Slash: 'I Can See Scott Weiland Coming Back to Velvet Revolver, But I Can't See Anybody Accepting Him'

artist: Slash date: 07/21/2014 category: general music news
I like this
111
voted: 12
Slash: 'I Can See Scott Weiland Coming Back to Velvet Revolver, But I Can't See Anybody Accepting Him'
As former Velvet Revolver singer Scott Weiland expressed desire to reunite with the band "to make easy money," guitarist Slash noted that he could in fact see Scott back in the fold, but not without consequences.

"I can see Scott coming back, but I can't see anybody accepting him. That's sort of the case," he told Toronto Sun. "It's not a big deal and I don't want to bad mouth Scott or anything. The whole thing is we're looking for another guy to replace him it just hasn't happened. It's dormant, but there's activity under the radar."

As reported, drummer Matt Sorum recently also noted that VR comeback is a possibility, stressing that it needs to happen "organically."

Back to the Slash interview, the axeman also shared his thoughts on the matter of rock 'n' roll future. "It's good and bad for new bands coming up," he said. "They really have to work their a-- off to make a statement and make something people can relate to.

"For me, I just want to do something that's inspiring ... I get excited about coming up with something that makes me say, 'This is cool; this is not something I did last week.' So I just keep moving in that direction."
More Slash news:
+ Slash Streaming New Album 'World on Fire' Upcoming Releases 09/16/2014
+ Slash Explains Former Rift With Paul Stanley General Music News 09/15/2014
+ Slash Discusses Guns N' Roses Reunion: 'I Can't Picture It' General Music News 09/05/2014
+ Slash Talks New 'World on Fire:' 'The Whole Process Really Started From Nothing' General Music News 08/28/2014
+ Slash Blames Media For Causing 'Unnecessary Conflict' Between Original GN'R Members General Music News 08/22/2014
+ Slash Teases New Single '30 Years to Life' General Music News 08/20/2014
+ view all
Comments
Your captcha is incorrect