and polls dont always get it right.
     
Nick-182 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:31 am / quote |
skills
     
a7xsoad wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:31 am / quote |
Go Radiohead
     
ctb wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:32 am / quote |
In Rainbows appears to be an Epic Win for the band and music history.
     
Shabalaba wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:38 am / quote |
Thats alot for such a short time. I think its only because its radiohead that it paid off, because they are soo big. I personally dont like em but congrats to them
     
tallicafan888 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:45 am / quote |
Well done Radiohead....shame we still have people like Simon Cowell on the record labels.
     
Tallman wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:47 am / quote |
All hail the new system!
     
LosVatos88 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:00 pm / quote |
crazy awesome idea
     
SmarterChild wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:01 pm / quote |
Anyone else think that this was a huge publicity stunt so they can get a load more money, and when other bands try this they'll get sod all, as it'll have been done before and they won't have a record label to promote them?
     
FunkyRenegade wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:06 pm / quote |
Good on them!
It's a brilliant album aswell.
     
duncang wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:06 pm / quote |
That's fantastic for them. This works so well for them because they are already a massively popular band but if this is to become commonplace among all sorts of bands there is one big problem to overcome. New bands will have to pay for all their recording, promotion and all the other things involved in a release that labels cover. While this is easy for Radiohead, new bands will have to struggle to pay up the cash to get their name out there so a release format like this can actually make them a bigger profit than a label release would, considering a label would pay for their promotion and pressing.
     
Dave_young wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:08 pm / quote |
nope.
     
Dave_young wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:09 pm / quote |
(that was to SmarterChild)
     
Cal UK wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:10 pm / quote |
Good for them, hopefully this is the beginning of the end of greedy record labels being used.
     
break-me-in wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:11 pm / quote |
Wonderful news. Hopefully this'll be how the record industry works now.
     
Dr. Metal Head wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:14 pm / quote |
I'm not a fan of Radiohead, but what they've done in my eyes, is hopefully what many will start to do. If more bands do this, less will have their music stolen and they'll get more money.
     
JackMonty wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:16 pm / quote |
codybcool wrote:

It was obvious they'd make a lot of money thanks to cutting out a 3rd party distributor or record label, but damn that is a lot of money to make in a week. I'm happy that it's a really good album as well.

However, another fault on behalf of the writing team is that this is being reported as fact. Only 3,000 people did that poll, so how you can state that they have made 4.8 million is beyond me.


They took the average of what their survey sample stated the paid and multiplied that by the 1.2 million copies sold. This is just a ballpark figure, but even so it stands to reason that they are raking in big $$$ on this project.
     
GiantRaven wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:16 pm / quote |
I hope acts like this don't get exploited if they become commonplace

Good for them for doing so well though
     
~Funky monk~ wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:22 pm / quote |
go Radiohead!
tho i still prefer having he CD ...
you can't really have proper music collection without it...
     
zzany1 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:23 pm / quote |
i think this is still a novelty..when bowling for soup bring out their genre and generation defining (not) next album im not sure they will get people paying a lot.
     
rlysaght wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:27 pm / quote |
Hurray for Radiohead! The RIAA has been putting the screws to both the artist and the consumer for years. I hope this scares those pony-tail havin' Armani suit wearing pr!cks to death. There is blood in the water and the tide is definitely turning in favor of both the fan and the artist.
     
Cheesepuff wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:28 pm / quote |
Damn... this is going to revolutionize music. Watch, 20 years from now this will be one of those legendary records that changed how music was listened to forever.
     
Reiatsu wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:37 pm / quote |
Not a fan of this style of music, but major Kudos for pulling this off.

I REALLY hope that figure is not some rumor that UG picked up on w/o verifying first (which they've been known to do...)

But if it is true, then I have a feeling this is going to be the new wave for purchasing music.

Now if we could only get Metallica to go along with it XD
     
burndttoast wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:38 pm / quote |
I can't imagine many other bands that would make as much money if they do what Radiohead just did.
     
GuitarHero1081 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:44 pm / quote |
They deserved that 10 mill, way to go Radiohead
     
sebbsmith wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:49 pm / quote |
Simply amazing.
     
codybcool wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:50 pm / quote |
"They took the average of what their survey sample stated the paid and multiplied that by the 1.2 million copies sold. This is just a ballpark figure, but even so it stands to reason that they are raking in big $$$ on this project."

I know how it was calculated by the article states this rough, more than likely inaccurate figure, as fact without actually knowing anything, which = writing.
     
codybcool wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:51 pm / quote |
^bad writing that is
     
Absent Mind wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:53 pm / quote |
Congrats to them I say, well done.
     
Chikao42 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:54 pm / quote |
Out of interest, how much money DO most bands see per album sold, in the old way of selling records?
     
7DaySkeptic wrote on 10/16/2007 - 12:55 pm / quote |
That's fantastic news, congratulations Radiohead.
     
creativeboner wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:04 pm / quote |
Amazing.
     
mp3stalin wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:11 pm / quote |
can someone put that in US dollars for me? im a stupid american
     
antareus wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:11 pm / quote |
I'd like to see more statistics behind this before declaring victory over the evil, evil record industry.
     
schecter_guy wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:14 pm / quote |
Chikao42 wrote:

Out of interest, how much money DO most bands see per album sold, in the old way of selling records?

i think i read somewhere that a band signed to a major label only makes like $3 per album sold, meaning you actually make more money per album as an independant artist.
     
yawn wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:18 pm / quote |
To be honest, the extent to which this affects the rest of the music industry is minimal. Radiohead made 10 million because they're already known as one of the biggest bands out there. This type of label-circumventing would only work for big name artists, and certainly not for any band or artist who doesn't have as fruitful of a history as Radiohead's.

That said, I still do not doubt that some other big names in the industry might try this as well, with the only setback being that they might be called "Radiohead rip-offs" and thus the idea might not go over as well (especially when it's evident of just how much the band could make).
     
Nhex wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:33 pm / quote |
well looks like there are ways of making money just by selling records

congrats to them
     
perilouspete wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:36 pm / quote |
that is unbelievable that they made that much just in ONE WEEK! holy shit.....they could be single-handedly rewriting the book on how to market music from now on....that's awesome
     
smidy wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:46 pm / quote |
the moneys in the touring not the albums
     
stevo192 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:47 pm / quote |
yeah this is great. most of the profits going to the people who actually did the work in writing the stuff, rather than the fatcats taking most of the profits
     
Midnight Barber wrote on 10/16/2007 - 01:53 pm / quote |
People in this survey claim to have paid that much. I paid £20 for it.
No I didn't, but someone might believe it and multiply it by 1.2 million to work out how much Radiohead have got.

Really hope they have earned 10 million, but I can't see it being anything like right.
     
lordpaco18 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:01 pm / quote |
this is the future of music

and radiohead deserves every penny for the incredible music
     
S2S wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:13 pm / quote |
Everyone is talking about how the album was distributed instead of the album itself. It's fantastic!

I hope all the guys enjoyed the seven dollars I payed for it. :
     
GL600FB wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:17 pm / quote |
they came up with a great idea and it worked. well deserved
     
 Nelsean   m   wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:33 pm / quote |
Viva la Revolution!
     
damienricecakes wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:40 pm / quote |
10 mill?!! this makes me feel less guilty for paying nothing :P gna buy the album when it comes out though, one of my fav bands and never cease to amaze me, great album
however i dont think the average band could pull this off, i think it will have an impact, not sure about revolutionary
anyhuuu gr8 album
     
Korzack wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:45 pm / quote |
Nice. Wish I came up with that one...
     
seanbaby27 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:51 pm / quote |
Revolutionary. This is going to change the music would for good, I can tell.

What they did was so smart on so many levels. Think about it.

The hardcore radiohead fans are going to buy the albumn, correct? So when they see that the albumn is avaliable at their OWN price? This creates a revolution. Because instead of paying full price and loosing more money then they need to through a record labels pricing system, the fan decideds to go half and half. This in turn supports the band in their endevors, while the consumer saves $ in the proccess!

Sure your gonna have the people who are like "Hey, radiohead is alright, ill download it for free, why not?" Thats a given, however, the true fans will pay and support the band they love, and in mass quantites because of the idea of name your own price.



Brilliant. I hope more bands start to pick up on this trend in the future.
     
shwilly wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:52 pm / quote |
Nah, I don't think this is gonna work in the long run.

I mean, I paid for this stuff, but I'm not going to pay 4 bux for every album I want, because I'm gonna be a poor mother****er if I keep doing this all the time
     
SORocker5678 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:55 pm / quote |
and so tolls the death bell for the record companies. This is bad. All the record companies suddenly going belly up will not be good for our economy no matter how you look at it.
     
aguynamedlarry wrote on 10/16/2007 - 02:56 pm / quote |
The simple problem with this is that while, for an already established band like Radiohead, they don't need a record label to exploit them. The fact is no band is going anywhere without a label at first.
     
Pukka-VCU wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:01 pm / quote |
GL600FB wrote:

they came up with a great idea and it worked. well deserved


While it was deserved, they didn't come up with the idea.... I'd like to see some real sales figures though instead of guesstimation and speculation based on surveys. Incredible album nonetheless, kudos Radiohead.
     
soundgarden1986 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:15 pm / quote |
Good for them
     
blues-guitarist wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:15 pm / quote |
every band should do what radiohead did, that way, they get more money and more people get to listen to it
     
RHCP94 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:16 pm / quote |
Coolio.
     
samerika wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:17 pm / quote |
That's awesome, i liked the idea and it's good to see them profit from it.
     
Widow6 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:18 pm / quote |
HeyStoopid wrote:

to be fair, john wesley (porcupine tree) did this with his solo albums first!

But its a great idea, and a kickass album!


Yeah, and they're all free download now on his myspace page, from what I understand. Btw, I met him last thursday =]

About radiohead, however, i'm thrilled this did so well. A new era with the internet is obviously here, and they showed everyone it's going to work. Good for them.
     
Td_Nights wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:43 pm / quote |
Glad to see a change in the way some people charge for music now.

With the success Radiohead had,others are most likely going to follow suit.

Ozzfest was basically free last time around,so I'm hoping it will be again.

Wonder what lies ahead...
     
Td_Nights wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:44 pm / quote |
blues-guitarist wrote:

every band should do what radiohead did, that way, they get more money and more people get to listen to it


Suppose it COULD happen,but then all the people running the record labels would get pissed because of no money,and they'd bitch and bitch until something happened.

On top of that,alot of newer,just starting bands need a studio to record in,and almost always can't afford their own.
     
Pingis_Or_Death wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:48 pm / quote |
Wow. That is a LOT of money.
     
Godsmack_IV wrote on 10/16/2007 - 03:52 pm / quote |
I'm really happy this worked out for them. They do it for the music, not for the money, but they still get paid.
     
2icdude wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:01 pm / quote |
radiohead comes up with another breakthrough awesome idea.. why doesnt this surprise me lol theyre amazing congrats to them
     
ghost_killaz wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:05 pm / quote |
This is great because Radiohead is such a great well known band...but I dont think it would work for new and upcomming bands so i agree w/TD_Nights' last comment!!
     
Toasty25000 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:11 pm / quote |
Not a bug fan but I think that it's great that a band came forward with this new way to sell the CD, congrats to them.
     
big duck wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:41 pm / quote |
I think it will only work for a while, becuase people who whould never have bought it have bought it for novelty's sake.
     
ScreamingCheeto wrote on 10/16/2007 - 04:46 pm / quote |
this is amazing and surprising. however im skeptical of any "revolution" because the ******* kids all over the place who are unappreciative of the musicians would be donating 25 cents and getting thousands of albums.
     
tehREALcaptain wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:04 pm / quote |
1 point for radiohead
0 for the music industry
     
Confetti wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:06 pm / quote |
Thats one hell of a budjet for one album O,O

If i recall it's sayd that all the profit from this album is gouing to the recording budjet for the next album.
What the heck are they gouing to de with all that money? ;D Make some sick music videos?
It bedder be outstanding record darn it
     
 Dyer's Eve   m   wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:06 pm / quote |
Checked/De-Spammed.
     
piff665 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:09 pm / quote |
Great job by Radiohead. This was a very smart decision even though it could have cost them financially (if that even matters to them). However, i only see this idea working for bands that already have a name for themselves.
     
Tehzekester wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:21 pm / quote |
Good for them, bet they're happy as hell. When my band releases an album I'd love to pull a Radiohead, but Christ, think of the bandwidth they used ._.
     
Parker731 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:29 pm / quote |
dimebagsmygod wrote:

Hell yeah! All though I will still buy the cd for the sake of having a hard copy.

same here
     
dgme92 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:30 pm / quote |
$10m!!!?!! wow, i'm SO glad to see this whole sum of money going radiohead's way instead of some spoiled record company executive.
     
theo_siordia wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:35 pm / quote |
Very Cool
     
CoolDudeMorgasm wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:39 pm / quote |
Kudos to Radiohead.
     
Krisp wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:39 pm / quote |
I think it's a great idea.
     
mister bass guy wrote on 10/16/2007 - 05:57 pm / quote |
leave it to radiohead to start a revolution!
     
qOcOP wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:05 pm / quote |
cool! i downloaded it for free though
     
GrungePb wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:06 pm / quote |
registered_user wrote:

amazing, its so refreshing to see the music industry take a positive turn in terms of new ideas
     
ready2breakdown wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:07 pm / quote |
Thats awesome. Even if the amount is wrong, to even have estimated something in that price range is tremendous. Kudos to them! And I don't even like their music!
     
Godsmack311 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:26 pm / quote |
i still think this is a stupid idea, something physical is 1,000,000,000x better
     
The Spoon wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:27 pm / quote |
Hell yeah thats amazing....

i think it would be a good idea to start out with a label for maybe 1 or 2 albums or whatever and then go the radio head way

but congrats to them
     
 paintITblack39   m   wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:29 pm / quote |
checked.
     
16kramer05 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:29 pm / quote |
Man, I would've contributed too but the stupid download doesn't work for me. I got so pissed off! Anybody else have this problem?
     
WhereArtEsteban wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:31 pm / quote |
Godsmack311 wrote:

i still think this is a stupid idea, something physical is 1,000,000,000x better

Comes out in January man.
     
KileManA7X wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:36 pm / quote |
Dude, I paid nothing.
     
Shredder Guitar wrote on 10/16/2007 - 06:49 pm / quote |
not only did they see who the real fans are, but they got the money instead of a snobby old record executive. radiohead is awesome
     
Rengori wrote on 10/16/2007 - 07:05 pm / quote |
It's nice they're doing this, but I doubt in the future people will pay for albums offered like this. People do pay because they like radiohead or whoever or want to "take down the cooperate fat cats" and then after that, when more bands start to do this, people might not choose to pay.
     
pinkhaze29 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 07:06 pm / quote |
It's good to see some people payed.

I still haven't got the email about downloading it. I got an email saying I'd get info the next day and that was like a week ago =/ could some one message me if they know what I need to do.
     
tbarrettl wrote on 10/16/2007 - 07:16 pm / quote |
richwatkinson wrote:

Reliktunes wrote:

they sure deserved that 10 mil.

Hopefully people wont take this article as radiohead being about the money, but they do deserve it for having the nerve to do something like this.


Well it was a gamble because look at this

KileManA7X wrote:

Dude, I paid nothing.


And they still have a CD out sometime around New Years that may include bonus tracks from what I read.
     
sparky_den wrote on 10/16/2007 - 07:22 pm / quote |
£4 per buyer....quite shite to be honest
     
pancakes wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:11 pm / quote |
record companies will not be pleased.

=]
     
bananaboy wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:17 pm / quote |
This works for a band of Radiohead's scope, but not many bands could pull this off, and definitely no developing bands. It worked for Radiohead because they're so popular, but other bands need money as well as exposure, and they don't get that with this. We don't need to get rid of record labels, we just need some that don't screw bands over.
     
WyldeGibsonPlyr wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:21 pm / quote |
Thats not surprising. The album is so good as it is, and it is Radiohead were talking about anyway.
     
Insolent wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:39 pm / quote |
If some new band were to do this with their debut album, I doubt many people would pay much at all for it. Radiohead already had a huge fan base anticipating the album, hence the sales and generosity. The idea is great, but it'd be more practical with an (appropriate) minimum fee. And for god's sake, if you aren't going to give us a CD at least give us lossless downloads!
     
psilocyndreams2 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:40 pm / quote |
it actually was a brilliant marketing idea, though it would only work for bands with as big of a following as radiohead. even if its like 4 pounds a buyer, that's still much more than they'd make through a record company.
     
kooky_kaymo wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:42 pm / quote |
its genius
     
recliner33 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:44 pm / quote |
yawn wrote:

To be honest, the extent to which this affects the rest of the music industry is minimal. Radiohead made 10 million because they're already known as one of the biggest bands out there. This type of label-circumventing would only work for big name artists, and certainly not for any band or artist who doesn't have as fruitful of a history as Radiohead's.

That said, I still do not doubt that some other big names in the industry might try this as well, with the only setback being that they might be called "Radiohead rip-offs" and thus the idea might not go over as well (especially when it's evident of just how much the band could make).

I disagree with you, smaller bands will make more money this way then with a label. The only problem is that the small bands won't have the expenses to record the album and distribute it, that's what their record labels do. They lend the small bands money and shit to make the albums.
     
elcapitanloco wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:45 pm / quote |
RIP, music industry. And good riddance!
     
llanafreak44 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 08:48 pm / quote |
Not interested in the band, but I think this could be the turning point of the music industry and the RIAA. Very innovative idea.
     
RadioMuse wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:08 pm / quote |
I'm doubtful that Radiohead would keep that kind of money to themselves either. They're sure to spread it around to plenty of worthy causes that they believe in.

What an excellent band. Oh and the music industry is going to grow like crazy as a result of this, the record labels are what's being killed. More music than ever is going to flow to the ears of fans world wide, and as long as live shows remain important to the 'listening experience' then bands will continue to make money and succeed.
     
rebreh wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:22 pm / quote |
this ausome. Destroy the record companys.
     
nklax wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:22 pm / quote |
what a great idea!!! they're geniuses, even when i thought that it wouldn't work.
     
Godsmack311 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:23 pm / quote |
WhereArtEsteban wrote:

Godsmack311 wrote:

i still think this is a stupid idea, something physical is 1,000,000,000x better

Comes out in January man.


sweet i didnt know
     
GoWithTheFlow wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:30 pm / quote |
if this is how music is gunna be then musicians are gunna get real rich
     
Sapient wrote on 10/16/2007 - 09:45 pm / quote |
aguynamedlarry wrote:

The simple problem with this is that while, for an already established band like Radiohead, they don't need a record label to exploit them. The fact is no band is going anywhere without a label at first.


What if we had a "next-gen" record label?

What I'm saying is, what if someone started up a site something a bit like last.fm where they hosted a bunch of band pulling this same trick? it could be almost like music myspace, except you can buy the album from the band at the same time, and the web company would just charge bands something like 40 bucks a year to be hosted, which could in turn lead to free advertising, a place to sell your cd, and a place where you can list tour dates, etc.
What I'm saying is that if this were to become mainstream, bands wouldn't necessarily need labels the way they did a couple years back. There are so many ways to get your band's name out now.
     
Brain245 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:18 pm / quote |
Yes! I'm really glad this worked out. I hope that a ton of other big bands start doing this so the record companies will be forced to offer more money to bands and also move on to smaller bands. Then maybe we'll start hearing more original music on the radio and less of this clone bullcrap that they design and carefully choose to sell to the masses.
     
Kimby wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:27 pm / quote |
That would be sticking it to the man at its finest.
     
yawn wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:34 pm / quote |
recliner33 wrote:I disagree with you, smaller bands will make more money this way then with a label. The only problem is that the small bands won't have the expenses to record the album and distribute it, that's what their record labels do. They lend the small bands money and shit to make the albums.
Exactly...
     
Learn_to_fly wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:37 pm / quote |
Kimby wrote:

That would be sticking it to the man at its finest.


well said brother
     
Nirvana_RATM2 wrote on 10/16/2007 - 10:56 pm / quote |
Never dug radiohead much , but they are making a pure genius move. Any idiot that thinks they are "selling out" is retarded , the artist makes their art , in every sense with out any help ( aka labels etc.. ) and tell to the world , this is my creation tell ME how much its worth. Thats something to be proud of , :cheers: for radiohead!
     
jimmysaint wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:16 pm / quote |
great idea by radiohead! i admire them for it... but as for the album... thumbs down. im not one to diss music.. but im glad i didnt pay $15 for it
     
 Dirk Gently   m   wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:40 pm / quote |
Definitely not a move a small band would be able to pull off, but an interesting idea for more established bands that already have a very dedicated following. For the record, after finding out it was 160k mp3, I paid nothing, but I'll buy the CD when it comes out.
     
carlsbad wrote on 10/16/2007 - 11:57 pm / quote |
Honestly, I don't listen to radiohead but I seriously do beleive that they deserve that money for being the first with the balls to say "Hey, Give me how much you want. You can have my music".
     
suminorudder wrote on 10/17/2007 - 12:30 am / quote |
this is such a fantastic development. i dont like to go out and pay 20 bucks for a cd and hate it, so this seems like the best thing. i can download it for free, then if i like it ill flip them a couple bucks. its so genius of them to stop the middlemen of the industry take all the money and blow up the album price to huge proprtions.
     
DeadDerykk88 wrote on 10/17/2007 - 01:25 am / quote |
Boooo individualism, YAY CORPORATIONS
     
dieloony2 wrote on 10/17/2007 - 01:52 am / quote |
that is amazing.
     
Nybb wrote on 10/17/2007 - 02:19 am / quote |
Other bands have done this before, but props to Radiohead for pulling it off so well. Great album by the way. I'm loving Bodysnatchers and All I Need. I paid nothing for it, but once they release the actual CD I probably will. I certainly will if it comes with extra stuff.
     
pigmaggots wrote on 10/17/2007 - 02:33 am / quote |
Like they need more money.

Its a good idea for established bands but us new ones cudnt do that!
     
pringa wrote on 10/17/2007 - 03:01 am / quote |
we need someone to contact radiohead to borrow money for the UG Missile Base
     
Agony wrote on 10/17/2007 - 03:05 am / quote |
Radiohead did NOT come up with this idea, but it's cool that they did it anyway.
     
LegsOnEarth wrote on 10/17/2007 - 03:49 am / quote |
You fools! they were meant to make nothing!
Stop being so sympathetic!
     
diaspora wrote on 10/17/2007 - 04:52 am / quote |
I've only recently gotten into radiohead, but man, i love them! im happy they made this much money!
     
Forcemaster wrote on 10/17/2007 - 05:15 am / quote |
frankv wrote:

The reason they made this much money is because it's a new idea and they're so big, thus have a big diehard fan base. They were sympathised by the idea and might have paid €10 for it. If this becomes the new way of offering cd's it'll make economic sence if everyone just downloaded it for free again. Only the cd buyers will pay, and not as much as for a cd.


Exactly.
     
fornillia wrote on 10/17/2007 - 06:13 am / quote |
that is cool
     
Birdy266 wrote on 10/17/2007 - 06:19 am / quote |
Thats pretty cool, good to see people actually paid for it
     
Mr_Jubby_Jubs wrote on 10/17/2007 - 06:23 am / quote |
This could be the start of something. Perhaps not if artists always let people pay what they want, but if it was still a lot cheaper it could work.
     
lachlandavis wrote on 10/17/2007 - 08:17 am / quote |
You have to remember though, that only the biggest bands can afford to do it to this extent
     
Badreligionrock wrote on 10/17/2007 - 08:25 am / quote |
I doubt they've made $10m, but even so, well done to them.

However it's still not gonna change the music industry that much; Radiohead can only do this because they have a large, dedicated fanbase and a big name in music to ge this out to the press. Smaller bands would just not be able to do it.
     
Zero457 wrote on 10/17/2007 - 08:27 am / quote |
I think its funny how they used the record company to make them famous, and then turn from the record company and use that fame to make money on their own. It's a common business practice outside of the entertainment industry all over the world. They treated the record deal like an apprenticeship. ...without that... Radiohead would still be playing bars on wednesdays and stuff. (not selling millions)

I think its fantastic that they could be making so much money off the record. CD's cost too much in stores. The consumer responded pretty well when given the choice to get it for a reasonable price.
     
the_witch wrote on 10/17/2007 - 12:30 pm / quote |
zeroyon wrote:
I think its funny how they used the record company to make them famous, and then turn from the record company and use that fame to make money on their own. It's a common business practice outside of the entertainment industry all over the world. They treated the record deal like an apprenticeship. ...without that... Radiohead would still be playing bars on wednesdays and stuff. (not selling millions)

Apparently, record labers and music stores likes ripping off kids' money nowaday. Haven't you heard NIN is off the label too?
     
linkinwayne wrote on 10/22/2007 - 11:56 pm / quote |
Great. Good job to Radiohead. The album is fantastic btw
     
seabass324 wrote on 10/26/2007 - 08:59 pm / quote |
if i were to be in a band and want to record an album i'd just get a job and save up to buy my own equipment and learn everything so i'd never need a label. and as for publication, how about friends i know about 15 people i know would buy it or download it for free or w.e just cus i'm me, they could suggest to another 5 people each and the cycle continues, if it's good it'll get big enough for me no matter what. so if i were to want to be a musician which i already decided that i'd give my music away cus i don't want to make my money off of music, but i'd never get a label, just by my beliefs.
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register and read comments policy first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2012