guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Line 6 : Spider III 75 review. 29 reviews, 282 votes and 189 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

Spider III 75 Review

manufacturer: line 6 date: 11/24/2009 category: guitar amplifiers
Spider III 75
 Features:8.9
 Sound:8.4
 Reliability:9.1
 Impression:8.6
 Overall rating:
 8.8 
 Users rating:
 8.4 
 Comments:
 189 
  pictures (1)  user comments vote for this amp:
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 6.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 6.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 3.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 189 
 comments posted, 2 removed | this article is 99% spam-free
dilbert_5150 :
Well, it's pretty nice amp for the price, but if you want a "multi-sounding" amp, there's always a g00d idea to consider vox ad50vt, especially if you want more vintage sounds.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 06:47 am / quote |
mister_crowley :
hmm. No. Don't think thats convinced me they are good either.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:16 am / quote |
Kingyem0c0re :
To be honest, this amp isn't to bad,
It's nothing I'd write to jesus about though,
But it's still quite good in comparison with the Spider II

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:29 am / quote |
La Qotsa :
Just as digital as the rest, no doubt. All those presets are to hide it.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:37 am / quote |
kentaro.roy :
I'm sold
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:40 am / quote |
ygokazuki :
Orkin wrote:

Line 6 Spider III? I feel a storm brewing. Let the flaming commence. xD
Haha yeah really.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:58 am / quote |
Nerdo-sez-bo :
Spider II's better. Only because i got one for christmas though.. _>
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 08:11 am / quote |
zoso58 :
I got this amp for Christmas and it blew me away. There is so much you can do with it. It has almost every stombox built into it that i could ever want to own. The navigator is a little finicky, but you do get used to using it. Also, it provides a great tone library without covering up your guitar's own tone (which I was afraid of when i got it). Forty user-programmable presets are also a major plus.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 08:25 am / quote |
cds+stereo=life :
Hooray crappy modeling amps. Plug into a B-52 AT100 and you'll never even touch another line 6. Modeling amps suck by default.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 09:21 am / quote |
Cizzie :
I bought my Spider II about 4 months ago, it was from €400 to €250 because of the Spider III coming, but is the III really alot better than the II?
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 10:10 am / quote |
Scourge441 :
My friend has the Spider II amp. There is absolutely no tone whatsoever when you turn the distortion on; it's all fuzz.

Unless the Spider III is different, I'll have to tell people to stay away from it.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 10:15 am / quote |
grouch593 :
I have the Spider I and I love it.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 10:18 am / quote |
blue_strat :
i spent about an hour on a spider III 120W in a shop, and sounded great, but you would really need to get a footswitch with it if you wanted to access different artist models easily. on the actual amp there is just a button to cycle thru the 400 or so presets - not so helpful. i would probably buy it cos with a marshall u cant get a randall sound, with a randall u cant get a fender sound etc etc
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 10:44 am / quote |
Heilz :
Well not by my name or anything but i have a 30w spider III and my guitar without tuning it sounded great (just after changed my strings n stuff) but if you guys think it sucks w/e still i keep mine.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 11:08 am / quote |
last_biscuit :
lol i love the way how half the people on here consider line 6 to be crap purely because they are modeling amps, when half of the people on here don't own the equipment they talk about kicking ass, and themselves only have crappy little amps. also for a beginner to intermediate guitarist, or someone who isnt rich enough to have it bought for them by mommy n daddy or their wages from work...these amps are great value for money...i've had a Spider II for about 3 years, and i've been playing for 10...it's only in the coming few weeks when i get a Hughes & Kettner Switchblade stack that i am putting the Spider aside as a mere practise amp. And if you know what you're doing, you can make a Spider sound great when recording, not just what i've found but also the words of a studio engineer at a well-known recording studios in Birmingham...the place has had many famous bands rehearse there and record sessions for Kerrang Radio in Birmingham, including artists like Robert Plant, Megadeth, Hammerfall etc
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:11 pm / quote |
shrediquette :
Everyone with ears can hear the digital sound of the spider II, maybe it is a decent practice amp for the price but theres also the Vox valvetronix amps(which are also modeling amps)that destroy the Line 6 spider II any days of the week. The tone of the Vox is simply superior to the spider II. I haven't heard a Spider III yet so i won't jump to conclusions but if its anything like the II then you'd be better off going with a Vox or anything else that sounds good.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:30 pm / quote |
fade_to_black18 :
lol i agree with last_biscuit, ihad a spider two and loved it, i've been playing for 8 years but i've only had the spider for about one year, and this christmas i got a new marshall half stack, and i still use the spider i love the sound on both, yea the marshall is way better but like last_biscuit said, if you know what your doing you can make the spider sound good.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:47 pm / quote |
sum41freak8733 :
this actually inst that bad of an amp get a board for it and its great,ive been playing on a little crappy crate for the last 9 years and this and is alot better than that old shitty thing now of course there are alot better amps out there(duh) but this one is pretty damn good its ment to be a MODELING amp so thats what i expect from it
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:47 pm / quote |
sum41freak8733 :
oh and i got a 150 not a 75
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:51 pm / quote |
blackbullet006 :
i just got this amp for christmas and i absolutely love it. i paid 300 for it at music and arts, and its also 300 at musiciansfriend.com. its an amzing amp, with insane versatility. i think that this amp is the best deal out there, even if you paid 420 for it.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:56 pm / quote |
st.jimmy4091680 :
Ihave the Spider III, and it kicks ass, not as good as say a vox or a marshall, but it really does have a nice tone to it. =D
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 12:59 pm / quote |
x_themetalfan_x :
last_biscuit wrote:

lol i love the way how half the people on here consider line 6 to be crap purely because they are modeling amps, when half of the people on here don't own the equipment they talk about kicking ass, and themselves only have crappy little amps. also for a beginner to intermediate guitarist, or someone who isnt rich enough to have it bought for them by mommy n daddy or their wages from work...these amps are great value for money...i've had a Spider II for about 3 years, and i've been playing for 10...it's only in the coming few weeks when i get a Hughes & Kettner Switchblade stack that i am putting the Spider aside as a mere practise amp. And if you know what you're doing, you can make a Spider sound great when recording, not just what i've found but also the words of a studio engineer at a well-known recording studios in Birmingham...the place has had many famous bands rehearse there and record sessions for Kerrang Radio in Birmingham, including artists like Robert Plant, Megadeth, Hammerfall etc


You just owned every naysayer in this comment section. I love to hear from people who actually know what the **** they're talking about.

I tried one of these out at a local shop, and for the price it's a great amp.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:10 pm / quote |
AVAguitar182 :
i have the spider III 75 W and i think its great, i paid $318 for it. its probably the best amp ive ever played with
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:11 pm / quote |
JDawg4098 :
What??
Spider III, versatile?? On a yamaha??


You need to play a REAL amp my friend...This amplifier is not versatile to anything except metal and thrash. I tried to play blues on my strat through my SII, and I wanted to hit it with a sledge hammer...

Dont get me wrong, Line 6 are not crap amps, but come on, they are for metalheads. Not blues and classic. Thus they are not versatile.

I'm out.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:20 pm / quote |
 
 m 
  :
checked, and to the people saying 'omg the people who say they suck should go away' stfu, there are about 2 people who have said that and they have done it in a mature manner.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:30 pm / quote |
ilovethinlizzy :
Everyone is bitching about the line 6 modelling amps, yet most people don't realize that alot of guitarists can't afford a flash tube amp or aren't at the stage where they feel they need a really great amp. For 300 dollars or whatever they are over in america they're great, and they are versitile
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:50 pm / quote |
FallingRecord :
i don't know, its all right, its nothing i would use if i toured, the effects get old quick, and real pedals are better.. me personally, i'd go with a marshall, or an orange amp.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:51 pm / quote |
apmaman :
its far far better than the Spider II.. you shuld all go try it out. it really is a great improvement. plus its really cheap =D
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 01:58 pm / quote |
SchitzoJoe :
I'm considering buying this amp, but I'm not sure exactly HOW versatile it is. I listen to a wide variety of music, but not to stray away from rock in general. I don't really like playing blues, but classic would be nice from time to time. Anyways, could I play things ranging from the genres of My Chemical Romance to Slipknot to Disturbed and have a decent sound on all of them?
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 02:24 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
JDawg4098 wrote:

What??
Spider III, versatile?? On a yamaha??


You need to play a REAL amp my friend...This amplifier is not versatile to anything except metal and thrash. I tried to play blues on my strat through my SII, and I wanted to hit it with a sledge hammer...

Dont get me wrong, Line 6 are not crap amps, but come on, they are for metalheads. Not blues and classic. Thus they are not versatile.

I'm out.


Like i said before *thanks to the people who got the point of my message*, money is a major reason why many people go for these, as the moment you look for a valve amp you are lucky to find a valve combo for under £1000 that is decent enough to deliver at a gig. And like i also said...versatility...if you know what you are doing you can make most amps sound great, whether recording or live... for instance..the last few times i've been into any studio to record, i have only used a valve amp for the rhythm parts, and not even all the rhythm parts...sure with a valve amp and a good cab *i.e Mesa Boogie Stilleto Deuce* it beefs up the rhythm part, but with effects added it often sounds just as good and sometimes clearer using a solid-state modelling amp like the spider, especially when i need a bit more gain during a solo.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 02:35 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
SchitzoJoe wrote:

I'm considering buying this amp, but I'm not sure exactly HOW versatile it is. I listen to a wide variety of music, but not to stray away from rock in general. I don't really like playing blues, but classic would be nice from time to time. Anyways, could I play things ranging from the genres of My Chemical Romance to Slipknot to Disturbed and have a decent sound on all of them?


Yes you could, there are even patches by Slipknot on the amp

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 02:35 pm / quote |
Kingyem0c0re :
last_biscuit wrote:

lol i love the way how half the people on here consider line 6 to be crap purely because they are modeling amps, when half of the people on here don't own the equipment they talk about kicking ass, and themselves only have crappy little amps. also for a beginner to intermediate guitarist, or someone who isnt rich enough to have it bought for them by mommy n daddy or their wages from work...these amps are great value for money...i've had a Spider II for about 3 years, and i've been playing for 10...it's only in the coming few weeks when i get a Hughes & Kettner Switchblade stack that i am putting the Spider aside as a mere practise amp. And if you know what you're doing, you can make a Spider sound great when recording, not just what i've found but also the words of a studio engineer at a well-known recording studios in Birmingham...the place has had many famous bands rehearse there and record sessions for Kerrang Radio in Birmingham, including artists like Robert Plant, Megadeth, Hammerfall etc


As soon as you get the H&K Switchblade,
You'll want nothing else, it's cream worthy.
Although, I have one of these spider III & the H&K Switch, I still prefer to use my 80's JCM800 2x12.


POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 02:39 pm / quote |
beovulf :
I have a Spider Also.I got that in christmas present.It sounds so good!!!I love it!!!!!
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 02:51 pm / quote |
A-G-guitarist :
looks good but i personally wouldnt pay/try to save up 419.07 for an amp. although i'm only 12 lol.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 03:08 pm / quote |
pinkvelocity :
is it truly worth spending $400 on an amp? I have a crappy little 8" amp and it works fine, because I just got the RP 250 for christmas, and I can get plenty of sound out of my set up, so why buy a $400 amp?
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 03:43 pm / quote |
SchitzoJoe :
pinkvelocity wrote:

is it truly worth spending $400 on an amp? I have a crappy little 8" amp and it works fine, because I just got the RP 250 for christmas, and I can get plenty of sound out of my set up, so why buy a $400 amp?


You can find it for $300 at Zzounds.com and MusiciansFriend.

It looks like a decent amp.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 04:16 pm / quote |
CSUTremonti777 :
This isnt too bad of an amp in reality, just like most every other person on here has been saying. I was gonna buy this amp and then I played the Vox AD30VT and the Marshall 15w microstack and both of em blew this out of the water. And the Marshall was the same price and the Vox was 60 bucks cheaper. And even another thing, both the Marshall and the Vox were waaaaay louder than this amp. So basically if you want built in effects, get the spider. If you want tone quality. Get the Marshall or the Vox.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 04:26 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
pinkvelocity wrote:

is it truly worth spending $400 on an amp? I have a crappy little 8" amp and it works fine, because I just got the RP 250 for christmas, and I can get plenty of sound out of my set up, so why buy a $400 amp?


Lol of course it's worth it if you play gigs, but can't afford a professional quality amp. However i would go with the 150watt ones if you were gigging and they're better value for money anyway. I have a Spider II 212, its a 150watt combo, and it's alot better than people give Line 6 credit for. In terms of the sounds you can get out of it, and because of it has more gain *the insane setting and metal settings for example* than the Marshall or Vox amps mentioned, i think it is a great choice of amp. However the Marshall and the Vox are preferred by puritsts because of their associations with the valve-amp versions of their amps. i personally prefer the line 6 solid state amps to the marshall and vox solid-state amps.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:05 pm / quote |
dilbert_5150 :
And once again, the best idea is to go to your local guitar shop (with your axe!), try it and compare to another modeling amp (if really want a modeling one). As for me Vox ad30vt is a better solution (mainly because I found the vintage and classic rock sounds to be more interesting in it). But YOU can find the 'insane' setting the most interesting, and you'll choose spider. You can't really go totally wrong with those modeling amps. I'm not saying they're outstanding but it's quite good to play a song using some vintage A-class amp tone, and then with a push of a button switch to A/B-class hi-gain beast. I know that everyone would like to have more then one great amplifier in your house, but hey, only few can afford it :] The most important thing is go and find the sound that suits the best your own preferences and style.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:07 pm / quote |
redteamleader :
a great amp at a decent price that eliminates the need for a host of pedals and effects. loud enough for gigging and sturdy enough to drag around.

both myself and the other guitarist in my band have a line 6 now (his is the spider II, mine the spider III)- digital's the way, man.

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:22 pm / quote |
CapnKickass :
I got to try this amp at long and maquade, the effects were pretty neat. Though I was in a little sound proof room and had the volume low, so it was too muffled to tell how good it really sounded. I think i'll just save up for a good orange amp, tubes just sound so good. a couple pedals for good measure and i'm set.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:40 pm / quote |
Orkin :
IMO, I think if you have a bit more money you should go for the next line 6 up, the flextones are nice amps and sound a little less digital than the Spiders, plus for the people that are interested there are a lot more bluesy tones on the flextone as well as some heavily distorted ones. Digital really is the way forward but most people wont be converted over too it until its absolutely perfected.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:42 pm / quote |
RevolverX :
I had a Spider II amp, and it was perfect for helping me try a variety of sounds and play songs that demand a bevy of effects without buying pedals - ie. late Pantera. We pay about twice as much for guitar stuff here in Canada, so a JCM 2000 wasn't an option until recently when I could cover it. As a student, I bust my ass paying tuition, and stuff like the cheap Line 6 products are a godsend at times. That said, my Spider II was faulty and crackled like a sparkler on the fourth of July by the time I was done with it ... so, make sure you get that extended warranty.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 05:50 pm / quote |
pinkvelocity :
thanks for the tips guys
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 06:57 pm / quote |
boba899 :
but the sound is still as great as a tube amp


Yeah. You lie

POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:46 pm / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Checked...Quebec Style
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 07:57 pm / quote |
calculated_loss :
Quebec style? Haha, so many comments, so little time. Sorry:P. But yeah, I have a Spider II and I think teh IIIs a waste of money. Like really, $100 extra dollars for PRESETS? I paid $450 for my 210 the other day, and I think a Spider III 210 is a little over $100 more. It sucks that they stopped making Spider IIs, cuz you can figure the presets from the Spider III out on a Spider II with a good ear and a little patience.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 08:05 pm / quote |
Dewy141 :
its funny how everyone disses Line 6 but half of the people own one.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 09:25 pm / quote |
USAPeavey :
Well, after playing this amp for about a half hour at GC, I have to say I was impressed. The distortion sounds great...probably the best built in dist. I've heard in a SS. I wasn't too happy with the cleans though... there are no dynamics on the clean channel at all. It may have just been me, but I couldn't get a satisfying clean at all. That being said, Its sill a great amp and I will be looking into other Line 6 gear. As for the "modeling amp skeptics", sit down with a Fender Cyber Twin for a couple of hours, hopefully it will change your thinking.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 09:26 pm / quote |
mrs. jimmy page :
i love my spider III! it suits all of my needs and i make some pretty darn AH-MAZING sound fx from it! i got mine for $350, but thats cuz i "know" ppl at guitar center. its totally rox. i'm sooooo glad i got it, cuz i needed it cuz i'm performing in front of my whole school so i cant use a dinky single spekr 20 year old randall thats just a piece of crap. its perfect for me (at least right now). I havent run into any problems... cept that i need to put casters on it and i cant find any possible way to do it... any ideas? HELP!!!!!
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 09:27 pm / quote |
bambi_slaughter :
Really, people need to play these amps some more. I have played my friends spider II tons and i despise it. Vox is a much, much better alternative. You know, when amps come in in series like other consumer electronics, they're bound to sound digital.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 09:42 pm / quote |
whitebluesboy :
These amps are all garbage. The sound is so fake and digital its ridiculous. For $420 you should do yourself a favor and buy a decent tube amp and the distortion pedal of a your choice. These amps are okay if you are playing clean but they really have terrible distortion.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 11:39 pm / quote |
QuiteTheFellow :
If you have a Spider III, I hope that you tried out a Vox Valvetronix or a Roland Cube before buying it. I was going to go for a Spider III, but one of my friends told me to try the Vox instead. Sure enough, it completely blew away the Spider III in almost every way (except for the amount of wattage, but IMO the Spiders' tone totally craps out when you crank it up).

If you have one and you've tested out some other brands before you got it, props to you. If you think that the tone sounds better than a Vox or a Roland Cube, that's what matters. But if you haven't, you don't really have much to compare it to besides your crappy old practice amp, so you'll think it sounds awesome.

For the price/wattage, it's a decent amp, but if you save up just a little more and don't mind missing out on the extra wattage (see next paragraph) of a Spider, there are so many other amps you can get that will likely serve you better.

The bottom line: Test out other amps before you buy a Spider (or any other amp). Don't buy it just because you like the amount of features, or the amount of wattage the Spider III has for the price. If you haven't played a tube amp or anything, you really won't have anything to compare it to. Also, don't be fooled by the wattage it has; that's what lures in people who don't have much experience with amps. I find that the louder you crank the Spider, the worse it sounds.

POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 12:10 am / quote |
Dude... :
Everyone on the comments dissing the SIII are comparing it to the SII. Honestly, I can tell SII is a complete piece of trash. The SIII however has very nice distortion and does okay with cleans. Not the best amp, however not the most expensive and quite versatile.

~my 2 cents~

POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 12:12 am / quote |
SomethingWild :
Let me first say that I play heavy metal, and wanted an amp with high gain. For metal, the Spider III in my opinion sounds much better than the vox valvetronix amps. However if I played anything other than metal, I would have chosen the vox. I think this is a great metal amp, but I would not choose it if I played any other style of music. The cleans are decent but don't compare to the vox valve amps
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 12:29 am / quote |
ravinbay :
If i have a 400 bucks i'do go buy a cheap tube amp rather than this one
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 12:34 am / quote |
JesseWyllychuk :
Well kids, I play every type of music, and this amp hasn't disappointed me, all the stuff going around that it sucks is completely incorrect. The spider III is great!
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 12:37 am / quote |
pnkr0cker :
if nobody has ever really had time to mess with a line6 amp they cannot talk. and to be honest most people on here probably haven't. all the fx and of presets don't aren't the whole reason why it makes so many different sounds. i can make totally different sounds just from messing with the bass drive treble and mid knob. next time you go to a store with one of these spend all your time messing with it as many different ways possible and youll see its not another modeling amp. its the real deal. the spider 2 even makes many sounds.
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 01:08 am / quote |
punkbass479 :
is it any different from the spider II or is it just an upscale model?
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 02:10 am / quote |
the spiker :
This is just a spider II amp with a spider III look.... amp models are pretty much the same -_-
POSTED: 12/28/2006 - 02:43 am / quote |
DisturbedOne126 :
yeah i just got one for x-mas and i love it. i think its alot better then the spider 2 and idk about an problems it has because i just got it. but if i was to do a show or something, i would use this most of the time its very goos for the price
POSTED: 12/31/2006 - 02:22 pm / quote |
Rocketboy :
Got one for christmas, and it seems really good. The presets are great for finding new tones and sounds, but most importantly it sounds good. Well i used to have a fender frontman so anything would be better
POSTED: 01/12/2007 - 11:11 pm / quote |
SchitzoJoe :
I'm highly considering buying one of these, but I'm not sure... If I have distortion on, will I hear any buzzing? I'm using a Crate GX-15 amp, and that's the #1 reason I want to change is because with overdrive on and my guitar with distortion, it sounds like a hive of bees.
POSTED: 01/14/2007 - 12:30 am / quote |
mattmcavoy400 :
I'm looking to get the head version of this, can you get a silverstein/taking back sunday tone?

also does it come with a footswitch?

POSTED: 01/22/2007 - 02:37 pm / quote |
Venom™ :
lyk omg i want this amp, is the price @ the top in dollars or GBP
POSTED: 03/24/2007 - 11:59 am / quote |
bls4life8 :
why do ppl say line 6 amps suck

the ones that own this amp is it worth 300 bucks and is the distortion and the presets good and you can tell the difference between the different sounds

POSTED: 03/25/2007 - 09:07 pm / quote |
aenimafist :
i wish people would stop calling out Line 6 and just play one
POSTED: 04/04/2007 - 03:05 pm / quote |
zembot :
I have read a lot of bashing on this amp and I just don't get it. I've had this amp for a bit now and it is a great little toter as well as for modeling in the studio. I would recommend this amp as a perfect "going out to jam with the buds" amp. Not having to haul around a bunch of extra pedals for a quick night out makes it superb and if you want the "Vintage Sound" then spend the $'s but this amp works great for a simple night out jammin'.
POSTED: 04/23/2007 - 11:54 pm / quote |
travman_401 :
ok i got a question.. This, or a Vox AD50VT?? I cant decide witch one I want.
POSTED: 05/07/2007 - 06:53 pm / quote |
tsmilliner :
Travman, unless you only play heavy metal type music, the Vox totally blows this away in tonal quality and ease of use. I have this amp (Spider III 75) and the vox AD30VT. I like them both but love the Vox for every day playing. Unless you are playing a song that sounds like one of the presets, it is really hard to dial in just the right tone. I am not saying you cannot get good sound out of the spider, only that I think the vox is a (way)nicer sounding easier to use amp that is more flexible. The only thing the line 6 does way better is the built in effects are a little bit better.
just my opinion.
Peace

POSTED: 05/11/2007 - 07:54 pm / quote |
star_playa619 :
my spider 3 blew on me on a show yesterday.....midaway thru the set.....reliable...
POSTED: 05/12/2007 - 06:00 pm / quote |
[B]C [R]ich :
cant really say if its a good amp or not, but i hate amps with a million n one things built into em, why not just get an fxs pedal and save the hassle?
POSTED: 05/14/2007 - 02:12 am / quote |
hiddeninromance :
i guess line 6 amps get flak because there are not actual tones just simulations...like say a strawberry flavour lollies..i guess some people prefer normal strawberries.
i love my spider II 212 superb...
xxx

POSTED: 05/14/2007 - 05:09 am / quote |
mr. ... :
i love this amp. you can get any sound you want with it. perfect
POSTED: 06/02/2007 - 01:46 pm / quote |
SpeedCacophony :
i have got a line 6 spider2 30, would anybody say that this amp is worth trading for that? i have tried this out and i think that it is fantastic but im not sure i want to fork out that much more money for this, is it worth it anybody?
POSTED: 06/04/2007 - 02:01 pm / quote |
ExDeath :
Good amp nothing to write home about. Needs a little more cow bell. Woot. I play classic rock and heavy metal from Led Zep to Trivium and it gets the job done.
POSTED: 06/04/2007 - 02:14 pm / quote |
SkateEmerica987 :
FallingRecord :
i don't know, its all right, its nothing i would use if i toured, the effects get old quick, and real pedals are better.. me personally, i'd go with a marshall, or an orange amp.


God some of these people are retards. no shit anybody would take a marshall or an orange, but not everyones mommys can buy them a $2000 orange, for $300 this is a quite loud and great sounding amp for metal, ya it doesnt stand up to a tube amp and everyone knows that so why doesnt everyone just quit comparing it to one, because obviously if everyone had the money they'd get a tube amp over this, so just quit bitching.

POSTED: 06/30/2007 - 11:22 am / quote |
plantnuke :
the spiker wrote:

This is just a spider II amp with a spider III look.... amp models are pretty much the same -_-


I totally disagree. The spider III looks similar to the spider II, but has a number of great improvements ESPECIALLY THE SOUND! I spent over an hour with this amp tweaking the settings and listening and I found it to be just as good as anything else. You just have to know what you are doing. On the clean model, it sounded just as well as my instructors old crate 150 watt, which is an absolutely fantastic amp. For the money you can't go wrong at all. And besides, why buy a ton of stomp boxes and get a high end amp? It doesn't make lot of sense to me because you get all that with this amp, and once again if you know what you are doing, the sound is on par with anything else, minus the cost of buying 5 stompboxes.

POSTED: 07/23/2007 - 03:32 am / quote |
acdcyou :
SchitzoJoe wrote:

I'm highly considering buying one of these, but I'm not sure... If I have distortion on, will I hear any buzzing? I'm using a Crate GX-15 amp, and that's the #1 reason I want to change is because with overdrive on and my guitar with distortion, it sounds like a hive of bees.


ha, noooo, not even a peep, this amp is so quite i couldnt believe it, ill have it on the insane setting, and forget to turn it off when i leave the room cause u just cant hear it, but hit that massive chord and this amp makes itself known, for the money this amp is THE best, just spend some time fine tuning a sound, save it and ur good to go, i recommmend this amp for sure!!

POSTED: 08/10/2007 - 10:52 pm / quote |
nightimedweller :
the sound sucks live i wouldnt waste your money id save up for something else this would probably be best bought as a practice amp not a show amp i wouldnt consider going out and buying a half stack...
POSTED: 08/15/2007 - 05:08 pm / quote |
Noahfalin :
i have a problem with the NR, if i don't use it, i get killer feedback, if ido use it, it chokes the higher notes!!

e-mail me with ideas PLEASE!!!!!

POSTED: 08/21/2007 - 07:09 pm / quote |
the-kid66 :
I must agree that line 6's are good and arent complete shit amps like other people say they are and i think they only say that because they have a blind loyalty to the vintage and think anything digital sucks.But there are just bettor amps out there that make this one obsolete.Im not ganna say AC30, or a JCM800, or a Fender Hot Rod, or some other tube amp that most of you ****ers like me cant afford Im saying an amp within this same price range. I dont understand why anyone would buy a line 6 when you could get a Roland Cube thats in the same price range it just dosent make any sense at all to me out of all the modeling amps out there Roland is the best (excluding the mesa boogie road king of course).The Roland Cube or a Valvetronix would easilly beat this amp, because of one simple reason, they just SIMPLY FUCKING SOUND BETTOR. In my opinion all amps within this price range go in this order. Roland, Vox, line 6, Marshall, Crate. Vox and Roland are very close to a good sound but the Roland is only a little bit bettor. I have a Valvetronix.Line 6 sound good but compared to a Roland cube or the VOX the line 6 sounds empty it dosent have that rich sound the other two could produce it dosent have good tone. Trust me there is no reason to buy a line 6 when you could easily get a bettor amp for the same price, its like having a Marshall JCM800 and a Crate amp next to each other(and yes the vox and the Roland are that much bettor) with the same price and chossing the crate.The Roland Cube cost the same if not cheaper and it beats the sht out of this amp.Like I said its good but why the **** buy this amp when you you could buy an even bettor amp for the same price, that has numbers of amp models on it and effects just like the line 6 but bettor sound and tone . In my opinion any one who buys a line 6 or a marshall mg or a crate within the same price range is a dumbass.Plus these amps are crapier versions of the spider 2, which my friend has and I play it at his house whenever i come over the spider 2's sound bettor not only that but spider 3's also have circutry problems. Long story short do yourself a favor and DONT BUY THIS AMP and GET A ROLAND CUBE or VOX VALVETRONIX you'll be doing yourself a favor. And like i said if you dont believe me be a dumbass and buy it for all i care.
POSTED: 08/30/2007 - 12:36 am / quote |
the-kid66 :
SkateEmerica987 wrote:

FallingRecord :
i don't know, its all right, its nothing i would use if i toured, the effects get old quick, and real pedals are better.. me personally, i'd go with a marshall, or an orange amp.

God some of these people are retards. no shit anybody would take a marshall or an orange, but not everyones mommys can buy them a $2000 orange, for $300 this is a quite loud and great sounding amp for metal, ya it doesnt stand up to a tube amp and everyone knows that so why doesnt everyone just quit comparing it to one, because obviously if everyone had the money they'd get a tube amp over this, so just quit bitching.


ya seriesly like we really need some ****ing sherlockk or einstein to tell us to ****ing buy the marshall, hey
numb-nuts out there telling us this, we dont have the ****ing money, so shut the **** up were just asking if its good for the money.

POSTED: 08/30/2007 - 12:46 am / quote |
the-kid66 :
st.jimmy4091680 wrote:

Ihave the Spider III, and it kicks ass, not as good as say a vox or a marshall, but it really does have a nice tone to it. =D


like i said another example if the vox is bettor then why the FUCK did you buy the line 6. Are you just plain stupid.

POSTED: 08/30/2007 - 02:36 pm / quote |
the-kid66 :
An by the way if you did buy the line 6 how do you justify it.
POSTED: 08/30/2007 - 02:45 pm / quote |
badluck39 :
this amp is awsome, any sound your looking for and a lot you arnt, it has
POSTED: 09/06/2007 - 04:24 pm / quote |
twinturboaudi :
seems to me that most of the "younger" ppl on here hate these amps..i guess its the cool thing to do..but for anyone that doesnt want to get a bunch of pedals..this amp is great and well worth the money...personally id rather be playing guitar than wasting my time bashing a product i dont own...cuz its the "cool" thing to do
POSTED: 09/12/2007 - 04:03 am / quote |
joshuacoates :
went and had a go on this today and i was quiet impressed. i'll defiantly buy it
POSTED: 09/17/2007 - 05:28 am / quote |
gothmessiah :
Hi guys, thanks for all the reviews but i am not sure about buying the spider III. I believe is a good amp for what i need, but i also have a Zoom G9.2tt and wanted to know if you guys can tell if the spider wont color my g9 sound after i plug it into it. The G9 comes with 2 Tubes Pre and Post and sound ok because of the tubes and i am looking for a solid state amp for my Multieffects....any suggestions??? (by the way, i only have 4 options here where i live...Colombia... one is a Kustom Quad amp, a Marshall MGDFX, a Vox and 4 is the Spider III). here i can buy those amps almost in the same price range, hope i can buy the spider but you guys are the experts so please thanks for the help and the short replys.
POSTED: 09/19/2007 - 09:18 pm / quote |
guitar is yummy :
I have this amp and I quite like it, yeah the cleans aren't the best but more high gain settings make up for it in my opinion. However has anyone tried the new Spider Valve series - sounds intresting.
POSTED: 09/23/2007 - 06:57 am / quote |
7DaySkeptic :
twinturboaudi wrote:

seems to me that most of the "younger" ppl on here hate these amps..i guess its the cool thing to do..but for anyone that doesnt want to get a bunch of pedals..this amp is great and well worth the money...personally id rather be playing guitar than wasting my time bashing a product i dont own...cuz its the "cool" thing to do

You got it bud, spot on. thekid-66 seems to be a good case of this, calling everyone stupid. Alright, it DOES lose some tone when you put the volume RIGHT up, and there ARE some crap tones to be found on it, but hell, there's so much goodness to be found there as well.
I'm just a hobbyist, still trying to find my sound, and it's perfect for me. I'm just trying to have fun, and this amp is definitely fun.

POSTED: 09/23/2007 - 10:06 pm / quote |
the-kid66 :
guitar is yummy wrote:

I have this amp and I quite like it, yeah the cleans aren't the best but more high gain settings make up for it in my opinion. However has anyone tried the new Spider Valve series - sounds intresting.

ya ive been wondering about those they sound promising
but then again they did cut mack on the tubes a little(thats why its pretty cheap for 650) i think one more or two more wouldnt have been that bad but who knows how the thing sounds. in my opinion is its ganna be ****ing awesome a full tube amp(not a hybrid) thats also a modeling amp that is defenetly worth more than 650 sounds like a steal if you ask me

POSTED: 10/02/2007 - 11:28 pm / quote |
Gazmataz_C :
gothmessiah wrote:

Hi guys, thanks for all the reviews but i am not sure about buying the spider III. I believe is a good amp for what i need, but i also have a Zoom G9.2tt and wanted to know if you guys can tell if the spider wont color my g9 sound after i plug it into it. The G9 comes with 2 Tubes Pre and Post and sound ok because of the tubes and i am looking for a solid state amp for my Multieffects....any suggestions??? (by the way, i only have 4 options here where i live...Colombia... one is a Kustom Quad amp, a Marshall MGDFX, a Vox and 4 is the Spider III). here i can buy those amps almost in the same price range, hope i can buy the spider but you guys are the experts so please thanks for the help and the short replys.


Being completely honest, i read all this page, thought about the "vox", tried both out, and chose the spider III. I dont regret it either i absoloutly love it, gives me everything i want.
If you wanna play metal, try out both the vox and spider... personally i dont like marshall amps, too many pedals needed, my opinion only, dont kill me. lol

POSTED: 10/03/2007 - 01:55 pm / quote |
the-kid66 :
guitar is yummy wrote:

I have this amp and I quite like it, yeah the cleans aren't the best but more high gain settings make up for it in my opinion. However has anyone tried the new Spider Valve series - sounds intresting.

nvm the 40watt versions are 700 and the 100 watt version is about 1100 still if i play one and its really good witch i think it will be i will definately sell my vox and buy the spider valve

POSTED: 10/03/2007 - 08:47 pm / quote |
the-kid66 :
and the spider valves should be in sotres now
POSTED: 10/06/2007 - 09:54 pm / quote |
guitar is yummy :
nice one... i haven't seen one 'in the flesh' but there we go. I wouldn't be ble to aford it any ways cos i can't get that much for my spider iii now as they have devalued a little now the valve one is out.
POSTED: 10/07/2007 - 08:41 am / quote |
SG_Man_1810 :
I have about 300 quid maximum to spend and I want an amp thats good for gigging and a JD cry baby wah. Would you recommend this?
POSTED: 10/17/2007 - 04:03 pm / quote |
thatguywhorocks :
This amp kicks ass
Might be my bias but I've tried a Marshal 150 stack and I have to say that my Line 6 Spider III amp(75 watt)is much better.

POSTED: 10/17/2007 - 08:18 pm / quote |
ralleymonkey :
Hey a friend of mine bought this amp and brought it to school for me to try. It sounds prety good but to me the effects sounded a little digital and some of the presets were wayyyyy off. Overall a good amp sounded really good with my boss MT-2 and Ibanez S470
POSTED: 10/22/2007 - 11:11 am / quote |
Mikey p :
I got the spider valve 112 today, and from what ive heard of it, it is incredible. I'm probs going to post a review of it, maybe closer to christmas. the valves do make the difference, obviously. Very impressed with the sound in comapred to the spider 2 & 3 series although they're not that bad anyway. The reverb has been improved on the spider valve - i found the reverb on the spider 2 a bit empty. I have a spider 2 30W, and to be fair, i dont think the spider 2 and 3 series are as bad as everyone makes it out to be, although they do limit you on what sounds you can get out, especially at the lower end range, but overall they are good amps for the price. Sorry, this is turning into a full review... lol.
POSTED: 10/25/2007 - 06:05 pm / quote |
jeppethebest :
I got one of these and the amp is awsome. the only thing is that the amps presets are somtime a bit wrong for exampel red house(to mutch dist) ...but i think that its very hard to get a so good amp for the price especialy when its 75w
POSTED: 11/02/2007 - 06:51 pm / quote |
mistertomo123 :
Go for a good old marshall any time and find your own tone. these things are so fiddly and have really got too much on them. Keep it simple, stop messing around with all these thousands of effects and get rockin'
POSTED: 11/23/2007 - 03:40 pm / quote |
saanster :
I have this amp. when my friends and i jam metal, my favorite tone is the Red LED "Insane" preset. i've edited the treble, mids, bass and drive to how i like and set it to my channel A. so anyway, if i put the master volume cranked up to full, and pull the channel volume up to a little over half-way, i get this bassy sound that is annoying as ****. Say i play an E5 and palm mute it, i'd get this annoying feedback every time i chug it. so if i'm shredding, it sounds ****ing horrible and irritable. even if i turn the bass completely off, if i want to crank up the amp i get that annoying "burst" with my lows. not to mention, i can barely hear my highs and solos and stuff when i pull up the volume.

is there a problem with my particular amp? I play through this amp with an Ibanez RGR320EX. My friend plays an ESP LTD MH-400 through a 65w Crate amp (i'm not sure what model or series the amp is) and if we jam at complimenting volume levels he won't get that annoying sound. also i've played through his amp to try out the sound and it sounded fine.

what should I do?

POSTED: 11/29/2007 - 07:55 pm / quote |
saanster :
i get this really annoying feedback when i play on the Red LED "insane" setting, with master volume cranked up to full and channel volume a little more than half-way. If i'm shredding a really low note it sounds like a ****ing mess because of that annoying bassy "burst" every time i play low note... Not to mention you can't hear my highs and solos very clearly.

i play through this amp with an Ibanez RGR320EX. i've tried playing at comparative volume levels and distortion settings on other amps, for example a 65w Crate amp, and i don't get that same sound. so it's not my guitar. Even if i turn bass all the way down, meaning off, i still get that sound.

so is it just my particular amp? Or am i doin it wrong? help please

POSTED: 11/29/2007 - 08:01 pm / quote |
saanster :
WOW! I just doubled posted, congratulations to me i'm an idiot!
POSTED: 11/29/2007 - 10:56 pm / quote |
unholy_love :
Spiderr IIIs get so much shit, but they're not horrible. The distortion is THE best thing about it period. The effects sound rarely good. But, if ya want metal, here ya go.
POSTED: 12/01/2007 - 09:13 pm / quote |
Sambo03 :
okay guys here's the score. i play mostly metal, bands like children of bodom, metallica, trivium, bullet for my valentine, some acdc, arch enemy, megadeth etc. would you recommend this amp if thats the kinda stuff i play? also consider ive been playing for like a year and a half and i dont have the money for anything much more expensive. is it the best in its price range?
POSTED: 12/05/2007 - 03:30 am / quote |
scarygt :
shrediquette wrote:

Everyone with ears can hear the digital sound of the spider II, maybe it is a decent practice amp for the price but theres also the Vox valvetronix amps(which are also modeling amps)that destroy the Line 6 spider II any days of the week. The tone of the Vox is simply superior to the spider II. I haven't heard a Spider III yet so i won't jump to conclusions but if its anything like the II then you'd be better off going with a Vox or anything else that sounds good.


I had the Vox 50VT 2X12 for about 4 days and could get some good rhythm sounds, but I just couldn't get a real good 80's hair band (lynch type) lead sound that I was after. I took the vox back and tried the spider iii. The salesperson put the spider on Insane Red and there was the lead sound that i wanted... heck even with no effects you can shred with that amp model. I took home the Spider III and have not regretted getting rid of the Vox. Plus compared to the Spider the Vox's user interface just wasn't up to par. I'd say if you want to play clean or blues stuff that the Vox is your amp, but if you want strictly metal or 80's hair band stuff that you will love the Spider III.

POSTED: 12/05/2007 - 07:20 pm / quote |
petey gunnz :
Sambo03 wrote:

okay guys here's the score. i play mostly metal, bands like children of bodom, metallica, trivium, bullet for my valentine, some acdc, arch enemy, megadeth etc. would you recommend this amp if thats the kinda stuff i play? also consider ive been playing for like a year and a half and i dont have the money for anything much more expensive. is it the best in its price range?


its def the amp for you, i play alot of metal mostly the same bands you listed put it on green metal or green crunch and itll sound awesome as long as you set up the little eq right youll produce awesome tones. also about the metallica, they give you presets for a couple of there songs. master of puppets, enter sandman one more that i cant remember. I think this would be perfect for you. Also has great clean channels too

POSTED: 12/09/2007 - 08:43 am / quote |
LeZeNkO :
See the thing is, Line6 have invented something that isnt just another amp, its a variety of amps all built into one. Apart from pickups, look at Zakk Wylde etc, Marshall amps sound so ****ing similar its untrue... everybody has the same sound and its boring, This gives you the opportunity to be unique. Ordered mine today, comes tomorow, and ill tell u what i think.
POSTED: 12/11/2007 - 10:14 pm / quote |
LeZeNkO :
OK!!! Everyone can shut the hell up!! It came today and holy crap this thing is awesome, I havent tried recording anything with it yet but the general sound and tone is absoultely perfect, if your a heavy metal player, get this amp!! I play Thrash and Power metal and this is almost perfect, the clean tones could be a tiny bit better but still non the less a fantastic amplifier!!
POSTED: 12/13/2007 - 07:39 am / quote |
kingofnima :
come on guys seriously line 6 amps are no good!!! the sound is so digital that it destroys all the fun playing it!! the people at guitar center try to sell them to people who just start of cause they don't know what crab they are getting but seriously the sound is so bad and hey ok all those fun effects are kind of nice but who needs all of that if the sound sucks to begin with!! get an amp that doesn't have ll those weird effect you never gonna use and get a Pedal with it and you will be fine for every song!!!
POSTED: 12/15/2007 - 03:56 pm / quote |
BurningTheLives :
kingofnima wrote:

come on guys seriously line 6 amps are no good!!! the sound is so digital that it destroys all the fun playing it!! the people at guitar center try to sell them to people who just start of cause they don't know what crab they are getting but seriously the sound is so bad and hey ok all those fun effects are kind of nice but who needs all of that if the sound sucks to begin with!! get an amp that doesn't have ll those weird effect you never gonna use and get a Pedal with it and you will be fine for every song!!!


You couldn't be more wrong. They sound very good. I mean that is why some big metal bands use them.

POSTED: 12/18/2007 - 06:26 am / quote |
Tartan_nick :
No offense, but it you think marshal are better than line 6, your off your rocker. Ive played about 7 different Marshall amps, and they were ok, surprisingly.
Id always though they were amazing, however, after playing different amps, i foud they were WAY WAY WAY over rated.

I played a 30 watt line 6 which sounded like it was 75 watts, and it was far better than any marshal amp ive ever played.

POSTED: 12/23/2007 - 02:16 am / quote |
whatiaminstead :
i bought this a few months ago and i really really like...mostly due to my experience being limited to a 15W crate and a Digitech RP80. the sound is alot more refined than ive ever been used to, but after graduating from a Squier Strat to a PRS SE Custom, id say that the amp does a little too much to mask the sound of the actual guitar...and it sounds terrible through headphones. ill definately be getting something new once i begin building myself a switchboard. the biggest reason i keep it is my lack of effect pedals...and really, it isnt that bad. just something to go for when, like me, you're poor and have only been playing 2.5 years.
POSTED: 12/27/2007 - 12:36 pm / quote |
whatiaminstead :
ok, i easily rate the durability of this amp at like 59485798237589/10. i took out a year warranty on it just in case...and dropped it down the stairs at my cousin's house today. 10 agonizing bangs against the hardwood later...the thing is still as good as ever. i suddenly love this thing all the more.
POSTED: 12/31/2007 - 03:49 pm / quote |
Afterburner666 :
What is different from Spider III 75 to Spider III 75-112?
POSTED: 01/03/2008 - 08:09 am / quote |
joby :
I brought a 75 watt spider3 on new years eve,i needed an amp real quick and had £200 the line 6 was £199 and sounded ok in a quick test.The only other amps were 15 watt practise amps or Fender amps out of my price range,so th i got the spider.
Two hours latter i played a new years eve gig to around 500 punters the amp was ok,i just plugged in using a clean channel and used stomp boxes for sounds.
Having had the time to play around with the amp proper i made a great buy.Ok most of the presets are for metal heads but ignore those or use them as a guide as to what you can acheive with this amp.
I play in a covers band who play mostly classic rock from 60's to modern and i can get prety much every sound i want.At home im a huge David Gilmour fan and can get all my sounds out of this amp.I still use stomp boxes as i like them,but to dissmiss this amp because it is digital modelling is purely naive,sure i would like a huge collection of classic valve amps,but have neither the money or space,plus i dont have time for the maintinence.If you want a VERY GOOD versitile amp i can recomend the 75 watt spider 3.I have been playing for 25 years now mostly using Laney (which is what i had intended to buy another of) i have also used Marshals but they just dont cut it on the clean sounds for me(marshals,not Laneys).
This amp is fine,but so are Marshalls and Laneys the best thing i can recomend before parting with yuor hard earned cash,is try as many amps as you can go and see some live bands and see what they use and how it sounds,and good luck!

POSTED: 01/07/2008 - 02:39 pm / quote |
NFA34 :
I picked up one of the Spider III 75's at Guitar Center last night.

I went in looking for this amp, or a Roland Cube or Fender G-DEC. They were sold out of the Cube and only had the display model G-DEC's.

When I stated the guitar I play (Highway 1 Strat) and my budget (up to $400) the sales person immediately suggested I look at some of the tube amps they had.

I told him that I'm a new player, and am looking for something fun. (If I'm goofing around playing guitar, I'm STILL playing guitar) Also, that when the time comes that I will jam with my friends, I can get a appropiate amp.

Also, many people have said you can't run pedals through this digital amp.

Well... I hooked my Boss DS-1 Distortion pedal up to it today and with the amp on the clean model (Clean GREEN LED) it runs GREAT!!!

Anyone looking for a fun practice amp, should look at the Line 6 Spider III 75W

Yeah, 75W is alot... but I can always turn it down. Kind of hard to turn up a 15W!

POSTED: 01/13/2008 - 07:12 pm / quote |
joby :
Hi NFA34,good for you dude,you made your own choice of amp and didnt let the salesman push you into anything you didnt want to get.
Just for the record,you can run affects pedals through this amp,but as you state it is best to have the amp on one of the cleaner settings then add your effects to that.For reference to anyone else(that might be interested)I use the green TWANG setting on the amp and a pedal line up of RATpro co 2 into zoom gx7(i think)guitar proseser into boss chorus into a cheap anologe delay and have had no probs at all.
RE (if im goofing around playing guitar,im still playing guitar)NEVER A TRUER WORD SPOKEN,keep it up dude and keep it fun!

POSTED: 01/16/2008 - 02:18 pm / quote |
Crazy Redd :
really good amp for people who has a low budget, and wants a good sounding amp
POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 07:25 am / quote |
GeekUSA :
Just got this amp its great
I Can't pay 1,000 dollars for an amp so this was perfect
Its way more versatile then what people say
ANd the effects are first rate

POSTED: 02/01/2008 - 09:18 pm / quote |
Give_em Hell :
badluck39 wrote:

this amp is awsome, any sound your looking for and a lot you arnt, it has


any sound? please! seriously amps that have effects usually the effects sound like shit id rather buy a boss delay an ibanez tube screamer, boss flanger or electro harmonix something worth it

POSTED: 02/04/2008 - 02:33 pm / quote |
batiboy06 :
last_biscuit wrote:

lol i love the way how half the people on here consider line 6 to be crap purely because they are modeling amps, when half of the people on here don't own the equipment they talk about kicking ass, and themselves only have crappy little amps. also for a beginner to intermediate guitarist, or someone who isnt rich enough to have it bought for them by mommy n daddy or their wages from work...these amps are great value for money...i've had a Spider II for about 3 years, and i've been playing for 10...it's only in the coming few weeks when i get a Hughes & Kettner Switchblade stack that i am putting the Spider aside as a mere practise amp. And if you know what you're doing, you can make a Spider sound great when recording, not just what i've found but also the words of a studio engineer at a well-known recording studios in Birmingham...the place has had many famous bands rehearse there and record sessions for Kerrang Radio in Birmingham, including artists like Robert Plant, Megadeth, Hammerfall etc


+1

i liked the way you mentioned that. but i like the amp more.

POSTED: 03/02/2008 - 06:29 am / quote |
SlashsGuns :
i'm thinking of getting this amp or a 2X12 120W Crate with 7 DSP effects,which one should I get?
POSTED: 03/09/2008 - 07:17 pm / quote |
Avenged.InFlame :
alright i got this amp about 4 months ago, ive played 9 shows with is (gigs wtf/e) and for 75w? it's amazing, to hear me over the drums, vocals, and the crowd i had to turn it up to like 6 (of 10 on volume) and it was perfect, the tone will give out if you go too ten sure but if you need to go that loud, why the hell didnt you get the 150w? think about it people, but anyways along with my ltd ec-1000 deluxe this amp rules, and yes, its good for rock, blues, and especially metal, so all you people comparing it to a vox? suck it, yes i have played a vox, and the SIII rapes it in blues sound (but the blues amp model sucks so make the sound yourselves) im 17, and i love this amp, so its not a thing about age, its a thing about being a poser, or opinion, oh and if you cant find the sound you want from the pressets THATS WHY YOU CAN MAKE YOUR OWN AND SAVE THEM IDIOT. hands down, the SIII 75w is AMAZING 11 out of 10 definetly, and the hd75 is an amazing head check it out. last note, theres absolutely nothing wrong with having a digital sound, stop being afraid of change it sounds the same, your just being a pussy and dont wanna admit that its badass. (when i say "your" i mean everyone bashing the electronics)
POSTED: 03/19/2008 - 03:52 pm / quote |
es_kraken :
i love the built in noise gate, it rocks as good as the mesa emulation on "insane" -just gotta get the special line 6 spider's expression pedal/channel switcher and i'll never need another pedal again
POSTED: 04/01/2008 - 10:13 pm / quote |
pings15 :
got this amp this week.. for a whole week of tweaking.. i got the sound that i wanted.. compared it into a vox ad50 this dude owns... i've a/b it personally..

together with my pedals.. it requires a lot of tweaking into it's eq.. and i got the tone i wanted...

many said this thing sounds digital.. can you please explain it to me how is it "digital"?..

technology today really went on to the next level.. played this thing using my pedals and played with this thing using it's on board modelers.. i heard a tiny difference..

yeah yeah, i know that you guys will just say its too digital this.. and digital that, hey pretty soon all those analog stuff will slowly be phased out... i really believe that we should use this new technology..

"does it sound too digital?" come on there is no such thing as digital sound not unless im hearing 101001001101001100110001101010

TWEAKING IS YOUR FRIEND...

POSTED: 04/27/2008 - 11:45 am / quote |
cj10schmelzer :
i have a question about this amp...

is it only compatible with line 6 pedals or can it be hooked up with other brands?

POSTED: 05/03/2008 - 09:20 am / quote |
skinar :
cj shmelzer; it can be used on the fbv pedals or any other foot controllers. but the fbv pedals plug into a different place.
i got one of these. the insane setting kicks arse i also use it with an fbv express and it is one hell of an amp. had it for almost a year now and it has never broken or let me down. i live on a farm on dartmoor (middle of no where) and if i take it outside and turn it up to full volume. people living the otherside of our valley call us and complain it makes my pant like a 3 yr old with an icecream but im considering trading it in for a marshall JVM

POSTED: 05/09/2008 - 07:44 am / quote |
DJV646 :
I've had this amp for 2 months now and i am amazed at how many features this thing has.
POSTED: 05/09/2008 - 11:31 am / quote |
lespaul#1 :
Is it good for gigs?
POSTED: 05/21/2008 - 08:03 pm / quote |
travd92 :
wow, i thought everybody on UG thought these suck. i'm amazed at the comments. but personally, i think this amp is pretty decent. you can get good sounds out of it, and i don't understand why people hate so many modeling amps. this one can do an alright job, and for the money it's wonderful. if i owned one, i would primarily use it as a practice amp. but all in all, i'd give it an 8/10.
POSTED: 05/26/2008 - 11:17 pm / quote |
jblittlefield :
Owned one for about a week. Most of the presets sound the same. Craps out at higher volumes. Pretty much useless without the shortboard if you're using it live, and that adds another $270US to the cost. No speaker out!?!

Took it back and bought a Kustom Quad 100 DFX instead. Much happier now. Plan on buying a nice tube amp and some quality efx next.

POSTED: 06/01/2008 - 04:21 am / quote |
spongey_182 :
line 6 make the best amps ever next to marshall
POSTED: 06/04/2008 - 06:56 pm / quote |
unholy_love :
This amp is okay. Good for beginners and intermiate players. It is versatile, good effects but the distortion. It just doesnt have that good top of the line distortion. Dont get me wrong, its good... but not amazing.
POSTED: 06/14/2008 - 10:13 pm / quote |
aenimafist :
This is the best distortion amp in the history of amps. But the clean setting sucks.
POSTED: 06/18/2008 - 04:46 pm / quote |
peever :

spongey_182 wrote:

line 6 make the best amps ever next to marshall

aenimafist wrote:

This is the best distortion amp in the history of amps. But the clean setting sucks.

guys haha. man.
go try some really good amps.
its a decent practice amp, but jesus. it doesnt touch any REAL amps. (diezel vh-4, anything carvin, marshall jcm 900, fender supersonic, framus cobra, VHT pitbull, etc)

POSTED: 06/18/2008 - 06:06 pm / quote |
smitty93 :
I just recently purchased this amp and it is fantastic. It has so many presets i havent managed to get through them all yet. 10\10
POSTED: 06/30/2008 - 03:56 am / quote |
Huffman :
pinkvelocity wrote:

is it truly worth spending $400 on an amp? I have a crappy little 8" amp and it works fine, because I just got the RP 250 for christmas, and I can get plenty of sound out of my set up, so why buy a $400 amp?


just gunna say i was in ur boat nd mi shitly litte 15 nd w/pedal but then mi amp wasnt loud enough 4 a drummer so i bout a bigger one sooooo worth it!!! rp 250 distorsion sux!!!

i dunno about these amps... sum ppl are praising them way tooo much but ... its basicly the equivalant one combining an fx pedal with 75 watts of solid stat distorion... its a step up. right now im playing with a peavey 65w... its a comparably amp but mi friend just got a spider 75 nd it look like it takes the work out of finding your sound... definalty agreed that they need a better search system but theres realy only a few things theres a modeling amp --solid state = ceap nd fun .. theres the tube amp=top of the line and for the rich and famous.... and if u conciser this different theres the simple solid states like mine... peavey 65w... simply lead and clean chanels with vintage and moderen swiches 4 each... not exactly modeling but give u ur sound and power... i ve played on vox valvetron (w/e) and it did suit me .. the distortion was scratchy and simple and the fx were to generice... over all id say if ur buying an amp... read forums like this, do ur research .. then go out to the store nd pck wat u like and can afford

POSTED: 07/14/2008 - 06:05 pm / quote |
Hexagram :
Huffman wrote:

pinkvelocity wrote:

is it truly worth spending $400 on an amp? I have a crappy little 8" amp and it works fine, because I just got the RP 250 for christmas, and I can get plenty of sound out of my set up, so why buy a $400 amp?

just gunna say i was in ur boat nd mi shitly litte 15 nd w/pedal but then mi amp wasnt loud enough 4 a drummer so i bout a bigger one sooooo worth it!!! rp 250 distorsion sux!!!

i dunno about these amps... sum ppl are praising them way tooo much but ... its basicly the equivalant one combining an fx pedal with 75 watts of solid stat distorion... its a step up. right now im playing with a peavey 65w... its a comparably amp but mi friend just got a spider 75 nd it look like it takes the work out of finding your sound... definalty agreed that they need a better search system but theres realy only a few things theres a modeling amp --solid state = ceap nd fun .. theres the tube amp=top of the line and for the rich and famous.... and if u conciser this different theres the simple solid states like mine... peavey 65w... simply lead and clean chanels with vintage and moderen swiches 4 each... not exactly modeling but give u ur sound and power... i ve played on vox valvetron (w/e) and it did suit me .. the distortion was scratchy and simple and the fx were to generice... over all id say if ur buying an amp... read forums like this, do ur research .. then go out to the store nd pck wat u like and can afford


You have the worst spelling and punctuation errors I have ever seen on the internet...congratulations

POSTED: 07/27/2008 - 02:38 am / quote |
Plutoniummatt :
this is one soul-less amp, u get get much much better amps than this piece of junk
POSTED: 08/03/2008 - 02:25 pm / quote |
psss :
spongey_182 wrote:

line 6 make the best amps ever next to marshall


you my friend have never tried a soldano, a hughes $ kettner or even a peavy.

i suggest anyone willing to buy this amp should go out and earn alittle about amps

POSTED: 08/10/2008 - 05:54 am / quote |
CaptainPaul :
LMFAO YA'LL NOOBS
POSTED: 08/14/2008 - 02:57 pm / quote |
jacobparker :
Great if it fits your playing and you use it for practising/small gigs
POSTED: 09/07/2008 - 05:42 pm / quote |
ScreaminSavior :
grouch593 wrote:

I have the Spider I and I love it.


agreed! +1 those amps are great!

POSTED: 09/19/2008 - 11:33 pm / quote |
kingofnima :
everybody who ever played a tube amp or even a hybrid amp can tell that line 6 sounds like crab. I mean hey they are great if you start out and you want to play around with a lot of different sounds but thats it. Seriously for the money you pay for this map you can get a wayyy better sounding amp!!!
POSTED: 09/28/2008 - 05:48 pm / quote |
Bletic :
well this amp is mainly for poor people like me for practicing, lil 12 year olds who think this is teh shitz, or just plain retards. i love it for what i use it for. which is practicing at home. it was cheap and it does what i want it to. stop complaining cuz most people who buy this amp arent gonna gig, and if they do. let them fail by themselves
POSTED: 10/01/2008 - 11:39 pm / quote |
Bu113tProf :
I bought this amp in may and i love it so i dont know what you're talking about...

Only problem I've had was the handle popped out on one side...(made me pretty mad) haha.

POSTED: 10/10/2008 - 07:06 pm / quote |
Mources :
I bought this amp on friday... after reading this!!! And I don't regret at all =) So far so brilliant, although you have to get to know it to use its full potential... I'm still working my way around =P GREAT AMP!!!
POSTED: 10/12/2008 - 03:20 pm / quote |
eireannjon :
kingofnima wrote:

everybody who ever played a tube amp or even a hybrid amp can tell that line 6 sounds like crab. I mean hey they are great if you start out and you want to play around with a lot of different sounds but thats it. Seriously for the money you pay for this map you can get a wayyy better sounding amp!!!

POSTED: 10/15/2008 - 06:09 am / quote |
eireannjon :
kingofnima wrote:

everybody who ever played a tube amp or even a hybrid amp can tell that line 6 sounds like crab. I mean hey they are great if you start out and you want to play around with a lot of different sounds but thats it.
Seriously for the money you pay for this map you can get a wayyy better sounding amp!!!


OK, what does a Crab sound like?

POSTED: 10/15/2008 - 06:10 am / quote |
eireannjon :
Plutoniummatt wrote:

this is one soul-less amp, u get get much much better amps than this piece of junk


OK genius, pray do tell us what you in your infinite wisdom use. How do you achieve your obviously awesome tone. If you are going to say that the spider III is junk then at least tell us what you think is good. How about that for an idea?

POSTED: 10/15/2008 - 06:19 am / quote |
eireannjon :
Avenged.InFlame wrote:

alright i got this amp about 4 months ago, ive played 9 shows with is (gigs wtf/e) and for 75w? it's amazing, to hear me over the drums, vocals, and the crowd i had to turn it up to like 6 (of 10 on volume) and it was perfect, the tone will give out if you go too ten sure but if you need to go that loud, why the hell didnt you get the 150w? think about it people, but anyways along with my ltd ec-1000 deluxe this amp rules, and yes, its good for rock, blues, and especially metal, so all you people comparing it to a vox? suck it, yes i have played a vox, and the SIII rapes it in blues sound (but the blues amp model sucks so make the sound yourselves) im 17, and i love this amp, so its not a thing about age, its a thing about being a poser, or opinion, oh and if you cant find the sound you want from the pressets THATS WHY YOU CAN MAKE YOUR OWN AND SAVE THEM IDIOT. hands down, the SIII 75w is AMAZING 11 out of 10 definetly, and the hd75 is an amazing head check it out. last note, theres absolutely nothing wrong with having a digital sound, stop being afraid of change it sounds the same, your just being a pussy and dont wanna admit that its badass. (when i say "your" i mean everyone bashing the electronics)


Dude, I totally agree with you. And furthermore Both my Jacksons are loaded with EMG 81/85 and Seymour Duncan Screamin Demon and pearly gates respectively and there is NO WAY THEY SOUND THE SAME!!!

POSTED: 10/15/2008 - 06:37 am / quote |
eireannjon :
Avenged.InFlame wrote:

alright i got this amp about 4 months ago, ive played 9 shows with is (gigs wtf/e) and for 75w? it's amazing, to hear me over the drums, vocals, and the crowd i had to turn it up to like 6 (of 10 on volume) and it was perfect, the tone will give out if you go too ten sure but if you need to go that loud, why the hell didnt you get the 150w? think about it people, but anyways along with my ltd ec-1000 deluxe this amp rules, and yes, its good for rock, blues, and especially metal, so all you people comparing it to a vox? suck it, yes i have played a vox, and the SIII rapes it in blues sound (but the blues amp model sucks so make the sound yourselves) im 17, and i love this amp, so its not a thing about age, its a thing about being a poser, or opinion, oh and if you cant find the sound you want from the pressets THATS WHY YOU CAN MAKE YOUR OWN AND SAVE THEM IDIOT. hands down, the SIII 75w is AMAZING 11 out of 10 definetly, and the hd75 is an amazing head check it out. last note, theres absolutely nothing wrong with having a digital sound, stop being afraid of change it sounds the same, your just being a pussy and dont wanna admit that its badass. (when i say "your" i mean everyone bashing the electronics)


I totally agree with you mate, I have one of these amps and I use it with my two Jacksons one loaded with EMG 81/85's and the other has Seymour Duncan Screamin Demon and Pearly gates and in NO WAY DO THEY SOUND THE SAME!

POSTED: 10/15/2008 - 07:53 am / quote |
blackxrapture :
i have a question to ask, since i'm only a beginner at these kinds of stuff.
will a boss distortion pedal be compatible with this amp??

POSTED: 10/17/2008 - 11:23 pm / quote |
A Bad Guitarist :
blackxrapture wrote:

i have a question to ask, since i'm only a beginner at these kinds of stuff.
will a boss distortion pedal be compatible with this amp??
It will probably just make your tone divide by 0; there's no way you need THAT much distortion.

Now I have a question as well. Why does everyone seem intent on steering me away from this amp? I've talked to about 10 people, they all told me it sucked... But I have the 15w, and it's just fine, albeit very quiet. Whatdafxup?

POSTED: 11/05/2008 - 08:22 pm / quote |
Xdearxxdiaryx :
Personally i recommend getting the Spider III 30 watt it saves you some money plus you cant turn up the 75 watt III more than half way without it sounding like crap so theres really no point in getting the 75 IMO. Pretty Ok amp though.
POSTED: 11/30/2008 - 09:42 pm / quote |
SPBY :
So far all i've read in these reviews are Solid State vs. Tube reviewers. It sounds fine until you turn it past its limits (up near 10)... I have a Vintage Walnut Fender (which is the best sounding fender i have ever played or heard) and an ok ESP LTD F-100FM.

To all of the people saying that the tone sucks, maybe its your guitar because i can hear a massive difference between these two guitars. I have also played my guitars through an old marshall, and a randall, and the tone sounds exactly the same on all 3 amps, unless i use the awesome effects (which sound fine) on the spider III. I used to use a boss Distortion pedal, and the distortion on the spider is much better.. and you do get less hum because of the noise gate, and when you're playing, your playing should overshadow the hum, unless you don't know how to mute out your other strings.

So go learn how to play the guitar, or take the tube fanboy sh*t elsewhere.

POSTED: 12/03/2008 - 05:52 pm / quote |
zackmuise :
Hexagram wrote:

You have the worst spelling and punctuation errors I have ever seen on the internet...congratulations


ahahah, after reading that I was so annoyed, and prayed that someone would say taht, hi 5

POSTED: 12/11/2008 - 02:00 pm / quote |
sixstring sicko :
this comment is for image 6. there was a ****ing sicker telling u how to configure your pickups! **** the place i got it from took of the stickers!
POSTED: 12/21/2008 - 07:22 am / quote |
Tanman0725 :
Which one would be better, line 6 spider three, or, Roland cube 30x?
POSTED: 12/25/2008 - 10:14 am / quote |
nightraven :
Tanman0725 wrote:

Which one would be better, line 6 spider three, or, Roland cube 30x?

the roland cube, without a doubt.

POSTED: 01/01/2009 - 07:54 am / quote |
Spartan969 :
havent played this one, but played the Valve 212 which sounded awesome, but for my small room this would probably be more useable as a house full of people = restriction of volume i can play at. gonna go try this out at the weekend, if its anything like the valve version then i should sond dark, dull and crunchy for my metal :P
POSTED: 01/14/2009 - 01:09 pm / quote |
matt_guitar150 :
I have one. I get into trouble when I tunr it to 4. It is loud. sounds good to. I use an Epiphone Les Paul Standard with stock pickups and it sounds goog. My friend played a Jackson/Charvel through it and it sounded even gooder!
POSTED: 01/17/2009 - 07:45 pm / quote |
Pat Borden Sr :
As a beginner I wanted an amplifier that would give me a lot of variety, without having to lay out a ton of cash for stompboxes. I'm perfectly happy with the way my little amp sounds. I'm no pro, but I know what I like. My only complaint would be that it's nearly impossible to remember where all the presets are.
POSTED: 01/20/2009 - 04:30 pm / quote |
cmacTR4Q :
nightraven wrote:

Tanman0725 wrote:

Which one would be better, line 6 spider three, or, Roland cube 30x?

the roland cube, without a doubt.


Your crazy. the presets on the roland sound like crap, and the eq doesnt help. get the line 6.

POSTED: 01/22/2009 - 01:55 pm / quote |
Tengatu Man :
hmm... I played on this for about 1.5 hours at Guitar center on a Dean ML X, seems pretty good, I liked phaser and sweep echo. Distortions are great. If you don't like the presets then well... don't use them, like me. But all in all I have to try it out again to make a final decision.
So far I think I'll buy it.

POSTED: 01/30/2009 - 10:12 pm / quote |
tom_martin_123 :
cmacTR4Q wrote:

nightraven wrote:

Tanman0725 wrote:

Which one would be better, line 6 spider three, or, Roland cube 30x?

the roland cube, without a doubt.

Your crazy. the presets on the roland sound like crap, and the eq doesnt help. get the line 6.


ROLAND! easily! I have played on this.... it's got a lot of effects and presets but it doesn't sound good at all. It's all simulated and there is no depth in the tone at all... it's just noise.
However... i would try out the vox valvetronics first.

POSTED: 01/31/2009 - 06:00 pm / quote |
Mloer :
witch one is better, the roland 80x cube or this one=?
or the roland 60 cube or this one ?
Please answer, i cant decide

POSTED: 02/04/2009 - 12:14 pm / quote |
salrap10 :
i jus got one of these last night and i absolutely love it. its got a big bold sound and a lot of great and presets too. i wood definitly recommend this to any guitar player
POSTED: 02/19/2009 - 08:39 am / quote |
Hark-o :
im thinking on getting this amp at the end of the month. I play in a punk band with some other random covers thrown in from other genres but haven't really heard if this amp is any use for punk rock. someone please advice
POSTED: 03/30/2009 - 02:18 pm / quote |
Yegor95 :
should i get this or a marshall 50 watt

POSTED: 04/11/2009 - 02:26 pm / quote |
Glenn Guitar :
Yegor95 wrote:

should i get this or a marshall 50 watt


Thats kinda useless if we dont know what amp division it is.

By the way, these amps arent as shit as they sound out. Sure, they aint made for your classic tones. Its modern, its new, its fresh and its a nice amp to play. I only have a 15 watt, ive had it for a while and i can tell my tone is 'lacking' something. I want to try to move onto peavey, or vox/kustom. Ive never been a marshall fan, because i'd have to rob a bank to get a decentone. At the end of the day, the line 6 amps are good if you have a shit 5w practice amp which when you press the overdrive button it farts when you hit a note. Everyones been there, you all didnt start out on flaming marshall JVM stacks. This is good for practice or the youtube kid. Saves time for making videos, all i have is a webcam, my ipod and a connector to my amp. Would you seriously ho somewhere nuts like download tour with this? Also these amps have good recording quality into the higher end ones, this 75W with tape echo i could get a nice steve vai sound on the insane red channel. Im still interested in getting a 75W one, for £200 and great quality, also these things come pumped with celestions as i remember... But try before you buy.

POSTED: 04/11/2009 - 03:55 pm / quote |
hobozach :
Facts: Line 6 is digital
Tube Amps are obviously...Tube.

Solid State amps tend to be cheaper and have
a multitude of FX
Tube amps typically have 2 channels, and are
pricey

For these reasons, people with less coin go to solid state modeling amps. However, there are some artists out there who are guilty of having a line 6 podxt3 on their stack somewhere.

If you have volume/FX problems, maybe for a band or practice in general, Line 6 Spider III are amazing for a fix. If you want to get serious and maybe develope signature sound, DEFINETELY consider a higher quality amp.
If you have more than $400, dont even hesitate, regardless of the loss of FX or watts, get a tube. Most have the basics built in(Distortion, Reverb). If you don't, you'll be kicking yourself in the ass.

Long story short: Line 6 Spider III = Temp. fix.
Tubes = Pro

POSTED: 04/20/2009 - 11:40 am / quote |
GusIsBored :
hey i recently saved up 600$ to buy a new amp but i cant decide which 1 to buy
ive so far got it down to three amps:

spider 3 75w -600$
vox AD50VT 50w -650$
fender FM212r 100w -550$

plz help

POSTED: 04/23/2009 - 02:56 am / quote |
wchurchill :
hey i recently saved up 600$ to buy a new amp but i cant decide which 1 to buy
ive so far got it down to three amps:

spider 3 75w -600$
vox AD50VT 50w -650$
fender FM212r 100w -550$

plz help


Well tell us about yuor style and what what kind of amp you are looking for and then i could be able to answer

POSTED: 05/17/2009 - 09:08 am / quote |
Carvin-on-Bass :
I'm sick of hearing people going on about how modelling and digital amps suck and we need to go back to vintage marshells and tubes and shit. FUCK vintage. Back in the day vintage amps were being thrown away for digital. I love this amp and I'm sick of playing through ****ing marshells.
POSTED: 05/28/2009 - 05:10 pm / quote |
reidcole17 :
is this a good amp to play guns n roses and metallica?
POSTED: 06/04/2009 - 09:46 pm / quote |
lambofgodowns :
lespaul#1 wrote:

Is it good for gigs?


I've played a few shows with it and it works great. it competes very well with my other guitarist's mesa triple rectifier. I love this amp

POSTED: 06/20/2009 - 01:46 am / quote |
gofaster1000 :
i just got this amp today at guitar center for $255. i am very pleased with it it has alot of great sounds. very quiet operation no noise i mean. been playing a few years never heard a small amp in this $ range sound so good from whisper quiet to max it sounds superb.i play everything from lullabye to death metal. wont be disappointed if youre lookin to buy under 300.
POSTED: 06/21/2009 - 03:50 am / quote |
Rocker.Ross.777 :
Im Looking for an amp that will have the power and volume to play small gigs, pubs and clubs sort of thing... Could anyone tell me if this amp would be approipriate. If not... Which amp would be.
Thanks

POSTED: 07/04/2009 - 07:27 pm / quote |
davidblackjuda2 :
omg,the sound really kicks serious asses!!bought 1 a month ago.no need for using distortion pedals with it coz it already has quite a lot of sexy killing distortion in it.by the way did anyone find all the 400 presets?it's a huge damn amount of presets we've got here.Awesome amp,i make love to it all nightlong.LOL
POSTED: 07/20/2009 - 09:27 am / quote |
drongo43 :
Ok here it is,
If my 35+ years of playing has taught me anything its that either you like an amp or you don't. It's been said Pete Townshend didn't llike the Marshall head but loved the cabs so he put a Hiwatt head on Marshall cabs. so sound and tone are selective. what sounds good to you might sound like crap to someone else.

The important point to this whole thread is to get the users impression of this amp. Some will love it some will hate it, but each is entitled to their opinion. with that being said ill give some points to ponder that will serve well for any amp reviews you read.

Points:
1. Take into account how long the reviewer has had the product- imediately throw out reviews from people who have had the amp a few days or a week and either say its the greatest thing ever, or its the worst thing ever.. truthfully they haven't had time to fully explore the product and make an informed decision

2.The playing 2 years "experts" you can pretty much throw out these reviews too, mainly because short time players don't really know how to get a good sound on an amp for the most part yet which will come in time.

3. Tube snobs- these are the ones that keeps saying "buy a tube amp, solid state sucks" yada-yada
sure their high end tube amps they keep trying to toss up to compare with a low end digital job is going to sount better tonaly in most cases, but at cost of 10 to 15 times the price... really its like a ferari driver wanting to race a mini-van.

Fact: 99% of the people who own tube full stacks and half stack dont need near that much power, sure its great for your ego standing in front of 7ft tall tube stack, but in the 1000's of gigs I have played on only 2 occasions have I needed more than a 22 watt fender deluxe reverb, a good distortion pedal, and a sure 57 to mic it up with.

Finaly guys and gals you and only you have to do your homework, go to the music store with (YOUR) guitar and sit down and try it and compare it side by side against other amps in the price range you can afford, and buy the one that works best for you.

The line 6 spider III?, look at it for what it is, which is a decent practice/jam session amp that wont break the bank (or your back carrying it around)

POSTED: 08/02/2009 - 09:19 pm / quote |
darcylespaul :
i have this amp, its really good and all if u want to mimic bands and guitar sounds
but what pisses me off is how u can't create and save any custom banks or sounds, if u can tell me btw.
otherwise its an 8 but if it had the custom feature a definate 9.5

POSTED: 10/10/2009 - 07:27 am / quote |
MotörHeadFan22 :
GREAT amp! I have one got it for $200 at a local music store, barely used, it still had the stickers on it and not one ding or dent, works perfectly fine, i love every single thing about this amp, all the preset tones, and the effects are all great i know i've only been playing for a few years now and i'm decent but it's a great amp not to heavy, just the right weight for any person. Great for metal and rock tones, along with some clean tones with a nice touch to them! i recommend it to anyone who wants to play Metallica, AC/DC, Megadeth, Beatles, Rolling Stones, Hendrix and even Guns N' Roses, it's solid state too, and it's amazing...
POSTED: 11/20/2009 - 01:38 pm / quote |
MotörHeadFan22 :
darcylespaul wrote:

i have this amp, its really good and all if u want to mimic bands and guitar sounds
but what pisses me off is how u can't create and save any custom banks or sounds, if u can tell me btw.
otherwise its an 8 but if it had the custom feature a definate 9.5

you can, but you have to download them from the line 6 website and use one of those POD things, i'm pretty sure of that and as far as i know you can create and save your own sounds.

POSTED: 11/20/2009 - 01:39 pm / quote |
vanzantkevin :
Ive been using line 6 amps for a long time now(6 years), theyre highly versatile and give out great sound for solid state without the risk of breaking down, i havent played a single solid state amp that can keep up with this one in any feild alone... that being said the clean sounds need some slight tweeking at the high ends and most of the distortion can get too gainy, still every sound out of the 400+ presets can be used in a very unique way, just think like tom and the possibilities are endless
POSTED: 11/23/2009 - 01:15 am / quote |
xander_sk8 :
Great amp i use this amp all the time around my house and at my studio it always suprises me
POSTED: 11/24/2009 - 10:25 am / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009