Released: Oct 6, 2009
Genre: Hard Rock, Heavy Metal
Label: Universal/Roadrunner Records
Number Of Tracks: 11
Although 11 years have passed since KISS has released an album of full material, the classic band remains true to its roots with Sonic Boom.
Sonic BoomFeatured review by: UG Team, on october 07, 2009 4 of 7 people found this review helpful
Sound: Gene Simmons is no fool. As the mouthpiece and businessman (often to a fault) of KISS, he probably is well aware that you don’t screw with a formula when it works. It’s been 11 years since his legendary quartet released a full-length album of original material, and Sonic Boom certainly sounds like what you’d expect out of a KISS record. This is where the slippery slope comes into play. Does the audience want something a little different after so many years? Do you risk artistic freedom? It’s hard to say if Simmons even broached these subjects, particularly when Sonic Boom is the latest in several rock records to be sold exclusively at Walmart (a move which reeks of marketing ploys). Once you get over that elephant in the room, you’re left to enjoy an album that at least has the “fun” factor going for it.
You’ll get your standard KISS fare on Sonic Boom, with both the sleazy rockers and arena anthems coming out in full force. Once again Ace Frehley is a no-show, but the current lineup is a familiar one with Stanley, Simmons, guitarist Tommy Thayer, and drummer Eric Singer lending their efforts. If there is one thing that is still impossibly impressive, it’s that Stanley’s enthusiasm and vocal delivery has not been affected in the slightest by age. He’s still a dynamo at what he does, and that’s jaw-dropping at 57 years of age. Simmons’ up-to-no-good vocals are always a hoot, particularly when paired with some of the cheesy lyrics heard on Sonic Boom. Singer and Thayer make a good showing, with Thayer actually bringing the record up to a different level. There are some incredibly juicy riffs (it wouldn’t have hurt to hear even more) and Thayer deserves credit for keeping the album fresh at many points along the way.
The first single “Modern Day Delilah” is a perfect opener with its blues-rock, in-your-face intro. The guys in KISS aren’t reinventing the wheel, but Thayer’s riffs (plus solo) and Stanley’s vocals make the track incredibly likable. “Russian Roulette” is pure Gene Simmons, with even the monster-tongued rocker’s bass thumping brilliantly in the mix. As far as core songwriting is concerned, “Russian Roulette” is Simmons’ most memorable song when acting as singer, but “Yes I Know (Nobody’s Perfect)” is so over-the-top and sleazy lyrically that it might be the latter that garners the most attention.
The key feel-good song on Sonic Boom is “Stand,” but it doesn’t necessarily start off as your run-of-the-mill spirit lifter. Although the intro is fueled by a fantastic riff and the verses are power-chord driven, the chorus utilizes KISS’ trademark harmonies. In fact, there’s even a moment at the end where that harmonization goes in more of a Beatles’ direction. The band isn’t getting all artsy on us, but it makes for a refreshing change.
You could argue that the new KISS record sounds somewhat cookie cutter in fashion. “Never Enough” is reminiscent to Poison’s “Nothin’ But A Good Time” during the verses and “Hot and Cold” actually runs fairly close to “Dr. Love.” There is, however, a good chunk of your standard fun KISS material, with “I’m An Animal” delivering a dirty, grooving riff and “When Lightning Strikes” supplying plenty of cowbell. // 7
Lyrics and Singing: The band rarely takes itself too seriously on Sonic Boom, with plenty of tracks covering sexual topics or general machismo. A lot of the boisterous lyrics come from none other than Simmons (in “Hot and Cold’ he sings, “What’s your name; We’re both thinking the same thing; Now we’ll let the games begin”), and not surprisingly, he sells the content pretty well. If you’re familiar with any of KISS’ past material, the lyrical content should be par for the course and not create too many waves. // 7
Impression: KISS won’t make any huge splashes with Sonic Boom, and it feels like the quartet is maintaining the status quo. Guitarist Thayer is an unexpected highlight, and he actually could have been utilized more so throughout the course of the 11-track album. At no time will you likely be surprised by the material, and that might be disappointing for anyone who is expecting Simmons or Stanley to change their tune at this stage in the game. But if all you’re looking for is some groove-oriented straightforward rock tracks that stay true to KISS’ roots, there’s a good chance you’ll enjoy Sonic Boom. // 8
Sonic Boom
Reviewed by:
Battman1993, on november 07, 2011 1 of 1 people found this review helpful
Sound: After 11 years, the dimissial of two founding members, and a stream of products of all kinds, music industry moguls (and a pretty good rock band) KISS have returned with a new album "Sonic Boom". Right off, I should tell you that the Spaceman, Ace Frehley, and the Catman, Peter Criss are not in KISS anymore. In Ace's place, Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons recruited former Black N' Blue guitarist Tommy Thayer, and in Peter's place is longtime associate Eric Singer. Gene Simmons and his giant tongue continuously hyped "Sonic Boom" as a return to the 1970's heyday of KISS. He's certainly right on that front. "Sonic Boom" sounds like a modern 70's hard rock album, and it is VERY loud. However, I detect a little bit of 80's glam/hair metal thrown in here. I decided to do a track-by-track review.
01. "Modern Day Delilah" - The first single from "Sonic Boom", and a great choice. A very blues-y song, it's the first song to show off Paul Stanley's still awesome voice. Can you believe he's been singing for 35 years?!
02. "Russian Roulette" - The first vocal contribution from KISS's resident a-shole Gene Simmons. I may be in a minority, but I really don't like Gene's voice. It might be because I love Paul's voice so much, but every song on "Sonic Boom" that Gene sings seems to be a letdown for me. The music behind Gene's vocal is actually a nice mid-tempo rock track that speeds up into a chugging rock track at certain points.
03. "Never Enough" - Other reviewers hear Poison's "Lookin' For A Good Time" in this song, but in the intro I actually hear "Rock N' Roll All Nite" (ironically a song Poison covered). Anyways, the most hair metal-ish track on here. Paul sings here, and does it well as usual.
04. "You Know (Nobody's Perfect)" - Another song Gene sings. It's one of the heavier tracks on here, and actually Gene sounds better on this cut.
05. "Stand" - probably the most controversial song on here. It's really the only anthemic song on "Sonic Boom" (actually members of the KISS Army will probably tell you that every KISS song is an anthem). The vocals are the focus here, with a sing-along chorus and multiple full-band harmones.
06. "Hot & Cold" - In what seems to be a theme, Gene sings here. Really nothing special to say about this. Powered by a bass riff. One of the weakest tracks on "Sonic Boom".
07. "All For The Glory" - KISS drummer Eric Singer takes a turn at being the singer here. Eric sounds like a slightly better Gene Simmons. I'm neutral on this one.
08. "Danger Us" - One of my favorite songs on "SB". Back to Paul. This one has a very Guns N' Roses feel. The chorus is insanely catchy and will get stuck in your head for days.
09. "I'm An Animal" - Gene again. The heaviest track by far. A plodding number with heavy riffs and drums. The only Gene vocal contribution I really like, but that might just be because the music fits his voice.
10. "When Lightning Strikes" - Tommy Thayer gets a turn on the mic here. Great guitar solo on this one. Cowbell galore, Tommy is decent on vox.
11. "Say Yeah" - The final track on "Sonic Boom". This one could be another anthem for KISS. Clean intro. This one feels very Def Leppard-like. The chorus is killer. // 7
Lyrics and Singing: I'm going to rate each singer before I tackle the lyrics.
Gene Simmons - As I indicated above, I don't like Gene Simmons as a singer. Compared to Paul Stanley, he's just not a great singer.
Paul Stanley - This man is so underrated as a vocalist. His range is still intact 35 years on. I think he should be the only singer for KISS, but having multiple singers has worked for years for KISS, so what do I know?
Tommy and Eric each sing one song, but I won't spend time rating them.
Lyrics: Yes I know KISS has always sung about sex, but it's still a bit disheartening to hear same old-same old on "Sonic Boom". The only instances I actually have a problem with are Gene's songs, "You Know (Nobody's Perfect)", "Russian Roulette", and "Hot & Cold". The lyrics are incredibly juvenile on those cuts. Otherwise the lyrics are serviceable everywhere else. The chorus on "Danger Us" ("Danger You, Danger Me, Danger Us!") is suprisingly good IMO. // 7
Impression: This is the first KISS album I ever bought. To keep it short and sweet, it's fun as all hell. BUT I have some problems with Sonic Boom. First, Gene Simmons is just a problem, both vocally and lyrically. However, I feel that's why Paul Stanley is in KISS at all: To balance out Gene's horsesh-t with decent vocal contributions and decent songwriting. Is this a great album? Hell no. But it is definitely good. // 7
Sonic Boom
Reviewed by:
unregistered, on october 28, 2009 0 of 0 people found this review helpful
Sound: Sonic Boom is one great sounding album. It's louder than some of Kiss' past albums, but is never loud for the purpose of making your ears bleed. It sounds a lot like their work from the 70s; it's good old rock and roll. You wont hear anything like the disco from Dynasty or the heavy metal from Psycho Circus. In fact, it's most closely akin to their first album, the eponymous "Kiss."
Tommy Thayer can definitely keep up with Ace Frehley, now gone solo. He's written some of the best riffs they've had in years and the solos, while a little quiet, are fast, fun, and very well done. "Modern Day Delilah," "All For the Glory," and "Danger Us" really showcase Thayer's talent. He even sings well on "When Lightning Strikes." Gene's basslines are thumping as usual, and they definitely complete the album's second track, "Russian Roulette." Vocal-wise, Simmons' best song is "Hot and Cold." Eric Singer is the best drummer that Kiss has had yet, and is even more fun to watch than Peter Criss or Eric Carr- YouTube will prove that.
The best part of the album, however, is Paul Stanley. His vocals are still top notch, even after singing for Kiss for 35 years. His skills have not waned at all (like AC/DC's Brian Johnson) and he is the one who is really responsible for how good the album is.
The Kiss sound is definitely not stale, but by the end of the album, it seems like they kind of ran out of gas. They should have cut out a song or two, like "Yes I Know (Nobody's Perfect)" and "Say Yeah," the two weakest songs on the album, because they really only hold the disc back. // 9
Lyrics and Singing: The lyrics on Sonic Boom are not the best that Kiss has ever had, nor are they the worst. Some of the lyrics sound somewhat odd, like "Hot And Cold." "If it's too loud than you're too old" just sounds odd coming from a band with members in their 50's. Still, they stay true to that classic Kiss mischief-making, women-objectifying fun. // 6
Impression: Sonic Boom is definitely one of the best rock albums that has been or will be released this year. It's got all the components for an awesome rock and roll experience, and is only marred by a few slightly boring tracks. "Never Enough," "When Lightning Strikes," and "I'm An Animal" are the best songs on the album, and the bad should seriously consider taking them on the road with them next time they go on tour. Sonic Boom shows that Kiss is still one of the greatest names in rock, and we should look forward to the material they put out in the future. // 8
I saw them in concert at cobo hall in detroit, and they are right to say that paul stanley's voice hasn't changed. He sounded awesome. As for the record I've only heard "Modern Day Delilah" and I think it sounds a lot like the classic Kiss
Love this album! i picked it up, just to see what it was like, and it's great, a whole lot more than a 7.3, I'd got for a 8.5 myself, it's a good album!
Anybody who can seriously put down this cd is not a fan of Rock and Roll, PERIOD! I'm really enjoying it. A solid 8/10. Worth picking up on your next Walmart visit.
This album is AMAZING. One of the best true Rock albums to come out in the last decade. This is one of my favourite KISS albums too. Go out and Buy this album because it owns!
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Sorry for the previous gramatical errors, I should have done a better job of proofing my comments before posting.
I meant to say (corrections in caps): "the fact that Tommy Thayer...Eric Singer...chosen to cop two EX-members makeup IS RIDICULOUS...this is AN UNACCEPTABLE blasphemy.
Also: "IF they want to be in KISS...the make up OR I SUGGEST THEY come up with THEIR own gig.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Thayr is perfectly aware no one can replace Ace Frehley. You say it's a shame to have a new spaceman.
Why not.
I'm not a Kiss fan. I'll just say it's cool that this band now comes back with such an album, perfectly aware of what they are to people. Look at at this artwork... Pure fun. To me, Kiss is one the bands which embodies this "pure fun" spirit.
To say that there is only one catman and one spaceman sounds like true to a die-hard, but it's TO A CERTAIN EXTENT the same thing as "Queen can't sing with Paul Rofgers since he's not Mercury".
I'm a Queen fan and i IDOLATE Brian May, and this sentence is to me pure flapdoodle : like Kiss, they play music and give people (especially young people) a chance to see a dream come true : see Kiss live.
Paul Stanley said in an interview it would be fun to see the band continue through generations with same makeup and different people. I think the same.
Spit on me calling me a mainstream ******* if you want.
Yeah, I think this is a fairly solid album. Granted, Kiss may have "sold out" as some people put it, I personally think that they still rock socks regardless, they have this signature sound, that is still present even today with half the band elsewhere, and I do agree how stupid it is that Eric and Thayer are wearing Frehley and Chris's get up, that kind of burns my grill a little bit. But, it was a rock album, and it sounded solid once again. Maybe they'll finally stop when they have their wheelchair tour.
thirteenburn wrote:
the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
Seeing how Gene Simmons owns all the rights to KISS and how Paul works for him and Gene pretty much owns Paul to the extent one man can own another, I don't think Paul had much to say about anything, so I think It's just Gene.
After listening to this cd 3 times already it has gotten progressively worse. Unimaginative, repetitive, formulated and of course "branded".
It sounds more like a Def Leppard album, no disrespect to them however as they are an entirely different genre. I've been a fan of the original KISS lineup since their first album and can't believe that I spent money on this. Elder and Dynasty and dare I say Hot in the Shade sound better than this monopolized collection of music geared at fans (that will purchase anything with a KISS logo on it).
Shameful and distasteful. When KISS comes to Winnipeg next month I will not be there. I refuse to support a cover band that sells out arenas with guys pretending to be a 'character'.
If you want true musical genius with actual harmony, melody and rhythm in 4/4 time then go and purchase the new Ace Frehley Anomaly cd.
Sorry for the previous gramatical errors, I should have done a better job of proofing my comments before posting.
dont think it was thayer or singers idea, its genes. it is all about marketing and what sells. it is too diffucult to change characters and would cost wayyyyy to much money for someone other than the spaceman or catman
I meant to say (corrections in caps): "the fact that Tommy Thayer...Eric Singer...chosen to cop two EX-members makeup IS RIDICULOUS...this is AN UNACCEPTABLE blasphemy.
Also: "IF they want to be in KISS...the make up OR I SUGGEST THEY come up with THEIR own gig.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
Also, "to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10"?
How can you possibly expect any musicians to make any money whatsoever? Lets say the world was magically changed to how you like it (meaning new make up for Eric and Tommy, as well as $8 cds).
NOTE: The following is all based on estimates.
Let's take this album for example. Take an estimate of about $3-4 for production, as well as a potential 20% cut of sales from Walmart and management. That would leave 10% of sales going to the band.
Now let's say the album sells, oh I don't know, 500,000-1,000,000 copies? Total, that's between $400,000 and $800,000 between the four members for what, a year or two of work? It looks like a lot of money.
Granted, in this case it's KISS and they have ridiculous amounts of money to begin with, but now compare it to any relatively unknown band. Their album costs the same, with the same percentages and everything, but it only sells 50,000. That's $10,000 each. You're right, cds should be $8. Ok, maybe it might lure a few of the internet lurkers out of their shaded up rooms to buy some music for once, but come on. Now that the technology is available, people will inherintly *steal* music. You download 300 albums for nothing, or you buy them for your $8 for $2400. I occasionally download, but if it is something I like enough, I always go out and buy it.
Anyway, that's my little rant for today.
Will have a listen to the album soon; sorry for getting a bit off topic, but things like this annoy me.
I've enjoyed the recent release of cool new albums, Megadeths Endgame, Behemoth's Evangelion, AiC's black into blue or whatever it's called all quality albums and Sonic Boom is no different. A solid and fun album. I got it today and I'm enjoying it loads. I'm as happy as a happy thing.
Good,solid, and back to basics KISS album. It is better than I thought, and much,much better than Psycho Circus. The amount of material you get for the price is wonderful. 11 new tracks, 15 classic tracks, and a live dvd...all for:$12.00 (US)...ROCKIN'!!!!
Good,solid, and back to basics KISS album. It is better than I thought, and much,much better than Psycho Circus. The amount of material you get for the price is wonderful. 11 new tracks, 15 classic tracks, and a live dvd...all for:$12.00 (US)...ROCKIN'!!!!
Also, "to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10"?
How can you possibly expect any musicians to make any money whatsoever? Lets say the world was magically changed to how you like it (meaning new make up for Eric and Tommy, as well as $8 cds).
NOTE: The following is all based on estimates.
Let's take this album for example. Take an estimate of about $3-4 for production, as well as a potential 20% cut of sales from Walmart and management. That would leave 10% of sales going to the band.
Now let's say the album sells, oh I don't know, 500,000-1,000,000 copies? Total, that's between $400,000 and $800,000 between the four members for what, a year or two of work? It looks like a lot of money.
Granted, in this case it's KISS and they have ridiculous amounts of money to begin with, but now compare it to any relatively unknown band. Their album costs the same, with the same percentages and everything, but it only sells 50,000. That's $10,000 each. You're right, cds should be $8. Ok, maybe it might lure a few of the internet lurkers out of their shaded up rooms to buy some music for once, but come on. Now that the technology is available, people will inherintly *steal* music. You download 300 albums for nothing, or you buy them for your $8 for $2400. I occasionally download, but if it is something I like enough, I always go out and buy it.
Anyway, that's my little rant for today.
Will have a listen to the album soon; sorry for getting a bit off topic, but things like this annoy me.
10% is what a popular band makes, most bands don't make even that much. The real money comes from touring. I'm not saying don't buy an artist's cds, they did work for it, but don't try to use that as an argument.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
A REAL FAN holds an artist accountable for a certain level of quality in their music. If I like an artist and they put out crap I fully intend to speak my mind about it and complain if I feel the need to. There's nothing wrong with expecting quality output.
Personally, I've given these guys repeated listens. They never have really impressed me. They're an overrated band just like the Beatles, Metallica, and Nirvana.
Personally, I've given these guys repeated listens. They never have really impressed me. They're an overrated band just like the Beatles, Metallica, and Nirvana.
Beatles and Nirvana overrated? In a way I can understand how Metallica and Kiss could classify as being overrated, but not the other two. Tell me, what bands do you enjoy? I am curious what bands you rate higher than the 'classics'.
Kiss are and have always been a product, the merch is valued equally, if not higher, than the musical content - especially nowadays.
@thirteenburn: another old school fkker like myself. I quit listening around the time they went disco. But before that I did indeed have the KISS book covers, the KISS trapper keeper, the KISS pillow cases, and anything KISS I could talk my parents into buying me.
But like you said, its not the same anymore. If kids today want to listen; fine! By all means listen to KISS and not some electronic BS, country or (god forbid!!) Gangsta Rap. But most people dont remember how it was back then.
Alright, I like Kiss. Not a huge fan but I was raised around it. My dad is 45 and he has all the vinyl, collectibles etc. But, this album Is like 80s KISS. I won't criticize people for liking it. I just criticize people for saying it sounds like 70s classic KISS. It sounds like Crazy Crazy Nights or Animalize. It lacks the soul of 70s Kiss and I think Tommy Thayer is talented and spot on Ace's sound. But That to me is a fault. Ace was sloppy but thats what made him great. He played with so much feeling and Tommy is like a robot with his guitar work. Eric is great though. And I totally dig his version of Black Diamond. He really does sound like Peter Criss. Ok theres my 2 pennies.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
Well since there's two cds and a dvd they're only $4 a piece which is half of the $8 you said it should be.
They tried giving new members their own schtik and it didn't sit well with the fans. The makeup is an identity, created by Ace and Peter but carried on by Tommy and Eric.
Stop trying to be all snobby about something as simple as KISS and enjoy some rock n roll. These are the four guys who want to make music together, its not fair to Paul and Gene to tell them that they should have to start a different band when THEY are the ones who established KISS.
Don't hold a man against his music, or music against the man. Just cause you hate a person doesn't mean they can't make good music.
Am I the only person who believes this album to be a major step up musically for Kiss?
I'm not a Kiss fanatic by any means, but this is a solid album which they've obviously put plenty of soul into.
It's not amazing, but it's not garbage.
Much of the guitar is juicy as.
Good work Thayer, good work Kiss.
Also, "to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10"?
How can you possibly expect any musicians to make any money whatsoever? Lets say the world was magically changed to how you like it (meaning new make up for Eric and Tommy, as well as $8 cds).
NOTE: The following is all based on estimates.
Let's take this album for example. Take an estimate of about $3-4 for production, as well as a potential 20% cut of sales from Walmart and management. That would leave 10% of sales going to the band.
Now let's say the album sells, oh I don't know, 500,000-1,000,000 copies? Total, that's between $400,000 and $800,000 between the four members for what, a year or two of work? It looks like a lot of money.
Granted, in this case it's KISS and they have ridiculous amounts of money to begin with, but now compare it to any relatively unknown band. Their album costs the same, with the same percentages and everything, but it only sells 50,000. That's $10,000 each. You're right, cds should be $8. Ok, maybe it might lure a few of the internet lurkers out of their shaded up rooms to buy some music for once, but come on. Now that the technology is available, people will inherintly *steal* music. You download 300 albums for nothing, or you buy them for your $8 for $2400. I occasionally download, but if it is something I like enough, I always go out and buy it.
Anyway, that's my little rant for today.
Will have a listen to the album soon; sorry for getting a bit off topic, but things like this annoy me.
10% is what a popular band makes, most bands don't make even that much. The real money comes from touring. I'm not saying don't buy an artist's cds, they did work for it, but don't try to use that as an argument.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
A REAL FAN holds an artist accountable for a certain level of quality in their music. If I like an artist and they put out crap I fully intend to speak my mind about it and complain if I feel the need to. There's nothing wrong with expecting quality output.
Personally, I've given these guys repeated listens. They never have really impressed me. They're an overrated band just like the Beatles, Metallica, and Nirvana.
Don't give me that line about more money in touring. It's a blanket statement when in reality it depends on the band in question. Some make more off albums some make more from touring some even make most of their money through licensing.
Ok, I've read most of these comments so far and I would like to express my opinion.
ONE: Yes, I too, didn't think this album was going to be good and was being used as a cash bank. Whether it's a cash bank or not, I was was taken back on how awesome this record is.
I listened to the entire album over and over again, and I can say, that KISS have not lost their touch. It sounds like KISS and rocks like KISS. As much as UG compaires some songs to other bands, I think it's stupid. UG is trying to be all fancy in their knowledge that they lose sight on what is real: This is a frickin awesome album (especially after 11 years and having two seasoned lead singers). Gene's voice is amazing, Paul's voice is superb and the music rocks hard.
TWO: Uptight (too hardcore?) KISS fans really need to grow up. Honestly, you can listen to their album KNOWING that it's not the original lineup. Even though Ace and Peter are no longer apart of the band, doesn't mean that Tommy and Eric are "posers" or "imposters." I think if anything, I agree with UG by Tommy Thayer's performance on this album. I think he knew that he had big shoes to fill and had to earn respect from the fans, and on this album, he gave his all, and you know what? He's an amazing guitarist. He well fit to be in KISS and deserves a lot more credit than being called an imposter! (Do I dare say he's better than even Ace?) Did anyone complain when Dave Grohl replaced the drummer for Nirvana? What about Travis Barker for Blink-182? Anybody up for the lead singer of ACDC? Didn't think so. I don't hear anybody griping about how they don't listen to the Eagles anymore when they added another member to their band...
ok, so maybe it's not the best analogy, but you get my point.
THIRD: KISS has been a massive marketing band for years, and to "fans" of KISS, it shouldn't come as a surprise. T-Shirts, PJs, Posters, Pool Tables, etc. KISS has it covered. Fans love collecting memorbilia and KISS has produced tons of products to satisfy their fans. In the case of Sonic Boom, to me, for what KISS is known for, $12 is a bargain. You get the album, Sonic Boom, and you get a KISS KLASSICS CD, which I should add that all the songs are rerecorded , not just a rehash of a greatest hits album. Plus, you get a DVD with different LIVE songs, sure it's not the full concert, but hey, it has Rock and Roll All Nite. For $12...that's a steal. I'm one of those people that believe albums should be $10, too, but honestly, lets be serious. For $2 bucks more, you get a DVD and 15 rerecorded klassic hits. WOW! geez, $2...Pearl Jam's Backspacer was $12 and I got 11 songs that has a total running of 37 minutes. Though, just because it's KISS, we'll complain more.
I will make one side note, and that is not all bands can afford to make their CDs $8 or $10. They need a living too and I think if you were in a band, you would understand.
I watched KISS' performance on the David Letterman show and I think, for being seasoned as they are, they really rocked hard. Paul's voice still illuminates and Thayer (though slightly unheard) shouldn't go unnoticed. KISS still know, despite thoughs who disagree with their marketing, how to rock the house.
I think people need to get over themselves, stop whining and listen to the music. KISS, no matter what, is legendary. Whether you hate em or love em, they've inspired many around the world and their music is stapled into rock and roll. This album proves that KISS still has it, and it well worth the listen, and it shouldn't hold anybody back just because they love to whine.
Overall, in my opinion, I would give this album a 9, but for those who gave it an 8, I would agree with you as well. To me, this was the Chinese Democracy I was looking for in KISS. It rocks, their lyrics, even as silly as they are, are classic and their music doesn't morph into mainstream "rock." Plus, Paul did this all on his own, to make sure KISS was up to his standards and to make KISS fans happy. If this was to be their last album, I would say they went out in a bang.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
You sound pretty tight, its $12 for you (i live in england and thats equivilent to 6) but its actually 12 over here. It includes the new album, 15 re-recorded songs and a DVD, how isn't that a good deal.
So what if they sell loads of other crap? Everyones knows that! I don't really care to be quite honest, they've made a decent rock n roll record, its a return to form.
I think a "true" Kiss fan would support Paul and Gene.
It looks like to me that they just want to keep on making music. They don't need to, they're stinking rich, but they still do cos they care about the music too.
He lost faith at Destroyer, so R-n-R over and Love Gun were to much of a change for him. Peter and Ace blew their SECOND chance. Neither of which ever progressed as musicians. Peter was never good. Every drummer in the 70's out-shines Peter by far. And his playing today is plain and out dated. Tommy and Eric dont have a say in different make-up designs or how they play on KISS records. Although they both are still noticeably better live and on record than Peter or ACE. $12 is too much for 2 cd's and a dvd. And he hates that KISS is a merch-machine and he wont give two greedy old men his money. Yet he went to the first reunion show and bought a t-shirt. As a goof. Right. Enjoy this years show and dont forget to buy the shirt. You hate them, yet Gene and Paul were still able to get your money!
There is a Great interview with Paul Stanley on sleazeroxx.com He has intelligent anwsers that unintentionaly address all the bone headed comments made here and other forums. He say's that he is not delusional enough to think that even he isnt replaceable in KISS! And for all the Peter Criss lovers, and there is nothing wrong with that, we should remember that Eric Singer has been in and out of KISS for the last 18 yrs. Anyways, check it out, its a good read.
And for all the people that hate, Eric and Tommy wearing Ace/Peter make-up, you might as well get used to it and prepare yourselves. Because there will be a day when Gene and Paul are no longer in KISS, at least not on stage(at least while they are alive)taking more of a CEO, behind the scenes role, and two strangers WILL be wearing their make-up. Kiss will go LONG after they are dead. who knows, Eric and Tommy will probably go on to be the elder members of the group and make sure that the KISS idea and image are carried out.
I hate how all people do is bash KISS in every single thigns that mentions them. Yes their music is simple, even they know that. It's meant to be fun and great and does just that. Yes Gene is in love with money, he knows that. He's a business man and a kickass bassist as well. And stop complaining about Eric and Tommy using Peter and Ace's makeup designs. This was Gene's idea and, in my opinion, represents the KISS the world fell in love with. And those people who say KISS sucks and only listen to "black metal" or whatever it is, take a good look at the bands you listen to. Black and white make up, pyrotechnics and shock-rock attitudes? Oddly familiar to KISS don't you think?
being a true kiss fan from the early 70's, and sticking with them through the 80's, to present, i must say that this new cd is truely there best since '77 love gun. paul stanley got it done. the mix is much like rock and roll over, and the songs are a fusion of the first 3 studio albums and the 2nd 3 studio albums. which is what kiss was and is.
as far as the attitude about thayer & singer - my hat is off, thayer plays ace better than ace, and singer is a team player with chops and they both have great voices. people forget ace was a hired gun. he auditioned for kiss, he was not a founding member,and he wanted to play his own music. peter left the first time for his family, and of course the second time was over money. i guess 4 million bones wasn't enough.
what ever - i recommend this cd for the true kiss fan, especially the fan who don't hold personnal grudges, or are jealous of there "money". i give it 9
cherrypie287 :
Led Zeppelin didnt wear make up and use fireworks.
first of all will you and Zappanator stop trolling so bad..
second, I remember Jimmy Page sometimes dressed himself like a drifter when they performed live around the time when Led Zeppelin II and Led Zeppelin III were released isn't that a kind of other side of him too and a sort of trademark back then for him ?
I just bought the album today and I think the album is good for KISS standards because thats where you have to look at. Seriously do you people expect a musicalgenius album of KISS ? KISS is and was always about having fun and for me thats what real Rock N Roll is about and I think you can't deny that having a good time the spirit of rock n roll is.
I saw KISS last year at the Alive 35 tour and they were very tight and put on a good show because you know what, thats what KISS is about ! Having a good time at their concert with entertainment and Rock N Roll because they are Rock musicians and entertainers as well.
Sure I love Ace and Peter but people need to get over them. They both obviously couldn't handle being famous with the alcohol and drug problems back around '79. It was Gene and Pauls band so I can respect they made the decision not to let KISS fall apart because of them. If you have a own band with people and you started it would you let it go to pieces because someone or maybe 2 persons are too much busy with drugs or alcohol then with trying to go further ? Believe me you don't I kinda know how it is.
I too find it kinda stupid they first put on a farewell tour but then decidided to go on but I can understand it a bit because they had too give up something that is bigger as life. KISS fans are probably they loyalest fans of any music group ever just like Slayer fans and perhaps they were afraid letting them down.
In conclusion I think Sonic Boom is a good album for KISS. If they put out another album like Music In The Elder then it be a bad album yes because it isn't what KISS is about, just having fun in life and to rock n roll. Even though Gene is an ''greedy *******'' he never tried letting fans down, Ace and Peter clearly had a lot of demons in them which cause them to let KISS down and so let the fans down. I'm a big fan of Ace Frehley's guitar playing but he simply ****ed up. Thayer and Singer did a good job on the album, they both fit in well and they both earned their stripes with other bands soo get over it, listen to the album and realise its just a KISS album, pure and simple.
well, being a huge kiss fan (mainly with ace and peter in the band), I couldnt help but have to get the record anyway. I am pleasantly surprised. The album is actually pretty good. What really surprised me about the new music is Tommy Thayer. He does a very good job as the lead. Without trying to copy or replace ace, his sound is very similiar to aces and I really like his sound. Thumbs up to this
I bought the album, just out of curiosity of what it would sound like, and I was impressed. Every song is really good and has that classic Kiss sound. The Klassic Kiss CD that's packaged with it is pretty cool too. The songs sound like they have a new life to it, very fresh.
ironpriest believes kiss is over-rated just like the beatles, metallica and nirvana. and cherrypie287, had the late breaking news that Led Zepplin didnt wear make-up and use fireworks. please tell me that you two morons(although there are alot more of you,that I just havent mentioned)are just instigators with nothing better to do. Because I cant truely believe that you guys believe what you are saying. i can understand having nothing better to do. But it scares me that you really could be as dumb as you come across.
i bought the album today and i must say, this album is very good. i loved how you got 3 disc's for 12 dollars. klassic hits cd i thought was sad. they were great covers, but i thought it would've been easier to just collect their old recordings and put it on a cd. other than that, its a great album. Buy It Now!
Kiss already does have greatest hits CDs, but I personally like the idea of re-recording some of their greatest hits just for them to sound new, and get a new energy to them. I'm not necessarily a fan of messing with classics, but I think more people would be more willing to listen to Kiss if it sounded new. Lots of people won't even give songs a chance for the pure reason that they're old, or they sound old. The one that I noticed the biggest difference on was Calling Dr. Love. I think the change was positive.
The packaging of the new KISS album is similar to what Journey recently did: 1 cd of new material, 1 cd of classics re-worked and 1 live DVD. I have been an Ace Frehley fanatic, but I was pleasantly surprised with Tommy Thayer's playing. Eric Singer is also a better drummer than Peter Criss ever will be. I had the pleasure of seeing Eric Singer tour with Black Sabbath and Badlands. He is a solid musician.
As far as Sonic Boom goes, the Simmons' tunes remind me of KISS in the 70's and Stanley's tunes remind me of KISS in the 80's. The vocal appearances by Thayer and Singer were decent. Regretably, I didn't get a chance to see the recent KISS Alive 35 show. However, if they return in the next year or so I will be there. In closing, this is far better than Pyscho Cirus. I give it an 8.
I will admit that not having Ace Frehley and Peter Criss is a let down but if Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley wanted to make a new KISS cd then they have the right to get other people. What is with everyone complaining about not having original members? Does anyone realize how often bands go through different people? And it's been 30 or so years since they started, It's almost suprising that there's any original members other than Gene Simmons. Tommy Thayer is a kickass guitarist and is probably better than Ace Frehley (Expecting hate mail for that). Eric Singer is as good a drummer as Peter Criss. Anyway, I got this CD and with the exception of a couple songs, i can listen to the CD the entire way through. Not spectacular, but it has it's moments.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
Eh, I lost faith in KISS after Destroyer. Not in anyway a psychic, but I knew back then that they were heading in a "different direction" and it turned out I was right. They became far more commercial and to me, it seemed they existed only to sell merch. Psycho Circus blew massive chunks and to be honest, I really don't care that the majority of the reviews I've read so far give this album props. The fact that Tommy Thayer (ex-Black N' Blue guitarist) and Eric Singer have chosen to cop two members make-up and to any die-hard, original member (within the first couple years at least) of the KISS Army, this is unexceptable blasphemy!
If I happen to know someone who owns this and I like it, I may have them burn it for me but I don't care what's involved for "only" $12 bucks (to me, ALL CD's should be priced between $8 and $10), I'm not giving my money to a couple of greedy old men and two imposters. They want to be in KISS, fine, just do it without the make up or come up with your own gig - there was, is and always will be only ONE Spaceman and only ONE Catman, period and the fact that Gene and Paul allow this fakery to happen says exactly how they've let greed go to their heads.
The sooner this band just goes away, the better. I saw them back in the 70's and I went to their FIRST "farewell" tour and I still wear the concert shirt as a goof because of the FOUR "farewell" concerts that followed. Now they claim to be having so much "fun" (spelled $$$$$) to ever think about quitting.
Ya, right.
If you were a REAL KISS fan you would like the music regardless of who is in the band. Speaking of which... calling Eric an "imposter" is ludacris. He has been in the band for 10 years & MOST fans would agree that he is better than peter anyways. Speaking of Ace... he is sloppy as all hell live. Tommy... not so much. I do agree that they should have there own makeup, but it really isn't there choice now is it? So stop being such a whine ass & enjoy the music... or even better DON'T, because if you are more concerned about the makeup than what the music sounds like... we don't want you in the KISS Army.
Good Post!
I totally Agree, My favorite song off the album is Modern Day Delilah
I love this!
Still doing the same thing, and I have nothing to complain about!
... well I would rather see Ace and Peter in the band than Tommy and Eric, but it's awesome anyway!
I'm an oldie KISS fan from the 70's and have long retired fromt the "Army" and painting my face for Halloween but I might have to go buy some grease paint this year again.. Oddly I heard the Letterman Performance while 1/2 asleep (as I said, I'm an Oldie and that's late night) and didn't even catch that it was from an upcoming LP. So coincidentally this afternoon while shopping at a WalMart that had it's Grand Opening today I saw the disc and bought it. It said 2009 and I said OOOOO new KISS! I've only listened to it 1x through but couldn't stop listening. It's fresh, It's clean and loud and its KISS. It's what I would want to hear from them. Love it guys!!!!!
bob6.1 WROTE
Personally, I've given these guys repeated listens. They never have really impressed me. They're an overrated band just like the Beatles, Metallica, and Nirvana.
WOW WHAT A SICK BASTARD TO SAY THESE 3 ARE OVERATED U SIR ARE DEF GOING TO HELL.
Oh my god! People, listen to yourself! And listen to the album!! I am a die-hard KISS fan as so many other people here. BUT! You still have to realize and accept that your favorite band can sound bad! Crazy nights and music from the elder are bad albums. A few good songs yes, but in general bad.
I really liked the final sessions and psycho circus, but this?!
Be honest! You can really hear that Paul is the producer on this one. All the digital effects, about 15 voice tracks in every song etc.
AND! Both gene and paul have lost their voices. They just don't have the balls in the vocals.
And cuz of that there is like 15 voice tracks in every song in different harmonies, to make it sound thicker.
The songs are just to poppy and non ballsy. I am very disappointed in this album. And dont get me wrong, i LOVE KISS. But you just gotta know when youve lost..
Thayers guitar solos.. Hmm. Bad.
straight up immitation of Ace. Even though he says that he cant replace ace, he is still trying to sound like him??? THe riffs arent that great either..
i agree with beatles/nirvana being overrated, these 2 bands just came along at the right time when the music scene was quite stale and boring in both decades. if these bands came out today, they'd get no further than your average pub/bar band...they couldn't hold a candle to the great powerful rock bands (like KISS) and many others that we enjoy today, also,they'd be lucky to even get airplay on the radio and never come close to the mega-stardom of KISS....nuff sed
i loved modern day delilah! i can't wait for the album to arrive so i can hear the other tracks! kiss had its ups and downs, but im sure this is going to be an awesome album.after all they are the hottest band in the land.
kiss is my favorate band, before i herd kiss i thought areosmith was the only good band out there. i was very happy to hear kiss came out with a new album because kiss was an old band and i have heard every song by them and i wanted something new. i thought their new stuff was going to suk but after i heard modern day delilah i thought otherwise. never stop rocking!!
they hyped this album way to much. And they are pushing the wrong song. This is a bad attempt at a new album, when will they get smart and bring back ace and peter? That's where the talent was and is
This album might be a bit of old news...
But i've had this album for a while.
and i still love it...
It's good KISS stuff...
I know i wasn't around for the 70's when KISS, REALLY REALLY, were at the top of the game...
But i've gone back and listened to most of their old stuff, and you can still feel the magic...
Next time KISS comes by... i am going to their concerts.
As for Songs:
Modern Day Delilah, a little sleazy,
Still sounds good.
I love how "I'm an Animal" sounds so dark and gritty.
But... i gotta say... Favorite song has to be
"Say Yeah" idk why... But i just love the chorus...
anyways...
(Can someone please Tab that song for me?)
KISS still rocks no matter what way you look at it...
(BTW, what's the Name of Ace's Solo album?)
And...
Kissfan23?
Get over it, Ace and Peter are gone...
If they come back into the band...
even if only for a show...
they probably wouldn't stick around to make another album...
They're out.
Singer and Thayer are in...
I just bought this album today..and I think Gene Simmons should refrain from singing. EVER. Paul Stanley actually has a great voice that I never realized he had, but Gene Simmons..no, just no.
Incredibly cathcy songs on this album... I read the second review (with the track to track reviews) and suddenly all of the songs got stuck in my head, although it's like half a year since I last listened to it.
I really enjoyed Singer's track and Tommy sounds kinda like Ace when he starts singing...in my opinion...lol \,,/
Kiss already does have greatest hits CDs, but I personally like the idea of re-recording some of their greatest hits just for them to sound new, and get a new energy to them. I'm not necessarily a fan of messing with classics, but I think more people would be more willing to listen to Kiss if it sounded new. Lots of people won't even give songs a chance for the pure reason that they're old, or they sound old. The one that I noticed the biggest difference on was Calling Dr. Love. I think the change was positive.