guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Gibson : Les Paul Studio review. 42 reviews, 633 votes and 115 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Les Paul Studio Review

manufacturer: gibson date: 08/31/2009 category: electric guitars
Les Paul Studio
 Features:9.4
 Sound:9.7
 Action:8.9
 Reliability:8.9
 Impression:9.5
 Overall rating:
 9.3 
 Users rating:
 8.5 
 Comments:
 115 
 user comments vote for this guitar:
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.2
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.2
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.4
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.4
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.2
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.4
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.2
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.2
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 4.4
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.4
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 115 
 comments posted, 1 removed | this article is 99% spam-free
ArcherTheVMan :
the guy who wrote the review thats the third one down is an idiot. if he cant shred on it he must be doing it wrong because if you cant shred on it what do zakk wylde, slash, randy rhoads and all the others do? and if didnt realise before he bought it that gibsons n fenders have 22 frets on then that makes him more of a fool.
POSTED: 04/27/2006 - 11:51 am / quote |
_futurerockstar :
ArcherTheVMan wrote:

the guy who wrote the review thats the third one down is an idiot. if he cant shred on it he must be doing it wrong because if you cant shred on it what do zakk wylde, slash, randy rhoads and all the others do? and if didnt realise before he bought it that gibsons n fenders have 22 frets on then that makes him more of a fool.


oh yeah

POSTED: 04/27/2006 - 02:21 pm / quote |
EewokMan33 :
well argueably slash, zakk wylde and randy were not shredders at all, but i see your point. matt heafy uses a lp and he can pull off some good sweeps and stuff so it shouldnt be a problem
POSTED: 04/27/2006 - 08:25 pm / quote |
american-psycho :
yeah penis's are for men
POSTED: 05/24/2006 - 04:18 am / quote |
Mahoru :
This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.
POSTED: 05/27/2006 - 06:55 am / quote |
PlugOfDoom :
Mahoru wrote:

This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.


I love Gibson's, but unless you're a big dude like Zakk Wylde, I think they're kind of tough to work with for metal and fast stuff. I myself am not a huge person and don't have the strongest hands and arms in the world, so I tend to like Jackson's, Ibanez's, and other smaller guitars that are made for metal better than the Gibson. Plus, if you're like me, too, you can't afford the price tag on the Gibson

But still, a Gibson is a GIBSON...nothing else can compare to that.

POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 09:23 am / quote |
595Metallica595 :
i played one of these babys in the store brand new, hooked it up with a dolby metal master on some marshall amp i cant remember, and its awesome for metal, heavy metal, blues, and jazz. i play those styles but i mostly play heavy metal like pantera, metallica, ozzy, zakk wylde, i sound like a god when playing that on this guitar, then it sounds really creamy playin some clapton riffs, you will love this guitar if you like blues - heavy metal
POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 10:07 am / quote |
DaBlackE :
Ever notice that Gibson SG Standards are a little cheaper than the Les Paul Studios? For the price, I'd go with a SG Standard before a Les Paul Studio.
POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 04:28 pm / quote |
bunyard :
thts what i did and my sg is AMASING !!! and i got it signed by GARY MOORE :O
POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 06:46 pm / quote |
ZoxRoxMySox :
i played this guitar at guitar center friday and i wasnt really impressed. so i bought a gibson firebird
POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 07:32 pm / quote |
Mad Skillz :
sgs dont have a whammy bar thats the only down thing
POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 11:19 pm / quote |
Ignite :
^ Some do.

I've been wanting a LP Studio for quite a while. I got a Epi LP Studio, but it crap. Very faulty. I will never buy another Epi unless it's a semi hollow.

But once I get enough money, I will get one of these. Preferably ebony.

POSTED: 05/31/2006 - 11:58 pm / quote |
Minority27 :
Awesome review. I was going to get a LP Studio this week and then get it when I got back from vacation. After reading this review, I can't wait till I get to play it.
POSTED: 06/01/2006 - 02:26 am / quote |
Mahoru :
PlugOfDoom wrote:

Mahoru wrote:

This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.

I love Gibson's, but unless you're a big dude like Zakk Wylde, I think they're kind of tough to work with for metal and fast stuff. I myself am not a huge person and don't have the strongest hands and arms in the world, so I tend to like Jackson's, Ibanez's, and other smaller guitars that are made for metal better than the Gibson. Plus, if you're like me, too, you can't afford the price tag on the Gibson

But still, a Gibson is a GIBSON...nothing else can compare to that.


Well, I'm not a small guy with small hands (I use to play with SG's and B.C. Rich's). And I've seen lots of death and j-rock bands use this one, and I play these styles, so maybe It'll fit. I'll try, anyway.

POSTED: 06/11/2006 - 10:51 am / quote |
GuitarManiac09 :
Personally, I dont think the 3rd guy down didnt buy the guitar at all and is just an ibanez fanboy making people mad. And heres why:
What person in their right mind has an ibanez, is into shred (vai, satriani) and buys a gibson les paul?
Well, if he did really buy it, i laugh at him for his lack of research. HAHAHA.

POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 10:09 am / quote |
guitar135 :
i played this at guitar center, and it was horrible. the neck doesnt have that binding that other les pauls have. i didnt mind the weight, but the guitar just overall sucked. i ended up with an epiphone les paul- it sounded better, looked better, and felt better. this is like the worst gibson makes,dont buy it save up for a real les paul
POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 10:54 am / quote |
Vrstone87 :
this is the only guitar i will buy in the near future other than a Ibanez JS1200...JS1200 ftw!
POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 12:51 pm / quote |
RandyismyIdol :
Gibson quality has been inconsistent in recent years. If you want decent Gibson quality, go for a '96 or older. I managed to find a '96 LP Studio on Ebay and couldn't be happier with it (and it's 10 years old!).
POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 02:26 pm / quote |
Hamer213 :
PlugOfDoom wrote:

Mahoru wrote:

This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.


I love Gibson's, but unless you're a big dude like Zakk Wylde, I think they're kind of tough to work with for metal and fast stuff. I myself am not a huge person and don't have the strongest hands and arms in the world, so I tend to like Jackson's, Ibanez's, and other smaller guitars that are made for metal better than the Gibson. Plus, if you're like me, too, you can't afford the price tag on the Gibson

But still, a Gibson is a GIBSON...nothing else can compare to that.

i disagree i like epiphone better than gibson the gibson quality may be better but the epiphone sounds better but if you want good sound quality get a hamer explorer thats wat i have

POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 05:47 pm / quote |
CustomCustom :
I used to have one but one thing always bothered me, the fret wire wasnt cut slightly shorter to make up for the fact theres no creme plastic binding around the fretboard like a standard or Custom so you can see the metal sanded down with the edge of the fretboard showing thru the rosewood on the edges. That and there were some sharper fretwires hanging over the edges that hurt while sliding up and down quickly. Ebony fretboards are a negative to me also rosewood is mellower.
POSTED: 07/17/2006 - 08:25 pm / quote |
realic :
But still, a Gibson is a GIBSON...nothing else can compare to that.


shouldnt matter, leamons are everywhere.
and with gibson that leamon will leave a nice sourtaste in your pocket book.
Just cuz its a Gibson doesnt mean its grand. Treat all guitars as indiviuals. If it is an awsome Gibson then good stuff, but each guitar isnt always awsome.
Play to Buy. Buy to Play.

POSTED: 08/02/2006 - 03:29 pm / quote |
DownbëloW :
I bought this guitar just last week (as of right now) and I absolutely love it. Mine looks way diff from the picture but it's same guitar. I love everything about it, besides the lack of Tremolo and it only has 20 frets If you're like me, and love Afi and their sound, this guitar is perfect for that. Plays anything from Deep purple to Dragonforce. Rock on Gibson!
POSTED: 09/01/2006 - 07:23 pm / quote |
makuserusukotto :
i have a alpine white with 91 studio with gold hardware and i love it, i prefer the studio to regular because of its simpler looks, no binding or burst finish
POSTED: 09/26/2006 - 06:00 pm / quote |
stjimmy86 :
ive played my friend's les paul studio. i hadnt ever played a gibson before so the fatter neck bugged me. ive played other gibson's now to get used to it. but besides that, he played his LP through my shitty 10 watt amp and it still sounded pretty damn good. i didnt care for the color/finish (wine red) but a les paul is a les paul and i would take it any day
POSTED: 10/05/2006 - 12:12 am / quote |
Noodles TSG :
i cannot understand what people see in this damn guitar!! i hate lp!!
POSTED: 10/15/2006 - 06:39 am / quote |
fire within :
the reason an SG is cheaper is because they are thinner so there is less wood, and the body is smaller wioth 2 cuts in it, meaning even less wod, the wood price can mount up

i prefer my SG to a LP because of the size and styling , plus the sound is just as good

POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 11:08 am / quote |
The_bushidoka :
I thought that first reviewer was more obsessed with bragging about his new toy and ten years of experience than with actually talking about the guitar. That could just be me, though.
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 11:11 am / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Checked
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 12:55 pm / quote |
jcs5234 :
wow jumping from a squier to a les paul studio is pretty big...usually at least one step in between...and after only one year!! where do you plan to go from here?
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 02:28 pm / quote |
wigers will die :
I find gibson les pauls to be amazing... they sound awesome and are beauitfull haha, but they are too espenive
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 02:35 pm / quote |
gwitersnamps :
The_bushidoka wrote:

I thought that first reviewer was more obsessed with bragging about his new toy and ten years of experience than with actually talking about the guitar. That could just be me, though.

Hey, you have to give him credit. He seems to have found the worlds ONLY 23 fret guitar!

POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 05:46 pm / quote |
Jersey_Rokr :
NICE!
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 06:02 pm / quote |
thefoldarsoldar :
is there really 23 frets????
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 06:44 pm / quote |
E V H 5150 :
Guitarcaw...you seem amazingly stupid. you had to "adapt" to this guitar? If I, or any sensible person on earth, was going to spend at least over $1200 for a guitar, I think I might want to see if it fits my style. BEFORE I BUY IT. As for the featured review, I thought it was very long, and it seemed to talk less about the guitar and more about how much money the guy has (seeing as he has a whole bunch of crap according to the review). I'm not a Gibson guy. I've only ever seen ONE gibson with whammy, and that was an Angus Young. The sad thing is that it doesn't seem like Angus even uses whammy. I'm more a fan of the Stratocaster bodies.
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 07:25 pm / quote |
AngryGuitarist :
Thres no way theres 23 frets, thats not standard.
22 - 24 frets pl0x.
dude 900 bucks for a gibson LP is a fricken' steal

POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 07:38 pm / quote |
sexmeister :
I DUNNO THE GUY IS PROBABLY RIGHT BUT GIBSON IS NOT THAT BAD BUT I WOULD PREFER AND IBANEZ INSTEAD WELL THATS JUST ME
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 08:09 pm / quote |
sexmeister :
gibson r nice i wuold want 1 but just 2 say that i have a GIBSON LES PAUL but the guy is right almost a thousand bucks 4 that guitar i would prefer an ibanez instead but thats just me
POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 08:17 pm / quote |
MESAexplorer :
ArcherTheVMan wrote:

the guy who wrote the review thats the third one down is an idiot. if he cant shred on it he must be doing it wrong because if you cant shred on it what do zakk wylde, slash, randy rhoads and all the others do? and if didnt realise before he bought it that gibsons n fenders have 22 frets on then that makes him more of a fool.


Joe Satrianis sig series Ibanez has 22 frets, Eric Clapton, Jimi Hendrix, Yngwie all use fender strats 21 and probably 22 frets on some. etc.

POSTED: 10/16/2006 - 08:35 pm / quote |
supergerbil :
The first reviewer says he has been playing since he was 7. So what, alot of people have.
POSTED: 10/26/2006 - 09:20 am / quote |
phillyguitar :
the first reviewer also says he's had the guitar for ten years, yet it was made in 2005. Unless he's warped to the future, that doesn't make sense
POSTED: 11/01/2006 - 10:40 am / quote |
jcs5234 :
he doesn't say he's been playing this guitar for ten years, he says he been playing the guitar for ten years
POSTED: 11/07/2006 - 11:37 pm / quote |
Ibanez_4 :
mines made of magohany,bad ass
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 05:46 pm / quote |
mfkr511 :
my lead guitarist has one of these and he plays it through a Marshall mg250dfx combo and the tone can kill, my only complaint is that it is really heavy, hurts ur back
POSTED: 01/15/2007 - 09:45 am / quote |
DANROCHE :
I have one. Nothing wrong with it. They are not that heavy
POSTED: 01/18/2007 - 12:08 pm / quote |
guandi18 :
OK lets get one thing straight here. The idea that there is one guitar that, at a professional level, may be more suited to say metal than blues, is one that can be debated till the cows come home (and indeed even the cows seem somewhat reticent about their E.T.A.). Bearing this in mind why would anyone bother to waste their time penning such mundane statments such as "This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one." All this guy apparently needs is the possibly ill-gotten views of his peers to be expressed for him to then rush to the shops to buy a guitar that he hasn't played or even heard. Don't be so wet boy. Make up your own mind on whether this is the guitar FOR YOU(!) and not on what some other confused adolescent with too much money can tell you. Oh and back to my first point (if I had one). There is no guitar that you can plug in to an amp that will not at least play the music you are into, and like I said the jury is still out on whether or not, at a amateur or even semi-pro level, it makes difference which guitar you choose. Put an LP Studio and a Ibanez RG to work on the same track and there almost certainly will be a difference in sound, but I defy anyone to be able to tell the difference between the two by ear alone. So I guess what im saying is, always just go for the sexiest looking beast you can find because at this level you are kidding yourself if you think you can make a decision otherwise.
POSTED: 01/24/2007 - 07:16 am / quote |
guandi18 :
Sorry, that bit at the end should have read...

"Put an LP Studio and a Ibanez RG to work on the same track and there almost certainly will be a difference in sound, but I defy anyone to be able to tell which is which by ear alone."

POSTED: 01/24/2007 - 07:19 am / quote |
DaBlackE :
DaBlackE wrote:

Ever notice that Gibson SG Standards are a little cheaper than the Les Paul Studios? For the price, I'd go with a SG Standard before a Les Paul Studio.

Well you can disregard that comment now, Gibson has jacked the price on SG Standards to $1499! I think Studios go for 200 or 300 cheaper, but that's only if you're buying them new. Unless you're really picky or got money to burn, I'd say get a good used one, they're all over ebay for less than grand.

POSTED: 03/11/2007 - 06:08 am / quote |
winslow31 :
i have a wine red one connected to a line 6 spider 3 and the sound id amazing
POSTED: 03/17/2007 - 11:22 pm / quote |
fenderdude0071 :
i got mines to day its fireburst and i paid 850 for it
POSTED: 03/30/2007 - 08:25 pm / quote |
Fuzzbox91 :
Mahoru wrote:

This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.

um... go with an SG standard, better quality, better upper fret access, just better

POSTED: 04/01/2007 - 10:07 am / quote |
METAL MILITIA1 :
JUST GOT ONE TODAY MOTHA FUKERS AND IT RULEZ
POSTED: 06/10/2007 - 11:06 pm / quote |
raihidara :
I just got a LP Studio today, and I'm running it through a Randall RG50TC. It is definitely the best guitar I own (I have an Ibanez Iceman, Epiphone SG, and Fender American Strat). Plus, I prefer this to the LP standard--the tone and weight are much better IMO.
POSTED: 06/27/2007 - 12:59 am / quote |
rbthom :
The LP studio is a great Guitar but the paint on the neck causes static noises which I don,t get from my Ibanez, nothing can beat the tone and sound but the static noise bugs me.

Russell

POSTED: 07/12/2007 - 05:30 am / quote |
rbthom :
I own Gibson LP Studio and I love the tone and sound but the guitar has one very annoying problem, when you are playing it there is a lot of static build-up in the neck caused by the paint on the back of the neck.
I've had the guitar checked out and the electronics are fine and everything is grouded.

POSTED: 07/12/2007 - 05:34 am / quote |
FloyDZeD :
I got a '96 LP Studio for $900. You can play any type of music with these things.
POSTED: 10/01/2007 - 11:53 am / quote |
envoykrawkwar7 :
This is the slowest neck I've ever played. Plus, the back of it is painted which becomes sticky ever 4 minutes and you have to constantly clean it then wash your hands.

tahts easy to fix, just wear some gloves with the fingers cut off
it helps a lot [have the same paiint on my epi lp sp2 it sucks]

POSTED: 10/03/2007 - 12:28 am / quote |
ACDClover31 :
i just bought a used wine red one and cannot play it until christmas but i am looking forward to playing it after all of these great reviews. Thanks
POSTED: 12/05/2007 - 05:26 pm / quote |
ACDClover31 :
i agrre 100%
ArcherTheVMan wrote:

the guy who wrote the review thats the third one down is an idiot. if he cant shred on it he must be doing it wrong because if you cant shred on it what do zakk wylde, slash, randy rhoads and all the others do? and if didnt realise before he bought it that gibsons n fenders have 22 frets on then that makes him more of a fool.

POSTED: 12/23/2007 - 07:22 pm / quote |
I am the Drake :
I've had mine for about a year and I love it!!!!!
POSTED: 12/31/2007 - 04:30 am / quote |
Walternativo :
I tried this guitar today (ebony/gold version: 2002) and compared it to a Les paul standard faded. The studio is significantly heavier and has less sustain. The pickups are on the studio have less bite.

The studio is less suitable for the rock/metal sound Im looking for than the Les Paul Standard faded.

POSTED: 01/02/2008 - 11:27 am / quote |
ACDClover31 :
i love my les paul.
POSTED: 01/05/2008 - 10:27 pm / quote |
guitarest99 :
GuitarManiac09 wrote:

Personally, I dont think the 3rd guy down didnt buy the guitar at all and is just an ibanez fanboy making people mad. And heres why:
What person in their right mind has an ibanez, is into shred (vai, satriani) and buys a gibson les paul?
Well, if he did really buy it, i laugh at him for his lack of research. HAHAHA.


I'm one of those people who actually owns 6 different Ibanez's (a old RG 550 from the 80's is in the collection, a Older Iceman from the early 90's, and a few SA Models and a Bass) and I broke down and replaced a Les Paul I used to own in the 70's. I love my Studio its Wine Red with Gold hardware, I run these guitars through my Line6 PodXt Live and a 5150 Full Stack. I am totally in love with my Paul again, nothing will beat the sound of a Les Paul, its because the damn thing weighs so much and that why it sounds so great..... OK I'll be quiet now..... Jocko

POSTED: 01/13/2008 - 01:39 am / quote |
aaron00lee :
Looks great, im plannin to buy one...aye
POSTED: 01/21/2008 - 01:37 pm / quote |
briang1110 :
AngryGuitarist wrote:

Thres no way theres 23 frets, thats not standard.
22 - 24 frets pl0x.
dude 900 bucks for a gibson LP is a fricken' steal

I got mine for like 921, its an amazing guitar, dont know what that shredder review was talking about the electronics, sounds like he screwed it up himself

POSTED: 01/29/2008 - 12:05 pm / quote |
briang1110 :
AngryGuitarist wrote:

Thres no way theres 23 frets, thats not standard.
22 - 24 frets pl0x.
dude 900 bucks for a gibson LP is a fricken' steal

I got mine for like 921, its an amazing guitar, dont know what that shredder review was talking about the electronics, sounds like he screwed it up himself

POSTED: 01/29/2008 - 12:05 pm / quote |
Kabalist :
The Gibson LP Studio is a great guitar but it's not for everybody. If you are just starting out on the electric guitar the expense of this instrument may not make it the best choice for you. I've been playing the guitar since 1973 and it wasn't until after I had played the electric for about 5 to 10 years that I started to appreciate the tonal qualities of the guitars I was playing and was able to make an informed choice about what I really wanted or needed. Back in the 70's there were some really crappy beginner guitars out there. I owned them and wondered why they wouldn't stay in tune! Now days even the the cheapest beginner instruments are light years better in quality compared to what I was trying to play in those days. Now you can spend about $200 and get an instrument, that when set up properly, will sound better than anything I could fantasize about when I was getting started. My first really good quality instrument was a 70's Fender Stratocaster that I bought in 1982 while I was in the Marines and was just starting to get really good with the Blues, enough so that my friends were starting to spend hours listening to me because they enjoyed it and not out of sympathy. I believed the sun rose and set on Jimi Hendrix and I wanted nothing so badly as to sound like him. But still it took a lot of time and experimentation (years) to realize the different pickup settings and effects and amplifier brands that would help me get somewhere near to approximating his great sound. After over 30 years on the electric guitar I feel that paying $1200 for my Gibson Studio LP is worth it in order to get that just so tone that I knew I could only get from this particular guitar. And I chose it out of 7 or 8 Studios that weren't nearly as good. But back in the 70's when I was a kid I didn't have the ear to even begin to appreciate what I wanted out of a guitar. My point is, if you can't tell the difference between the sound of a $200 Ibanez and a $1200 Studio LP, buy the Ibanez and get really good on it. Then as you get better and better you will start to develop your ear and realize what kind of quality instrument you can't live without.
POSTED: 02/28/2008 - 09:16 pm / quote |
LD_Luke D :
i got mine 635 used with case, but it came it the natural finish, which takes some time to get used to because most other guitars are really flashy, if you have a tase for a real piece of art and want a thick rich, and full sound this guitar is for you. the only problem is i went from an ltd which has a thinner neck i just had to get used to it, but once i did it was easy to play
POSTED: 03/05/2008 - 05:17 pm / quote |
Dnalrafcmb3 :
Kabalist wrote:

The Gibson LP Studio is a great guitar but it's not for everybody. If you are just starting out on the electric guitar the expense of this instrument may not make it the best choice for you. I've been playing the guitar since 1973 and it wasn't until after I had played the electric for about 5 to 10 years that I started to appreciate the tonal qualities of the guitars I was playing and was able to make an informed choice about what I really wanted or needed. Back in the 70's there were some really crappy beginner guitars out there. I owned them and wondered why they wouldn't stay in tune! Now days even the the cheapest beginner instruments are light years better in quality compared to what I was trying to play in those days. Now you can spend about $200 and get an instrument, that when set up properly, will sound better than anything I could fantasize about when I was getting started. My first really good quality instrument was a 70's Fender Stratocaster that I bought in 1982 while I was in the Marines and was just starting to get really good with the Blues, enough so that my friends were starting to spend hours listening to me because they enjoyed it and not out of sympathy. I believed the sun rose and set on Jimi Hendrix and I wanted nothing so badly as to sound like him. But still it took a lot of time and experimentation (years) to realize the different pickup settings and effects and amplifier brands that would help me get somewhere near to approximating his great sound. After over 30 years on the electric guitar I feel that paying $1200 for my Gibson Studio LP is worth it in order to get that just so tone that I knew I could only get from this particular guitar. And I chose it out of 7 or 8 Studios that weren't nearly as good. But back in the 70's when I was a kid I didn't have the ear to even begin to appreciate what I wanted out of a guitar. My point is, if you can't tell the difference between the sound of a $200 Ibanez and a $1200 Studio LP, buy the Ibanez and get really good on it. Then as you get better and better you will start to develop your ear and realize what kind of quality instrument you can't live without.
Kabalist wrote:

The Gibson LP Studio is a great guitar but it's not for everybody. If you are just starting out on the electric guitar the expense of this instrument may not make it the best choice for you. I've been playing the guitar since 1973 and it wasn't until after I had played the electric for about 5 to 10 years that I started to appreciate the tonal qualities of the guitars I was playing and was able to make an informed choice about what I really wanted or needed. Back in the 70's there were some really crappy beginner guitars out there. I owned them and wondered why they wouldn't stay in tune! Now days even the the cheapest beginner instruments are light years better in quality compared to what I was trying to play in those days. Now you can spend about $200 and get an instrument, that when set up properly, will sound better than anything I could fantasize about when I was getting started. My first really good quality instrument was a 70's Fender Stratocaster that I bought in 1982 while I was in the Marines and was just starting to get really good with the Blues, enough so that my friends were starting to spend hours listening to me because they enjoyed it and not out of sympathy. I believed the sun rose and set on Jimi Hendrix and I wanted nothing so badly as to sound like him. But still it took a lot of time and experimentation (years) to realize the different pickup settings and effects and amplifier brands that would help me get somewhere near to approximating his great sound. After over 30 years on the electric guitar I feel that paying $1200 for my Gibson Studio LP is worth it in order to get that just so tone that I knew I could only get from this particular guitar. And I chose it out of 7 or 8 Studios that weren't nearly as good. But back in the 70's when I was a kid I didn't have the ear to even begin to appreciate what I wanted out of a guitar. My point is, if you can't tell the difference between the sound of a $200 Ibanez and a $1200 Studio LP, buy the Ibanez and get really good on it. Then as you get better and better you will start to develop your ear and realize what kind of quality instrument you can't live without.
[quote]Kabalist wrote:

The Gibson LP Studio is a great guitar but it's not for everybody. If you are just starting out on the electric guitar the expense of this instrument may not make it the best choice for you. I've been playing the guitar since 1973 and it wasn't until after I had played the electric for about 5 to 10 years that I started to appreciate the tonal qualities of the guitars I was playing and was able to make an informed choice about what I really wanted or needed. Back in the 70's there were some really crappy beginner guitars out there. I owned them and wondered why they wouldn't stay in tune! Now days even the the cheapest beginner instruments are light years better in qua

POSTED: 03/13/2008 - 10:00 am / quote |
dnamra13 :
i played a Gibson Les Paul Studio when i was in the market for a new guitar. and i have a few things to say about them.

the TONE of this thing is amazing and sounds perfect for rock and roll and more progressive rock. it doesnt sound good enough for modern metal cause it has this more vintage sound to it.
the playability of this guitar well isent for everyone because it has a really chunky neck and because it is a
single-cut guitar you cant reacht the upper strings at the 18-22 fret.
my conclusion: dont buy it because it is a gibson dont buy it because it is a Les Paul. buy it if you really love it in terms of sound and playability after all you are the one who will be spending many hours playing it.

POSTED: 03/13/2008 - 01:55 pm / quote |
PBDoo :
I've got a Wine Red LP studio and had it for almost four years now and the sound out of it is truely awesome. Run it through a Marshall MGDFX50 and it is brilliant and when I connect it through a GT-8 the range of sounds are superb. It gives me a big smile when I thrash out GNR and Velvet Revolver! However, I've also found the sounds off this guitar are quite convincing for covering Muse. I've noticed a few LP's on YouTube doing Muse and its a good alternative to a Manson custom as long as you don't want to divebomb or go whammy mad! If you appreciate guitar tone as so many have said on here, the Gibson LP studio is a great choice.
POSTED: 03/29/2008 - 01:07 am / quote |
Iamonfire :
sexmeister wrote:

I DUNNO THE GUY IS PROBABLY RIGHT BUT GIBSON IS NOT THAT BAD BUT I WOULD PREFER AND IBANEZ INSTEAD WELL THATS JUST ME


CAPS LOCK IS NOT CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME.

Also, great guitar, currently saving up for one at the moment.

Alpine white pour moi.

POSTED: 03/30/2008 - 08:29 pm / quote |
2dor :
Gibson=OVERRATED
POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 10:06 am / quote |
j-e-f-f-e-r-s :
Jeez, what's with all the wannabe tone-hounds out there saying 'Oh, it's good for blues but rubbish for metal, good for jazz but crap for indie, etc etc.'

I've got news for you. Les Paul (the guy who created it) uses an LP to play some awesome jazz music. Zakk Wylde uses an LP to play metal, as does Adrian Smith on occasion. Page, Moore, even Clapton use or have used an LP to play blues. Slash uses one to play hard rock. The chap from Sigur Ros uses one to make spaced-out indie music.

What I'm trying to say is, a Les Paul guitar is what you make it. Tone ultimately comes from your fingers, not the plank of wood you're playing. If you like the sound an LP makes, then for chrissakes get one and don't let some snotty little teenager on the internet persuade you otherwise.

POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 10:22 am / quote |
the.spine.surfs :
So many kids, so happy that they guilted their parents into buying a Studio, so ready to post reviews with inflated ratings.
POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 11:13 am / quote |
SL!!! :
j-e-f-f-e-r-s wrote:

Jeez, what's with all the wannabe tone-hounds out there saying 'Oh, it's good for blues but rubbish for metal, good for jazz but crap for indie, etc etc.'

I've got news for you. Les Paul (the guy who created it) uses an LP to play some awesome jazz music. Zakk Wylde uses an LP to play metal, as does Adrian Smith on occasion. Page, Moore, even Clapton use or have used an LP to play blues. Slash uses one to play hard rock. The chap from Sigur Ros uses one to make spaced-out indie music.

What I'm trying to say is, a Les Paul guitar is what you make it. Tone ultimately comes from your fingers, not the plank of wood you're playing. If you like the sound an LP makes, then for chrissakes get one and don't let some snotty little teenager on the internet persuade you otherwise.
Yeah, you can use any guitar for any style really depending on how YOU want it to sound.

POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 02:31 pm / quote |
strat0blaster :
It's not a bad guitar, but definately not a Custom or Standard. Played alright, but LPs are extremely tempermental in terms of neck adjustments - much like SGs. Overall, I was okay with mine - wasn't worth the 1200 paid for it, though. My 900 dollar Ameristrat destroyed the Studio, in my opinion. So did my Ibanez and my ESP. If it had cost 800, I would have been better with it.

POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 04:05 pm / quote |
justindellacort :
I bought this guitar at Guitar Center used for $999.99 in a beautiful fireburst finish. It can definitely be considered a pro guitar; i've played the expensive gibsons, and it is definitely a trimmed down standard, with between 58 and 59 neck. I have no complaints
POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 04:22 pm / quote |
TheFreeBird :
i hate guitar center
POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 07:03 pm / quote |
cj10schmelzer :
the people who write the reviews for gibson les pauls dont have to say what genres it can fit with they can go with almost anything you play
POSTED: 04/09/2008 - 08:15 pm / quote |
teleblaster :
wow, cool! 23 frets! i'm having one of those!
POSTED: 04/10/2008 - 01:11 pm / quote |
52637james :
hey,
eh im thinkin of buyin a 8 year old lp studio for 600 euro (900 dollars) its head was broke but fixed n im gettin a years warranty on it? wat u think?
oh n a new one in ireland costs 1800 dollars plus!
Thanks

POSTED: 06/01/2008 - 11:47 am / quote |
stevenpollock :
52637james wrote:

hey,
eh im thinkin of buyin a 8 year old lp studio for 600 euro (900 dollars) its head was broke but fixed n im gettin a years warranty on it? wat u think?
oh n a new one in ireland costs 1800 dollars plus!
Thanks


I don't think I'd every buy an instrument that's been cracked anywhere but the body. And itd have to be a SUPER small crack.

POSTED: 06/10/2008 - 05:21 pm / quote |
jempap67 :
just got lp studio today. Amazing! Just go into the music shop and try it. You'll know if it's right for you or not.
POSTED: 06/11/2008 - 10:50 pm / quote |
slashrock94 :
i got my one a couple of months ago. The worn brown finish that mine has is just beastly
POSTED: 07/01/2008 - 12:04 pm / quote |
KCW1229 :
are gibson really that overrated??

POSTED: 07/17/2008 - 01:31 am / quote |
XChainsawGorgeX :
Gibsons are Slightly overrated, atleast they are sometimes overpriced in my opinion. VERY nice but, Buying a Gibosn is buying a Name brand, don't get me wrong, I LOVE them, BUT, i found ESPs to be around the same rating with the NEW Gibsons.
the '59 "Burst" PWNS ALL! though ^_^

POSTED: 07/24/2008 - 11:45 pm / quote |
Quarbon :
Gibsons IS the best, no doubt there for me.
To compare this Studio-model to a standard (I own a standard) -> Studio's sound kinda suck. It's a boring sound compared to the Standard-model. Ofc standard is more expensive etc., but a Studio sound is just too boring.
Gibson Standard for the win.

POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 08:59 am / quote |
Gammas1 :
Yeah I think I would buy either a standard or a classic... IF I HAD THE MONEY! :s
POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 11:25 am / quote |
ALeMmjon :
I don't think you are buying the name.. your paying for elite parts. Think about it. You have sustain, brilliant tone, smooth fretboard, you can drop it (not that you want to) and it's fine, just over all girth. It's sexy. I personally prefer PRS between the two if you are going to go all out. But Gibson knows what they are doing..
POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 12:29 pm / quote |
S.L.A.S.H. :
My Schecter Hellraiser c-1 fr is better! I own them both
POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 01:12 pm / quote |
guitargodderyck :
Seems like a mad nice guitar. If only it was cheaper..
POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 08:27 pm / quote |
NOSPI :
Purchased from: meth junky former friend

you do realise you just funded his habit?

POSTED: 11/06/2008 - 05:34 am / quote |
Waltron427 :
give me a floyd rose and ill take it. or even just emgs. (please.....)
POSTED: 11/18/2008 - 11:04 pm / quote |
CHM120 :
im personally a les paul kind of guy, people always whine about shredding being impossible ona lp but its really about the player, i like the thick neck alot because my hands are massive and they feel cramped on smaller necks, its all preferance but this is a truly great instrument
POSTED: 12/06/2008 - 03:14 pm / quote |
Ibanez187 :
Hamer213 wrote:

PlugOfDoom wrote:

Mahoru wrote:

This one looks nice. But I need to know if it's a right guitar for playing some kind of progressive death metal stuff, like Opeth, or more melodic, like In Flames or At The Gates. Please answer, 'cause if it's good for this, I'll buy one.

I love Gibson's, but unless you're a big dude like Zakk Wylde, I think they're kind of tough to work with for metal and fast stuff. I myself am not a huge person and don't have the strongest hands and arms in the world, so I tend to like Jackson's, Ibanez's, and other smaller guitars that are made for metal better than the Gibson. Plus, if you're like me, too, you can't afford the price tag on the Gibson

But still, a Gibson is a GIBSON...nothing else can compare to that.

i disagree i like epiphone better than gibson the gibson quality may be better but the epiphone sounds better but if you want good sound quality get a hamer explorer thats wat i have


Hamer i hope your kidding epiphone blows...

POSTED: 12/14/2008 - 08:07 am / quote |
Ibanez187 :
2dor wrote:

Gibson=OVERRATED


That's what i thought for awhile when i tried this guitar at guitar center but my friend just got one and it screams although i still like my ESP EC-1000 more.

POSTED: 12/14/2008 - 08:09 am / quote |
Ibanez187 :
XChainsawGorgeX wrote:

Gibsons are Slightly overrated, atleast they are sometimes overpriced in my opinion. VERY nice but, Buying a Gibosn is buying a Name brand, don't get me wrong, I LOVE them, BUT, i found ESPs to be around the same rating with the NEW Gibsons.
the '59 "Burst" PWNS ALL! though ^_^


I agree completely gibsons are great guitars but i just bought an ec-1000 deluxe in green and it plays just as well as a gibson, i think that the neck on mine be better.

POSTED: 12/14/2008 - 08:11 am / quote |
Ibanez187 :
You guys know that some of the people on here that are bitching about the guitar are blatantly unaware of the fact that some of the reviews are for the mahogany version of the guitar and the regular les paul. ive tried both and i think that the only difference is the neck playability and the fretboard on the $1200 les paul is way better.

POSTED: 12/14/2008 - 08:20 am / quote |
slashrock94 :
Ibanez187 wrote:

XChainsawGorgeX wrote:

Gibsons are Slightly overrated, atleast they are sometimes overpriced in my opinion. VERY nice but, Buying a Gibosn is buying a Name brand, don't get me wrong, I LOVE them, BUT, i found ESPs to be around the same rating with the NEW Gibsons.
the '59 "Burst" PWNS ALL! though ^_^

I agree completely gibsons are great guitars but i just bought an ec-1000 deluxe in green and it plays just as well as a gibson, i think that the neck on mine be better.


Yes, but an EC-1000 Deluxe costs what, about twice as much as an LP studio?

POSTED: 12/18/2008 - 11:58 am / quote |
slashrock94 :
Also, for people saying ''It's not as good as a standard, the pickups are not as good.'' It has the same pickups as the Supreme and most customs.
POSTED: 12/18/2008 - 12:00 pm / quote |
alexec947 :
can anyone help me here? im small. so i have small hands. i want to be able to play heavy rock/metal, and i want a really full, rounded, powerful sound for stuff like powerful barre chords. but also want a lot of drive for stuff live avenged sevenfold riffs, and avenged sevenfold-style solos (Althoughim not that good). is this a good guitar for me?
POSTED: 12/22/2008 - 05:37 am / quote |
ghiyath :
Gibson Les Paul Studio is absolutely overrated. When you get this guitar you pay for the Gibson name. It's a budget Les Paul and plays like one. You could without a doubt find another brand of guitar that sounds just as good without paying out the ass for it. If you truly want a Les Paul, save the money and get a real Les Paul Standard.
POSTED: 01/28/2009 - 11:36 am / quote |
Ace-014 :
slashrock94 wrote:

Ibanez187 wrote:

XChainsawGorgeX wrote:

Gibsons are Slightly overrated, atleast they are sometimes overpriced in my opinion. VERY nice but, Buying a Gibosn is buying a Name brand, don't get me wrong, I LOVE them, BUT, i found ESPs to be around the same rating with the NEW Gibsons.
the '59 "Burst" PWNS ALL! though ^_^

I agree completely gibsons are great guitars but i just bought an ec-1000 deluxe in green and it plays just as well as a gibson, i think that the neck on mine be better.

Yes, but an EC-1000 Deluxe costs what, about twice as much as an LP studio?

I could be wrong, but last time I checked on Musicians Friend, the EC-1000 Deluxe was about the same price, maybe a little more

POSTED: 02/04/2009 - 04:12 pm / quote |
slashrock94 :
Sorry, are we talking ESP or LTD.
POSTED: 02/20/2009 - 04:03 pm / quote |
retka :
All I can say is this is NOT the rock guitar....BC RICH guitars are the original metal/rock guitars. I have played many LPs and they all were horrible. Very nasily tonal quality even on a modeling amp. Poor wood quality, sticky neck finishes, cheap electronics, and overall poor setups. Dont waste your money on this...go buy a real work of art like a BC RICH Mockingbird Evil Edge SE.
POSTED: 03/04/2009 - 08:24 pm / quote |
Dallinisrad :
retka wrote:

All I can say is this is NOT the rock guitar....BC RICH guitars are the original metal/rock guitars. I have played many LPs and they all were horrible. Very nasily tonal quality even on a modeling amp. Poor wood quality, sticky neck finishes, cheap electronics, and overall poor setups. Dont waste your money on this...go buy a real work of art like a BC RICH Mockingbird Evil Edge SE.


bc rich are the worlds ugliest guitars in every way. oh and rock came before metal

POSTED: 04/02/2009 - 09:13 pm / quote |
Muramasa :
I just got a 06 studio in red wine and chrome hardware yesterday. I feel complete now and it sounds amazing through my triple recto and my nova system.
POSTED: 04/25/2009 - 11:12 pm / quote |
Ibanez187 :
slashrock94 wrote:

Ibanez187 wrote:

XChainsawGorgeX wrote:

Gibsons are Slightly overrated, atleast they are sometimes overpriced in my opinion. VERY nice but, Buying a Gibosn is buying a Name brand, don't get me wrong, I LOVE them, BUT, i found ESPs to be around the same rating with the NEW Gibsons.
the '59 "Burst" PWNS ALL! though ^_^

I agree completely gibsons are great guitars but i just bought an ec-1000 deluxe in green and it plays just as well as a gibson, i think that the neck on mine be better.

Yes, but an EC-1000 Deluxe costs what, about twice as much as an LP studio?


Actually i got mine for $8oo including a hardshell case. check this guitar out it screams and looks sick in green.

POSTED: 05/05/2009 - 08:07 pm / quote |
Vitooch :
what makes this les paul so much better then all other les pauls?
POSTED: 07/14/2009 - 02:37 am / quote |
AltarageR :
This or Godin XTSA?
POSTED: 07/16/2009 - 03:22 am / quote |
AltarageR :
So...this or Godin XTSA?
POSTED: 07/16/2009 - 03:28 am / quote |
whencowsfart101 :
my michael kelly patriot custom is like £800 cheaper and they play+sound the same.
POSTED: 07/21/2009 - 12:26 pm / quote |
Fear3001 :
DaBlackE wrote:

Ever notice that Gibson SG Standards are a little cheaper than the Les Paul Studios? For the price, I'd go with a SG Standard before a Les Paul Studio.


It depends really on the type of guitar player you are wether you want the playability of the SG standard or the full thick sound of the Gibson Les Paul Studio

POSTED: 08/17/2009 - 06:04 am / quote |
joey arce :
There is a reason les paul took his name of the sg
POSTED: 08/31/2009 - 04:06 pm / quote |
jensen33 :
I'm sad to say, but a review it worthless unless it's benchmarked. A gibson LP Studio may be a good guitar, but compared to what? So I've benchmarked the Gibson LP Studio against the Gibson LP standard. (The following may seem harsh to some people in here, but it is just because I am a dedicated musician:
I'm the happy owner of a Gibson Les Paul Standard Model, which I purchased about 4 years ago, after playing on a Gibson Marauder for about 10 years. I bought it because I've always dreamed of the renowned "waupwaup" sound of the Les Paul. Of course I tried out all of the different Gibson Les Paul guitars before I decided.
The les paul studio is a crappy guitar. It is in no way comparable to the more expensive standard model. It is, to my liking, a guitar worth appr. 4-500 usd. the finish it fairly bad, but most importantly, - it doesn't sound or feel like a Les Paul (not to my anyway).
I am very well aware that buying a standard is a big deal, so my advice is: save up for the real thing, or buy a less renowned guitar brand, 'cos you are paying too much for the Gibson logo on the Studio.
For instance I bought a Washburn bass recently. An excellent buy. I reckon you would get a lot more sound for less money buying a washburn guitar (I haven't tried one out though!).

The lowdown Gibson LP studio:
Sound: 4-5
action, fit, finish: 5

/jensen

POSTED: 10/17/2009 - 07:11 am / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009