guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Guns N Roses : Chinese Democracy review. 24 reviews, 746 votes and 411 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Chinese Democracy Review

artist: guns n roses date: 10/16/2009 category: compact discs
Chinese Democracy
 Sound:7.3
 Lyrics:7.7
 Impression:7.3
 Overall rating:
 7.4 
 Users rating:
 7.2 
 Comments:
 411 
 user commentsvote for this cd: 
overall: 7.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 4.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 6.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 2.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 2.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 411 
 comments posted, 25 removed | this article is 94% spam-free
TheFrog :
wow im the first to comment!!!!

Its not really gnr though iz it i mean its like an axl rose band or something.

Axl Slash Steven Izzy Duff= GN'R and nothing else!!!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:29 am / quote |
JackOSF :
lol, yeah i thought more people would've been interested in this XD

listening to the aklbum though, it's not the same anymore.still good, but very very different to appetite for destruction etc.

id give it an 8/10, but im still on the hype so it might drop a bit

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:33 am / quote |
wiggyisgreat :
Meh I don't think 14 years in the making or whatever has paid off. Good review
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:37 am / quote |
[x]Huffy[x] :
^ 17 years.

I quite like Chinese Democracy. It surprised me quite a bit.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:42 am / quote |
Tenacious D'er :
wiggyisgreat wrote:

Meh I don't think 14 years in the making or whatever has paid off. Good review


Agreed, I haven't fully listened to it, but what I've heard isn't as good as it could have been with 14 years and such skilled musicians helping.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:42 am / quote |
jobling08 :
this is a good album and a good review, though i think they were a bit harsh on the chinese democracy song itself, its a new sounding Guns N Roses, although it should have been called Axl Rose and friends or something else like that
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:45 am / quote |
aaciseric :
I disagree with what you said about 'There Was A Time' but I think it's a great album overall, definately a fair analysis of the songs.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:45 am / quote |
dinley :
ima go buy it for the hell of it
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:47 am / quote |
Shabalaba :
Not worth the time spent on it, i found creativity to just be very lacking in most songs. Good review
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:49 am / quote |
OMEB :
I would appreciate this as am AXL solo album, which in essence it is. There are a couple good songs on this album, but nothing that lives up to the hype and the name Guns n' Roses!

Get the band back together and quit being an idiot, Axl. A GN'R Reunion right now would be bigger than the second coming of Christ. If you wait much longer you'll miss out on the chance!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:50 am / quote |
lbj273 :
Definatly not worth the wait, I am rather disappointed
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:52 am / quote |
98Timberwolf :
Hmm...I actually liked "Shackler's Revenge." My personal favorite is "Better." This album is about as good as I thought it would be, but not great. My biggest complaint is that I wasn't able to get a free Dr. Pepper
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:55 am / quote |
Steve The Plank :
I thought 'If The World' was ****ing epic and a great tune, especially through the headphones.

Wouldn't rate the album very well as a whole though, but it has its moments.

I prefer the guitar work on it to most classic GnR personally.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:56 am / quote |
fukkindoyle :
i hated this album. i used to have a lot of respect for axl, and i'm glad he finally released this, but in my personal opinion, it just sounds like he's trying to fit into the mainstream.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:00 pm / quote |
cam_sampbell :
Spaghetti Incident wasn't atrocious!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:00 pm / quote |
Chimpy101 :
I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:01 pm / quote |
Cruel :
Major shite to be honest, dissapointment at it's finest.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:03 pm / quote |
mlukeroberts222 :
Very good, in-depth review that saved me some money...oh wait, I wasn't going to buy this crap anyway. But good review though.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:04 pm / quote |
gr1170 :
This albums biggest problem is going the fact that it is almost a different band. If you can put aside preconceived notions it is a great album, make sure to listen to it as a whole too, it grows on you.

"This I love" is beautiful, if anything at least listen to that song.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:05 pm / quote |
RGshred88 :
me and my dad went and got it as soon as it came out....i miss the good music they once made.....
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:05 pm / quote |
EEE_ELLL_OHH :
Amazing. BEST. ALBUM. EVER!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:08 pm / quote |
add_g :
kinda disapointing for an album that took 17 years to make. i couldn't even get the coupon for my free dr. pepper
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:15 pm / quote |
nick9790 :
After much deliberation about whether or not i was going to actually listen to this album, i couldn't resist logging on to the GNR myspace...The album was not worth the 17 years it took to record, but it is a musical accomplishment for Mr. Rose. He takes many risks that many musicians wouldn't even dare to touch. it makes me wonder what the producers thoughts were...they must have been tearing their hair out! Good album in a musical sense. The experimentation was refreshing. But it is not a GNR album...It will forever in my mind be an Axl Rose record.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:15 pm / quote |
EEE_ELLL_OHH :
Also this review was kinda biased, lacking in true facts and just generally a bit shit.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:16 pm / quote |
The Eyes of OZ :
gr1170 wrote:

This albums biggest problem is going the fact that it is almost a different band. If you can put aside preconceived notions it is a great album, make sure to listen to it as a whole too, it grows on you.

"This I love" is beautiful, if anything at least listen to that song.


I agree with him, you can't go into expecting the old GnR at all. This is a different band 15 years on, lots of growth and changes in the music direction, some familiarity remains, but this is a new GnR guys. Get past that and this is a VERY good album. Not a masterpiece, but a good comeback record none the less.

I guess Axl has 3 possibly 4 records almost ready, with the third to be released in 2012.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:17 pm / quote |
highwayone73 :
*Listens, Drops Forehead in to hands*
I'm not mad like i was when Metallica released St. Anger, I'm just disappointed. 14 years and 40 mil, Axl's gonna have to tour til death to make that back. Put the ego down, pick the phone up and apologize to slash, duff, and sorum and make a good album.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:18 pm / quote |
Ginger-les-tom :
EEE_ELLL_OHH :
Amazing. BEST. ALBUM. EVER!


ARE YOU SERIOUS ?!
This album will never be a scratch on Appetite for Destruction or Use Your Illusion 1&2, this is just Axl Rose making a peice of crap, with 4/5 of the talent of Guns N Roses missing, it's not Guns N Roses, just Axl wasting our time taking ages to release a crap album.

Having said that, back in the Guns N Roses hay-days, 1980's and early 1990's he was a very good front man.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:19 pm / quote |
metallica4evr :
i didnt hear much off the album...but from what i heard i'm VERY disappointed....it doesnt even sound like GN'R...
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:20 pm / quote |
SlashFan810 :
Haha I expected this...Rose's talents and interests barey holding the album together with muddled and lacking contributions from the band, all confused by unecessary electronics. When I hear these tracks, I hear good concepts that could have turned out great in the hands of the right people- of course the old GNR crew. At least this shows Rose still has talent for a reunion or solo project in the future, I don't think he has anything else in mind but making music.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:20 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
cam_sampbell wrote:

Spaghetti Incident wasn't atrocious!
i know i actually liked that album

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:22 pm / quote |
scarfacesuit :
Considering the fact that I listened to it and knew it wouldn't be Guns N' Roses anyway, I still didn't like it. One song sounded like it was R&B or something... what happened to the rock music he used to make?
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:24 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:25 pm / quote |
seekmetal :
Although Play still haven't sent me the album I have the final version several times and I think it's great. People who were expecting it to sound like Guns are just stupid. They all lef him long ago so now its just Axl. But proves once and for all what a great songwrite he is.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:29 pm / quote |
PaulieIommi :
Haha I expected this...Rose's talents and interests barey holding the album together with muddled and lacking contributions from the band, all confused by unecessary electronics. When I hear these tracks, I hear good concepts that could have turned out great in the hands of the right people- of course the old GNR crew. At least this shows Rose still has talent for a reunion or solo project in the future, I don't think he has anything else in mind but making music.

This may as well have been a solo project anyway, it was practically an entirely different band on every song. Still quite like it though.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:30 pm / quote |
FaceTomorrow :
this is a good album. To my surprise that is. Slash & co are not really missed. Just too bad that it took so long. This made expectations higher than Axl could possibly live up to. But he did a good job.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:33 pm / quote |
Smcash :
This album sounds exactly like what it was: Axl Rose with pretty much a bunch of studio musicians...A lot of talent and no chemistry. And it pains me to say it, but the song Chinese Democracy is actually pretty good. I catch myself singing it sometimes.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:35 pm / quote |
sabaka151 :
the name of the band needs to change, its not GNR, its axl roses, or the axl road show... GNR was one of the best bands ever and this isn't GNR.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:37 pm / quote |
LifesSweetDrug :
sabaka151 wrote:

the name of the band needs to change, its not GNR, its axl roses, or the axl road show... GNR was one of the best bands ever and this isn't GNR.


I agree, they should put it out as an Axl only project.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:39 pm / quote |
Gunpowder :
This isn't GN'R; it's not a bad album, but this band can't rightly call itself GN'R. Did anyone else who played even get writer's credit?
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:39 pm / quote |
daza_guitarman :
The thing that really gave GNR their awsomeness (how u spell it?) was the way that all the musicians connected with everyone and the axl was with all the musicains, until he bacame a control freak. I'm still gunna buy it but my expectations are down low, comparing to appetite.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:40 pm / quote |
mercurymay :
Richycinsideme wrote:

bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic


Agreed. It's easily hands down my favorite album in the world. I've been listening to it non stop for about a week. I understand where the reviewers are coming from, I just don't share their view.

FYI, I'm a huge fan of Appetite. Axl has changed music yet again.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:40 pm / quote |
SuicidalFreak :
I can't believe this album actually happened, but it's too bad that Slash, Izzy and Duff don't play on this album.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:42 pm / quote |
Spoony_Bard :
I'm just glad it's out already! Now we can stop the Chinese Democracy jokes and go back to taking stabs at St. Anger like good Christian hecklers!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:42 pm / quote |
heavyprog :
I was kinda pissed too about the bashing the Spaghetti Incident received. I have a lot of great memories of listening to that album. Coming from someone who doesn't really listen to punk music, I really dug those songs.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:43 pm / quote |
sabaka151 :
Spoony_Bard wrote:

I'm just glad it's out already! Now we can stop the Chinese Democracy jokes and go back to taking stabs at St. Anger like good Christian hecklers!


now thats comedy!!!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:44 pm / quote |
ChucklesMginty :
People just don't get it, he's not gonna spend millions of dollars, and 20 years, to make something that sounds the same as the old stuff.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:48 pm / quote |
srvkicks@$$ :
i think guns n roses over the years has developed like a heart. the right side would be axl rose the left side would be slash and izzy.

after a long time the left side gets cut out and replaced with a new artificial heart (buckethead)


the left side of the heart was never the same as the the original and soon was rejected by the right side of the heart

and this album is kind of like a defribulator trying to revive this dead heart

it will probably run for awile until it realizes it is only half of a heart and it will die trying to keep up

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:50 pm / quote |
Ponchibego :
This is kinda like the albums Metallica has been releasing.... It's not living up to the bands name but there 3-4 good songs on the album. At least we can hope that now the album is out it opens up the chances of a reunion tour in the future. I'd give this more than a 7.3 maybe like an 8.5 or so.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:51 pm / quote |
makutoid :
i think the review got it spot on personally. it's good and i love it but i think i might still be on the hype of it. definately not guns n roses anymore but there is still an element of the energy that used to be there. i had seriously low expectations before but i've been proved wrong. these guys deserve credit for this album with exeptions of a few songs.
i have to say though, 17 years is ridiculous to only cough up this. that time span should have been so much better if Axl bloody Rose could keep a few good musicians under his belt for the process of making this album. great guitar solos mostly, great riffs in most songs and generally, pretty dam good

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:54 pm / quote |
slashprodigy :
it must be said that better is an awesome song, i can't actually flaw it, its catchy, has old school sounding solo reminiscent of slash in a way and still has a guns effect to it. better its by far the best on the cd and is a good song even in comparison to the old school classics.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:55 pm / quote |
makutoid :
oh, forgot one thing.
my rating, 8/10 compared to Appetite which for me is definitely a 10

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:55 pm / quote |
ChucklesMginty :
I disagree with everything in this review.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:56 pm / quote |
sabaka151 :
HELLAWAITS88: yet again you are totally right!

The content of the album is ok, thing special... but the main problem here is with then name and the band, axle didn't make GNR, 5 guys playing together made the band. and if you want to get really specific sweet child of mine was thier first commercial success and what really put them on the map, (Slash came up with that riff) so lets treat this like its supposed to be treated, Axel's solo project...

The next album is called "American Communism" coming out in February 6, 2062. When Axel turns 100

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:57 pm / quote |
Fauche :
Not a Guns n' Roses album, this is an Axl album, and that doesn't interest me.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:58 pm / quote |
Shinsen88 :
Well obviously it doesn't live up to the expectations. Still... I guess I'll probably check it out.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:58 pm / quote |
slashprodigy :
and as much as most of you may hate axl, look at what happened to velvet revolver, hey dont get me wrong they are good, but there vocals and lyrics look like trash compared to axl's. except shackler's revenge, that song is just a mess. you can say what you want about the it nt being GNR without slash/ duff/ sorum/ izzy etc, but its stands without axl, gnr would not be what it is and was. He is iraplaceable
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 12:58 pm / quote |
srvkicks@$$ :
i didnt mean to get all philosophical on my last comment i just want ppl to relize guns n roses is going to die

and we shouldnt let it suffer we should put it out of its mizery with a shot to the head

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:00 pm / quote |
SGibson666 :
"If The World" = Fail on Epic humor
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:02 pm / quote |
Noverion :
I thought that review was crap, i mean, it was well done in all, but i think that IRS and Madagascar are two of my favourite GnR songs of all time. Absoloutely love the album. No, its not Appetite for Destruction, but did anyone expect it to be?

Shacklers Revenge is superb as well, sure, the guitar playing isnt slash, but ya know, just because its a different guitarist (in this case it sounds like Buckethead to me) doesnt mean it can't be good! Someone needs to review this without comparing it to the previous works.

Having said that i do agree that This I Love is the best track on the album.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:02 pm / quote |
slashprodigy :
one does get the impression tho, that some of those songs were a desperate attempt or were put on because they didn't know what else to use. apparently they have more material and are already preparing a new album, lol wonder when we can expect that tho
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:02 pm / quote |
slashprodigy :
shackler's revenge? are you serious? what interests you about that song? the guitar is horrible and recording is distorted, not a fan of the lyrics either, they have no deep meaning or catchy-ness to them, it sounds like an out of space song from ET
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:05 pm / quote |
BTKA :
srvkicks@$$ wrote:

i think guns n roses over the years has developed like a heart. the right side would be axl rose the left side would be slash and izzy.

after a long time the left side gets cut out and replaced with a new artificial heart (buckethead)


the left side of the heart was never the same as the the original and soon was rejected by the right side of the heart

and this album is kind of like a defribulator trying to revive this dead heart

it will probably run for awile until it realizes it is only half of a heart and it will die trying to keep up


But heartless but fair!!!! lol

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:06 pm / quote |
slashprodigy :
this album is better than metallica - death magnet (is crap)! ac dc black ice is the ebst new album form old school bands
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:06 pm / quote |
Lick_Soloist :
I really can't understand the high amount of skepticism and criticism on offer within this review, it is almost as if the reviewer cannot forgive the sheer amount of time the album has taken to be released. It is unconventional! Personally for me I love it although it is a different beast to previous studio offerings the album reflects maturity; a diverse sound which only Axl Rose could have produced. After 24 hours of repetative listening I continue to discover melodies, hooks, hidden dubs and im sure the album will continue to bloom. Rose has developed his musical direction and rightly so, no one expected another appetite and had he meerly created a similar offering, disapointment would be found in droves. Axl has "stuck to his Gun's" (no pun intended) and created something so collosal and magnificent it is almost impossible to find geniune flaws beyond maters of taste. The album will gain classic status and rightly so. I question the integrity of the reviewer and suggest further listening rather than produce structured dross filled with few constructive observations which themselves are rooted in cliche and devoid of language with justifies brilliance. Ultimate Guitar and its thousands of members deserve so much more than this review, another review should be posted which reflects the album, not one rooted in maters of taste.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:08 pm / quote |
Empathica1928 :
ChucklesMginty wrote:

I disagree with everything in this review.


I do, too.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:08 pm / quote |
rhcp-legends :
its kinda funny that this album was started before i was born and its only finished now
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:13 pm / quote |
SnookM :
I scrolled down here expecting to see:
Plain haters
People saying it isn't GN'R it's Axl and friends
People saying it's not as good as Appetite
People bashing just cause it's fun to bash

Everything I saw, this is stupid if you don't like it why are you commenting, we value your opinion if you're posting your opinion, constructive critisism or whatever but shut up!


POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:13 pm / quote |
pawnshopguitars :
mercurymay wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic


Agreed. It's easily hands down my favorite album in the world. I've been listening to it non stop for about a week. I understand where the reviewers are coming from, I just don't share their view.

FYI, I'm a huge fan of Appetite. Axl has changed music yet again.


I was going to write a comment, but this one is exactly what I would have written. So I'll just quote it instead.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:20 pm / quote |
korinaflyingv :
I like this album, I'd probably give it 7 or 8 /10
but it really should have been released as a solo album... i mean most of the tracks (except for the vocals) bear no resemblance whatsoever to GnR

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:23 pm / quote |
guttersnake :
piece of crap.Axl lick a pole.Call the band Axl and the new wave or something only a couple of songs similar to GNR.I can do without it.Haven't heard St Anger but sure I would like that better.Anyone who says dont compare it to GNR,well change the band name then. Theres only a couple of songs worth listening to. I got tired of his screeching a long time ago.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:28 pm / quote |
Ben_Eaglesfield :
I wish people would stop saying things along the lines of

"Its not GnR without slash/izzy/duff/ etcetc

Thing is guys, it is.
Yeah, slash has his own style, and its a fairly distinctive one at the best of times.
Thing is, his guitar parts are fairly easily replicated, evidenced by the fact that the re-recordings of appetite songs are virtually note for note perfect. I'd also like to point out that while people are familiar with seeing izzy and duffs mugs on the old appetite logo, they don't have an amazingly recognisable vibe about them IMO.

I mean, take a look at Megadeth. I'm, absolutely nuts over them, but, i don't call it the Dave Mustaine show or whatever, that bands line-up changes like the wind. People rarely comment on that, and the only reason i can make out that they comment on this line-up so frequently is because after 15 years of waiting for an album Axl said not to wait for, you're gonna run out of things to comment on.

I'm not saying that this GnR is better or worse, im just saying it IS GnR, even if theres only Axl and the occasional walk-in from dizzy.....

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:30 pm / quote |
ballabds4555 :
heres the thing i really love this record..but the die hard GNr fans wont =(..im really buckethead influnced and this album has buckethead wrtitin all over it...i gave it a 9 i love the musical parts burt axls voice gets old after awhile.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:39 pm / quote |
megadethirish :
Absolutely terrible...
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:40 pm / quote |
guttersnake :
I dont know what kind of expectations can be put on it much less lofty ones.What was the reviewer thinking when he said that? Guns has been out of the spot light for so long now. I guess this is what you could expect something totally different. I can him his due for staying current and not just rehashing like so many AC DC cuts but I still like the Aussies better than this.I listened to most of this at least the parts I could stand to listen too. That ballad wasn't that great just a song to hook the women with.I thought the last song on there was OK. I am pretty diverse when It comes to what I will listen to.I know other pople will disagree but I like the new Metallica better than this has some old and new to it that keeps me interested.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:42 pm / quote |
theotherguy7145 :
no doubt he can write songs. they're all well written. just not very catchy. certainly not gnr
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:43 pm / quote |
Mechanixx :
I consider GnR my favorite band of all time but what ive heard from this album is decidedly average, and not what Guns N Roses are.

I can listen to any song from Appetite, Lies, UYI 1 and 2 and enjoy it (barring My world). ANd I thought Spaghetti incident had some great moments on it for a covers album.

But this is a huge letdown. That said I havnt heard the whole album, but from what I have heard.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:43 pm / quote |
jjdude :
Personally forget the old band GNR is no longer a band. GNR is more of a franchise imo great artists using the brand name to get the music heard. The album is stellar from top to bottom a few blips here and there but compare it to the new killers album or Ac/dc who are giving us the same old dad rock(not that it isnt good dad rock;p)Chinese Democracy knocks spots off them.

People are always gonna bash it because it is different and they are afraid of something new. The fact is no other artist today has the guts to try something different they are content to give us the same old dribble to sell records.

Axl/GNR may have taken 14 or so years but it has been well worth the wait to hear and see a group of gifted musicians pour their heart out into an album the result is amazing. So sit back forget GNR and listen to the sweet sweet music

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:44 pm / quote |
MasterExploder0 :
TheFrog wrote:

wow im the first to comment!!!!

Its not really gnr though iz it i mean its like an axl rose band or something.

Axl Slash Steven Izzy Duff= GN'R and nothing else!!!


Exactly!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:44 pm / quote |
Silas S Thompso :
Agreed it is a new them. One thing I didn't like is it seemed like axl was aiming a young audience. I remember a few years ago hearing a recording of madagascar one the first times it was supposed to come out and I loved that song. Now that I've heard the new one I hate it. Axl butchered the song. The drums were so annoying and that keyboard in the verse was agravating.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:47 pm / quote |
Saintsatan :
The ballads on this are immense.


Nothing else.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:48 pm / quote |
BlisteringDDj :
Richycinsideme wrote:

cam_sampbell wrote:

Spaghetti Incident wasn't atrocious!i know i actually liked that album


Isn't that a bunch of covers anyway? their version of Hair Of The Dog is horrible at least.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:50 pm / quote |
The_Moth :
I can't believe that no one is going to just come out and say it; this album blows. It sucks. It's god awful. That song where Axl sounds like he's about to cry.... someone should have told him that the album wasn't a rock opera. He's not going to Broadway. I think perhaps the reason people aren't lashing out is because, somewhat in the vein of the new Star Wars movies, it's in a certain sense, just very comforting to hear the voice of an old friend; i.e. Axl Rose. However, if you go back and really put yourself in your old shoes when you heard songs off Appetite and the Illusion albums you'll remember what the band really was like and the sound and fury that was GNR. We're mostly guitarist here. Like it or not, Slash is a guitar LEGEND and his absence from this album isn't merely disappointing; it's a deal breaker. From this album we finally have conformation that Slash was the genius behind GNR and that Axl is a hack riding the coattails of those who have within them greatness. Chinese Democracy is horrible. It's a joke. It's the last breath of an old dying ***** who would have done better to off herself years ago rather than suffer embarrassment of such a laughable fate.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:52 pm / quote |
Empathica1928 :
ballabds4555 wrote:

heres the thing i really love this record..but the die hard GNr fans wont =(..im really buckethead influnced and this album has buckethead wrtitin all over it...i gave it a 9 i love the musical parts burt axls voice gets old after awhile.


I'm a diehard GnR fan and I think this is some of the best work the band has ever put out.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:54 pm / quote |
Empathica1928 :
BlisteringDDj wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

cam_sampbell wrote:

Spaghetti Incident wasn't atrocious!i know i actually liked that album

Isn't that a bunch of covers anyway? their version of Hair Of The Dog is horrible at least.


Yea it's a cover album, though I love the renditions of Black Leather and Human Being.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:55 pm / quote |
woodworth :
daza_guitarman wrote:

The thing that really gave GNR their awsomeness (how u spell it?) was the way that all the musicians connected with everyone and the axl was with all the musicains, until he bacame a control freak. I'm still gunna buy it but my expectations are down low, comparing to appetite.


Seriously, DON'T COMPARE THIS ALBUM TO APETITE!!!
That will make you blind to how good this ablum actually is. If you compare it to other albums in a similar genre...you'll apreciate it alot more.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 01:57 pm / quote |
The_Moth :
woodworth wrote:

daza_guitarman wrote:

The thing that really gave GNR their awsomeness (how u spell it?) was the way that all the musicians connected with everyone and the axl was with all the musicains, until he bacame a control freak. I'm still gunna buy it but my expectations are down low, comparing to appetite.

Seriously, DON'T COMPARE THIS ALBUM TO APETITE!!!
That will make you blind to how good this ablum actually is. If you compare it to other albums in a similar genre...you'll apreciate it alot more.


It's retarded to suggest that you shouldn't compare an album to others albums BY THE SAME BAND. Axl Rose put the name GNR at the top of this pathetic album and so he deserves to have it compared to previous albums that bore the genius that is Slash. This album is a turd burger. Axl Rose find a warm place to die. "Similar Genre"??? What should I compare to to Meatloaf's "Bat Out of Hell?" And if I'm blind to "how good" this album is then by God I'll stay blind because blind is a place where good music is still appreciated.

I would just like to say that I can appreciate some of the guitar parts, however the lyrics, singing, overall melodies and absolutely sad.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:04 pm / quote |
jackfromcs :
What a terrible review. I expected a lot better from "The Official UG Team".
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:10 pm / quote |
Shimekiri :
The quality of the album is not proportional ot the time spent on it.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:11 pm / quote |
rhyme2zone :
i wonder if this will turn out like appetite. that album wasn't so popular when it was released. But it hit no.1 a year later.It could be the same case here, but today the band has already been heard of and are expected live up to expectations, so we don't know really.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:15 pm / quote |
rhyme2zone :
sry for the double post. i agree with carlos ramirez. Axl should release another album fast, maybe then it could help this album if it doesn't become big.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:17 pm / quote |
lordrcceaser :
The_Moth wrote:

This album is a turd burger.

oh how your words of wisdom comfort me

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:24 pm / quote |
Vauxite :
Id on't really agree with the whole If The World 2/10 review, I thought it was quite a good song, a good 6.

Mind you, I would give each song one or two more points, especially scraped, that's an 8 in my eyes.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:26 pm / quote |
guttersnake :
guess you cant tell axl to lick a pole and new gnr sucks or you get edited.Just my opinion though.There were a couple of songs that were ok but the rest is really not for me.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:26 pm / quote |
HELLAWAITS88 :
sabaka151--The next album is called "American Communism" coming out in February 6, 2062. When Axel turns 100

LMAO...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:37 pm / quote |
Ekoroski :
all you people saying this is GNR without everyone else needs to stfu and take this album for what it is, a good album made by a good artist yeah so its not the original GNR get over it and drop your one sided opinions and give the album a chance
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:40 pm / quote |
Thienskater :
the album was alright
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:40 pm / quote |
beelaal85 :
This album deserves (according to me): Sound: 9 (check out the guitar solos & riffs, just perfect even without 'Slash'), Lyrics: 9 (Axl's still a cool songwriter, even after 18 years) & Impression: 9.5 (ultra-high anticipation since 1993).
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:42 pm / quote |
SLASHer77 :
While I agree that this is not the real Guns N' Roses, I do like the album... a lot. Better and This I love are my favorite songs. The solos are great on every song.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:51 pm / quote |
RyANDeRLeGEnd :
Sorry to say this, but whoever wrote this article is either deaf or metally challenged. This album is brilliant. Why comapre it to old Guns N' Roses when its not them? Also people seem to think that it took 14 years for this band to record this album. It's been a lot less as the band has had to be completely rebuilt apart from 2 foudnign members. Musically it's not as good, however, Robin Finck has written a lto of his solos with meaning, the kind of which Slash is famous for. It's a different style. Don't get me wrong, I think the Old Guns N' Roses were far better but to give this album an average review is disgraceful. And where do you get the 2/10 for If the World? Fair enough it's the worst song on the album but its a solid 5 or 6. And There Was A Time is possibly the second best song on the album. I do agree with This I Love being highest rated. It is unbeleiveable. Lyrically the album is the best that Axl has ever done expecialyl with the style of music.

It's definitely a 9/10 album for everything.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:52 pm / quote |
postmortem2006 :
The fact this album is even out is the sign of the apocalypse, no? Still, I think that whilst this hasn't lived up to the hype its still decent. Just a shame that 30% of the album is wank.

What happened to the 30836836585 disc edition?!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:54 pm / quote |
ricardosevillav :
I Don't like Axl at all (As fat as attitude) but I have to admit that he's got a great voice and he is a good musician. This cd is not bad… it’s not the best GNR work but it’s a good (elevator music XD) album. “This I Love” great song!


POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 02:59 pm / quote |
MedicreDemon :
I listened to some songs on their myspace and most of it wasn't even mixed very well.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:00 pm / quote |
kitkadkid101 :
fukkindoyle wrote:

i hated this album. i used to have a lot of respect for axl, and i'm glad he finally released this, but in my personal opinion, it just sounds like he's trying to fit into the mainstream.


i've gotta agree here. The original GN'R just can't be recreated or imitated and i'm glad that axl didn't try to, but instead he took the name of a great american rock band and put it's sound to shame by turning it into some Marilyn manson punk rock shindig. overall axl needs to grow up and stop milking the name of a great band for his own personal gain.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:01 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
Empathica1928 wrote:

BlisteringDDj wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

cam_sampbell wrote:

Spaghetti Incident wasn't atrocious!i know i actually liked that album

Isn't that a bunch of covers anyway? their version of Hair Of The Dog is horrible at least.


Yea it's a cover album, though I love the renditions of Black Leather and Human Being.
totaly and down on the farm

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:04 pm / quote |
Skuzzmo :
RyANDeRLeGEnd wrote:

Sorry to say this, but whoever wrote this article is either deaf or metally challenged. This album is brilliant. Why comapre it to old Guns N' Roses when its not them? Also people seem to think that it took 14 years for this band to record this album. It's been a lot less as the band has had to be completely rebuilt apart from 2 foudnign members. Musically it's not as good, however, Robin Finck has written a lto of his solos with meaning, the kind of which Slash is famous for. It's a different style. Don't get me wrong, I think the Old Guns N' Roses were far better but to give this album an average review is disgraceful. And where do you get the 2/10 for If the World? Fair enough it's the worst song on the album but its a solid 5 or 6. And There Was A Time is possibly the second best song on the album. I do agree with This I Love being highest rated. It is unbeleiveable. Lyrically the album is the best that Axl has ever done expecialyl with the style of music.

It's definitely a 9/10 album for everything.


NO, no, no ,no, no....wrong you naughty boy...

Average at best, to say it is anything else is just madness.

lol

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:07 pm / quote |
Rocker_94 :
I listened to the whole thing on their Myspace page when they posted it. I'll hold up my flameshield high and proudly, but this really is a crummy album. It sounds like the guitars were plugged into Line 6 Spiders, played with drum machines, and Axl sounds screechy. He still has his incredible range, but it sounds like he's on the last song of a gig after touring 3 years straight.

I want to see what VR can come up with when they get a new singer.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:08 pm / quote |
Menzaine :
They finally released the album...
Bring on the Dr.Pepper!!!
YEEEEHHHH!!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:09 pm / quote |
thchero :
haha its funny how my opinions are the absolute oposite of the guy who made this review. id hafta say pretty much every song he hated were my favorites. very different genre than true guns n roses, but i dig industrial so its all good for me.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:10 pm / quote |
Jawkster :
I'm liking the review.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:12 pm / quote |
SoftParade1967 :
I only really like Chinese democracy, CAtcher in the Rye and This I Love. Didnt live up to my expectiations although the title track is ****ing badass.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:12 pm / quote |
Kuzak :
Amazing album. I'm actually really glad slash izzy duff and all them weren't a part of it. Theres no way they would have allowed the album to sound like this and I think its perfect.

P.S. Awful Review IMO, seems like they asked "Ok, which one of you thinks the album is bad before even hearing it?" Than had them listen to it so they could actually use some examples.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:13 pm / quote |
courtkid1012 :
That's a really good review. Almost dead on. I couldn't agree more with Shackler's Revenge... any shit band could do that. I have to say though, I do like the intro on Chinese Democracy.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:19 pm / quote |
whatamidoinhere :
Has anyone pointed out that the lyrics and singing section got an 8, when only 2 of the songs actually got an 8 or more individually?
Something doesn't quite add up there...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:20 pm / quote |
metalonastrat :
axl makes the difference.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:27 pm / quote |
AXE187 :
if you would all listen without your preconceived notions you would love it.
its an amazing album.
This I Love is one of the best Guns songs ever.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:29 pm / quote |
areese82 :
I'm not gonna buy this thing
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:33 pm / quote |
paquiquinho :
I think that if Axl had droped the Guns N' Roses and had named the band realeasing this album difrently it could be one of the best ones this year. For a GN'R album, this is pretty disappointing. Great album though
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:35 pm / quote |
killing_inc :
Over produced, over done, not the original Gn'R, not worth the years of wait BUT the actual songs are pretty good and it was surely worth a listen and the $$$. My 2 cents.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:35 pm / quote |
1010 :
I think that its a pretty decent album if you look at it as chinese democracy as opposed to comparing it to appetite. Face it, the appetite days were gone long before the rest of the band quit/got fired. Can anyone say that there is much appetite in use your illusion? Obviously its not the same band anymore, deal with it, we know that already. Just try to enjowy this as what it is, a fairly decent album, not the best, but not as bad as you all are making it out to be.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:36 pm / quote |
mafiaman20 :
whats the craic with the artwork tho, i dont get it
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:36 pm / quote |
6rock6god6 :
youre supposed to sign up for the free Dr.Pepper on the Dr.Pepper website and they give you a coupon. I however, cannot get one because Im canadian. Which is a shame because the Dr.Pepper would make up for the horrible song "If the World", which is not Guns n' Roses, it is rather Timbaland or some crap like that, is that the kind of sound Axl was goin for?
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:41 pm / quote |
satanlives :
I think it is a fair reveiw. I don't know if I can get past the looped drums though. I can't stand that stuff, it loses the feeling of being real or raw or anything for that matter. Otherwise I think the album is so,so.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:44 pm / quote |
ALLCINGI :
I did'nt like this article at all ,I think what I've always thought and that is that Axl is a brilliant musician and if you dont get it then stop listening .If your a music hater or an Axl hater do not post or write articles cause your opinion would be heavily biased .Set aside Axls history and 14 years and all that other bs .And listen to the album itself .The music is brilliant and fresh ,better than anything on the radio right now .Axl said on his website that he would mix up his songs he's got like 3 albums worth of materials .And that everyone would like some songs better than others just depends on who you are .Cant wait for the next album Axl!!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:50 pm / quote |
JBizzle Da Truf :
i actually liked this album. not good ole' guns n roses, but decent music.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 03:53 pm / quote |
JamesxHetfield :
To me it just sounds like a metal band with Axl Rose singing
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:04 pm / quote |
[travis] :
I think we all know this album wasn't going to be great. I only enjoyed "Chinese Democracy" out of all the songs. Everything else just wasn't GNR material. GNR was only good when Slash, Izzy, Steve, and Duff were in it. Axl should just make this his new band, and call it something else.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:04 pm / quote |
beelaal85 :
Imagine if Slash was in this album, den it cudve been da gr8est album eva mad3! 10 ova ten! Why Slash WHY did you leave GNR?
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:08 pm / quote |
valnir230 :
genre and label is backwards

I like this CD, not the whole thing, they have a huge section of complete crap but the first 4 songs, Sorry, and This I Love are excelent songs, its not like Appetite but its a good album, don't hold it to the standard of the GNR name

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:08 pm / quote |
SlashFan810 :
I wonder how isolated axl is from the public and realizing his own mistakes and if he sees the faults in calling this version of the band Guns N' Roses...You would think he would drop the band name by now and at least make some public statements, but he seems just as wrapped up in his own visions as an artist. Just a thought...
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:13 pm / quote |
porkymc :
beelaal85 wrote:

Imagine if Slash was in this album, den it cudve been da gr8est album eva mad3! 10 ova ten! Why Slash WHY did you leave GNR?


he left cuz axl wanted 2 fit in the technolgical industrial crap mainstream and slash was smart and didnt, so he left. axl was bossin evry1 around.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:14 pm / quote |
Jrsd :
I remember some controversy about Bon Jovi some years ago. The thing is, when I want to listen another kind of music than what is to be found on Appetite or even the Illusion albums, I'd rather listen to Bon Jovi than this crap. Shit is shit, no matter what stamp you put on it (go and listen to the full album on the gnr myspace page before posting here). 4/10
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:18 pm / quote |
failsaferemedy :
There are parts to love and parts to leave alone, but really... the music is solid. I outgrew my hair metal/80's hard rock phase about 4 years ago and it was nice to hear that Axl did too.
Whether or not this is Guns N' Roses isn't important. You either agree or disagree and that won't ever change.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:28 pm / quote |
OzZY-RuLE5!!!!! :
the album was great. appetite is overated just by how people talk about it. as for the review pure biased. all of you haters get the **** over the fact slash, izzy and duff aren't in. you don't hear slash, duff, izzy bashing the album. in fact slash said he liked chinese democracy and said i quote 'it's good to hear his voice again.'also alot of you are pissed off that the album is good. leave it at that axl proved you wrong. nonetheles album had a good use your illusion feel to it. personally their use our illusion albums are their best work imo. chinese democracy has the epicess of uyi while having the attitude of appetite.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:34 pm / quote |
TheRobbo7108 :
i know it isnt exactly guns n roses how we'd like them but i think that the new album rocks...

not everyone's into it though and i can understand why

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:36 pm / quote |
sunovagun :
The songs are, on the whole, really quite good, better than I expected to be honest. The main qualm I have is some of the solos, they deviate too much from what made guns, well, guns. Sweeps and Taps is not something I have EVER associated with gnr and never will, say what you will but I don't see the emotion in them. Glad I saw this album in my lifetime, Rock N'Fucking Roll!!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:39 pm / quote |
Micardo :
During illusion sessions, Axl threatened to split up GnR if the other dudes didnt sign over the right to own the name 'Guns N Roses'. That was a pretty stupid mistake, because in trying to control/own the name, Axl immediately undermined the strength of the band, so in some cases that coulda been seen as him losing control of the band, which is completely contradictory to what he probably intended.

Which is why this album, although being great in a few parts but lacklustre in others, comes included with a bitter taste of selfishness. Axl had a hand in writing every song, so in this way it makes it like a dictatorship, and with him being producer as well, its like him being a president of a country wherever everyone (in the band/country) can vote, but they can only vote for him.

If Axl wanted to keep this a band, then he should have given more power to the other members. I know that Axl writes the lyrics for every song, which is almost how its always been, but in the old days he left most of the music to the VR guys (plus Izzy) and occasionally came up with a bit of music here and there (november rain and estranged etc). And with UYI, there would be a few solo songs that Axl only sung a few lines in (14 years, so fine, double talkin jive etc) In this album he has too much power over each song, which makes the album a bit tainted. But then again, if he allowed more input from the other members, would the album be as good? Maybe.

The question posed to everyone is that would you rather see the current incarnation of GnR functioning more as a band, with the risk of hearing a possibly lesser album?

I'm still deciding myself.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:39 pm / quote |
paul1991 :
it took 14 years to come up with this I am a big gnr fan but have to say this is a let down
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:45 pm / quote |
Tubyboulin :
You slash and Izzy fanboys are worse than the Tarja fanboys with Nightwish. get the hell over it already, its been 15 years.

This album was pretty damn good. Title track is my favourite.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:47 pm / quote |
Power123 :
bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:50 pm / quote |
Power123 :
bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic


Amen to that! seriously lyrically this is some of Axl's best work!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:52 pm / quote |
J.J.G. :
wiggyisgreat wrote:

Meh I don't think 14 years in the making or whatever has paid off. Good review


(it was 17) those years however were not of intense work they passed a lot of time just scratching their balls...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:52 pm / quote |
Keegz_smith :
its funny to think that most of their success is because of an Australian band called rose tattoo with Angry Anderson
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:53 pm / quote |
ringo23rsr :
this album didn't do much for me. sounded like industrial stuff and i love industrial stuff but GNR is not the best band to experiment with industrial. this album had a couple cool songs that i really dig but thats bout it. 4/10
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 04:55 pm / quote |
Archetype00 :
yeah lyrically its great, and it is musically as well. people really just need to get over the fact that its a totally different band and listen to it with an open mind. sure, i love classic gnr, but what people dont get is that this is an appetite for destruction of the new generation. its groundbreaking, its against the grain, and its something completely new that hooks people in.

personally, i love every track with the exception of this i love. maybe because i was a frequent poster at chinesedemocracy.com and everyone had a high hopes for that song, but for me it just doesnt hit home.

im not trying to press my opinion on anybody, but i love the fact that axl is doing something different. i mean, lets take a look back at the gnr career... they were always doing something different and evolving with the times. appetite and lies arent alike at all. lies and illusions are barely alike. honestly, if gnr were to have released albums in the past 17 years, with the way they evolve, it wouldve hit this point anyway, and eventually they wouldve hit this sound. its just strange to people because its an immediate change. if there were albums in between maybe linking the change and showing their evolution, people would like this album more. 17 years is a bit ridiculous, but im happy its finally come, because i love it.

then again, im open minded. not like alot of other people my age.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:03 pm / quote |
sick&twisted :
i just heard a song on the radio.... not that good... definatly not worth the wait
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:06 pm / quote |
Ieuanm :
Spoony_Bard wrote:

I'm just glad it's out already! Now we can stop the Chinese Democracy jokes and go back to taking stabs at St. Anger like good Christian hecklers!


What has being Christian got to do with anything, other than James Hetfield is one and im sure God disapproves of heckling about his children!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:08 pm / quote |
nickyjohnson :
it's not a massively suckish album,but it's nowhere near what it could've been with all the hype.
not really worth buying tho.especially seeing as they put the songs on myspace and you could just get them from there :P

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:14 pm / quote |
not_dead_enough :
Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:14 pm / quote |
not_dead_enough :
Ieuanm wrote:

Spoony_Bard wrote:

I'm just glad it's out already! Now we can stop the Chinese Democracy jokes and go back to taking stabs at St. Anger like good Christian hecklers!


What has being Christian got to do with anything, other than James Hetfield is one and im sure God disapproves of heckling about his children!

James Hetfield is not a christian. His parents were of Christian Science but James is certainly not now. just listen to "The God That Failed"...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:16 pm / quote |
A8039077 :
I disagree with some of the ratings that have been given to the individual songs. IRS i would give a 7, and both There Was A Time and Madagascar should have at least an 8 each. People have been saying that its self-indulgent, but it's Axl Rose, you'd be dissapointed if it wasn't! It's quite epic.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:23 pm / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
Listened to this album as soon as it came out!!!!! As a massive GNR fan i totally believe GNR died 15 years ago and was proved completely right by this. An absolutely shocking album, i couldnt even get past song number 4!!!! Anyone who claims to be GNR fan who says they like this album needs to go away and have a good long think!!!! Axl needs to drop the name, drop the poor musicians and seriously consider if its worth starting again at all!!!!!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:26 pm / quote |
Blackflame47 :
This review was clearly made by someone partial to the old GN'R.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:26 pm / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%


Erm sorry to disappoint you guy, but this is NO WHERE NEAR the standard of either of the illusion albums!!!!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:30 pm / quote |
randyaintdead82 :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

Listened to this album as soon as it came out!!!!! As a massive GNR fan i totally believe GNR died 15 years ago and was proved completely right by this. An absolutely shocking album, i couldnt even get past song number 4!!!! Anyone who claims to be GNR fan who says they like this album needs to go away and have a good long think!!!! Axl needs to drop the name, drop the poor musicians and seriously consider if its worth starting again at all!!!!!



well i ****in love this album and im a big time fan, i cant be a fan huh? can't OPEN MY EARS TO NEW THINGS sorry dude i dont wanna hear welcome to the jungle played on the same disc several times and have it considered new material

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:34 pm / quote |
serjYankovic :
wiggyisgreat wrote:

Meh I don't think 14 years in the making or whatever has paid off. Good review


Unfortunately, I don't think ANYONE could pull off 14 years being worth the wait. It's just not in the mind's capacity to imagine...

It's a fine album... I'm gunna have to say Street of Dreams is my favorite at the moment, and that throughout, the vocals are damn near perfect. GNR will never be the same, so if we're gunna keep listening, might as well get into what he gives us.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:42 pm / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
randyaintdead82 wrote:

DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

Listened to this album as soon as it came out!!!!! As a massive GNR fan i totally believe GNR died 15 years ago and was proved completely right by this. An absolutely shocking album, i couldnt even get past song number 4!!!! Anyone who claims to be GNR fan who says they like this album needs to go away and have a good long think!!!! Axl needs to drop the name, drop the poor musicians and seriously consider if its worth starting again at all!!!!!



well i ****in love this album and im a big time fan, i cant be a fan huh? can't OPEN MY EARS TO NEW THINGS sorry dude i dont wanna hear welcome to the jungle played on the same disc several times and have it considered new material


Im not saying i want to hear that either, I would of loved new GNR material but that didnt happen. Even if you take away the fact that the GNR name is still being used it is still a very poor album!!!! It has nothing to do with OPENNING MY EARS TO NEW MUSIC, i do that on a regular basis, what i refuse to do is open them to music, whether its GNR or not it makes no difference, that is as poor as this album is!! That btw goes to the last album that slash and co produced aswell!!!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:42 pm / quote |
dragen_slair :
I actually prefer this over older G'n'R's stuff, it's more 'mature' I guess. After listening to it, I thought Buckethead might've ended up on the album after all. The guitar on this album was BY far the best, Slash has nothing on this.

/flameshield

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:45 pm / quote |
HuckIt :
pure rubbish. Appetite for Destruction was one of the best hard rock albums ever. Use you Illusion I & II were great, but this...bleh.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:45 pm / quote |
tim western :
Shackler's Revenge and If the World were 2 of my favourite tracks :S

And this album is fantastic.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:46 pm / quote |
Superperfex :
No Izzy= No G and R
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:46 pm / quote |
BTBAM_7 :
only one thing i like about this album
i got a free dr pepper

at least well stop hearing about all this axl rose bullsh*t, for at least a little while.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:49 pm / quote |
Nebjy :
Honestly I think this album shoudl have gotten an 8

it's not Guns and roses

its' Axl Rose and friends, but it's still a pretty good album.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 05:54 pm / quote |
David_Bowie=GOD :
i agree with this review, seeing this album is almost as old as me, if not older, it should have been better.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:04 pm / quote |
gunners fan :
OMEB
Get the band back together and quit being an idiot, Axl. A GN'R Reunion right now would be bigger than the second coming of Christ. If you wait much longer you'll miss out on the chance!


Agreed!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:11 pm / quote |
SG_Player93 :
the new guns is no were near the old
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:11 pm / quote |
itmustbejesus :
didn't slash leave because he didn't want to play ballads... i think street of dreams is ****ing amazing... what has slash done lately to impress anyone VR was a huge let down if he wanted to write Appetie of Destruction part 2 he would've wrote it izzy... and who cares about the name like really you won't by an album because axl owns the rights to the guns n' roses name grow up
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:20 pm / quote |
itmustbejesus :
*with izzy*
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:22 pm / quote |
zink10192 :
u kno who needs a singer nowadays?
velvet revolver

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:26 pm / quote |
randyaintdead82 :
itmustbejesus wrote:

didn't slash leave because he didn't want to play ballads... i think street of dreams is ****ing amazing... what has slash done lately to impress anyone VR was a huge let down if he wanted to write Appetie of Destruction part 2 he would've wrote it izzy... and who cares about the name like really you won't by an album because axl owns the rights to the guns n' roses name grow up



no. read the last part of slash's book, he left because of the way axl was treating everyone, he said would've stuck with axl through an industrial record as long as they were on good terms musically and socially

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:28 pm / quote |
Charles88 :
If the world scored a 2?!? There was a time, a 4?!!? I dont think the reviewer actually listened to the album... Its fantastic!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:29 pm / quote |
PedophilePriest :
So the Chinese are pissed, thinking that the U.S. is conspiring against them with Axl as the pin man. Yikes. I'm not sure which song it was,
but one of the songs off the album sounded like such an unbelievably cut and pasted Pro-Tools hack job it was painfully obvious. I'll say this though, the dude can still sing his ass off.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:31 pm / quote |
Zanon :
Ron Thal's guitar work on this album is incredible! I think if this album was under a different bands name without Axl it would be a huge success, instead of being scrutinized by everyone instead.

I think Axl brings his fair share to the table but the rest of the band easily overshadow him in my view

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:32 pm / quote |
JadedDeath :
this album is garbage. i don't even consider this Guns and Roses.

Axl rose is the only one left, and he sucks now.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:32 pm / quote |
GIBSONroks6167 :
ehh, this is a pretty accurate review. it surprised me that they failed 2 mention how "catcher in the rye" is probably the most traditional rock song on the record, but then again thats my opinion. also, i think they underestimated "madagascar" a bit, its f***ing EPIC live...but all in all, they were pretty much right on the money
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:34 pm / quote |
boxcar_smasher :
Shimekiri wrote:

The quality of the album is not proportional ot the time spent on it.


That comment pretty much sums up this album all together

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:45 pm / quote |
SERIALTRENDKILL :
quit hating. this album is really, really ****in' good. theres just no way around it. the only song that isn't good on the entire album is shackler's revenge. period.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:46 pm / quote |
breadstick :
At least the review wasn't really biased. Most other reviews give 10/10 even if it was crap.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:53 pm / quote |
Vinura :
i said this a few years ago and ill say it again

it should have been called

AXL AND FRIENDS

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 06:56 pm / quote |
Blackflame47 :
If you stop comparing this to Appetite and just listen to it, it's an incredible album. From the start I didn't expect another Appetite, and I was pleasently surprised when I realized the amount of win packed into these 14 songs. It's awesome, and deserves at least a 9/10.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:03 pm / quote |
Nightfyre :
The math here surprises me... on the song by song breakdown, I noticed generally ok to bad scores, with a couple highlights and a couple of pieces of trash. Yet that section has an overall score of 8. I don't get it. Ignoring the fact that the entire middle section (tracks 5-9 given the length of this album) only reach a 7 once and go as low as a 2, working your way through the entire album would be a chore in itself. The opening tracks are passable, with the exception of Shackler's Revenge, and the closing 5 are decent if you get rid of I.R.S, but you have to slog through 5 straight songs that range from "meh" to "ugh" first. A straight-ahead average of the song ratings yields a 6. I might bump it down to a 5 just because of how rarely they rise above mediocrity and for making us suffer through 3 separate tracks that wouldn't rate as b-sides on anybody's album, but let's say we bump it down to a 6 and take a new average of the 3 sections. 7, 6, and 7 give us an average of 6.7. I'd rate it about a 6.5 at the most, because there are a few good songs on it but in general it ranges from ok to crap. Not just for GnR, for any band.
tl;dr - Review score artificially inflated but if you look at the individual song scores you'll get a better idea, they average an even 6.0.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:06 pm / quote |
Sell Out :
Good review, thanks
I am really depressed cause I forgot to get my damn dr. pepper...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:19 pm / quote |
taytay8b :
Well we have at least another 2 more albums of this crap. Apparently, Chinese Democracy is the first part of a trilogy of albums. Anyways this album sucked.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:23 pm / quote |
diablo rooster :
i want my dr pepper now.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:29 pm / quote |
stevecallahan :
i agree it do suck and i used to love gnr. they are all over 40 now i think if they dont get back together soon Axl's carrer i think is going down the tubes.Slash may hold on a couple more years if he finds a good singer....Bach... cough....
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:31 pm / quote |
Shread_6009 :
i really liked this album, its not just a total rip-off of the old days, and it has some good songs.

and if you think about it, most of the hype was about how it was gonna be really really terrible, but its actully prety decent. and with 2 more albums supposedly on the way, its good as a start.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:40 pm / quote |
TooFast :
I think Shackler's Revenge has a great chorus.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:40 pm / quote |
80guitarguy :
I personally love this album. Not as much as Appetite for Destruction, but still is a great album. But I haven't gotten into the recent history of the band until I saw Buckethead as the guitarist. That really shocked me right of, but it brings a nice touch to the album and the solos are very Buckethead sounding(if that makes any sense). I don't know when it happened I'm just glad it did. It brought one of my favorite guitarists together with one of my favorite bands. But I looked at the album booklet I want to cal it and I read the thanks area and there was a really funny thing from Buckethead and another from Brian. Buckethead: ... Lastly, Thanks Giant robot.
Brian: Christ, Viagra, and the power to choose.
Now both of these made me laugh and most of you already know this, but for those who didn't nice little treat. But I kinda wish it was the original GN'R band mates: Axl, Slash, Izzy, Rob Gardner, and Duff McKagan/Ole Beich...

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:48 pm / quote |
Kiffa :
The only song on the album that I wouldn't rate above a 6/10 is Shacklers Revenge, every other track is damn good.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:53 pm / quote |
HavokStrife :
People who like this music are retarded, at least, the songs that I've heard. Greatest album ever? WTF kind of shit do you listen to?

The reviewer is pretty retarded too! I mean, how many tracks did he rate "2" "4" "5", and gave it an 8!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:53 pm / quote |
Nigzy :
If you take the album on the grounds of the record itself and not who's recorded it i think most will think its good..but because its under the lable of GNR then most have a impartial view of it an i am the same..Im a Slash fan more than an Axl fan but i still think its good but a bit over produced..Think Madagascar is brilliant
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:54 pm / quote |
Roedy0309 :
You got to look at this album without thinking it can only sound like old gnr. There's one member from the original lineup and it's Axl. Slash, Izzy, and Duff made the tone of their albums and why are you so pissed that it doesn't sound like Appetite, it shouldn't.

I love this album, I love that Axl had the guts to change the sound of the band around and I love the whole album through in and through out. It's definitely their best work IMO since Appetite. Not better than Appetite, but very close.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 07:56 pm / quote |
jetfuel495 :
BRILLIANT.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:14 pm / quote |
pwninator123 :
I say it's some of his strongest vocals

and the guitar is not as good as Appetite, but more interesting than the Use Your Illusions

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:16 pm / quote |
SlashIsGod091 :
I really wish people would stop complaining about the band being called Guns N' Roses. It will never be called The Axl Rose Band or Axl Rose and Friends or anything like that. Axl has the rights to the name and it will always be known as Guns N' Roses.
That being said, I love this album. GN'R has been my favorite band since I first bought Appetite For Destruction when I was 12, I'm 17 now, and I honestly think this album is every bit as good, if no better, than AFD. Slash is my favorite guitarist of all time, but I can admit that Buckethead, Robin Finck, and Bumblefoot are all better guitarists.
And people are saying that an original GN'R reunion might happen soon since this album finally came out, well they are wrong. Chinese Democracy is the first in a trilogy of new albums; the second will be released in 2010, the third in 2012. After that, who knows. GN'R will be eligable for induction into the Rock N' Roll Hall Of Fame in 2012, so if there is gonna be a reunion, I'm not expecting it to happen until then at the very earliest.
This album basically displays what the original GN'R would have been like if Axl had total creative control over it, and I think is sounds absolutely brilliant!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:20 pm / quote |
sbinlb :
good review and the only good song is "better"... the rest is complete crap if i would have bought it i would have been pissed
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:22 pm / quote |
metalmiked48 :
I don't think that this album should really be judged according to expectations we have from how long it took. Crap would still be crap even if Axl sat over it poking it with a stick for a decade and a half. First of all, from what I've heard from it, it sounds like a fairly respectable and good hard rock record. Secondly, it would be almost impossible to fill the expectations of a GnR album with just Axl and some other people. The sound of GnR was based on the combination of the styles, techniques, and musical creativity of the musicians. For Axl to come out with a bunch of other people saying he was making another GnR album didn't seem like the most smart move to me, because, by saying that, people were automatically going to expect, say, a Slash liquid blues guitar solo when he wasn't htere to give one.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:25 pm / quote |
live2rock :
Its just not a GnR album at all.

If you listen to 'my world' on use your illusion 2, you can blatantly see what direction Axl was headed even back then.
GnR was always about raw rock n roll and Axl was too in the beginning. Now it looks like he is trying to keep up with the other bands around and trying to create something different. Which is fine up until the point where he calls it guns and roses. It just simply isn't and there are way too many fans out there that have craved another classic GnR album. Understandably they have more than likely bought this album and felt let down.
I got it and took it for what it is, an Axl Rose project and not the classic lineup we all know and love. Credit to Axl for creating a distinctively different album but unfortunately it misses the mark after all the hype.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:25 pm / quote |
mafiaman20 :
I think the average person who knows I thing or two about music can appreciate that this is an Axl project despite having the GnR name, if you cant look past that and take the music for what it is, im sorry but your just a spanner.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:29 pm / quote |
fatpat123 :
Good Album but not GnR, just Axl. Bring back Slash,Izzy, Steven and Duff!!!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:30 pm / quote |
live2rock :
mafiaman20 wrote:

I think the average person who knows I thing or two about music can appreciate that this is an Axl project despite having the GnR name, if you cant look past that and take the music for what it is, im sorry but your just a spanner.


Does that mean you agree with me?

Sorry its late where i am and feeling groggy!

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:32 pm / quote |
tekee007 :
buckethead saved this album
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:41 pm / quote |
castellorizon :
Think about it. Take away the fact that it is supposed to be GNR. This is actually a good album. It's not Appetite and it never will be, but its not a bad album just because it doesn't have Slash, Izzy, Duff, or Steve. Its still good music and I pleasantly surprised by this album.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:42 pm / quote |
joshro :
Wow, I can't believe the writer thought the worst song on the album was If the World. Thats gotta be one of my favourites next this i love, There was a time and Sorry. This is not a bad review but Axl deserves more. He showed all you GnR haters, all you people that say this isnt GnR, he showed you guys that he can still put out a record that is amazing because it truly is. It wasnt meant to live up to 17 years or 13+ million dollars, because if honestly think about it, that's impossible. It's meant to be judged as a hard rock album and you know what? Axl did it, and he did it better than anyone else could nowadays. No hard rock band could do this, no nickelback, seether, or green day bs, just good, pure, hard rock and Axl, i congratulate you and hope to see many more from you.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:44 pm / quote |
Nycto :
Slash was all that bad had going for it. Got the album and disowned it...ouch.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:44 pm / quote |
jacob911363 :
As long as we have waited for Chinese Democracy, it's still pertty good. Axl may have been a jerk over the years, but still i'm proud'a him and the rest of GN'R. I would probably give this album 8.9/10.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 08:56 pm / quote |
Bunyip :
God damn it I wish they'd just get back together. I realize the originaly line up prolly unreasonabl but the use your illusions line up was still quality
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:05 pm / quote |
mcsjm3wso :
Thank you Joshro. Someone has good taste.

I almost completely disagree with UG's review here. The album is great for such a long wait, even though it's not perfect as promised. I don't understand why everyone keeps saying "Better" is the best song on the album. What a load. Seriously.

Anyways, decent album, even though I haven't been that big of a GNR fan, I think Axl put out a decent effort.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:05 pm / quote |
Bunyip :
The session muso's sound like session muso's the album has no feel. just my opinion.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:05 pm / quote |
mcsjm3wso :
Oh, and the fact that Nickelback got a higher rated review on here is absolute BS. Nickelback isn't half the rock band GNR is, even though GNR doesn't have half their old members. It just shows you that Axl is not all talk like Chad Kroeger and his ponyboys.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:07 pm / quote |
Ironpriest :
I expected crap, and i got a masterpiece. I was very much suprised and can't wait for either the next album n the year 2023 or a Reunion!
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:18 pm / quote |
BallerVR35 :
Everyone thinks the album isn't half as good as the others because slash and izzy aren't on it
but the session guys did a great job and deserve some credit

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:30 pm / quote |
rocknrollplayer :
ok this guy went really hard on the album, maybe hes a lil biased that its taken so long 2 come out.
I think this one of the greatest albums ive ever heard, personally
its got the attitude of appetite, and the soal of use you illusion.
Its the most creative albuum that come out in probly the past decade, and its very origonal. i like the whole industry part of it and i think this will inspire many musicians. I think that this might start a new trend in music if the singles are a big hit, then hopefully we can get out of this lack of musical talent (apart from a few bands) that is going on today.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:42 pm / quote |
Head BANGER 81 :
slashprodigy wrote:

and as much as most of you may hate axl, look at what happened to velvet revolver, hey dont get me wrong they are good, but there vocals and lyrics look like trash compared to axl's. except shackler's revenge, that song is just a mess. you can say what you want about the it nt being GNR without slash/ duff/ sorum/ izzy etc, but its stands without axl, gnr would not be what it is and was. He is iraplaceable


...so is slash

...so is izzy

...so is duff

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:45 pm / quote |
rocknrollplayer :
and another thing, every single song on this album is written liek a single. You can tell that he has spent alot of time on each song. andif u havent noticed, everybody has different opinions on theyre favorite and least favorite songs, so there will be a large group of people who love each song, which will make this album a great hit

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:46 pm / quote |
sidvicious_91 :
HELLAWAITS88 wrote:

AXL ROSE AND FRIENDS - CHINESE DEMOCRACY - TEH
GUNS N ROSES - CHINESE DEMOCRACY - HELL NO
THIS ALBULM DOES NOT LIVE UP TO THE HYPE OF AXL ROSE AND CAN NEVER AND WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO LIVE UP TO THE REAL GUNS N ROSES MATERIAL.
GOOD REVIEW, JUST HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE WRITER REFERRING TO "THEIR OLD STUFF" AND "THEY"/"THEM" LIKE THIS WAS THE ORIGINAL LINE-UP...IT'S JUST F'N AXL ROSE...TEH


Take your Ritalin, Garth.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 09:57 pm / quote |
Jack_skelington :
Roedy0309 wrote:

You got to look at this album without thinking it can only sound like old gnr. There's one member from the original lineup and it's Axl. Slash, Izzy, and Duff made the tone of their albums and why are you so pissed that it doesn't sound like Appetite, it shouldn't.

I love this album, I love that Axl had the guts to change the sound of the band around and I love the whole album through in and through out. It's definitely their best work IMO since Appetite. Not better than Appetite, but very close.


Im with this guy.Aside from a few songs from the Illusion albums this is my fave since Appetite by far.It still feels like the old gnr in a way and I had my doubts that they could pull that off.And it only took them 17 years!!

Cheers Axl well played.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 10:13 pm / quote |
77ari77 :
i really enjoy this album, and i'm a huge fan of all their stuff.

Yes it is guns n roses. axl rose is guns n roses, slash, duff and matt left- leaving the name guns n roses to axl. period. axl is guns n roses. without axl, then you have velvet revolver. which is also a great band.

Anyway, If The World is one of my favorite tracks, i don't agree with the review of that song at all.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 10:45 pm / quote |
jthm_guitarist :
ALLCINGI wrote:
F@#! the Haters. If you dont like it dont listen to it.
F@#! music critics too.
F@#! all the people that bought this album and then BITCH about it.
I'm sorry for you, not sorry for me.
BUNCHA' BITCHES.

Haha now that almost sounds like a GNR song.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 10:58 pm / quote |
Felttoaster :
if it wasnt by "guns n roses" this would be a excellent album no doubt about it
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:26 pm / quote |
VanQuisheR91 :
its not guns and roses

its just a roses without gun.

havent hear the album yet thought...waiting for it released here

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:34 pm / quote |
nofishxing :
srvkicks@$$ wrote:

i think guns n roses over the years has developed like a heart. the right side would be axl rose the left side would be slash and izzy.

after a long time the left side gets cut out and replaced with a new artificial heart (buckethead)


the left side of the heart was never the same as the the original and soon was rejected by the right side of the heart

and this album is kind of like a defribulator trying to revive this dead heart

it will probably run for awile until it realizes it is only half of a heart and it will die trying to keep up

perfect analogy.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:48 pm / quote |
nofishxing :
ALLCINGI wrote:

F@#! the Haters .If you dont like it dont listen to it . F@#! music critics too .F@#! all the people that bought this album and then BITCH about it.I'm sorry for you ,not sorry for me.BUNCHA'BITCH'ASS'HOES'YOU'ALL'IS'BE'DAMN'IM'OUT'LATE

and THIS is why the current generation sucks. wish i wasnt part of it. you all is be damn im out late. what. the hell. i think you have to TRY to sound that uneducated.

POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:51 pm / quote |
tyranofreak :
I like this album and all, but I hated how Axl used the GNR name so much, that I changed the band's name on iTunes to Axl Rose Band.
POSTED: 11/24/2008 - 11:57 pm / quote |
Shun1010 :
They gave some of my fave sons on that cd bad ratings. There was a time and street of dreams are better than what they got, so is IRS.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:04 am / quote |
jakehendrixman :
I don't care what any of you say. I'm listening to it as of right now and I back it 100% We all know that we wanted another appetite for destruction but it ain't gonna happen if AXL is runnin' loose. I believe that this CD is another great rock record albeit that it is taken in a different direction than hard rock. Every song is written like an epic song and that is how it should be appreciated. All I know is that Axl can still belt out his paint pealing vocals with plenty of conviction. I can honestly say that this album is way better than most stuff being played on air because of the creativity put into it. I mean who would trade this for the Jonas Brothers or Hanna Montana???? Anyway, I can't change your minds but mine as well voice my opinion. This CD is different in every way which sets it apart from the rest and will be seen as Chinese Democracy, not Appetite. Now off to get me free Dr. Pepper lol cheers!!!
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:10 am / quote |
zep_n_gun :
I love GNR, but if the ablum didnt have GNRs name on it i dont think i would buy it. Yeah it is completely different than the old days but i think axl kept the name GNR because harldy anyone would buy the album if it said something different (besides GNR). I know i wouldnt.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:27 am / quote |
srvkicks@$$ :

everyone stop your B!tching already slash will never be in the band again

and this band is axls watever he does with it is wat guns n roses is
axl is the self appointed dictator of the band
and if a member didnt like it they quit
just like the original members of L.A. Guns that quit
right after they joined axl to make guns n roses
they couldnt deal with that fact that he was the boss
and the same thing happened with his next group of musicians

so dont give me this crap on how it takes duff, slash, izzy, sorum, adler to make GNR
this is axls band
it always was

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:40 am / quote |
Rokeman :
^ bands should't have dictators, they should have equal input from all the musicians. and GnR was like that, until Axl messed it up.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:56 am / quote |
glowinghamster4 :
seriously i think this album should be getting way better reviews than it has. Of course its not gonna sound the same it has been laying around for 17 years and theres one original member. big freakin surprise. give it a chance ive been listening to it non stop since it came out
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:58 am / quote |
EncoreProducer :
[x]Huffy[x] wrote:

^ 17 years.

I quite like Chinese Democracy. It surprised me quite a bit.


not 17 not 14, 10 YEARS it wasnt worked on sice right after illusions OR right after Spaghetti Incident it started in 98 and its ****ing retarded that people wanna bash Axl so bad that they dont get their facts straight

and to all those bitching "it's not gnr blah blah blah" who gives a **** if he called it GnR Axl can call it whatever the **** he wants Slash quit and made shitty velvet revolver albums with duff and matt congrats to them on making shit and being stuck in the past, this IS guns n roses because Axl IS guns n roses **** off the albums great go back to ****ing 1987 if you're to scared of a ****ing change

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 01:02 am / quote |
m1chael w0rkman :
I...bought it just to say "I bought an original press of Chinese Democracy on the day it was released in 2008."
I didn't care too much for a lot of the songs on this, but a few really did remind me of the feel of the old days. I mean, that "swinging but tight" rhythm section is gone entirely, in my opinion, but some of the guitar work is definitely notable and Axl has become a fantastic singer. Meh. Overall...4/10. I think it this was just another band releasing a CD, it wouldn't even get a score that high. I just wasn't a total fan of it.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 01:09 am / quote |
m1chael w0rkman :
Oops...
...I think it this was just another band releasing a CD...


"I think IF this was just another band releasing a CD"

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 01:10 am / quote |
MasterExploder0 :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%


Sry bro but Axl ALWAYS needed Slash and the others, he's a great singer but his voice sounds like shit when its accompanied by industrial meal.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 01:19 am / quote |
SOADriff :
it doesnt sound like gnr at all =(
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 01:52 am / quote |
shortikid12 :
this albums been in the making since i was born, man i hope im not as big a disappointment as this album is
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 02:05 am / quote |
wchizm :
to ppl those who think guns n roses is axl and friends and wat not.....do u call velvet revolver slash n duff featuring friends jst coz they left gnr and formed nother band?
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 02:21 am / quote |
Night_Lights :
Ginger-les-tom wrote:

EEE_ELLL_OHH :
Amazing. BEST. ALBUM. EVER!

ARE YOU SERIOUS ?!
This album will never be a scratch on Appetite for Destruction or Use Your Illusion 1&2, this is just Axl Rose making a peice of crap, with 4/5 of the talent of Guns N Roses missing, it's not Guns N Roses, just Axl wasting our time taking ages to release a crap album.

Having said that, back in the Guns N Roses hay-days, 1980's and early 1990's he was a very good front man.


personally i think this is better than Use your illusion, which to me only had a handful of amazing songs (estranged, you could be mine, november rain).

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:08 am / quote |
benjibreeg :
first review is bullshit.

If the world is an amazing track once it kicks into your head..really groovy song.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:22 am / quote |
bazman13 :
wchizm wrote:

to ppl those who think guns n roses is axl and friends and wat not.....do u call velvet revolver slash n duff featuring friends jst coz they left gnr and formed nother band?


no, we call them velvet revolver, diff band, diff name. simple as that. if you were in a band and everyone left and it was only you, would you carry on with the same band name?

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:29 am / quote |
BlackDethMetal :
This is worsth GNR Album ever made.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 04:05 am / quote |
GrayFoxz :
If Axl was as humble as a noble, the only reason that he kept the GNR name would be that he found the name sentimental LOL . I guess the biggest problem with that and this album would be people comparing it with previous GNRs albums (when the band was with it's finest line-up) and since it isn't in the same league as that, people dubbed this album as bad.

But having said that, this isn't worth the how many donkey years we've waited.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 04:07 am / quote |
DOA24 :
nofishxing wrote:

ALLCINGI wrote:

F@#! the Haters .If you dont like it dont listen to it . F@#! music critics too .F@#! all the people that bought this album and then BITCH about it.I'm sorry for you ,not sorry for me.BUNCHA'BITCH'ASS'HOES'YOU'ALL'IS'BE'DAMN'IM'OUT'LATE
and THIS is why the current generation sucks. wish i wasnt part of it. you all is be damn im out late. what. the hell. i think you have to TRY to sound that uneducated.


Ironic

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 04:16 am / quote |
J.Wilson-Solo :
I've loved GNR since i was well born haha,first thing i ever listened to,and well i don't hate this CD but i don't Love it.But there are few songs on here i really love,like I love Chinese Democracy,and Shacklers Revenge is ok,like if you didn't make most of the guitar sound like shit
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:09 am / quote |
[x]Huffy[x] :
EncoreProducer wrote:

[x]Huffy[x] wrote:

^ 17 years.

I quite like Chinese Democracy. It surprised me quite a bit.

not 17 not 14, 10 YEARS it wasnt worked on sice right after illusions OR right after Spaghetti Incident it started in 98 and its ****ing retarded that people wanna bash Axl so bad that they dont get their facts straight

and to all those bitching "it's not gnr blah blah blah" who gives a **** if he called it GnR Axl can call it whatever the **** he wants Slash quit and made shitty velvet revolver albums with duff and matt congrats to them on making shit and being stuck in the past, this IS guns n roses because Axl IS guns n roses **** off the albums great go back to ****ing 1987 if you're to scared of a ****ing change

I lol at thee, dear fanboy.

I think you'll find that its the other way round.

Velvet Revolver changed. Axl still thinks he has as many fans as he did in 1987.

And I wasn't bashing Axl, you complete idiot. I was praising the album.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:13 am / quote |
Reviewer Pete :
Not overly fond of this.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:21 am / quote |
not_dead_enough :
#####
OK GUYS HERE'S A BETTER COMPARISON:

Chinese Democracy vs Saints of Los Angeles

Whatcha all think??

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 06:42 am / quote |
PoP N FresH :
first review was about right.....its really boring in parts, but has moments.....rather listen to something that soinds complete than this. wont be coming back for more.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:51 am / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
not_dead_enough wrote:

#####
OK GUYS HERE'S A BETTER COMPARISON:

Chinese Democracy vs Saints of Los Angeles

Whatcha all think??


Dude SAINTS OF LOS ANGELES all the way for me!!!!! it is an awesome album. Because it is all original members doing what they do and have always done best.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 08:13 am / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
It sounds completely old style crue, but with an awesome new mordern sound to it!!!!!
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 08:14 am / quote |
Sonic Blast :
i love the album!!!

this is the new guns n' roses!

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 08:33 am / quote |
Nigzy :
I think it lacks tone..you can tell Slash isnt there instantly
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 09:42 am / quote |
StringsofBlack :
Wow the guy from the second review completely just copied and pasted the review from Rolling Stone magazine. Good job jackass!
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 09:51 am / quote |
ServantofBurzum :
I don't understand Axel. I don't really like Slash, but no one can deny that he's a legendary guitarist. Why would Axel kick him and all the other members out of the band? It's nice that they're changing how they sound though. Should not have gotten rid of Buckethead. I'm no fan of rock music really, but Velvet Revolver DOES NOT suck. They make good rock music even if it isnt very agressive.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 10:20 am / quote |
josemontero :
To be perfectly honest, this album is quite good in comparison to other recent releases. However,it is doomed. The reason? Everyone is expecting the album to kick ass in the same way as youse your illusion and that is a mistake. This album is the evolution of Guns N Roses, so dont expect the same old hard rock style. You need to let bands change and evolve their sounds otherwise we will have the same music/sounds for ever.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 10:58 am / quote |
MoleMania :
Brilliant album. However, if Axl had called his group something other than guns n roses it would of had a much better reception. All those crappy "it's not GNR" comments would never exist.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:04 am / quote |
jcthomasva :
I have given it a cursory listening and was not impressed. I may try it again a little later but I didn't really hear any tracks that grabbed me.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:27 am / quote |
SERIALTRENDKILL :
stop complaining. the album was awesome, and light years ahead of all these shit bands they clog up all he radio's airplay today. everyone should support this album, motley crue, motorhead, metallica, and AC/DC in an all out effort to bring talented/real music back..
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:40 am / quote |
Pr0teZT :
I love it !
The songwriting and playing is incredible on this album.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:52 am / quote |
Brendan.Clace :
The riff at the beginning of Shackler's Revenge is clearly from Dig by Mudvayne.... if you dont see that, then you are blind.

I'm sorry.... but this is NOT the GnR im used to and a WASTE of 20 years coming.....

I am a HUGE GnR fan....but this just sucks....

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:57 am / quote |
EncoreProducer :
[x]Huffy[x] wrote:

EncoreProducer wrote:

[x]Huffy[x] wrote:

^ 17 years.

I quite like Chinese Democracy. It surprised me quite a bit.

not 17 not 14, 10 YEARS it wasnt worked on sice right after illusions OR right after Spaghetti Incident it started in 98 and its ****ing retarded that people wanna bash Axl so bad that they dont get their facts straight

and to all those bitching "it's not gnr blah blah blah" who gives a **** if he called it GnR Axl can call it whatever the **** he wants Slash quit and made shitty velvet revolver albums with duff and matt congrats to them on making shit and being stuck in the past, this IS guns n roses because Axl IS guns n roses **** off the albums great go back to ****ing 1987 if you're to scared of a ****ing change
I lol at thee, dear fanboy.

I think you'll find that its the other way round.

Velvet Revolver changed. Axl still thinks he has as many fans as he did in 1987.

And I wasn't bashing Axl, you complete idiot. I was praising the album.


i know you werent bashing the album but people who do seem to always say 17 or 14 years i simply quoted yours cuz it said 17 years. and velvet revolver really didnt change nething except their music got shitty and old really fast while how can you say axl has remained the same he never said oh im as big now as bag there but even if he did that has nothing to do with the music once again i know you liked the album just saying people need to get facts

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:01 pm / quote |
sav46e :
what Im about to say is gonna sound crazy,

but nearly rvry song sounds a bit rushed.

more so that its trying to get to the end as soon as it starts rather than that they rushed the recording though.

few decent songs. prob need to listen to it a bit more to get into the tracks. Just seem bit industrial for me. like their is a constant noise in the background that doesnt need to be there

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:24 pm / quote |
Hobo279 :
ok, really...
I listened to this album for kicks. I thought you know, MAYBE if you give the guy 14 years he's bound to come up with something decent. maybe.
well, even considering my low, low standards for axl, i was disappointed. it was that terrible. I hate that "overproduced" sound, and this album, as one would expect, reeks of it.
I heard soo much hype about the song "this is love," virtually everyone I talked to loved it, even those like me who hated the album. So i listened to that track. and it was pretty good. until the much talked about "solo" in the middle. first of all, the guitar sounds like it's coming out of a multi-effects processor. Secondly, to say it "echoes slash's sound" is laughable. It has maybe a fifth of the soul of slash's worst.
good effort, axl. but go crawl in a hole where you belong.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 12:42 pm / quote |
kmchipower :
to the people constantly crying that this is not gnr, its axl solo record...you're right...now SHUT UP!!!

this is a VERY good record that falls just short of great because there aren't enough truly WOW moments. But the entire album is pretty WOW all the way through. nothing but good songs, not a bad song in sight (well there better not be given it took 17 years for this thing to come out).

and it does sound like gnr...but it sounds only like the axl part of gnr obviously...which means...genius lyrics, genius melodies, and genius voice(s).

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 02:37 pm / quote |
thirdeye_15 :
Yeh this is kik ass, im happy with the results fuk every1 dont give a fuk bout shit man, this is good music, would i wait 17 years for any artists album, mayb Tool , Radiohead, or even Between the Buried and Me, but at the same time i dont htink i would sit and wait for much for 17 years, and i still enjoi this cd . Atleast i get to hear it, Fuk off ppl
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 02:39 pm / quote |
jy9626 :
The only reason I listened to Guns n'Roses was Slash.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 02:57 pm / quote |
Tenacious Z :
Coming from someone who isn't really a GnR fan, this album is a pretty decent rock record. I enjoyed it.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:23 pm / quote |
stratdud39 :
I hate to say it but this album aint half bad.
its actually really good, i really like the guitar.
sort of sounds like its copying buckethead though.
i might go out and buy it

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:46 pm / quote |
rottened23 :
i don't know what everyone is saying im loving this cd

...atleast its better than anything velvet revolver has ever made

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 03:56 pm / quote |
Crillz :
Each of the GnR albums were different, this ones just Slightly more different - people shouldn't say its not GnR just because it sounds different - and yes the others will be missed (steven more than matt tho) but you've just got to accept they aren't getting back together, they have!
O yeah and pretty good album, not brilliant but still good

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 04:01 pm / quote |
kmchipower :
oh yeah, everyone listen to the lyrics of "Sorry" carefully...

no one has said anything about it yet...but i think its obvious that hes talking to scott weiland...and maybe slash at the same time

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 04:31 pm / quote |
MetalGear1786 :
You guys writing reviews except the first guy are all ass kissers! This album dosen't desirve more then a 6.5 7 at best. Its worth buying, but its not some real acomplishment or anything. Get Slash and Duff back and you will have a album worth a 9.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:18 pm / quote |
powerstroke :
Honestly, this was one of the worst albums i've ever heard. Ever. This I love is a horrible song. Listen to the Dracula musical in Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Axle sounds just like that the whole ****ing album. I've listened to the whole thing twice only to be more disappointed with each listen. I can honestly say Axle should have never released this and at least preserve Guns n' Roses legacy instead of ruining it.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:52 pm / quote |
powerstroke :
Ps what the **** is up with most of the drum beats? They sound all synthesized and crap. I enjoy listening to that if I'm listening to NIN or some Radiohead, but thats not GnR. I know some people disagree with me, but I've yet to actually meet anyone who has had one good thing to say about it. (My roommate and his sisters' favorite band is GnR. They enjoy every song made by them and they think that this is the worst album ever.)
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 05:55 pm / quote |
BMTH666 :
I don't like this album at all. They got rid of all the good band members and replaced them with these idiots. Guns N Roses old stuff is way better than their new stuff. If they would've kept they members it would've been WAY better
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 06:13 pm / quote |
madh4ttr :
got my free Dr. Pepper
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 06:23 pm / quote |
JesterShred :
It's good, i have listened to it alot, infact i still am, but no offense, black ice was boring, especially compared to this album. This album would have been a great deal better if 1 thing had happened: he hadn't kept the name Guns and roses... because it's not. it's not even close to the same mentality that any of the other records they have show, he should have called it something like "Axl's Wank-Fest" then it would have been kick ass, but it's pretty run of the mill, and for something as great as guns and roses, it just doesn't quite cut it.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 06:34 pm / quote |
Brendan.Clace :
In the news next week...

Mudvayne sues Guns N Roses for plagiarism....

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 06:38 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
Gunpowder wrote:

This isn't GN'R; it's not a bad album, but this band can't rightly call itself GN'R. Did anyone else who played even get writer's credit?
yes look at the liner credits in the album cover over 10 people got writer credits

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:02 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
mercurymay wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic


Agreed. It's easily hands down my favorite album in the world. I've been listening to it non stop for about a week. I understand where the reviewers are coming from, I just don't share their view.

FYI, I'm a huge fan of Appetite. Axl has changed music yet again.
true i respect ugs opinion but it IS regardless of wheather you think it is not the real guns n roses.....which it is get over it people

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:05 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%


Erm sorry to disappoint you guy, but this is NO WHERE NEAR the standard of either of the illusion albums!!!!
yes it is

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:08 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

#####
OK GUYS HERE'S A BETTER COMPARISON:

Chinese Democracy vs Saints of Los Angeles

Whatcha all think??


Dude SAINTS OF LOS ANGELES all the way for me!!!!! it is an awesome album. Because it is all original members doing what they do and have always done best.
sola was a bit weak 4 me chinese democracy

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:18 pm / quote |
reignofrock :
Richycinsideme wrote:

DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

#####
OK GUYS HERE'S A BETTER COMPARISON:

Chinese Democracy vs Saints of Los Angeles

Whatcha all think??


Dude SAINTS OF LOS ANGELES all the way for me!!!!! it is an awesome album. Because it is all original members doing what they do and have always done best. sola was a bit weak 4 me chinese democracy


That is the exact album I thought of when I heard Chinese Democracy. If I had to pick, Saints of Los Angeles kicks the shit out of Democracy.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:39 pm / quote |
spooner1957 :
longest comments on anything ever. this is the greatest album ever. you can hear so many of his influences. axl got to do exactly what he wanted. when a band's sound stays the same, im sorry that's boring. congratulations axl rose, you change dmusic once again
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:57 pm / quote |
xSUNxOFxNOTHING :
Chimpy101 wrote:

I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2


you have the worst taste in music my friend
Use Your Illusion 1 & 2 had epic songs, although as a whole they were mediocre
and Appetite is one of the best albums...every song on there is awesome

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 07:59 pm / quote |
Shread_6009 :
if you didnt notice, one of the reviews is copy/pasted from a review from a web-site(rolling stones if im not mistaken) some people are just to lazy to do their own.

Hope UG will notice the copywright infringement in time

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 08:16 pm / quote |
mafiaman20 :
live2rock wrote:

mafiaman20 wrote:

I think the average person who knows I thing or two about music can appreciate that this is an Axl project despite having the GnR name, if you cant look past that and take the music for what it is, im sorry but your just a spanner.


Does that mean you agree with me?

Sorry its late where i am and feeling groggy!


Yes i agree with you, people need to stop being snobs and open thier ears to the new guns n roses and effectively forget about the GnR of old, becasue its simpily not the same band anymore and never will be.

POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 08:24 pm / quote |
hawkdude9 :
i actually like this album...i feel outnumbered lol guns n roses will never be the same-nobody should've thought they could live up to the expectations. bands need to grow and evolve and since this is such a sudden turn since use your illusions, it's strange for people to listen to it...
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 10:03 pm / quote |
King Krapp :
This album shat me up the wall. See review to be up in 48-odd hours.
POSTED: 11/25/2008 - 11:15 pm / quote |
metalcoremax87 :
It doesnt sound like old school guns and roses but its still alot better than i expected...
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 12:04 am / quote |
Mondo Generator :
I really didn't enjoy this album. Kind of a big letdown.
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 12:31 am / quote |
Rokeman :
kmchipower wrote:

oh yeah, everyone listen to the lyrics of "Sorry" carefully...

no one has said anything about it yet...but i think its obvious that hes talking to scott weiland...and maybe slash at the same time


i don't think it would be directed to Scott. but maybe to former members...

"Sorry" works a lot better if Axl was directing it at himself in my opinion.

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 01:20 am / quote |
kool98769 :
Guys...
I really enjoyed slash's absence.
This stuff is way too modern for slash's classic rock-y riffs.
I'm glad they seperated, because AXL has a completely different musical direction.

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 02:40 am / quote |
Symmetry4321 :
I can honestly say that the only three tracks i liked were "Chinese Demoracy", "Sheckler's revenge" and "There was a Time". The rest just bored the living hell out of me or (like "This i Love or Prostitute") annoyed the living hell out of me
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 03:08 am / quote |
Vacmag :
Ya know, this may have been covered and if so it's good to get the same opinions sometimes. Listen to this cd MP3 or however.....but when you do, do it through headphones. It's one of those. I listened intently and I (Kinda) understood the mad genious that Axl is.....but kinda was pissed that he still doesn't understand that it's still just rock/roll man. These tunes are great but.....most the time we don't want to discuss songs as if they were movies. We just want to hear tunes that move us.....but not make us think too much. One or two is okay.....but an album full?? I get where he was trying to go.....I think he got there. But it's in the end unfullfiling to the listener. GNR was an attitude..not a thought. We're all older, but this is really too much to disect. With headphones and full intent on listening.....sure. Cruising around in your car, hanging at work, going out..going day to day, nope. I like this cd.....I just wanted this to be a bookmark not a benchmark. Hopefully in a couple of years these guys get back to basics. Looking forward to a tour though.
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 04:01 am / quote |
git-airman :
its a good album considering its axl and a bunch of (basically) hired hands, but it is a mere shadow of what it should be. compared to what the original members can do, they would have been a huge amount better. neither you or me can deny this is an album worth buying but lets face facts, if this was the real guns n roses it would be considered as dog crap on your shoe.
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 07:01 am / quote |
git-airman :
Gunpowder wrote:

This isn't GN'R; it's not a bad album, but this band can't rightly call itself GN'R. Did anyone else who played even get writer's credit?


yes, but none of the guest stuff was included. (zakk wylde, brian may)

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 07:04 am / quote |
kmchipower :
on second listen you might be right...

but some of the stuff definitely still sounds like hes talkin to scott...like how he keeps on saying..."you don't know who to believe" and "you talk too much, you say i do, difference is nobody cares about you"...those could be a reference to when they got into a spat over slash showing up at axl's house...and axl and slash had differing stories about it

i dont think he means any original band member when he says "nobody cares about you"...actually, he could be also talkin to matt sorum..who likes to mouth off alot

Rokeman wrote:

kmchipower wrote:

oh yeah, everyone listen to the lyrics of "Sorry" carefully...

no one has said anything about it yet...but i think its obvious that hes talking to scott weiland...and maybe slash at the same time

i don't think it would be directed to Scott. but maybe to former members...

"Sorry" works a lot better if Axl was directing it at himself in my opinion.

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 10:15 am / quote |
nuthinbutachump :
I do like this album alot and im bummed slash, duff etc couldnt be on it

butttt if they were on it the album would have probably
been an appetite 2 instead of being chinese democracy

im enjoying what axls roses have made

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 12:39 pm / quote |
JDZYX :
I think all the reviews are being far too kind. I listened to the album, and I personally think it was abysmal. I wasn't expecting anything, but it was still worse than I thought it would be.
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 12:51 pm / quote |
mafiaman20 :
Should have been called Chineses Democracy by Hired Guns!
POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 01:08 pm / quote |
bmxsulli :

i have a question...

why didn't axl call it a solo album, is it ALL about the money with him?


POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 03:50 pm / quote |
GNRrocka :
Personally I didn't have much hope for this album, but after listening to it... wow. It's really a great album. There's amazing guitar work, vocal work, and just overall musicianship and composition all over the album. It's certainly far from the old bluesy hard rock GNR that I love, but I'm not gonna complain.

Bottom line is though that you have to go into it with an open mind, if you're looking for old GNR you're gonna be disapointed, but if you're just looking at it as music you'll probably like it.

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 04:45 pm / quote |
Erik_Aero :
srvkicks@$$ wrote:
first its led zeppelin not led zeppelic

second before you say these bands latest albums suck (which they dont) try listening to THE JONAS BROTHERS
or HANNAH MONTANA or maybe even some TAYLOR SWIFT or KATY PERRY

that music is more scary than listening to Cannibal Corpse and watching every SAW movie then seeing the Hills have eyes in the middle of the night
in a haunted house on a dark stormy night with your creepy RELATIVES (and to make it almost as scary as hanah montana's music your relatives could wear slipknot masks and perform satanic rituals around a pentagram then they could sacrifice a kitten and drink its blood)


First it was a spelling error

secondly you're a raging pussy if you think any of that scares you.

POSTED: 11/26/2008 - 06:40 pm / quote |
Symmetry4321 :
bmxsulli wrote:

i have a question...

why didn't axl call it a solo album, is it ALL about the money with him?


i have asked myself that every day since i've heard the record

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 05:42 am / quote |
Slash_is_a_God :
The_Moth wrote:

I can't believe that no one is going to just come out and say it; this album blows. It sucks. It's god awful. That song where Axl sounds like he's about to cry.... someone should have told him that the album wasn't a rock opera. He's not going to Broadway. I think perhaps the reason people aren't lashing out is because, somewhat in the vein of the new Star Wars movies, it's in a certain sense, just very comforting to hear the voice of an old friend; i.e. Axl Rose. However, if you go back and really put yourself in your old shoes when you heard songs off Appetite and the Illusion albums you'll remember what the band really was like and the sound and fury that was GNR. We're mostly guitarist here. Like it or not, Slash is a guitar LEGEND and his absence from this album isn't merely disappointing; it's a deal breaker. From this album we finally have conformation that Slash was the genius behind GNR and that Axl is a hack riding the coattails of those who have within them greatness. Chinese Democracy is horrible. It's a joke. It's the last breath of an old dying ***** who would have done better to off herself years ago rather than suffer embarrassment of such a laughable fate.

I wouldn't quite call the Album crap on it's own, but compared to the Epic Records of their Original Lineup, I have to agree with you. But you have to consider that Axl has got some big shoes to fill. The Original GnR Lineup was Godly together, and without all 5 of them back together, anything else is going to sound horrible.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:02 am / quote |
SnakeSkinner :
mc92 wrote:

New Gn'R suck, new ACDC suck, new Metallica suck, new Whitesnake suck. but there is hope for hard rock! I mean new Led Zeppelic CD!


Metallica's new album is great my friend. Ac/Dc's new album is more of the same as the rest of their stuff, but the new GNR sucks balls.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:08 am / quote |
justpeteau :
Finally!!! someone brings up the royalties issue. Of course Axl took on 'ownership' of the Guns 'N Roses name to make gazillions off radio air play. It has been done for decades, Lennon/ McCartney anyone????

That doesn`t justify him using the name to create an album that will alienate alot of his fan base who have been waiting patiently FOR A VERY LONG TIME, for the new Gunners album. No matter what alot of supporters say here, this just isn`t a 'real' G'N R album. And by that I dont mean he needed Slash et-al to make it that way. No, what he needed to do was stick to a winning formula, and a modicum of passion would have been good too. Alot of this sounds way to clinical...something Guns `N Roses were never meant to be. Good songs? No doubt a few of them are, certainly the title track is and when Axl allows 'his' band, the real people part of it anyway, to flex their muscles it rises above the mediocrity it threatens to become.

Personally I dont really think Axl has done a whole lot in the way of redefining anything other than a much loved bands identity..which is fine I guess but please less talk of how inovative it is...maybe in 1995 yea ..when NIN were emerging this possibly could have been considered edgy or 'new' but now...rehashing a tired genre and repackaging it in the form of a classic '80s band who want to gain 'cred' in a new century?? No.

Axl has one of THE ROCK VOICES, he may even be a half decent lyricist, but as a musician, he falls down, he really does need the creative input of some passionate, hungry musos to add to his frame work. Not just studio players bought in to lay down some fretboard work. How ever awesome the playing is...with out the frame work of a good song..they are just sounds. Oh and G`N R are a rock band Axl has to remember that.Lets rock out a bit more next time yea????

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:21 am / quote |
b0ch0 :
I think this album is "out of time"
That happens when you put an album off for a long time.
If C.Democracy had come out in 1996 when other bands such as pearl jam or alice in chains were at their top moment, the album would have had a much better review

But there are some songs that are worth listening

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:22 am / quote |
b0ch0 :
areese82 wrote:

I'm not gonna buy this thing


download it

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:43 am / quote |
Ozwal :
Wasn't there a song called "The Blues" heard it before the album came out (X that song was nice...
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:49 am / quote |
Big Dave 91 :
Personally i think the album is shit GNR sound used to be punk and hard rock mixed together but now as one review said it sounds like they are caught up in the early Industrial scene which i think is very true
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 08:16 am / quote |
VeryHeavyMetal :
it's a good album, but it's just not Gn'R. and with a decade and a half to ****ing make it, I'd think it would be a little better. I was expecting the classic Guns n' Roses, but this album is way too digital for me.
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 10:32 am / quote |
theotherguy7145 :
Big Dave 91 wrote:

Personally i think the album is shit GNR sound used to be punk and hard rock mixed together but now as one review said it sounds like they are caught up in the early Industrial scene which i think is very true


I don't actually like the music tbh. Although no denying, they are well written and produced songs.
The old GnR was way better in my opinion.
I think Axl would get much more respect if he released it under a differant band name. This albums brought down GnRs catalogue of awesome albums.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 12:07 pm / quote |
harpcicle :
dgme92 is such a fanboy review. total rubbish. and as for the cd itself, this isn't G'nR so no comment
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 12:33 pm / quote |
Power123 :
Wasn't there a song called "The Blues" heard it before the album came out (X that song was nice...


yeah there is thats been renamed to 'Street of Dreams'..

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 01:50 pm / quote |
skateordie24f :
old GnR is better
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 03:02 pm / quote |
l)ragonForce :
skateordie24f wrote:

old GnR is better


wow shut the **** up i bet u havnt even listened to the album yet, and i bet ur one of those kids who just goes out buys a best of hits and listens to the first couple of songs

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 03:09 pm / quote |
BlackSymphony6 :
Rokeman wrote:

^ bands should't have dictators, they should have equal input from all the musicians. and GnR was like that, until Axl messed it up.


mate, most bands have one or two members that rule the roost. ie hetfield and ulrich in metallica, steve harris in iron maiden

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 04:06 pm / quote |
Snarl Dreadwood :
the album's pretty good. biggest problem for me is there's way too much unnecessary guitar wanking

the good thing about guns n roses is the guitaring is usually well phrased and played in really smart places

chinese democracy doesnt have the same flair

axl's stuff is good though

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 04:17 pm / quote |
str84ever :
Best thing GNR have ever made.
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 06:02 pm / quote |
Gallagher666 :
If it wasn't Gn'R you be thinking 'this is a good album' but no, people hate it, with I completely CLOSED mind. You're not music lovers, your just people that want an excuse to moan! GET OVER IT!
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 06:06 pm / quote |
stage4saiyan :
This got higher than Death Magnetic? Really? Damn...the reviewer must have very low standards (Death Magnetic= Album of the Year). I picked this album up expecting different musical styles but the same Axl Rose. Instead, I got Axl Rose pretending to be Trent Reznor. Slash ought to be happy that Velvet Revolver is better than GNR v.2
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:01 pm / quote |
pwninator123 :
some of his best vocal recordings, and the guitar is lightyears better than the Use Your Illusions, but then again Buckethead is lightyears better than Slash, no question
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:01 pm / quote |
GQ9999 :
Axl, Duff, Izzy, Slash and Sorum/Adler were the one's who wrote the music behind GNR. The sum of all their parts created the real Guns N Roses that rocked up until about 1996. With 5 of 6 of these artist not writing, creating and contributing to songs since then, we've lost any hope of ever hearing any new GNR material that will be anything like what was released from 1986-1996. It just can’t be GNR the way we want it to be.
Duff, Slash, Izzy and Sorum/Adler all offer their own unique musical style, and you can't replicate or duplicate their writing abilities and the passion they put into the parts they contributed to GNR. Sure, there are other artists with arguably far superior technical talent who can play their parts. However, any new “GNR” music made by artists other than them will not have the passion, drive, energy, style, rythm, riffs, melodies, rawness, grandeur and emotion that GNR had up until 1995-1996.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:09 pm / quote |
Richycinsideme :
rose,thal,fortus,stinson,reed,fink and ferrer ARE BETTER!!!
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:28 pm / quote |
guitargodwannab :

ok, this isnt as bad as wat i thought was commn, its vry well done if u ask me. so i give gnr (yes its gnr) a big thumbs up for a great album.

b4 i go i must comment on this.....

mc92 wrote:

New Gn'R suck, new ACDC suck, new Metallica suck, new Whitesnake suck. but there is hope for hard rock! I mean new Led Zeppelic CD!


new GnR= great
new AC/DC= great
new Metallica= great
new zepplin= in your dreams

maybe you should go back and listen to your jonas brothers, katie parry, nd other shit thats out there rite now

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 07:36 pm / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Geez, that's a lot of comments.

Checked.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 08:00 pm / quote |
TDAJGuitarist :
TheFrog wrote:

wow im the first to comment!!!!

Its not really gnr though iz it i mean its like an axl rose band or something.

Axl Slash Steven Izzy Duff= GN'R and nothing else!!!


Actually, I think Matt is better for the band then Steven but your point is totaly right....GnR fell apart when Slash, Duff, and Matt left.

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 08:51 pm / quote |
Smithsc :
I don't care what anyone says, this is not Guns n Roses the way I remember them. This is Axl & friends. Nothing more.
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 09:09 pm / quote |
pwninator123 :
*sigh* bands lose members all the time

look at Opeth. They have Mikael, and no more original members than that

The Replacements had a coupla good albums after they replaced half the band...accidental pun

The Melvins are and always will be godly, and they have one original member

The Ataris change members every album, and still sound great

that doesn't mean none of these are the band, they still are, lack of members or not

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 09:44 pm / quote |
not_dead_enough :
stage4saiyan wrote:

Slash ought to be happy that Velvet Revolver is better than GNR v.2

No it isn't

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 10:17 pm / quote |
not_dead_enough :
pwninator123 wrote:

*sigh* bands lose members all the time

look at Opeth. They have Mikael, and no more original members than that

The Replacements had a coupla good albums after they replaced half the band...accidental pun

The Melvins are and always will be godly, and they have one original member

The Ataris change members every album, and still sound great

that doesn't mean none of these are the band, they still are, lack of members or not

Not to mention Megadeth; the greatest metal band of all...still kicking ass, with the only important original member left (and before you all say it Slash was not an important member - he was just a moderately good guitarist in the right place at the right time and got famous off uninspiring solos).

POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 10:19 pm / quote |
de-fexxx666 :
BRING BACK TRACII!
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 10:27 pm / quote |
mrrman :
not the greatest GNR CD...glad it was free
POSTED: 11/27/2008 - 10:40 pm / quote |
Jondy :
not_dead_enough wrote:

pwninator123 wrote:

*sigh* bands lose members all the time

look at Opeth. They have Mikael, and no more original members than that

The Replacements had a coupla good albums after they replaced half the band...accidental pun

The Melvins are and always will be godly, and they have one original member

The Ataris change members every album, and still sound great

that doesn't mean none of these are the band, they still are, lack of members or not
Not to mention Megadeth; the greatest metal band of all...still kicking ass, with the only important original member left (and before you all say it Slash was not an important member - he was just a moderately good guitarist in the right place at the right time and got famous off uninspiring solos).


if was just slash left it'd be different. it's like we really like greasy pizza but if you take away the cheese, crust, and toppings, and you just have the grease, ewww man.

POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 12:21 am / quote |
justpeteau :
Buckethead better than Slash, very true, alot of players are but he and Robyn Finck, Rob Fortus and Bumble foot are not better for GnR. And yea Bands Like Megadeath, Iron Maiden, Opeth, Rose Tattoo, Motorhead all have a'controlling member' and haemorrage members all the time this is also very true. However the music they produce is consistant, style wise and generally quality wise, if it isnt they lose fans and have trouble luring them back or snaring new ones because people dont like inconsistancy. so when a GnR fan buys a G n R album..he ****ing well wants a G n R album. Why do you think Metallica pissed so many people off? If i go to the shop and buy a Coke I know it is gonna tast like Coke. If it tastes like ...say Dr Pepper.... Im gonna want some answers!!!!! Same thing. Change the line up put shred king guitarist in the band if u must...even if they leave later on you can keep their material and fool people into thinking they are still in the band, whatever, but keep the style close to what your loyal fans expect..of they will want answers!!!!!
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 06:47 am / quote |
beanhead :
if axl took the guns n roses name off the album and released it 10 years ago, we would be discussing a immense album. lets forget the band of the 80s/early 90s and surely we can agree on a great vocal display and versatile song writing. i m gutted that it doesnt have the intensity of old gnr, but i got over that like 5 years ago. still worth a listen n still glad i spent a tenner on it. agree??
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 09:35 am / quote |
blink182plus44 :
I'm not sure why you all love it so much. I don't really like GnR but their old stuff is beautiful compared to this. I listened to the samples on iTunes and his voice sounds terrible. Completely terrible.
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 03:40 pm / quote |
mate_jebate :
there are some good songs like there was a time and sorry. with others im not that impressed. but what i like is the sound, the sound on the album is just great, and also i like some guitar licks. and also i must say that you are just bull... when you say that axls voice is terrible. his voice may be terrible live, but on this album its great (mostly done by a computer i dont beleve that he can sing this good live)
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 04:45 pm / quote |
gnfnr4thewin :
Look, we have to stop comparing to "old GNR". I am a huge "Old GNR" fan, but I think this Album is terrific. If VR was called GNR I'm pretty sure Weiland would be torn apart being compared to Axl. If you buy the album, scribble out the band name, forget there was ever a band called Guns n' Roses, and enjoy the tunes. Relax, someday there'll be a kick ass reunion!
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 06:55 pm / quote |
ALLCINGI :
nofishxing wrote:

ALLCINGI wrote:

F@#! the Haters .If you dont like it dont listen to it . F@#! music critics too .F@#! all the people that bought this album and then BITCH about it.I'm sorry for you ,not sorry for me.BUNCHA'BITCH'ASS'HOES'YOU'ALL'IS'BE'DAMN'IM'OUT'LATE

and THIS is why the current generation sucks. wish i wasnt part of it. you all is be damn im out late. what. the hell. i think you have to TRY to sound that uneducated.


Sory i is be not getin an educajun i is retarded neva i is wil post agin

POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 07:24 pm / quote |
tesla_fan :
for all those who saythis isnt guns ....think of who named the band axl rose .....tracy guns.....axl is guns.....slash was auditioning for poison when axl came up with the name and btw velvet revolver sucks..stiil caught in the 80s
POSTED: 11/28/2008 - 08:19 pm / quote |
zirdox :
In my own opinion this album is by far superior to any rock today.
And it makes VR look like a high-school band comapared to the huge sound of Chinese Democracy.

The production should make Metallica say.. "Oops.. shit we ****ed Death Magnetic up" - that's how a record should sond.

The whole discussion about the GNR name... Argh forget about it. GNR was always 70% Axl Rose.

The highlight is absolutely "This I Love". In 17 years there hasn't been ONE! single with that much power.

POSTED: 11/29/2008 - 06:09 am / quote |
beanhead :
mate_jebate wrote:

there are some good songs like there was a time and sorry. with others im not that impressed. but what i like is the sound, the sound on the album is just great, and also i like some guitar licks. and also i must say that you are just bull... when you say that axls voice is terrible. his voice may be terrible live, but on this album its great (mostly done by a computer i dont beleve that he can sing this good live)


saw him live in uk in '06, axl was on form. he announced his earpiece was ****ed n cud not hear but he still tore it up. epic

POSTED: 11/29/2008 - 01:25 pm / quote |
beelaal85 :
I think this review is second to 'Death Magnetic' with most comments. Seems like the world has more Metallica fans, then comes GNR's.
POSTED: 11/29/2008 - 01:58 pm / quote |
mate_jebate :
maybe death magnetic has more comments becouse it is out 2 months and chinese democracy not even a week.
POSTED: 11/29/2008 - 03:03 pm / quote |
guitargodderyck :
Itsa good cd but it sounds nothing like GNR
POSTED: 11/30/2008 - 08:28 pm / quote |
reddevil1250 :
wow....im surprised ppl actually like this album..
POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 12:26 am / quote |
not_dead_enough :
justpeteau wrote:

Buckethead better than Slash, very true, alot of players are but he and Robyn Finck, Rob Fortus and Bumble foot are not better for GnR. And yea Bands Like Megadeath, Iron Maiden, Opeth, Rose Tattoo, Motorhead all have a'controlling member' and haemorrage members all the time this is also very true. However the music they produce is consistant, style wise and generally quality wise, if it isnt they lose fans and have trouble luring them back or snaring new ones because people dont like inconsistancy. so when a GnR fan buys a G n R album..he ****ing well wants a G n R album. Why do you think Metallica pissed so many people off? If i go to the shop and buy a Coke I know it is gonna tast like Coke. If it tastes like ...say Dr Pepper.... Im gonna want some answers!!!!! Same thing. Change the line up put shred king guitarist in the band if u must...even if they leave later on you can keep their material and fool people into thinking they are still in the band, whatever, but keep the style close to what your loyal fans expect..of they will want answers!!!!!

If you want Coke, buy Coke.
If you want Appetite for Destruction, buy Appetite for Destruction.

I'm sure when Vanilla Coke came out, had you tried it, and it tasted exactly like old Coke, you'd be disappointed.

POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 02:38 am / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
Richycinsideme wrote:

DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%

Erm sorry to disappoint you guy, but this is NO WHERE NEAR the standard of either of the illusion albums!!!!
yes it is


Cant believe you people are actually saying these words!!! This album doesnt even come close to the illusion albums, it makes me sad that people are actually comparing this!!!!!

POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 05:49 am / quote |
DownNdirtyRockG :
Gallagher666 wrote:

If it wasn't Gn'R you be thinking 'this is a good album' but no, people hate it, with I completely CLOSED mind. You're not music lovers, your just people that want an excuse to moan! GET OVER IT!


No, if it wasnt a GNR album i would still say that it was absolutely terrible.

POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 06:00 am / quote |
Richycinsideme :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%

Erm sorry to disappoint you guy, but this is NO WHERE NEAR the standard of either of the illusion albums!!!!
yes it is

Cant believe you people are actually saying these words!!! This album doesnt even come close to the illusion albums, it makes me sad that people are actually comparing this!!!!!
m8 listen to it again then compare you obviously ain't heard the album

POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 07:51 am / quote |
Time Seller :
This I Love is amazing.
POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 09:46 am / quote |
not_dead_enough :
DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

DownNdirtyRockG wrote:

not_dead_enough wrote:

Chimpy101 wrote:

I think this album is really damn good.
I'd rather listen to this than to Appetite For Destruction (although maybe that's just because it is new material), and it is certainly a stronger album than UYI 1 and 2

Definatly worth the wait.
Just goes to show that Axl doesn't need and has never needed Slash or the others

Agreed 100%

Erm sorry to disappoint you guy, but this is NO WHERE NEAR the standard of either of the illusion albums!!!!
yes it is

Cant believe you people are actually saying these words!!! This album doesnt even come close to the illusion albums, it makes me sad that people are actually comparing this!!!!!

It makes me sad that Slash is as famous and overrated as he is.

POSTED: 12/02/2008 - 02:21 am / quote |
Restlesscow :
I never have been a huge GNR fan, so wasnt sure bout this album...but damn its good. They dont need Slash, prob better off without him
POSTED: 12/02/2008 - 11:46 am / quote |
Richycinsideme :
not_dead_enough wrote:

stage4saiyan wrote:

Slash ought to be happy that Velvet Revolver is better than GNR v.2

No it isn't
revolver r shite

POSTED: 12/02/2008 - 12:46 pm / quote |
Jimi_D :
GNR are good, but Chinese Democracy could of been better, Axl still sounds the same, but with out the rest of one org. line-up, they lost their sound, without slash playing his killer leadys and izzy play his guitar, the to made a combo, that was hard to break, and now with out them, it seems the band lost it's fire, but, it was ok with buckethead, meh, i give the album 7.5/10
POSTED: 12/03/2008 - 08:49 am / quote |
RU Experienced? :
From what I've heard I think it's a pretty good album. I think a big part of this is because I didn't listen to it expecting for it to be UYI 3. It's not very reminiscent of old GNR but it's certainly not bad. I prefer Slash and Izzy's more raw tones' (sounds very digital in some tracks here) in their previous albums but it's good for what it is.
POSTED: 12/03/2008 - 05:26 pm / quote |
MoshPitRock :
i only liked the first three tracks.
the rest seemed like guns n roses for the elderly..very soft, mild stuff.
this album has nothing on appetite for destruction or use your illusions 1&2.
nothing.

POSTED: 12/03/2008 - 08:11 pm / quote |
mr_anal :
slashprodigy :
this album is better than metallica - death magnet (is crap)! ac dc black ice is the ebst new album form old school bands


how wrong !!! death magnetic is way better than this
black ice is good tho
refor, the original GNR now that velvet revolver have stoppped and release a good album


POSTED: 12/04/2008 - 11:22 am / quote |
Zwack09 :
the first time i ever heard this album i freaked cause it just wasn't the same at first...but over time i got used to it, but i just don't get the same feel like when i listened to appetite for destruction, but its alright overall i'll give it a 7
POSTED: 12/04/2008 - 11:29 am / quote |
Confetti :
It tells me something that all the reviews are either 10 or 5 average. Get your heads out of your asses and review the album the way as any other album. GOD DAMN IT!
POSTED: 12/06/2008 - 11:42 am / quote |
Confetti :
By the way i havent ever actually liked GnR's music that much but this album is really, really good. Thats a suprise for me. I tought it wouldn't matter when it is relised that its going to suck anyway but with the 5 first lissens the album is one of the best of 2008.
POSTED: 12/06/2008 - 11:45 am / quote |
kennethdave :
seekmetal wrote:

People who were expecting it to sound like Guns are just stupid. They all lef him long ago so now its just Axl.


Thats why he should just dump the band name Guns n roses and just call it "Axl the great Bastard"...

POSTED: 12/10/2008 - 07:42 am / quote |
Phoenix117UK :
This album isn't actually that bad , if you think of it as more of a GnR inspired album rather than an actual GnR album there isn't a lot you can fault it with.
POSTED: 12/11/2008 - 09:15 am / quote |
darksauce :
I'm quite enjoying this album. It grew on me. I'm a die hard gunners fan, and clearly this isn't oldschool guns n roses, its the axl rose experience, but it's still quite enjoyable.

I like most of the songs, but some sound a bit bland

POSTED: 12/11/2008 - 10:14 am / quote |
jfsj123 :
my favourites on the album are
chinese democracy
better
irs
this i love
2nd half of shacklers revenge
havent givin the others that much of a listen but madagascar is also good. tbh this isnt what i expected and i lrv gnr from the start so good album overall.

POSTED: 12/11/2008 - 01:57 pm / quote |
Rock! :
shit--i gave it a 1

i was meant to give it a 7

POSTED: 12/13/2008 - 02:26 pm / quote |
Jrsnyder881 :
At first I didn't really take to this album to well but on a couple closer listens I honestly don't think it's anywhere near as bad as half the people on here say it is There Was a Time is by far my favorite song on the CD and it seems like it's getting bashed to hell and back for the most part :/
POSTED: 12/13/2008 - 09:49 pm / quote |
powerstroke :
This I love is a horrible song and I don't see how anyone could like it. I've heard it over a dozen times and axle's vocals sound like shit. It is worse than uninspiring and I can't believe the amount of people that consider this to be good music. If you want powerful music, listen to something with actual depth (I turn to Radiohead or Muse but that's just my preference there are other bands in the metal, jazz, and rock genres that fit that description), however, Axle lacks depth. He is a piece of crap. That is my opinion and it won't change. If you don't like it, get over it.
POSTED: 12/16/2008 - 05:00 am / quote |
Capt_Clarkson :
Rock! wrote:

shit--i gave it a 1

i was meant to give it a 10


*fixed*

POSTED: 12/16/2008 - 12:02 pm / quote |
Onza_jk :
I think this album is a master piece. Truly a good piece of sonic art.
For the band, with the loss of their historic line up. I dont think anyone else(Apart from them) could of done any better.

POSTED: 12/17/2008 - 07:36 am / quote |
LeeA1991 :
I just listened to this album...

Guns 'n' Roses used to be one of my favorite bands but i just cant consider this to be a guns n roses album, for one...its shit, lol, axel just cant sing anymore

I thinki i'll stick with the earlier stuff tbh

massive disapointment

POSTED: 12/23/2008 - 06:27 am / quote |
mrbuckethead :
Part of me likes this album, but part of me hates Axl Rose (both the singing and personality). I like the concept of the album. But the music is just not doing it for me.
POSTED: 12/23/2008 - 03:37 pm / quote |
DG_XXX :
its good to see guns n roses back
good cd to come back on,

but i hate that people give em shit..
be happy that you got a new album and if your gonna hate on it cos slash is gone, go buy velvet revolver

slash was a good part of that band but shit happens and changes are made so get over it. if you dont liek the idea of broadening your horizons and listening to a new sound **** off and listen to old stuff dont complain about the new shit and how ****ed it is.

POSTED: 12/24/2008 - 12:01 am / quote |
SlashWannabe1 :
mercurymay wrote:

Richycinsideme wrote:

bad review 10 out of 10 this albums classic

Agreed. It's easily hands down my favorite album in the world. I've been listening to it non stop for about a week. I understand where the reviewers are coming from, I just don't share their view.

FYI, I'm a huge fan of Appetite. Axl has changed music yet again.


Your a ****in fruit cake. Guns N ROses is every CD before this crap Chinese.

POSTED: 12/26/2008 - 12:03 am / quote |
Axl_Explosion :
I'm sure it's been covered before, but am I the only person who seems to notice the GIANT contradiction to all the "oh, it sounds nothing like old GN'R," which is that...well...neither did the UYI albums. If you go from Appetite to UYI, it's a TOTALLY different direction...yet nobody seems to want to bash those albums.
No, it's all these hive-minded idiots who see people bashing Axl Rose because he won't change the name of the band that he came up with...yeah, him and Tracii Guns came up with it...before Slash and Duff and Adler were even a thought. Nobody bashes Megadeth for swapping members or Dave Mustaine for refusing to play a show where a band he didn't agree with, because apparently he's Christian now, was playing. Yet, Axl Rose refuses to change the name of his band and all of a sudden, he's the anti-christ. Nobody seems to bash Metallica for not quitting after, RIP, Cliff Burton died and they replaced him, and then replaced Jason Newsted later on.
The truth is the TRUE Guns fans can look past the fact that there are some new faces, but the man who made it all happen is still alive, and still kicking ass. AXL wrote Welcome to the Jungle about his experiences, AXL wrote Sweet Child of Mine for his girlfriend, AXL wrote Don't Cry, Axl is the only member who has been Guns N' Roses since they were ****ing Guns N' Roses, not LA Guns and Hollywood Rose and Road Crew (where Slash and Duff came from, for all the uneducated idiots who think they know everything). So why don't you people pull your head out of the Axl-hater in front of you's ass and make give this great album the chance it deserves, and then you'll realize that it is a great album, right up to par with Appetite and UYI, and it is just another side of Axl Rose's musical abilities, with just as strong of a band behind him as the original Guns was.

POSTED: 12/26/2008 - 07:21 am / quote |
dgme92 :
harpcicle wrote:

dgme92 is such a fanboy review. total rubbish. and as for the cd itself, this isn't G'nR so no comment

I'm sorry burst your bubble, but reviews are based entirely on opinion. You don't like my review, but I'm sure some do. Get over it, I love the album, I rated it highly. Move on with your life.

POSTED: 12/26/2008 - 11:07 am / quote |
alex g 38 :
tim western wrote:

Shackler's Revenge and If the World were 2 of my favourite tracks :S

And this album is fantastic.

I agree, well at least with if the world, but not with shacklers revenge. i think If the World is an awesome track, sure it's diferent, but thats what makes it so good. in my opinion anyway

POSTED: 12/27/2008 - 05:18 am / quote |
JamesxHetfield :
Im sick of people shitting on Guns. Im a diehard fan of them, and love the original line up. Axl couldn't have done a better record. No one should have even thought that it was going to sound like classic Guns. There are different members who dont write the same as the old Guns did. You have to listen to it for Axl, not the other elements that made up there sound before (Axl killer vox, Izzy grat rhythms, Slash's amazing leads, Duff sweet bass, and the awesome beats Matt and Steven came up with) This is Axl's thing and Axl's band now. Its not going to be the same. And i really enjoyed it. I loved every track with the exception of Shackler's Revenge. So everyone would stop bitching. and calling someone a fanboy for rating the album good is retarded. Harpcicle can suck my cock, by the way
POSTED: 12/28/2008 - 01:13 am / quote |
themtalisgood :
Theres no doubt that it is Axl Roses falt that GNR are a dying band. But I understand, he had a very ordanay childhood and I guess that had an effect on the relationship of the band. But i heard that Axl is paying the drummer less money because he thinks drums arnt as important. Chinese Democracy is ok, at least they maintained the feel of classic Guns N Roses, And saying that this album was too dfferent dosnt make sence. All the GNR Albums are different. Good luck to them history is against them.
POSTED: 12/28/2008 - 09:07 pm / quote |
fretman5000 :
I personally think this album is shit compared to original GN'R. Its just not the same and guns will never sound how they did ever again. Theyve lost me as a fan.
POSTED: 12/29/2008 - 02:20 pm / quote |
QuickPickTino :
this is a garbage album and should never have been recorded.
POSTED: 01/06/2009 - 03:41 pm / quote |
The Philosopher :
The album is not a 7.3, maybe more like a 8.7
POSTED: 01/15/2009 - 08:09 am / quote |
phantomm08 :
this album is okay i thing they got only like one or two good songs they need slash back
POSTED: 01/16/2009 - 04:08 pm / quote |
amacno2 :
i believe this is up there with use your illusion and appetite. it may be different and yes its really not guns n roses in its real sense but it still has what made it famous: axl. all in all i really like this album especially its veriaty of songs from shacklers revenge to catcher in the rye, it is really actually pretty good if you open your mind to new sound. i think the best songs are chinese democacy and better. i recomend this album 2 anyone lookin 4 a good metal/epic album and at least 8 stars.
POSTED: 01/16/2009 - 05:25 pm / quote |
white_ninja12 :
Axl_Explosion wrote:

I'm sure it's been covered before, but am I the only person who seems to notice the GIANT contradiction to all the "oh, it sounds nothing like old GN'R," which is that...well...neither did the UYI albums. If you go from Appetite to UYI, it's a TOTALLY different direction...yet nobody seems to want to bash those albums.
No, it's all these hive-minded idiots who see people bashing Axl Rose because he won't change the name of the band that he came up with...yeah, him and Tracii Guns came up with it...before Slash and Duff and Adler were even a thought. Nobody bashes Megadeth for swapping members or Dave Mustaine for refusing to play a show where a band he didn't agree with, because apparently he's Christian now, was playing. Yet, Axl Rose refuses to change the name of his band and all of a sudden, he's the anti-christ. Nobody seems to bash Metallica for not quitting after, RIP, Cliff Burton died and they replaced him, and then replaced Jason Newsted later on.
The truth is the TRUE Guns fans can look past the fact that there are some new faces, but the man who made it all happen is still alive, and still kicking ass. AXL wrote Welcome to the Jungle about his experiences, AXL wrote Sweet Child of Mine for his girlfriend, AXL wrote Don't Cry, Axl is the only member who has been Guns N' Roses since they were ****ing Guns N' Roses, not LA Guns and Hollywood Rose and Road Crew (where Slash and Duff came from, for all the uneducated idiots who think they know everything). So why don't you people pull your head out of the Axl-hater in front of you's ass and make give this great album the chance it deserves, and then you'll realize that it is a great album, right up to par with Appetite and UYI, and it is just another side of Axl Rose's musical abilities, with just as strong of a band behind him as the original Guns was.


+1

POSTED: 01/17/2009 - 04:36 am / quote |
Meshol :
I love Chinese Democrocy forgetting about the controversy on how long the album to to be finished or how much it cost it is a great album with plenty of great songs and im surprised none of them have a video yet!
POSTED: 01/17/2009 - 07:21 am / quote |
AaR0n ^ :
dude this is 1 hell of an album!


POSTED: 01/17/2009 - 06:52 pm / quote |
SlashWannabe1 :
Axl_Explosion wrote:

I'm sure it's been covered before, but am I the only person who seems to notice the GIANT contradiction to all the "oh, it sounds nothing like old GN'R," which is that...well...neither did the UYI albums. If you go from Appetite to UYI, it's a TOTALLY different direction...yet nobody seems to want to bash those albums.
No, it's all these hive-minded idiots who see people bashing Axl Rose because he won't change the name of the band that he came up with...yeah, him and Tracii Guns came up with it...before Slash and Duff and Adler were even a thought. Nobody bashes Megadeth for swapping members or Dave Mustaine for refusing to play a show where a band he didn't agree with, because apparently he's Christian now, was playing. Yet, Axl Rose refuses to change the name of his band and all of a sudden, he's the anti-christ. Nobody seems to bash Metallica for not quitting after, RIP, Cliff Burton died and they replaced him, and then replaced Jason Newsted later on.
The truth is the TRUE Guns fans can look past the fact that there are some new faces, but the man who made it all happen is still alive, and still kicking ass. AXL wrote Welcome to the Jungle about his experiences, AXL wrote Sweet Child of Mine for his girlfriend, AXL wrote Don't Cry, Axl is the only member who has been Guns N' Roses since they were ****ing Guns N' Roses, not LA Guns and Hollywood Rose and Road Crew (where Slash and Duff came from, for all the uneducated idiots who think they know everything). So why don't you people pull your head out of the Axl-hater in front of you's ass and make give this great album the chance it deserves, and then you'll realize that it is a great album, right up to par with Appetite and UYI, and it is just another side of Axl Rose's musical abilities, with just as strong of a band behind him as the original Guns was.


You are such an idiot beyond belief and its proof by wow little Chinese Democracy is selling and how little its rated now.

The truth is a True Guns N Roses fan wouldn't buy this album because a true Guns N Roses fan knows this ISN'T GUNS N ROSES. Stick that in your pipe and smoke you jackass!

The spirit of what Guns N Roses used to be is now Velvet Revolver. I believe Chinese Democracy is rated EVEN LOWER than Libertad ....LOL

POSTED: 01/19/2009 - 05:17 am / quote |
Galfadez :
The album is ok but not great. I thought the intro to chinese democracy was pretty cool but after that it turned to shit.
POSTED: 01/21/2009 - 09:21 pm / quote |
sulley42490 :
sorry but this is not guns and roses. way too overproduced. just throw computers out the window and use good ol marshall stacks. that's G'n'R!
POSTED: 01/27/2009 - 10:01 pm / quote |
EEE_ELLL_OHH :
sulley42490 wrote:

sorry but this is not guns and roses. way too overproduced. just throw computers out the window and use good ol marshall stacks. that's G'n'R!


No its not douchebag, thats Slash! Which is why hes been churning out half arsed boring rock albums since GNR! THIS ALBUM IS AWESOME AS IS NEW GNR! Get off the bandwagon.

POSTED: 01/30/2009 - 04:56 pm / quote |
Galfadez :
if the world is the best song. chinese democracy is the worst. short. simple
POSTED: 01/31/2009 - 06:31 am / quote |
SlipknotZ :
Chinese Democracy and Shackler's Revenge were the only good songs. Other than that this album was pure shit. It completely destroyed my faith in Axl. Like SERIOSULY some of the vocals on this album were atrocious, like he was trying to see how high pitched he could go before he broke the machines. Even with Buckethead backing him, Axl failed miserably. And it sucks cuz I was so dearly looking forward to this album...
POSTED: 02/02/2009 - 09:29 pm / quote |
stalefishtweak :
not_dead_enough wrote:

justpeteau wrote:

Buckethead better than Slash, very true, alot of players are but he and Robyn Finck, Rob Fortus and Bumble foot are not better for GnR. And yea Bands Like Megadeath, Iron Maiden, Opeth, Rose Tattoo, Motorhead all have a'controlling member' and haemorrage members all the time this is also very true. However the music they produce is consistant, style wise and generally quality wise, if it isnt they lose fans and have trouble luring them back or snaring new ones because people dont like inconsistancy. so when a GnR fan buys a G n R album..he ****ing well wants a G n R album. Why do you think Metallica pissed so many people off? If i go to the shop and buy a Coke I know it is gonna tast like Coke. If it tastes like ...say Dr Pepper.... Im gonna want some answers!!!!! Same thing. Change the line up put shred king guitarist in the band if u must...even if they leave later on you can keep their material and fool people into thinking they are still in the band, whatever, but keep the style close to what your loyal fans expect..of they will want answers!!!!!
If you want Coke, buy Coke.
If you want Appetite for Destruction, buy Appetite for Destruction.

I'm sure when Vanilla Coke came out, had you tried it, and it tasted exactly like old Coke, you'd be disappointed.


Very well said the both of you....

I personally think this album is great.... but like the
UG reviewer said.... That Specific Magic of The Old Days is lost... What he said was true... but the new G n R band and Axl are to be respected because they went out of their comfort zones to give us this album... I always appreciate originality and Chinese Democracy has it all over... Axl still has it like he used to in my opinion!!!!

But I really hope and pray that the old band comes back.. Now That will be a concert to jump around at!!
Led Zeppelin had 12 million people applying for tickets for their reunion show on December 2007...
Guns n Roses will have everyone who appreciates music from an electric guitar there...

POSTED: 02/05/2009 - 06:23 am / quote |
Deanwings79 :
i hate how everybody is comparing 2009 to 1987,1991 and such.

axl is the ONLY original member and i think it was a mistake on his part to sue for the name "guns n' roses" because he dragged all of these comparisons with him.

the thing is there IS not slash, duff, adler, stradlin theres a different group.

it was very smart on his part to change the sound completely of the band. you can't compare some of the ballads of the album to november rain and civil war etc, because it was a completely different band and a completely different sound.

thank you axl for giving us a completely different sound with your completely different band, i think it really worked for him. but his only mistake was keeping the name guns n' roses.

if axl chose a new name he wouldn't have the comparisons to the old band and velvet revolver will likely be called gn'r or something else.

i really liked the album, im not comparing this to appetite or uyi, this is basically a debut album and thats how im treating it and i like it.

POSTED: 02/08/2009 - 04:11 pm / quote |
JohnnyCapo.lp :
firstly if you want to compare old guns to a worthy comparrison, try velvet revolver! at least 3 out of 5 of the old guns and roses band members are there!

second Chinese democracy is a very mediocre album compared to the expectations made by the long wait for the "next g'n'r album"
Frankly there is no guns and roses without slash's timeless riffs and duff's amazing bass sound. to use a group name that was the "voice" of 80's hard rock and come out with something not worthy of the name guns and roses!

Thirdly, let's be honest, axl is older and he can't sing like "back in the day" and his lyrics are not as clever or as deep as touching as in civil war or patience.

Lastly all things considered they could have used less money and more creativity in many of their songs because at this poit it is just "a major disappointment"

that is all... for now!

POSTED: 02/11/2009 - 03:50 pm / quote |
X-Choko :
Hm, its the worst album, but its not that bad as people are claiming it to be. I like it, obviously a prefer to hear some of old GNR, but this has some new sounds that are really worth listening :P
POSTED: 02/12/2009 - 06:25 pm / quote |
srsfiter :
this album sucks. Axl rose can not sing his voice is not better he had to autotune a few times. HE SUCKS NOW and he is a complete ******* who destroyed GNR.
POSTED: 04/02/2009 - 05:39 pm / quote |
umbrella666 :
I find this album to be ok. It's not really Guns N' Roses but I still find it to be a decent change. Axl my of messed up the original line up(which was the best) but this CD is still good. 7 outta 10 *


POSTED: 04/03/2009 - 11:29 am / quote |
voodoochild23 :
Chinese Democracy is an outstanding album.

The first review on here was written one day after the album was released, which means it was basically a 'lets find as many faults as we can' review.

The solos on this album are incredibly diverse, the melodies are strong, not a single song sounds the same as any of the others, what do people want? Its so much stronger than use your illusion 1 or 2, its laughable.

For crying out loud, listen to it as an album, not as 'the new guns n roses album which must surely suck without slash!'

POSTED: 04/07/2009 - 08:29 am / quote |
QuiatFat :
It seems to me like most of the old, die-hard GNR fans are loving this album while the people who just knew the "popular" songs are hating this album.

Seems to be that true Gunners are loving this album. Which they should, because I'm a GNR die-hard and I think this album is awesome.

POSTED: 05/28/2009 - 04:29 pm / quote |
ESPman6505+ :
u can tell this has been in the works for 15 years lol
POSTED: 06/08/2009 - 12:30 pm / quote |
FearOfTheDuck :
If this was an amazing mind-blowing album then fair enough ya know? It took 15 years, it should have been a fecking brilliant album, but it wasn't, Axl clearly doesn't give a crap about the fans, the remaining ones anyway. Over hyped piece of shit...
POSTED: 07/20/2009 - 07:06 am / quote |
Cade_nickels :
worst G'N'R' album ever. but them again it's not really G'N'R so whatever...
POSTED: 07/23/2009 - 08:17 pm / quote |
BUTCHY13 :
No it's not the worst G n' R album ever, that was Lies. Lies was and is the worst G n' R album ever made. This album is the second worst they did. I thought it was a lot better than most of the crap that's being released at the moment though as it has 4 or 5 decent songs on it.
POSTED: 07/25/2009 - 07:45 pm / quote |
vascoa7x :
worst album ever along with spagetti -.-
POSTED: 07/27/2009 - 04:38 pm / quote |
somename454 :
I loved this record. The reason it dosnt sound like old Guns.....is because the old Guns is gone! So stop with that argument. Go listen to Appetite if you want 1987 Guns N Roses
POSTED: 08/25/2009 - 10:24 pm / quote |
Ponchibego :
I think it's really hard to review this album fairly anymore... There are too many people that are judging the time it took to make the album and what kind of person Axl Rose is instead of actually the music. Everyone is going in with a preset attitude about it and already knows what their thoughts are going to be before they even listen to it. Correct: It's not Gn'R, but it's still a good band and album in my opinion.
POSTED: 09/15/2009 - 09:37 pm / quote |
TheRobbo7108 :
wanted to hate this album as i loved the original GNR but i just couldn't, every song is an epic
POSTED: 10/26/2009 - 04:37 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009