guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Beatles : Anthology 1 review. 1 review, 18 votes and 13 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Anthology 1 Review

artist: beatles date: 11/03/2009 category: compact discs
Anthology 1
 Sound:9
 Lyrics:8
 Impression:8
 Overall rating:
 8.3 
 Users rating:
 6.8 
 Comments:
 13 
 user commentsvote for this cd: 
overall: 8.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 13 
 comments posted
Jesus_Dean :
There’s no denying that the Beatles were one of the most influential bands ever. They had the freedom of doing in the studio anything that they wanted, regardless of how silly or senseless it may have seemed at the time. There is a diversity in the Beatles music that can be found nowhere else. Bands today have a certain style or format that the record label dictates which doesn’t allow them to be as creative as they otherwise could be.

I once read an interview with Janis Joplin where she complained (laughingly) about not being able to come up with new sounds or styles because the Beatles had already done it.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 07:04 am / quote |
KurdtStaley :
Jesus_Dean wrote:
Bands today have a certain style or format that the record label dictates which doesn’t allow them to be as creative as they otherwise could be.


ugh not true.. try listening to Brand New and Nirvana. They display way more contrast from album to album.

also, why even review this? "the same old beatles you've been hearing for thirty years but with better sound quality" = entire review.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 11:40 am / quote |
Weyngott :
KurdtStaley wrote:
also, why even review this? "the same old beatles you've been hearing for thirty years but with better sound quality" = entire review.


Not to offend you... But do you have any idea what this album even is? It's not remastered Beatles, its almost the opposite: Demos, instrumentals, songs in mono and songs that never made it on the albums. So your logic won't work.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 12:36 pm / quote |
yus_yus_13 :
KurdtStaley wrote:
ugh not true.. try listening to Brand New and Nirvana. They display way more contrast from album to album.


Are you serious? You've obviously not been well acquainted with the Beatles catalogue.

A Hard Day's Night -> Rubber Soul -> Revolver -> Sgt. Pepper's -> The White Album -> Abbey Road

I left out a few, but each one of these steps were some of the most gradual musical changes by any band in the commercial music industry. I love Nirvana and own all three of their studio albums, but groups like this don't throw a stone on some of the greats of the 60s and 70s when it comes to album diversity

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 01:13 pm / quote |
fiktion :
KurdtStaley wrote:
ugh not true.. try listening to Brand New and Nirvana. They display way more contrast from album to album.

also, why even review this? "the same old beatles you've been hearing for thirty years but with better sound quality" = entire review.


Lol. Hahahaha. Wow... Nirvana shows way more contrast than the Beatles? Not even. You are completely misinformed about everything you responded to. As Wyngott pointed out, this is way more than just remastered Beatles.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 02:23 pm / quote |
Jesus_Dean :
@Weyngott / yus_yus_13 / fiktion: You guys beat me to it! Thanx!
POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 03:47 pm / quote |
shmoper10 :
I like the beatles
POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 05:04 pm / quote |
-Dylan :
KurdtStaley wrote:

Jesus_Dean wrote:
Bands today have a certain style or format that the record label dictates which doesn’t allow them to be as creative as they otherwise could be.

ugh not true.. try listening to Brand New and Nirvana. They display way more contrast from album to album.

also, why even review this? "the same old beatles you've been hearing for thirty years but with better sound quality" = entire review.

you're a dumbass....

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 06:47 pm / quote |
jean_genie :
Also, note that even though some acts changed more than the Beatles (David Bowie is the most diverse musician I can think of offhand), no one else did as much in such a short amount of time While the Beatles were around for a while, their studio albums were made in ten years' time.

The Beatles aren't my favourite band - even though they're up there - but I can't think of a single band that did even half as much new stuff as they did in ten years. It's almost like they were sent back from the future with a checklist. Almost every record has a different sound, every record was great (even though not every track was great), and most importantly, every sound was NEW.

Meet The Beatles/With the Beatles launched the Britpop movement.

Magical Mystery Tour launched the Psychedelic movement. Which in turn, created Metal. Beatles, Jefferson Airplane, Steppenwolf, Sabbath, Maiden. There's your timeline.

Let it Be launched the Singer/Songwriter movement.

Between these guys, Bob Dylan(or Woody Guthrie if you're a purist), and Chuck Berry comes basically all modern pop and rock. It just takes some 'in between' steps like Quicksilver Messenger Service and Blue Cheer that, unfortunately, not nearly enough people are familiar with today.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 07:34 pm / quote |
KurdtStaley :
yus_yus_13 wrote:
Are you serious? You've obviously not been well acquainted with the Beatles catalogue.

A Hard Day's Night -> Rubber Soul -> Revolver -> Sgt. Pepper's -> The White Album -> Abbey Road

I left out a few, but each one of these steps were some of the most gradual musical changes by any band in the commercial music industry. I love Nirvana and own all three of their studio albums, but groups like this don't throw a stone on some of the greats of the 60s and 70s when it comes to album diversity


um you're trying to argue with me but you actually just agreed with me. I said they display a larger contrast from one album to the next as in from album A to A to B and then from B to C. The beatles changed more over their entire career from album A to K (or whatever it would be) but they've also had a much longer career than either of those bands.

fiktion wrote
Lol. Hahahaha. Wow... Nirvana shows way more contrast than the Beatles? Not even. You are completely misinformed about everything you responded to. As Wyngott pointed out, this is way more than just remastered Beatles.


Then to this idiot, who obviously doesn't understand english. You think there is more of a contrast from Help to a Hard Days Night than there is from Bleach to Nevermind? You're "obviously misinformed" about what the word "next" means. And no this isn't original. I have these anthology albums or something exactly the same under a different name that has all the beatles oddities and covers from their early years. So in fact you're the misinformed one but that's not surprising since you can't understand english, it must be hard to be well read.

POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 08:52 pm / quote |
hairy-southpaw :
Nevermind is nothing more than a more focused Bleach. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that though. Both are really great albums.
POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 09:59 pm / quote |
steve108819 :
KurdtStaley has no clue what he's talking about. The reason Bleach and Nevermind sound so different comes down to one word. Budget. Anyone that would put The Beatles and Nirvana in the same sentence must be taken with a grain of salt.
POSTED: 11/03/2009 - 10:29 pm / quote |
leatherjackets9 :
Are you serious? You've obviously not been well acquainted with the Beatles catalogue.

A Hard Day's Night -> Rubber Soul -> Revolver -> Sgt. Pepper's -> The White Album -> Abbey Road

I left out a few, but each one of these steps were some of the most gradual musical changes by any band in the commercial music industry. I love Nirvana and own all three of their studio albums, but groups like this don't throw a stone on some of the greats of the 60s and 70s when it comes to album diversity.
i like leather jackets

POSTED: 11/10/2009 - 02:37 am / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009