Wednesday Question: Most Underrated Bands Right Now?

artist: misc date: 01/09/2013 category: ug news
I like this
222
voted: 24
Wednesday Question: Most Underrated Bands Right Now?
Classic rock artists have written some of the best music in history, and many have an established marketing team to help push them to the top of the news pile each day. We love them, but it's time to find some new blood. There's plenty of acts that the UG team wants to cover more in 2013, but since this is a community, we want to get your feedback first. This week's Wednesday Question is: Who are the most underrated bands in the world right now? They could be brand new, or they could be long-established. Either way, you think they deserve more coverage on UG, and you want your fellow readers to hear more about them. Post one nomination per comment, and remember to upvote any nominations that you agree with. We'll post the top 10 results on Friday, and put them firmly on our radar for news coverage and reviews. We're also interested in hearing about underrated labels, so feel free to nominate them too. They won't get on the top 10 bands list, but they might get on the post too, and the UG team will subscribe to their updates. To be clear, this isn't about unsigned acts - we want to hear which artists you love that will be active in 2013. Examples that would work: Tame Impala, Clutch, Tomahawk. Things that won't work: Your cousin's band, anyone unsigned, anyone who has broken up, and anyone on hiatus.
More misc news:
+ Hendrix, Bowie, Satriani Announce Black Friday Record Store Day Exclusives General Music News 10/17/2014
+ War of Words: Johnny Rotten vs. Russell Brand Entertainment 10/17/2014
+ Independent Label Market Returning to London in November Industry News 10/17/2014
+ Top 10 Best Guest Appearances in Rock Entertainment 10/17/2014
+ Not a Single Artist Went Platinum in 2014, Report Confirms General Music News 10/16/2014
+ Music Downloads Fall, While Vinyl Sales Almost Double Industry News 10/16/2014
+ view all
Comments
Your captcha is incorrect