Radio Better Than YouTube For Music Discovery

artist: misc date: 08/16/2012 category: industry news
I like this
1611
voted: 27
Radio Better Than YouTube For Music Discovery
New stats have shown that radio is still the most popular place to discover new music in America. 48% of listeners say they discover tracks through the older medium, compared to only 7% on YouTube. However, 64% of teens say that they'll go straight to YouTube once they've discovered a song and want to find it again. Nielsen surveyed 3,000 Americans for its latest 360 report on music consumption, and that only half of teens still listen to music on CDs, though only 36% paid for a CD over the last year. Surprisingly, more teens listen to music on the radio than buy music through iTunes, at 56% and 53% respectively. 54% say they are more likely to buy music based on a friend's recommendation than an endorsement on a music blog, though this suggests social networks can have a big influence over listening habits because people can easily publish their listening habits and opinions to friends online. US album sales fell by 3% in the first half of 2012, though digital sales rose by 6%, according to a Nielsen report in July. Streaming revenues continue to rise, with new stats showing a 40% rise in streaming revenue this year.
More misc news:
+ Today in Killer Young Bands: Crobot Streaming New Single 'Full Moon Howl' Upcoming Releases 04/20/2015
+ Is the Drum Sound in Player's Hands? Yes It Is, Here's Video Proof Entertainment 04/20/2015
+ US Preacher Says Children Who Listen to Metal Should Be 'Smacked Around' WTF? 04/18/2015
+ Astronaut Chris Hadfield to Release Album He Recorded In Space General Music News 04/17/2015
+ Weiland/Bumblefoot/Disturbed Supergroup Art of Anarchy Presents Debut Video ''Til the Dust Is Gone' Upcoming Releases 04/16/2015
+ Exclusive: Legendary Engineer Dave Jerden Shares Amazing Stories About Working With the Stones, AiC, RHCP, Jane's Addiction, Offspring and More General Music News 04/16/2015
+ view all
Comments
Your captcha is incorrect