guitar tabs + all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Schecter : C-4 XXX review. 1 review, 12 votes and 15 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

C-4 XXX Review

manufacturer: schecter date: 02/08/2008 category: bass guitars
C-4 XXX
This Schecter C-4-XXX Special Edition Bass has a loud tone, a metal-ish sound, so don't expect to be playing Blues/Jazz music with this one.
 Features:9
 Sound:9
 Action:10
 Reliability:8
 Impression:9
 Overall rating:
 9 
 Users rating:
 4.3 
 Comments:
 15 
 user comments vote for this guitar:
overall: 9
Reviewed by: Hakael, on february 08, 2008
1 of 2 people found this review helpful

Purchased from: Guitar Center

Features: Not sure of the year this bass was made. It's a special edition C4 model Guitar Center exclusive (although discontinued if I understand correctly), 4 string, made in Korea. Being of the C4 family of basses, this shares quite a bit of similarity with the C4 bass with some minor differences. It has a mahogany body with a maple (walnut too), bolt-on neck. Two EMGhz (non-active) pickups with a two band active EQ circuit (requiring a 9v battery). S-Tek bridge (looks like an ABM). The body is done in a glossy black with a cream binding on both body and neck. Pearl "Dancing Girl" inlays adorn the neck. Hardware is done in a dull, metal grey. It strikes a very unique look and is always a conversation starter. // 9

Sound: I listen and like to play various genres of music, with the majority being blues, hard-rock, and heavy metal. This is definitely a hard-rock to heavy metal toned bass. In comparing it with a friends Fender P-Bass (both played through a Peavey Max 110 Bass Combo), the C4 seemed to have a much stronger "punch" to it than the Fender. The best way I can describe it, is it has a much more "modern" voicing than the Fender did. It would lend itself very well to the hard-rock/metal genre, but would be a little overpowering/out of place with less heavy music styles. So if heavier music styles are your thing, this could chug with the best of them, however if you play anything other than hard-rock or metal, you may want to look elsewhere. The sound can further be adjusted by removing the backplate and fooling around with the switches for the onboard EQ. It's also very quiet, and I got very little hum, if any at all, even when standing close by my computer. // 9

Action, Fit & Finish: Since I got it used, I can't really comment on how it may have been setup at the factory. Considering my past experience with Schecter though, I wouldn't expect anything less than satisfactory. Even having been used, there was very little that needed to be adjusted on the bass at all when I got it. The intonation was "spot-on" and the action of the strings is amazingly low with the neck perfectly straight. I get very little if any string buzz out of it (and usually only when I mess something up on my part), and I'm just starting to learn myself. I had a more accomplished friend play it and it sounded perfectly clean with. For a used piece, I can honestly say this had no flaws that I can find, and I unfortunately was the first person I'm sure to put a little dink in the back of the headstock. Otherwise, you couldn't tell it was used from new. // 10

Reliability & Durability: Everything about the guitar seems very solidly built, from the tuners, to the knobs, and the electronics. Everything turned or reacted smoothly, not too loose or too tight. Even gave it a good shake without so much as a rattle or anything seeming out of place. Quality wise, I know this would be able to stand up in a gigging situation. My only gripe really (and an unfortunate big one) is with the bridge. There's approx. 16 little screws that keep the bridge saddles together and in place. The saddles themselves can easily be removed by unscrewing one screw, which if it isn't tightened properly, could possibly send a saddle flying off on an unfortunate string break. Also intonation is a slightly harder chore as there's no intonation screw to move the saddles back and forth and the saddles have to be loosened, then moved by hand. As long as all the screws are kept tight though, the bridge seems as solid as any. Just a lot more complicated than I expected a bridge to be. I still give it a higher than average score mainly because mine currently is pretty solid, and haven't experienced any problems with it. It just takes a little more work, than your average bridge. // 8

Impression: I'm admittedly new to the bass scene and picked this up used at my local GC. I made my initial decisions based on the facts that I own a number of Schecter guitars (including the bass's little brother, the C-1 XXX) and am fond of their quality of construction, playability, and price. Of course, the fact that it matched my C-1 XXX didn't Hurt either. I've been playing guitar for almost a year and picked up this bass to add to my collection as a way to add more variety to my practicing. Aside from the bridge, I think the bass is stellar in almost every way and matches most of the playing styles that I like to play on the guitar. My favorite feature, although it admittedly has nothing to do about it tonewise, is that it matches my C-1 XXX in looks. The fact that it not only looks great, but plays great is a combination I just couldn't pass up. If this was stolen, I'd definitely chase this one down, as these are seemingly getting harder and harder to find. If it was no longer available, the quality of it alone has me sold on Schecter and they would be my first manufacturer to check with when considering a replacement. // 9

 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No Post your comment
 15 
 comments posted
Joshyz^ :
it wouldnt be my favorite looking guitar

POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 06:20 am / quote |
Death-Speak :
Reminds me of Cliff's aria bass in a strange way. I'm not a fan of the inlays though.

Good Review.

POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 09:17 am / quote |
Fett13 :
I'm sorry to say this, but for some reason you don't even know what equipment is on your own bass. That isn't an S-tek bridge, its a diamond custom. There is a HUGE difference between them. The S-tek has four independent sections, one for each string, allowing for more individual stability when there is any change in tension on another sting (such as when you're tuning). Its also a lot sturdier and offers quite a bit more sustain than the custom. The custom is simply a slight step up from the diamond bass (standard Schecter bridge). It offers a bit more stability and sustain, but nothing to jump for joy over.

Also, if you can't manage to get anything other than a metal sound out of two EMG-HZs and a two-band active EQ, you're doing something very wrong. Granted I've got the Stiletto Elite, but the better construction and better bridge don't affect the type of sound that much. With a little thought and effort you can get anything from a deep blues sound to a treble punch reminiscent of a Rickenbacker. You need to play with it a bit more, you certainly aren't doing that bass justice if you're limiting the sound in such a way.

Sorry to go off on you and all, but I'm really picky about these things. They don't call me the Schecterman for nothing.

POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 04:23 pm / quote |
richgray5 :
i had a stilleto, not an elite.....but i decided that I could return it, save a little cash, and get the C4xxx. THis bass plays great...that was the most important thing to me. It might sound lame, but the stripper inlays put it over the top for me. I am manily a guitar player, but I do play bass in a band, and this thing is all I will ever need. yeah, I dont know about "metal" sounds....I cant really disttinguish bass tones, like I can with guitar tones....so I cant really comment on that, but I for sure, do not play in a metal band, and I have never been negatively critiqued about my sound or how my bass has strippers in teh inlays.
POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 04:35 pm / quote |
Hakael :
Unfortunately specification information regarding the C4XXX bass is severely lacking. A number of places I found information (although sketchy) named the bridge an S-Tek. As I don't have another bass to compare it too, I went with what I found.

As far as the tone was concerned, I never said it couldn't play anything other than hard-rock or metal, just it was better suited for it, and if you played anything other than that, there were probably other bass models that would fit the bill better.

POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 04:50 pm / quote |
richgray5 :
....also, my bridge....is not held together by 16 little screws. I am wondering if maybe yours was replaced? My bridge is held on my 4 screws...the same bridge that is on every C-model, that I have seen.
POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 04:58 pm / quote |
Hakael :
richgray5 wrote:

....also, my bridge....is not held together by 16 little screws. I am wondering if maybe yours was replaced? My bridge is held on my 4 screws...the same bridge that is on every C-model, that I have seen.

I was referring to the smaller "adjustment" screws on the saddles (four apiece). There's four larger screws that actually keep the bridge on the body.

POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 05:10 pm / quote |
richgray5 :
i just inspected my bridge....mine is held on by 4 screws, not 16.....are you sure your bridge wasnt replaced?
POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 06:10 pm / quote |
richgray5 :
wow, i am an idiot, i guess I forgot that i responded already about the # of screws...mine does have 4 per saddle.
POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 06:13 pm / quote |
LaidBack :
i have it. i love it. simple.
POSTED: 02/08/2008 - 06:24 pm / quote |
Pingis_Or_Death :
I think it looks rather ugly...
POSTED: 02/09/2008 - 04:39 am / quote |
Shredder Guitar :
Fett13 wrote:

Sorry to go off on you and all, but I'm really picky about these things. They don't call me the Schecterman for nothing.


what in the hell are you talking about? the kid is just going by information he found somewhere else. settle down a tad, its a bass, not some holy weapon from the dark ages.

POSTED: 02/10/2008 - 08:45 pm / quote |
Shredder Guitar :
i meant guy, not kid lol.
POSTED: 02/10/2008 - 08:46 pm / quote |
Hakael :
Shredder Guitar wrote:

i meant guy, not kid lol.


LOL, at my age, you start to take "kid" from any context as a compliment.

POSTED: 02/11/2008 - 12:09 am / quote |
Fett13 :
Shredder Guitar wrote:

Fett13 wrote:

Sorry to go off on you and all, but I'm really picky about these things. They don't call me the Schecterman for nothing.

what in the hell are you talking about? the kid is just going by information he found somewhere else. settle down a tad, its a bass, not some holy weapon from the dark ages.


Its a simple matter of a little research. If you're going to make a review listing technical specifications, you need to be damn sure you got it right. When you start listing the wrong things it kinda defeats the purpose of the review as to whether the bass is good or not. And its not difficult to go on the Schecter website, realize they discontinued the bass, but look at all the other pictures of basses on there and realize its is very obviously not an S-tek bridge.

POSTED: 02/12/2008 - 02:14 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2007