guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Marshall : MG100HDFX review. 28 reviews, 233 votes and 194 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

MG100HDFX Review

manufacturer: marshall date: 08/12/2009 category: guitar amplifiers
MG100HDFX
 Features:8.4
 Sound:8.6
 Reliability:9
 Impression:8.8
 Overall rating:
 8.7 
 Users rating:
 6.8 
 Comments:
 194 
 user comments vote for this amp:
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 3.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 194 
 comments posted, 7 removed | this article is 97% spam-free
pjrocks54 :
I will agree with the above reviews to the point that you can get killer tones out of the MG100HDFX, but, as far as being reliable it's a POS!!! Cuts out at practice as well as at gigs. I got rid of it and replaced it with a Marshall AVT50H. It has as much balls as the MG100 and sounds much warmer as it has a 12AX7 preamp tube in the preamp section. I just got it and feel the best is yet to come. Rock on my children!
POSTED: 05/10/2006 - 08:07 pm / quote |
sabbath1313 :
I bought this amp about six months ago mainly because I am a student and don't have a lot of money to spare, and this is (in my opinion) the best amp in it's price range. Despite it's low cost it is surprisingly good sounding and mixed with different FX pedals it sounds great. Unlike pjrocks54 I have bashed this amp around, and gigged with it and have never had the slightest problem. It makes all my friends jealous, and to get such a great amp at such a low price is a bargain.
POSTED: 05/28/2006 - 01:56 pm / quote |
Shredlet :
Ive heard that the MG's are meant to be really crap is this a lie or does it have some truth to it?
POSTED: 06/24/2006 - 08:45 am / quote |
rockdude_2008 :
i was gonna buy this but everyone told me it sucked, wow differnces in opinions on ultimate-guitar.com

POSTED: 06/28/2006 - 03:29 pm / quote |
spunkeymonkey36 :
I bought this guitar amp of ebay a few months back. I think this is a great amp for the money and the tone on the clean channel is great. I like the overdrive on it as well, but surprisingly I found that my smaller marshall mg15fx has more tone and can sustain notes longer in the same settings. It is a great shame really. I have also heard rumours that these amps have a tendancy to over heat if the volume is pumped up to high. This hasnt happened to me yet but i dont go any higher than 3/4 of the way up. Nevertheless this is very loud and will do your ears in if your not careful.
POSTED: 07/05/2006 - 06:22 am / quote |
Corle :
Guys if anyone rights a bad review, they lie. BUY IT. you cannot go wrong with this amp
POSTED: 07/21/2006 - 09:39 pm / quote |
different107 :
marshall makes some of the best...no doubt about it
POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 03:03 pm / quote |
gibsonlespaul44 :
marshall makes THE best....no doubt about it
POSTED: 07/28/2006 - 01:27 am / quote |
gibsonlespaul44 :
i also own this amp. if your into punk music like fallout boy, greenday, ect. youll love this amp. also corle is right. they reason they are lying is to get u to buy a different one like one in the jcm series. this is the best solid state amp for the price and sound
POSTED: 07/28/2006 - 01:30 am / quote |
thunderinblack :
zakk wylde sometimes uses it
POSTED: 08/29/2006 - 03:05 pm / quote |
E V H 5150 :
Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?
POSTED: 09/09/2006 - 10:29 am / quote |
powerlord :
I just bought one of these today after trying a Crate,a kustom,and a peavey in the same price range and all I can say is way to go Marshall!!!I thought for a long time that Marshall was just a name,not true,they deliver and roll the competition,this stack rocks!
POSTED: 10/10/2006 - 09:26 pm / quote |
Brainwash :
zakk wylde sometimes uses it


No, he doesnt. He uses JCMs. He got paid by marshall to appear in ads for MGs. Please look things up before trying to act like you know about them.

For all of you wanting to buy this amp, please, save up a little more and go for an all tube amp. If you stick with guitar, you will thank yourself in the long run. The cleans are decent on these, but the distortion is really muddy. Look into a B-52 AT series amp for a reasonably priced tube amp. It may be a bit of a step up price wise, but you will love it. Tubes are also MUCH louder, my 2x12" tube is at least 2 times louder than my friends MG half stack, and his sounds terrible when cranked.

POSTED: 10/24/2006 - 10:53 am / quote |
iceberg :
Not everyone can spend $1000 on a head and then $800 on a cab. If your a serious gigger, then you should have a PA system which projects all the sound. Marshall has earned it's respect in the rock world. I got the mg100dfx with the mg412a cab and this thing is all I need. This amp WILL hurt your ears, be careful!! Anyone who put's this amp down is probably using something rediculous like a avt pitbull or a mesa boogie. That could be 6 month's of income for some people. If your using a combo amp or a pathetic box with a speaker in it, then this is your best bet for a reasonable upgrade. Nevermind the anti-Marshall meatheads!! Nothing looks better than a Marshall stack on stage!!
POSTED: 11/01/2006 - 05:42 pm / quote |
lamb-of-god-666 :
This is a kick ass amp and sounds great for the price.
POSTED: 11/15/2006 - 06:00 pm / quote |
m.o.d.--- :
E V H 5150 wrote:

Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?


MG100HDFX is the best amp in your price range.

POSTED: 11/16/2006 - 06:48 pm / quote |
m.o.d.--- :
Brainwash wrote:

zakk wylde sometimes uses it


No, he doesnt. He uses JCMs. He got paid by marshall to appear in ads for MGs. Please look things up before trying to act like you know about them.

For all of you wanting to buy this amp, please, save up a little more and go for an all tube amp. If you stick with guitar, you will thank yourself in the long run. The cleans are decent on these, but the distortion is really muddy. Look into a B-52 AT series amp for a reasonably priced tube amp. It may be a bit of a step up price wise, but you will love it. Tubes are also MUCH louder, my 2x12" tube is at least 2 times louder than my friends MG half stack, and his sounds terrible when cranked.



No he uses it in the studio somtimes ive seenpitures of him in a recording video with it.

POSTED: 11/16/2006 - 06:50 pm / quote |
phillyguitar :
If this amp is cutting out on you, you need to get it fixed!

I've had this thing for 3 years and it has never done me wrong. It's been in vans, dragged around everywhere, it's got nicks to prove it. Never once have I had to even think of repairing it. Marshall makes some of the best amps so check this thing out, you can't really get much better at this price

POSTED: 11/29/2006 - 09:59 am / quote |
ponnightingale :
im a dud!
do you still have to buy a seperate amp for this or no? meh ive only got a marshall 10watt amp see?

POSTED: 12/10/2006 - 12:11 pm / quote |
TheDev01dOne :
I bought this amp around 4 months ago and I agree with most people here. It is definately the best amp init's price range, by FAR. Of course it's not as good as a JCM or Mesa Boogie. But not everyone can afford to spend 6 months pay on a guitar amp.

It is loud and has a GREAT clean tone. I prefer a pedal for distortion though. If this is your price range I would definately recommend buying this amp.

POSTED: 12/14/2006 - 01:21 am / quote |
shredder_666 :
rockdude_2008 :
i was gonna buy this but everyone told me it sucked, wow differnces in opinions on ultimate-guitar.com


whoever told you that is a moron, this amp is one of the best issued by marshall. dont let the cheap price fool you man...go out and get it. Ive had this amp for six months and it has never let me down unlike the tube amps ive used forever.

POSTED: 12/14/2006 - 04:34 pm / quote |
Terrify_Dmac :
This amp is alot of bang for the buck. It sounds great with my yamaha pacifica and bcrich zombie.

POSTED: 12/16/2006 - 08:04 pm / quote |
danet12345 :
ive heard that this amp is a bit on the pants side but some these reveiws have changed my mind. one of my mates has just this week bought a marshall mode4 350 and cab but theeres no way im gonna get them in a million years other mate got a limeted edition version in blue but i dont care im just gonna try it out just in case it is a biut pants
POSTED: 12/20/2006 - 10:08 am / quote |
mattmcavoy400 :
Is this amp better than the line 6 spider 75 head?
POSTED: 01/20/2007 - 05:46 am / quote |
mattmcavoy400 :
ponnightingale wrote:

im a dud!
do you still have to buy a seperate amp for this or no? meh ive only got a marshall 10watt amp see?


Yeeeees u need a cab.

POSTED: 01/20/2007 - 05:47 am / quote |
dylan87654321 :
the amps way better then a spider
POSTED: 01/25/2007 - 05:54 am / quote |
xyour_name_here :
i have this head. the distorion in my opionion kicks every other amps ass
POSTED: 02/08/2007 - 01:14 pm / quote |
gunsnr92 :
Ive had this amp for a couple months now and I love it! It has an Awesome Clean Sound and not quite enough distortion but I just add a BOSS DS-1 onto it an it works great! I would suggest getting a 1960A or 1960B cab to go along with it personally. But Wayne Static from Static-X uses this Stack.
POSTED: 02/22/2007 - 09:46 pm / quote |
Kirenjob :
Im getting this soon!!! I can't wait!!
POSTED: 03/04/2007 - 04:35 am / quote |
cyclefreak207 :
Dude, Today is wednesday, and on friday, i am going to guitar center to buy one of these, so YAAAAYYYYY,
they are bad ass!!!

POSTED: 03/21/2007 - 09:51 pm / quote |
shaunems :
i have been playing for 6 years and im in a band
is this the right amp for me?

POSTED: 03/22/2007 - 05:29 am / quote |
cyclefreak207 :
YO Yo I went and got it!! It's so good, it even sounds good playin a bass through it. You should definitely buy it
POSTED: 03/25/2007 - 12:25 am / quote |
zAg1619 :
I've had this amp for about 2 years now. It was the best amp decision I could make for the price range i was in. Now, if money flew outta my ass, obviously i would have bought a mesa/boogie, but that's beside the point. I play metal, and classic rock. For me, the OD tone isn't hard enough for metal so I use a pedal instead, but that's just me. I frankly think the OD tone is perfect for many classic rock songs. Also, as a side note, do not turn it up to 10 unless neccesary.. I got this amp on top of two cabs and hell, I usually stay parked at 5, and the cops drop by every day. I hate my neighbors..
POSTED: 03/27/2007 - 03:49 am / quote |
DescendanceRock :
i Bought this amp, about say,..... 7 momths ago?
just before novenber or something, because i wanted a new one for a small gig my band was heading for, and, i definitely need to rig it up through a PA, the feedback is just terrible, when you try to crank it up loud enough over a big-ass double bass, 6 tommmed pearl export drum kit, so id advise people who have a big-ass PA system to buy this, but it wont stand on its own, I personally have no idea how much difference the amplifier makes when you add another CAB, which is possible, as its a HDFX and not a DFX, this makes it alot better than the DFX, but people its a very nice amp, and you can get awesoem clean sounds and heavy metal sounds, so dont listen to them on that, any sound is possible through this beasty, its just, if your live, youll need a monitor or two and youll need to channel it through a mixer/PA.

Haydn,
www.Myspace.com/descendance1 (check my bands profile out
oh yeah theres a picture of me woth it on my site if youd liek to look !!

thanks

POSTED: 03/29/2007 - 12:35 pm / quote |
DaBlackE :
E V H 5150 wrote:

Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?

Buy the 5150 combo!!

POSTED: 04/04/2007 - 02:35 am / quote |
Doodleface :
shaunems wrote:

i have been playing for 6 years and im in a band
is this the right amp for me?


NO!


just because it says Marshall, doesn't mean that it's good. this is easily the most hated amp on the forums and theirs good reason. Their is better stuff for that money. I have a Carvin SX100 it has the exact same features as the combo MG. and it sounds at least 10x times better, and it only costs 350 bucks! A Roland Cube, or a Vox Valvetronix are better than this as well.

and tube amps aren't all 1000-3000 dollars, check out the peavey valveking, or the ashdown fallen angel.

POSTED: 04/24/2007 - 05:14 pm / quote |
grungefan89 :
I have a review coming up on this amp.

Overall, it's decent. But as many other people said, there are better stacks out there (just not for 320 bucks used).

POSTED: 04/29/2007 - 12:15 pm / quote |
High_o :
best amp for the price? no ****ing way. fairly decent tone? maybe. people are complete ****s for buyin a solid state stack. buy a smaller tube combo, not this. you dont really ever need a 100watt stack
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 06:33 am / quote |
bierstier :
Shredlet wrote:

Ive heard that the MG's are meant to be really crap is this a lie or does it have some truth to it?


I have one and i think that's really crap idd

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 10:13 am / quote |
CORT noob :
gibsonlespaul44 wrote:

i also own this amp. if your into punk music like fallout boy, greenday, ect. youll love this amp. also corle is right. they reason they are lying is to get u to buy a different one like one in the jcm series. this is the best solid state amp for the price and sound

They are not punk bands, and there are solid states equally as crappy as this for a lot less than the price.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 12:40 pm / quote |
StuC :
thunderinblack wrote:

zakk wylde sometimes uses it


No he doesn't, that would be daft. Why would he play an MG over his old JCM800's? Oh and just because marshall say he uses mg's doesn't mean he does.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 12:41 pm / quote |
CORT noob :
shaunems wrote:

i have been playing for 6 years and im in a band
is this the right amp for me?

If you have been playing that long, you deserve a better amp, for $600 you could go tubes.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 12:49 pm / quote |
DaBlackE :
StuC wrote:

thunderinblack wrote:

zakk wylde sometimes uses it


No he doesn't, that would be daft. Why would he play an MG over his old JCM800's? Oh and just because marshall say he uses mg's doesn't mean he does.

Zakk doesnt use this model. Marshall just came out with a Zakk Wylde signature mini stack MG. He just uses it as a practice amp. I think the mini stack MG is the only decent one outta the whole bunch.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 01:37 pm / quote |
Jimmy_Page1944 :
I think the mini stack MG is the only decent one outta the whole bunch.


Then you are obviously a bad thinker.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 04:01 pm / quote |
jessejames1414 :
This amp makes me sad ;-;. I was like "yay Marshall " than I felt like I was dating the sexy football captain until I realized he likes to do it in the ass and is abusive.
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 04:07 pm / quote |
stephen_rettie :
i wouldnt pisson this amp guys
seriously not jusrt sayen that cause theres better amps ouyt there
but the mg seies is just shit
in general
some ppl would say they cant afford a mesa or a tube amp or whatever
im saving up
i dont want to settle for shite
which is what this is
im saving up for a DSL401, ya it will take a while but man is it gonna be worth it

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 04:56 pm / quote |
Doodleface :
go to the forum. go to the "Guitar Gear and Accesories" forum, then click on the "The Ultimate Gear Information Sticky:Incorporating Info on Amps, FX and Pickups" and the "Amps Q and A thread and ONLY "Which Amp?" Thread"

read up. you will find better amps for the price and more useful information

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 05:07 pm / quote |
pub hero :
Hahaha. People LIKE the MG series? I guess if you're running a Yamaha Pacifica or a Squier you'll like anything.
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 05:19 pm / quote |
DaBlackE :
Jimmy_Page1944 wrote:

I think the mini stack MG is the only decent one outta the whole bunch.


Then you are obviously a bad thinker.

Why? Do you think all the MGs are good or you think they're all crap? I said the mini stack MG was DECENT, not good, not okay, not great but DECENT for a practice amp. Maybe you should explain what ya meant instead of just typing in one ****ing sentence.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 06:56 pm / quote |
FacingUsAll :
I feel sorry for the people who buy an MG based on the reviews on this site.



POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 08:27 pm / quote |
68_SG :
worst Marshall ever... period i hope they stop that line and get back and stick with the hybrids and tubes
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 08:45 pm / quote |
Chinomaster182 :
I want to cry after reading all this newbness.

Best amp in the price range? This is easily at the bottom right next to the spider, under no circumstances would i consider buying this pos.

POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 09:36 pm / quote |
people_hate_me :
i play an epi sg and i find the mg alright with that....has a good distortion channel but very shitty clean channel unless ya use sum reverb and chorus, then its not as bad
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 10:27 pm / quote |
llanafreak44 :
Wow. I can't believe how many people are going to buy this amp because of these reviews by gear noobs.
POSTED: 05/02/2007 - 10:53 pm / quote |
bloodyskull :
i have this marshall head running through a 1960 lead cab and its the best.
POSTED: 05/03/2007 - 12:00 am / quote |
EiDF202 :
People who are saying '...solids are crap, but a tube...' should realise that tubes don't suit everyone. I have this amp, go it with the MG cab and was contented, not blown away. I then plugged it in to an AVT cab and with the added lower end response of the AVT it's probably the baest amp i've played. I play proggy/post rock stuff ad if you're going to run a tonne of effects through an amp, like I do, the this is the one fo you.
POSTED: 05/03/2007 - 03:27 am / quote |
High_o :
Zakk doesnt use this model. Marshall just came out with a Zakk Wylde signature mini stack MG. He just uses it as a practice amp. I think the mini stack MG is the only decent one outta the whole bunch.
do you realise that the ZW micro stack is just a crappy mg15 head with tiny cabs, and the signature part is just some bullseyes drawn on? he is paid to say that he uses these amps. why would he use an unweildly micro stack as a practice amp when there are so many better practice amps that would give better tone, are more veratile, and would be so much easier to movearound (as htey are combos)?

POSTED: 05/03/2007 - 09:19 am / quote |
webbtje :
jessejames1414 wrote:

This amp makes me sad ;-;. I was like "yay Marshall " than I felt like I was dating the sexy football captain until I realized he likes to do it in the ass and is abusive.



Lovin' it. got one of these in the music room in school, i basically use it as a speaker, with my own distortion and effects. no ****ing way would i even dream of buying this as an amp.

POSTED: 05/09/2007 - 08:57 am / quote |
last_biscuit :
To all the people on here claiming this amp sounds amazing and better than any other even near the price:

Crank this amp past half master volume, and come back and say what you think. This amp can sound fine, like most other solid-state amps at low volumes, but once you put the thing into gigging volume, you lose the thickness and just end up with a really trebley sound.
This amp is fine for bedroom use, though if you have a stack for bedroom use i don't see the point, but try gigging a decent-sized venue with this and by the look on the soundguys face you'll know how this amp truly sounds.
All down to opinion though of course

POSTED: 05/09/2007 - 12:41 pm / quote |
nik_I :
last_biscuit wrote:

To all the people on here claiming this amp sounds amazing and better than any other even near the price:

Crank this amp past half master volume, and come back and say what you think. This amp can sound fine, like most other solid-state amps at low volumes, but once you put the thing into gigging volume, you lose the thickness and just end up with a really trebley sound.
This amp is fine for bedroom use, though if you have a stack for bedroom use i don't see the point, but try gigging a decent-sized venue with this and by the look on the soundguys face you'll know how this amp truly sounds.
All down to opinion though of course


ditto. and i actually have an mg series amp

POSTED: 05/09/2007 - 04:54 pm / quote |
shredder_666 :
Hart_Attack :
shredder_666 wrote:


rockdude_2008 :
i was gonna buy this but everyone told me it sucked, wow differnces in opinions on ultimate-guitar.com


whoever told you that is a moron, this amp is one of the best issued by marshall. dont let the cheap price fool you man...go out and get it. Ive had this amp for six months and it has never let me down unlike the tube amps ive used forever.


you sir, are an idiot.

a shit solid state over a tube? Man you must be like 13 or something


Dude....chill. Im just saying it like it is. I used the fender hot rod deluxe for a few years and the tubes kept going microphonic. Then i checked out the peavey valveking 100, not really a bad amp but still there is a reason that it is only about $530. The JVM410 head is really good though and ill probably invest into that.

Get a grip on yourselves. Just because an amp is a solid state does not mean that it is a shitty amp. The good tube amps are the ones that are $2000 a piece and not many of us can afford that. There are some solid states that are better than tubes out there. This is not a bad amp. Im in a band, i have done many shows with it, cranked it to its full potential and if you actually know how to work it youll hear that it sounds really great. You can crank this amp and get great sounds out of it. So go ahead and get this but take some time to see how it works in order to run it properly. Thats what i do and i havent had one bad show yet with the amp. We played with another band that had this amp and they sounded good too. Its obviously not comparable to the JVM or anything from the JCM or Vintage Modern series but its not a bad amp. For a solid state, its really quite good.

POSTED: 06/11/2007 - 05:20 pm / quote |
High_o :
Get a grip on yourselves. Just because an amp is a solid state does not mean that it is a shitty amp. The good tube amps are the ones that are $2000 a piece and not many of us can afford that. There are some solid states that are better than tubes out there. This is not a bad amp. Im in a band, i have done many shows with it, cranked it to its full potential and if you actually know how to work it youll hear that it sounds really great. You can crank this amp and get great sounds out of it. So go ahead and get this but take some time to see how it works in order to run it properly. Thats what i do and i havent had one bad show yet with the amp. We played with another band that had this amp and they sounded good too. Its obviously not comparable to the JVM or anything from the JCM or Vintage Modern series but its not a bad amp. For a solid state, its really quite good.

whilst it is true that it isn;t that bad of an amp, there are cheaper, better solid state amps out there (such as the cubes and vox valvstates)

POSTED: 06/29/2007 - 07:15 am / quote |
last_biscuit :
High_o wrote:
whilst it is true that it isn;t that bad of an amp, there are cheaper, better solid state amps out there (such as the cubes and vox valvstates)


Vox Valvtronix you mean? Marshall make the Valvestate :p:

POSTED: 07/01/2007 - 02:01 pm / quote |
deaththrashcore :
This head is great. I use it with a Boss ML-2 pedal and it's perfect.
POSTED: 07/04/2007 - 11:22 pm / quote |
High_o :
Vox Valvtronix you mean? Marshall make the Valvestate :p:

oops, yeah that one

POSTED: 07/08/2007 - 11:00 am / quote |
Kirenjob :
MG's don't suck. People reckon that just cause they are a solid state amp they are pathetic. For a solid state they are brilliant.
POSTED: 08/07/2007 - 04:53 am / quote |
High_o :
MG's don't suck. People reckon that just cause they are a solid state amp they are pathetic. For a solid state they are brilliant.

no they're not. you can get better one's for a cheaper price.

POSTED: 08/07/2007 - 05:16 am / quote |
HelpComputah :
The above comment that there are better, cheaper half stacks is BS. The only (New)half stacks cheaper than the MG100hdfx are from Crate. They're not bad, but Crate's gain channels tend to be very sterile IMO. That's not necessarily bad for extreme metal, but if your looking for more of an crunchy Marshall tone, then get the freakin' Marshall!

As far as other competitors, there's Randall with the RX120, but that's no cheaper than the Marshall and again, doesn't have the Marshall vibe. There's Carvin, which you have to buy on faith because you can't try it out before hand. There's Peavey but they no longer make a halfstack in the MG100's price range (the Supreme XL is discontinued). Line 6? I can't stand the Spider III's, personally. Of course, I've yet to play one that didn't have serious bugs in the FX sections.

I don't own an MG myself, but in over a decade of playing I've come across plenty of SS Marshalls. Most of them have been OK. The MG series are easily their best S.S. designs since the 1980's. They are about on part with the pre-AVT Valvestates IMO. They deliver a good approximation of the crunchy Marshall tone many guitarists crave (including myself) for not a lot of $$. They are definitely transistory sounding when compared to their big brothers in the JCM series. Nonetheless, it's more than possible to get a nice tone out of the MG with the Marshall flavor that other amps just don't do as well (including modeling amps).

Is the MG100HDFX as good as a JCM2000 DSL? Of course not! Is a DSL halfstack worth $1500 more than the MG half stack! Hell no! No one buys an all-tube stack out of necessity anymore. They buy them because they CHOOSE to and can afford to. Guitarists love to delude themselve into thinking they NEED this or that, and this board is full of those delusional types IMO.

Tube amps are not worth starving one's self over. Choose with your ears, and buy what you can afford. Take all written opinions (including the naysayers) with a grain of salt.

POSTED: 09/27/2007 - 07:39 pm / quote |
High_o :
The above comment that there are better, cheaper half stacks is BS

you talking about me? because i said there are better ss amps for the same price (or less), not better half stacks. roland cubes and vox valvetronix's are better (and you can get a valvetronix head anyways, so there are better halfstacks)
you talk about people deluding themselves, saying they need a tube amp. well, the biggest delusion of a ll is that you need a ****ing halfstack. combo+mic=just as good as a halfstack, with none of the hassle of buying and transporting a cab.

POSTED: 10/02/2007 - 04:47 am / quote |
djwrestle619 :
mg100hdfx ruleeee!!!!!
Blahhh

POSTED: 10/18/2007 - 04:20 pm / quote |
maca-venagas :
mg100hdfx ruleeee!!!!!
Blahhh


for every Mg sold amp

POSTED: 10/24/2007 - 07:26 pm / quote |
maca-venagas :
most of these reviewers say that they have been playing for like 2 months, and so many people here who have also been playing for two months believe them in all that they say. to all those beginners out there, ask yourself, would u be able to truthfully recommend a good amp, for whatever type of music, for whatever type of place. Could u do that? no. hell no. because your only starting out,uve played on two amps in ur lifetime and only owned one. everyones first amp sounds good to them. dont go reviewing it here on UG. talk to veteran guitar players, read their reviews.they have been around, played heaps of amps, heard heaps of bands and been around the scene, they not whats good for practice, gigging, the lot. dont listen to someone who just got a guitar and amp and thinks " wow what i play on this horizontal music majigy goes to this amp where is comes out all loud and distoted, WOW THIS AMP IS THE BEST!! im going to go to UG and give it a ten, without visiting the forums or asking anyone else about it" beginners most likely havent tuned their ears to good tones and such, they just hear clean and distortion, bass and treble. you can trust someone who has heard hundreds of amps and knows the very intricacys of the tones, and the different types. so please if u have been playing guitar for anywhere up to a year, dont review things here, you are destroying the young guitar community and making them buy crappy amps, which may make them get sick of guitar and alternative music, and they go back to buying to buying black eyed peas and panic at the disco albums. Just don’t listen to beginners.
POSTED: 10/24/2007 - 07:37 pm / quote |
maca-venagas :
ALSO_ i can bet that zakk wylde gets paid a shit load to endorse MG amps, but look at his collection and he wont have one. hes one of the best guitarists around, why the **** would he take an MG over a Mesa, Engl or orange? or any high class marshall for that matter. think about it you ****s its the world of advertising and greed. MGs cost shit all to make and still cost a bit. so if u get someone like zakk to endorse it, mindless newbs like these reviewers are gunna flock to them and make
marshall an absolute shitload. Personnally i havent played this amp, or any MG. but ive been told by many guitar veterans to stay away from them. And i will. If i get the opportunity to play it at a store i will. but anyything that is loved by begginers and hated by pros really is worth my time.
Im no begginer, and next amp will be a VOX Valvetronix AD50VT. great sounding and great value. its a much loved amp too.

POSTED: 10/24/2007 - 07:38 pm / quote |
fingers62887 :
MG Series is a big let down played this at guitar center and thought i was playing through a no-name brand i have A JCM900 Marshall Head And A Krankenstein Head And play both through A krankenstein CAB. If You dont have the money for an actual Marshall I would Recommend Trying this amp and many others at this price range NOT A GOOD PRODUCT.
POSTED: 10/26/2007 - 02:49 am / quote |
SG_Man_1810 :
do you need to buy the cab as well or can you just use the head? Im not using it for gigging but just bedroom practise really...I know this is loud for practising but Im hoping one day to be gigging with it, at which point I will buy a cab, but Im not sure if both are required straight away!?
POSTED: 10/29/2007 - 04:37 pm / quote |
the_dogs_master :
It's good to see that snobbery is alive and kicking! My son has just got an MG100hdfx, he's more than happy with it, and I've been impressed by its sound and versitility for the money. He's got it to replace his ageing Marshall valve amp, which isn't always reliable for gigging. I've found that the MG sounds best on od2, with the fdd button in. This way the amp produces a warm valve-like tone, but this is just personal preference. So far, we've tried it with a Gibson Les Paul Studio, a Les Paul Custom, a Tele and a custom built rosewood and maple Lawsuit, with hand wound pickups, made to my spec, which make EMGs sound like single coils (sensible offers over £12,000 only), and this amp has sounded great. Alright, it's not a JCM or a Mode Four, but with the built in effects and it's output, it strikes a good balance between home use and live work, on a sixteen year olds budget. Bear in mind also that rock and roll is not all about playing Stairway To Heaven note for note, it's 80% image. In all the years that I've been playing, one name is synonymous with rock music, Marshall. A Vox is great if you're in a sixties cover band (I've even got an old AC myself), Krankenstein are awesome amps, especially if you don't mind being seen as a metalhead and can put up with the sniggers behind your back. When all is said and done, if you're looking for a new 100 watt head and 4X12 cab for less than £350, than I personally would like to see a better deal.
POSTED: 11/03/2007 - 04:38 pm / quote |
maca-venagas :
^^^^ how much did marshall pay you to say all that???
dude, how can u say that and expect us to take u srsly.

leave UG and never come back. i would rather a tottally marshall free world rather than a world with marshall mgs

POSTED: 11/06/2007 - 05:19 pm / quote |
the_dogs_master :
Everyone has the right to their own opinions, and I'm sure you have valid reasons for your own preferences, but critisisms need to be constructive or they become worthless. I'm sure nobody would choose an MG as their first choice, but like I said, anyone looking for a new 100 watt head and 4x12 cab on a budget ain't gonna get much better. There's no point advising kids to go out and spend £1000 plus on a rig, 'cos it's not gonna happen. For instance, I could comment on any guitar, stating my preferences for tone woods; how a Brazilian Rosewood five piece set neck with Honduras Rosewood fingerboard adds a warmth to the tone that just needs to be heard to be appreciated, but how's that going to benefit someone checking reviews on a Squire Strat, who wants to know if any bits are gonna fall off. So, come on, let's be constructive here, what is a viable alternative half stack?
POSTED: 11/08/2007 - 03:17 pm / quote |
strungoutuk :
I think that some of the comments on this head are a little harsh. This amp does what is expected of it within its price range. I have had one for about 5 years now and it has never let me down. I hasnt been wrapped in cotton wool either, it has been trown around in the car and in vans, used at gigs, had beer spilt on it and although it looks tatty as hell now, it works just fine. Im not sure if it makes any difference but mine is one of the first series before they changed a few bits but im not sure what they changed.
As for the effects, if you are a fan of the "keep it simple"(i am) setup then its fine but i would advise that weeker pickups will sound a little shrill as in my strat i t almost squeeled but with my Jackson it sonds nice and heavy.
At the end of the day if you are buying brand new and are looking for something to help you get started gigging then this is great.. if you have been using somthing thats worth a few hundred quid more amd are used to that sound then it may not be for you.
I would just say try it out in the shop and make sure you try it thru the whole volume range. the reliability should not be a problem.

POSTED: 11/12/2007 - 02:23 pm / quote |
High_o :
Bear in mind also that rock and roll is not all about playing Stairway To Heaven note for note, it's 80% image
Maybe thats why i dont respect your oppinion. if you're in it for teh image, fine, buy a big, unwieldly marshall. but if you only want the best tone possible for the money, there are alternatives (as i've said, vox valvetronix, roland cubes are better amps in terms of tone and versatitly)

POSTED: 11/14/2007 - 05:55 am / quote |
sektor47 :
For me, the MG100HDFX totally pwns the MG100DFX in sound quality. It's just higher quality because all the stuff isn't crammed into a lil cabinet, theres a seperate head, so it can work it's fullest, and a seperate cabinet with FOUR 12" celestion speakers, now how crazy is that? Crazy good!
POSTED: 11/14/2007 - 08:16 pm / quote |
mongo_man :
Hey guys! How do you think a Ibanez RG350EX and a Marshall Guv'Nor 2 (effect pedal) would sound on this Amp? Anyone know?
POSTED: 11/19/2007 - 04:31 pm / quote |
GNRAGE_2010 :
It would be better to get a 30-50w tube combo which would sound 100x better than this piece of poo and also be just as loud.
POSTED: 11/20/2007 - 10:38 am / quote |
mongo_man :
just as loud? I can't see that possible :S...
POSTED: 11/22/2007 - 02:35 pm / quote |
Korzack :
^Aquila^ wrote:

You're all idiots. MGs suck. Ask any gear head.

Best in the price range? Yeah, whatever.

A DSL401 is LOUD and sounds infinitely better than this piece of shit.

Well obviously it's goping to be louder and better - for one, this is a solid state whereas that is essentially Marshall's flag-ship valve/tube amp combo. I like my MG50 a lot (read me review), but I'm thinking of replacing that with this & me practice amp with maybe the 15w version of this. Each to their own, fair enough - I just really like this range.

POSTED: 11/24/2007 - 03:43 pm / quote |
mongo_man :
I tried this amp with my Ibanez RG350EX and a Jackson guitar! It sounded awsome! It can play louder than drums when it's on volume 3.0 ! And you can play up to 10. The delay is awsome, and the clean sound is as clean as it can get. I'm gonna buy it this week
POSTED: 11/26/2007 - 06:22 am / quote |
mongo_man :
Now I have baught it :P It is really really awsome! seriously... it's great! If you know how to use your knobs, you can get really good-sounding stuff. As you might know it has OD1, and OD2, but it you only need one of them though.
POSTED: 12/02/2007 - 09:12 am / quote |
mongo_man :
Hey guys! I was just wondering if anybody know how to get a great Rush sound on the Marshall MG100HDFX and the MG412A. Hopefully I will get some response :P thx
POSTED: 12/05/2007 - 11:09 am / quote |
arowana1027 :
I've played through SS amps all my life. I've been playing for nearly 20yrs now. I'm saving up for an ENGL or Krank Rev100, but I need a halfstack on stage that not only can rock, but has a good stage presence as well. My Crate XT120 combo just doesn't look badass on stage, although it sounds badass. Almost ANY QUALITY SS amp can be made to sound good with the right effects, in the right order, and with some tweaking of the knobs on the amp it self. So with that said, I'm purchasing this amp after trying it out at my LMS. At the beginning of the year with tax money, this baby is mine.
POSTED: 12/06/2007 - 12:36 am / quote |
Guitar Sletten :
The Konztranata is ****in crazy! What the **** are you talking about?! do u have a braindamage or something?!
POSTED: 12/06/2007 - 04:50 am / quote |
SnoopyKojiApple :
HelpComputah wrote:

The above comment that there are better, cheaper half stacks is BS. The only (New)half stacks cheaper than the MG100hdfx are from Crate. They're not bad, but Crate's gain channels tend to be very sterile IMO. That's not necessarily bad for extreme metal, but if your looking for more of an crunchy Marshall tone, then get the freakin' Marshall!

As far as other competitors, there's Randall with the RX120, but that's no cheaper than the Marshall and again, doesn't have the Marshall vibe. There's Carvin, which you have to buy on faith because you can't try it out before hand. There's Peavey but they no longer make a halfstack in the MG100's price range (the Supreme XL is discontinued). Line 6? I can't stand the Spider III's, personally. Of course, I've yet to play one that didn't have serious bugs in the FX sections.

I don't own an MG myself, but in over a decade of playing I've come across plenty of SS Marshalls. Most of them have been OK. The MG series are easily their best S.S. designs since the 1980's. They are about on part with the pre-AVT Valvestates IMO. They deliver a good approximation of the crunchy Marshall tone many guitarists crave (including myself) for not a lot of $$. They are definitely transistory sounding when compared to their big brothers in the JCM series. Nonetheless, it's more than possible to get a nice tone out of the MG with the Marshall flavor that other amps just don't do as well (including modeling amps).

Is the MG100HDFX as good as a JCM2000 DSL? Of course not! Is a DSL halfstack worth $1500 more than the MG half stack! Hell no! No one buys an all-tube stack out of necessity anymore. They buy them because they CHOOSE to and can afford to. Guitarists love to delude themselve into thinking they NEED this or that, and this board is full of those delusional types IMO.

Tube amps are not worth starving one's self over. Choose with your ears, and buy what you can afford. Take all written opinions (including the naysayers) with a grain of salt.


If only there were more people like you on UG...
It would actually make this site constructive, helpful, and friendly.

The MG is great but it's all a matter of opinion. Marshall, along with most other popular brands, rarely produce "pieces of shit." That's the most ignorant thing I've read on here.

If you're interested in getting this, go try it out. When you're looking up reviews on it try to focus on the constructive reviews. Take the negative/ignorant ones with a grain of salt. It all boils down to opinion.
Some people like coffee, some don't. People are different. Accept it.

POSTED: 12/10/2007 - 02:20 am / quote |
High_o :
If you're interested in getting this, go try it out. When you're looking up reviews on it try to focus on the constructive reviews. Take the negative/ignorant ones with a grain of salt. It all boils down to opinion.
Some people like coffee, some don't. People are different. Accept it.

but by that same token, dont be convincedthat this is the perfect amp because it gets straight 10's in the reviews. a lot of the reviews are from people who are begginers, and dont have a great ear for tone, and most of the time dont gig. so yeah, always try before you buy, and dont have what you hear altered bythe fact you see Marshall or fender writen on something

POSTED: 12/10/2007 - 07:08 am / quote |
Death-Reaper :
m.o.d.--- wrote:

E V H 5150 wrote:

Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?


MG100HDFX is the best amp in your price range.


Well it depends on what you want.
If you don't like to struggle with big cabs you'd take the 250DFX, cuz it's a combo.
Also, if you're more into metal, the 250 might be a better option, as more power includes better overdrive sound.

I prefer the 100HDFX as I really need the 4x12' speakers (gigs)
Right now I'm playing Line6 Spider II series.
30 Watts, it sucks.
When at a gig, I can turn the volume to highest, and I'm still not being heard.


POSTED: 12/22/2007 - 03:45 pm / quote |
Weybl Himself :
The MG series truly is the armpit and arsehole of the Marshall range.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 08:20 am / quote |
High_o :
Well it depends on what you want.
If you don't like to struggle with big cabs you'd take the 250DFX, cuz it's a combo.
Also, if you're more into metal, the 250 might be a better option, as more power includes better overdrive sound.

no it doesn't, and anyway, i think the 250dfx is 50 watts with 2x12" speakers, not 250 watts

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 09:25 am / quote |
phenom1991 :
This is shit. You can get a Tube stack for same price as that hunk of junk hooked up with that damn marshall MG cab with those wannabe celestions.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 09:43 am / quote |
phenom1991 :
Death-Reaper wrote:

m.o.d.--- wrote:

E V H 5150 wrote:

Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?


MG100HDFX is the best amp in your price range.

Well it depends on what you want.
If you don't like to struggle with big cabs you'd take the 250DFX, cuz it's a combo.
Also, if you're more into metal, the 250 might be a better option, as more power includes better overdrive sound.

I prefer the 100HDFX as I really need the 4x12' speakers (gigs)
Right now I'm playing Line6 Spider II series.
30 Watts, it sucks.
When at a gig, I can turn the volume to highest, and I'm still not being heard.



AND I CAN'T EVEN BELIEVE YOU DIDNT SAY HE SHOULD GO FOR THE 6505!!!!! *STUNNED*

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 09:44 am / quote |
SylKain :
I often find this one in rehearsal spaces and I can't find anything good to say about it. I usually use heads as poweramps for my Pod XT Live and pretty much anything goes as long as the cab's speakers are fine, but this one is a nightmare even to use like that! And what about that ridiculous noise it makes from the fan... I'll admit I'm not a big fan of marshals but honestly even the most hardcore fanboy of this company that has any clue about what a decent amp sounds like won't be able to say anything good about this one (except maybe for the price). My advice? If you are really on a budget buy a combo amp and if you want a cheap marshall go for the AVT series.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 09:48 am / quote |
Death-Speak :
I have the MG250DFX 2x12 which I believe is the combo version of this head. I really don't know how to say it without sounding harsh, but it sucks. The distortion sucks, the built in effects all suck, except the reverb which is just OK. The cleans also suck. My Crate 25 watter delivers more tone than the Marshall MG...

Save money buy tubes. /End

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 10:10 am / quote |
phenom1991 :
Ditch this amp...or never buy it in the first place. Buy Randall RH50T/Peavey Valveking/Used Tube combo

/END OF FUCKING STORY!

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 10:17 am / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Checked!
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 10:47 am / quote |
GuitarPlayer716 :
Here's the problem: WHO USES A FUCKING SQUIER WITH A MARSHALL HALF STACK?????
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 11:21 am / quote |
phenom1991 :
Here's another problem: WHO EVEN WANTS TO USE A MG STACK?! I was ABOUT to buy one but i tried it out and it sounded like shit. Tube amps cost as much but are miles away from this horrid box!
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 11:33 am / quote |
phenom1991 :
the_dogs_master wrote:

Everyone has the right to their own opinions, and I'm sure you have valid reasons for your own preferences, but critisisms need to be constructive or they become worthless. I'm sure nobody would choose an MG as their first choice, but like I said, anyone looking for a new 100 watt head and 4x12 cab on a budget ain't gonna get much better. There's no point advising kids to go out and spend £1000 plus on a rig, 'cos it's not gonna happen. For instance, I could comment on any guitar, stating my preferences for tone woods; how a Brazilian Rosewood five piece set neck with Honduras Rosewood fingerboard adds a warmth to the tone that just needs to be heard to be appreciated, but how's that going to benefit someone checking reviews on a Squire Strat, who wants to know if any bits are gonna fall off. So, come on, let's be constructive here, what is a viable alternative half stack?


You dont even need 100W but Valveking would be a choice.

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 12:33 pm / quote |
dilbert_5150 :
When do you guys need to use a solid state half stack anyway?! I mean, what's the purpose? You don't need 100Watts for practicing in your home... And if you're playing a gig, do you really use SS for that? This shit rarely sounds good. The only thing it produces is loud noise. I don't own a valve amp, but when it comes a gig time I borrow one. If a was like giving concerts every week, I would buy one for sure.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 12:55 pm / quote |
the.spine.surfs :
*Sigh.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 01:11 pm / quote |
failsaferemedy :
I used this amp while I gigged in a hard rock/metal band and it could do the trick if you worked with it enough. However, I've used better solid state amps, such as the Ibanez Tone Blaster series.
This amp has a great clean channel, as far as I'm concerned, and the effects are a plus, but the distortion could never really be as warm as I needed it to be. I eventually sold it and I'm now saving up for a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe so I can get that warm blues tone.
It's really a matter of preference. Wayne Static uses these amps faithfully, and they obviously work for him.
Whatever floats your boat.

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 03:01 pm / quote |
Aminos :
sounds really good with a boss gt-8
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 03:51 pm / quote |
psychokiller99 :
Aminos wrote:

sounds really good with a boss gt-8


i bet you if you played ur mg with the boss gt-8 next to my JCM900 halfstack (which i got for roughly the same price as an MG stack) you would never touch the MG again. i would defend the MG so far as to say that it makes the 15 and 30 watt ones are decent practice amp. but anything louder than that (especially the halfstack) is a dimwit purchase. there are much better choices out there for the money. but i guess you gotta learn somehow...

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 04:39 pm / quote |
SkAsupafly :
i like my red one.... i think it sounds pretty good... if your guitar sucks and you don't have a good eq setting this amp will sound like crap....

try it... if you like it you like it
if you don't you don't....

sounds good with rg series ibanez guitars for sure...

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 05:15 pm / quote |
fretsonfire74 :
for all the flak this amp gets, it got good reviews.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 06:03 pm / quote |
which ones pink :
We really need to do something about these reviews, they're bullshit. Everyone with experience knows that these amps suck, yet noob reviews keep getting posted, and it's terribly misleading to the people that come on UG for the reviews.
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 06:14 pm / quote |
SL!!! :
High_o wrote:

Bear in mind also that rock and roll is not all about playing Stairway To Heaven note for note, it's 80% imageMaybe thats why i dont respect your oppinion. if you're in it for teh image, fine, buy a big, unwieldly marshall. but if you only want the best tone possible for the money, there are alternatives (as i've said, vox valvetronix, roland cubes are better amps in terms of tone and versatitly)
This is somewhat true. This is amp is reliable, but it has a marshall price tag. It really doesn't give a very good tone and is hard to mix with a full band if you want any good distortion or overdrive. It's definitely not the best, and the reviews aren't that helpful because some guy was like, **** marshall a 3.3 which isn't fair, but then again others are obviously under the marshall spell and like omg 10 out of 10 which also is not a very good review.

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 06:30 pm / quote |
Dance_of_Death :
Damn, i can't believe this amp is getting such good reviews. It has piss poor everything. It is an oversized practice amp. My Roland Microcube has more tone than this. I wish some of the negative reviews got on there, showing how this is such a piss poor attempt at a Marshall. Yes i have played this amp, yes i know it sucks.

And to the ONE negative reviewer, i salute you, you know tone and you know quality (something this amp does not have).

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 06:32 pm / quote |
wyldeshredder :
i tried one of these puppys out...and it sounded like utter shit. luckily i smartened up and bought me a JCM2000 half stack...i used to have an MG50 combo and it sucks if ur any louder than bedroom level...as a practice amp,the mg is good...but why do u want a half stack practice amp??? if ur thinking of buying an MG, DO NOT DO IT. DONT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AS ME,AND MANY OTHERS. BUY A TUBE AMP IF UR LOOKING TO RECORD OR GIG,AND GET A SMALL LITTLE PRACTICE AMP FOR WHEN U WANNA PICK UP AND JAM. and 25 or 30 watt is fine,heck i have a 10 watt traynor that i practice through. save ur money for a tube amp people...look at what the big boys play. TUBES!

that is all

POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 10:21 pm / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Checked
POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 11:05 pm / quote |
TheBloodstained :
I had one.... it was the first decent amp I ever played but as it turned out it just didnt have the tone I wanted.... I have now replaced it with a Randall RH150G3 which just suits my style better....

overall the MG100HDFX is a good place to start if you want something more than a 10watt practise amp ^^

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 02:18 am / quote |
Yngwi3 :
rockdude_2008 wrote:

i was gonna buy this but everyone told me it sucked, wow differnces in opinions on ultimate-guitar.com

only in the reviews- go into the GG&A forums and they'll tell you why it's such bad value for money.

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 08:08 am / quote |
maoven :
Brainwash wrote:

zakk wylde sometimes uses it


No, he doesnt. He uses JCMs. He got paid by marshall to appear in ads for MGs. Please look things up before trying to act like you know about them.

For all of you wanting to buy this amp, please, save up a little more and go for an all tube amp. If you stick with guitar, you will thank yourself in the long run. The cleans are decent on these, but the distortion is really muddy. Look into a B-52 AT series amp for a reasonably priced tube amp. It may be a bit of a step up price wise, but you will love it. Tubes are also MUCH louder, my 2x12" tube is at least 2 times louder than my friends MG half stack, and his sounds terrible when cranked.


That's just a piece of crap, it plays well and are LOUD if you want to, the distortion i pretty good and the clean is nice, the tubs have something elese, that's true, but it's a good amp

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 01:55 pm / quote |
phenom1991 :
^Son...you need to stop being tone deaf! Get your head of out of marshalls arse!
POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 02:02 pm / quote |
geetar_alex :
Marshall makes alot of from people who believe they truly need 100 watts for a seemingly small price but to be honest if you play a gig you can mic a small valve combo up this is what they do at festivals. there is know way you will get a good sound at the back of a fetival with full stack or two unless its micked up so a small valve combo will save you money in lthe long run instead of purchasing bigger and bigger amps
POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 05:34 pm / quote |
Bigdave9576 :
Seriously now. MG series? The whole series? Rubbish. The avt series is mildy better but if you think this is good its a shame. Maybe if you just play in your bedroom its good enough. If you want to sound good at a gig though....you need some valves. How can someone give this a 10 for sound???? hahah
POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 06:55 pm / quote |
SL!!! :
geetar_alex wrote:

Marshall makes alot of from people who believe they truly need 100 watts for a seemingly small price but to be honest if you play a gig you can mic a small valve combo up this is what they do at festivals. there is know way you will get a good sound at the back of a fetival with full stack or two unless its micked up so a small valve combo will save you money in lthe long run instead of purchasing bigger and bigger amps
True, just like someone else said, this is a big practice amp. It's targeted to people who think they NEED a half stack but don't want to shell out big bucks.

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 07:11 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
mongo_man wrote:

Hey guys! I was just wondering if anybody know how to get a great Rush sound on the Marshall MG100HDFX and the MG412A. Hopefully I will get some response :P thx


You don't, you get a decent amp.

Christ, having seen the state of things this review page has gotten into since I last posted.

About Rush again (briefly), like me, Alex Lifeson uses Hughes & Kettner amps (namely the TriAmp MkII and more recently the Switchblade as well). That is how he gets his tone, with high-quality gear.

People, this amp really is as bad as the gearheads have been saying all along. Crank the thing and you will instantly notice the dreadful clipping it gives; and though it does have a fair bit of headroom this amp is so trebley at higher volumes that cleans are painful unless you really max out the bass knob.

And I think he was called 'the_dogs_master' but yeah, putting a JCM and Mode Four in the same category as 'good amps' and 'better than the MG' is just sacriligeous to the JCM.

Oh and to the person (possibly the person I quoted at the start) who doesn't understand how one amp was louder than this with a much lower wattage...that's because the lower wattage amp was a tube amp. They are louder... 1 tube watt converts roughly to 2.5 solid-state watts, though the actual amount is highly debatable depending on the model.

Seriously, I guarantee my H&K Swithcblade stack is A LOT louder than this amp, though they are both 100 Watts.

Do some research before you begin reviewing things, I've been playing guitar for 12 years and I still learn things all the time.

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 08:32 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
Oh and before you get me on the 'loudness' argument, I don't have mine on full volume, and didn't buy it for the 'loudness'.

I use a power attenuator in the studio when cranking the amp, so it doesn't have to be as loud but I can still really drive the tubes.

Through a PA the tone is altered off-stage anyway, so I don't care as much for driving the valves as high, I keep the volume to a reasonable level on stage to eliminate feedback in combination with an ISP Decimator, and that way I'm happy and can hear myself through the monitors or by heading towards my amp

POSTED: 01/26/2008 - 08:37 pm / quote |
AdamDK :
I don't get why people are comparing the MG to JCM's, etc. It's a practice amp. It's decent for the price, but there is better amps out there IMO, such as Vox Valvetronix and Cube's.
POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 05:14 am / quote |
buhda :
You guys will give anything a 10.
POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 06:52 am / quote |
Kevin Saale :
I feel ill, this amp does not deserve a 10 at all. It's one thing to give a weak amp a 10 when it's cheap and meant solely for practice, I.E. microcube, but this is NOT a practice amp. Anyone who buys a 700 dollar halfstack practice amp is either, A, a total newb, or B, a complete moron. Stay away people, just stay away.
POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 02:14 pm / quote |
fleh :
marshall make some brilliant amps but they cost a bomb. (JCM n stuff). also....
marshall make some cheaper amps but their completely crap and still overpriced (MG)

POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 03:46 pm / quote |
Demonikk :
Only one review was honest imo
The one who said this had a tone like high-end Marshall tube amps made me lol so hard


POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 03:52 pm / quote |
unkownman99 :
i have this amp i had shows with it i ****in love it i play in a rock n roll band and i use the overdrive channel with thses settings gain:3 bass:3 middile:8 treble:7 and contour:2 and it is a great amp so every one tht says mgs suck try it before u open ur mouth
POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 04:15 pm / quote |
Yngwi3 :
unkownman99 wrote:

i have this amp i had shows with it i ****in love it i play in a rock n roll band and i use the overdrive channel with thses settings gain:3 bass:3 middile:8 treble:7 and contour:2 and it is a great amp so every one tht says mgs suck try it before u open ur mouth

we have...
Try a cranked valve combo.

POSTED: 01/27/2008 - 06:10 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
unkownman99 wrote:

i have this amp i had shows with it i ****in love it i play in a rock n roll band and i use the overdrive channel with thses settings gain:3 bass:3 middile:8 treble:7 and contour:2 and it is a great amp so every one tht says mgs suck try it before u open ur mouth


Wow, lyk OMG!!!1!! You've had shows?! f0r realz?!

Firstly, Marshall's in general (let alone sh*tty MG's) are too trebley for most people's liking without a bit of tweaking...almost entirely removing the bass from the EQ is beyond a noob mistake, utter idiocy.

Secondly, I have tried this amp...almost every week when I can't be bothered to take my amp head to the rehearsal studios my main band use, I have to use these damn heads, and they are dreadful.


POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 12:43 pm / quote |
last_biscuit :
*Oh and I forgot to add...

Do fullstops exist in the country you come from? Or do you actually talk the way you type? If the latter, you should try to beat the world record for holding your breath...actually, maybe you should anyway if you like the MG. :P

POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 08:21 pm / quote |
acdcrock2000 :
AdamDK wrote:

I don't get why people are comparing the MG to JCM's, etc. It's a practice amp. It's decent for the price, but there is better amps out there IMO, such as Vox Valvetronix and Cube's.


I agree totally. I have this amp because it was cheap and it does the job I want it too. I do agree that its a bit trebally, but i just turn it down and keep the bass up. I love that classic rock feel and sound. This is the setting I have: OD2- Gain:7.5 Bass:5 Middle:8.5 Treble:7 Contour:5.

I agree that its not the best amp butif I had the money to blow on a valve amp, I would have gone for a Marshall vintage modern stack or maybe a Marshall JVM410 stack.

But for it's price, I personally think that it's ok enough. I run my GT8 though it using the 4 cable method and I can just use the EQ on the GT8 to sort out any problems.

POSTED: 02/06/2008 - 05:31 am / quote |
mikeiscool :
Hey. I've been looking around the internet looking for a cheap tube amp. Any suggestions?(Besides the peavey valve king...)


$Price Range$: $600-$800

POSTED: 02/10/2008 - 08:21 pm / quote |
mp3stalin :
jessejames1414 wrote:

This amp makes me sad ;-;. I was like "yay Marshall " than I felt like I was dating the sexy football captain until I realized he likes to do it in the ass and is abusive.


I LOL'd.

POSTED: 02/21/2008 - 03:57 pm / quote |
TastyMooglePie :
mikeiscool wrote:

Hey. I've been looking around the internet looking for a cheap tube amp. Any suggestions?(Besides the peavey valve king...)


$Price Range$: $600-$800


Go to the guitar gear and accessories forum and ask. You'll get a bunch of help.

POSTED: 02/23/2008 - 10:44 pm / quote |
ekord123 :
i play a lot of avenged sevenfold, trivium, metallica,and as i lay dying. is this amp good for metalcore and heavy metal like that or will i need a pedal?
POSTED: 03/03/2008 - 05:56 pm / quote |
Toolshed#9 :
This amp is seriously sucks.
POSTED: 03/04/2008 - 06:34 am / quote |
Toolshed#9 :
m.o.d.--- wrote:

E V H 5150 wrote:

Is an MG100HDFX better than an MG250DFX? And is either better than a Peavey ValveKing? Or should I go to EBay and buy a 5150 combo?

MG100HDFX is the best amp in your price range.


Buying this amp is practically like flushing your money down the toilet.

POSTED: 03/04/2008 - 06:39 am / quote |
last_biscuit :
ekord123 wrote:

i play a lot of avenged sevenfold, trivium, metallica,and as i lay dying. is this amp good for metalcore and heavy metal like that or will i need a pedal?


No.

This amp is good for putting people's windows through, injuring small animals, or making dents in people's faces... all when thrown, I'm afraid.

POSTED: 03/04/2008 - 07:38 pm / quote |
uvq :
Doodleface wrote:

shaunems wrote:

i have been playing for 6 years and im in a band
is this the right amp for me?


NO!


just because it says Marshall, doesn't mean that it's good. this is easily the most hated amp on the forums and theirs good reason. Their is better stuff for that money. I have a Carvin SX100 it has the exact same features as the combo MG. and it sounds at least 10x times better, and it only costs 350 bucks! A Roland Cube, or a Vox Valvetronix are better than this as well.

and tube amps aren't all 1000-3000 dollars, check out the peavey valveking, or the ashdown fallen angel.



yes it is the right amp... the above guy is a tit..

plus on stage, you have to be standing in front of a marshall.. nothing else looks as good... and this amp sounds unbelievable..

POSTED: 03/19/2008 - 09:05 pm / quote |
uvq :
Bigdave9576 wrote:

Seriously now. MG series? The whole series? Rubbish. The avt series is mildy better but if you think this is good its a shame. Maybe if you just play in your bedroom its good enough. If you want to sound good at a gig though....you need some valves. How can someone give this a 10 for sound???? hahah



i gig every week, not with this amp but with the 250 one..

it sounds better than everybody elses gear..

POSTED: 03/19/2008 - 09:14 pm / quote |
High_o :
plus on stage, you have to be standing in front of a marshall
wow, poser much?

POSTED: 04/07/2008 - 10:08 pm / quote |
guitarist_with_ :
I played through a Behringer PA once and even it sounded better than this bag of fail.
POSTED: 04/12/2008 - 08:40 am / quote |
slashzsystem :
thts excatly wat i was thinking!!!
llanafreak44 wrote:

Wow. I can't believe how many people are going to buy this amp because of these reviews by gear noobs.

POSTED: 04/14/2008 - 03:59 am / quote |
In-Jeenyus :
Basicly the od1 and crunch channels are useless, and the od2 has too much treble at higher volume, the clean channel sounds quite nice though and i run a boss ds-1 through the od-1 channel, and get a damn nice sound, i mean it's no mesa but it is a solid amp for the price.
POSTED: 04/16/2008 - 12:02 am / quote |
rikigo :
zAg1619 wrote:

I've had this amp for about 2 years now. It was the best amp decision I could make for the price range i was in. Now, if money flew outta my ass, obviously i would have bought a mesa/boogie, but that's beside the point. I play metal, and classic rock. For me, the OD tone isn't hard enough for metal so I use a pedal instead, but that's just me. I frankly think the OD tone is perfect for many classic rock songs. Also, as a side note, do not turn it up to 10 unless neccesary.. I got this amp on top of two cabs and hell, I usually stay parked at 5, and the cops drop by every day. I hate my neighbors..


Thanks for the bottom 'postscript'! I've just bought a secondhand MG100HDFX (I'm waiting to have it delivered) and your review is one of the few that shows a sense of balanced criticism ...with some good humour! I'm looking forward to putting it through it's paces. ;

POSTED: 04/16/2008 - 02:07 pm / quote |
Doppelgänger :
rikigo wrote:
Thanks for the bottom 'postscript'! I've just bought a secondhand MG100HDFX (I'm waiting to have it delivered) and your review is one of the few that shows a sense of balanced criticism ...with some good humour! I'm looking forward to putting it through it's paces. ;

I'm sorry.

I recently tried it out at my friend's house (his brother's amp), and though it wasn't too bad at low volumes, it sounded horrible once you cranked it.

POSTED: 04/19/2008 - 03:22 am / quote |
HammettMustaine :
maybe you need to learn how to play dick
POSTED: 04/23/2008 - 03:57 pm / quote |
Pat_s1t :
Is this amp any good for metal and metalcore? I'm no where near a music store and i plan to be getting an ESP LTD Alexi 600 this summer in ottawa, so i just wanted some insight on how this performs with stuff like Children of Bodom, Bullet For My Valentine, Avenged Sevenfold, etc.
POSTED: 05/03/2008 - 08:57 am / quote |
travd92 :
i once suggested to someone on UG to get an MG100 and i got brutally flamed. I seriously don't know why. I've never had problems with mine, and it's got some killer tones and all the channels. granted its not the best in the world, but for 600 (half stack) i think it is the best for the price. for the people whose amps broke down, stop bitching and get it fixed.
POSTED: 05/26/2008 - 11:11 pm / quote |
Chl0rine :
Isn't it annoying when you want an honest review of something, and all you get is a bunch of pompous gits complaining? It's all personal preference.

'This amp is seriously sucks'
'maybe you need to learn how to play dick'
'You're all idiots. MGs suck. Ask any gear head.'

these and many more comments aren't helping anyone. If you dislike the amp, back it up with some reasons, or no one is going consider your childish rants. Some people will like the MGs, others wont. Being a fat headed moron when you post a comment won't make anyone else look bad, except yourself.


POSTED: 06/05/2008 - 10:49 am / quote |
guitargodderyck :
So this amp is great for like AC/DC GnR and Van Halen kinda of stuff right. Wht about shredding?
POSTED: 06/13/2008 - 08:40 pm / quote |
shredder_666 :
Its okay for shredding. Its great for its price and for solid state its brilliant. It is. It did die out on me though...but i gig alot (and my bass player knocked it around a bit) but i replaced it with a Mesa triple rec and a Marshall 1960 cab.
POSTED: 06/25/2008 - 05:18 pm / quote |
SULLYvin :
PEOPLE! The people that are writing bad reviews for this amp are clearly comparing it to valve amps, which cost about 4 times the price. For a SOLID STATE amp, this is the best that I've heard. It will give you huge tonal variety, and it's built like a tank.Best in it's price range for sure.
POSTED: 07/01/2008 - 12:58 am / quote |
GUMO,222222 :
Can this get a good Metallica sound? i am thinking of this or a bugera amp.
POSTED: 07/07/2008 - 09:13 pm / quote |
GUMO,222222 :
Adding to what i posted, good older metallica sound, like kill em all to puppets
POSTED: 07/07/2008 - 09:16 pm / quote |
house212 :
does this head sound better than an avt150h?
POSTED: 07/07/2008 - 11:02 pm / quote |
sam1618 :
Thanks SULLYvin for being a voice of reason here. If you have money for a tubehead, and a better cab, get it, and don't come back here saying how it makes the mg sound like crap. If all you do is post about how amps (that you do not own) suck, then you need to find yourself a girl, mate.
I played next to one of these boys for more than a year, the fullstack. It isn't bad, and it holds up very well unless you don't treat your equipment well. If you spend more than half a second on your tones, you'll find what you're looking for, as long as you're not in some industrial "find the wierdest sh** you can" band. Then you can fu** yourself. If your amp broke down within "like 3 hours after I got home" or "right after I cranked it to whatever," then chances are you're not smart enough to try out your stuff IN the store, for more than half an hour.
TRY BEFORE YOU BUY! Retailers don't get the rad equipment guarantees we do, so they will do all they can to pawn off shoddy stuff on you (not all, but some will).
I will say, the head is probably not as good of a piece of equipment as the cab. If you have some extra change, upgrade your head and keep the cab. It performs very well under other heads. I personally like it under the ValveKing, but its all your personal preference, and I'm sure under some heads it doesn't sound quite right. Don't put the head on a better Marshall cab though. I promise it isn't that great.

PS none of you are Zack Wylde or Kerry King so why are you so worried about what they play?

POSTED: 07/23/2008 - 12:51 am / quote |
Korzack :
TBH, I've had an MG50 for a couple of years - thought the tone was fairly limited and start well and truly buggering about with the EQ and now I like the sound a lot more - it's surprisingly versatile. Just don't expect it to do valve-work. In all honesty, it's a good choice if you want to start gigging on a shoe-string. But if you try comparing this to a DSL50 or a JVM, it's always gonna come off badly. That';s technology for you - Valve amps are great when cranked - solid states ain't. I like the sound of my 50, and if I need a bigger amp, I'll probably buy this and a 2x12 (because a 4x12 is a stupid amount of hassle for the weight)
POSTED: 08/08/2008 - 06:20 pm / quote |
spyguy34 :
first comment on here pj u suck lol u just dont know how to use it i bought it yesterday and its killer nough said buy this amp
POSTED: 09/17/2008 - 11:06 am / quote |
maiden_mexico :
most of these reviews are fail.
POSTED: 10/28/2008 - 04:01 pm / quote |
ReaperWaits :
I've just bought this with the cab for £200, for the price, you couldn't ask for more. The only people on here that don't like the amp are those that don't actually own it.


POSTED: 11/16/2008 - 10:35 pm / quote |
eyebanez333 :
...WOW...damn if people would put as much effort into something positive as they do into bashing this amp we could cure AIDS, cancer, and herpes before the day is over. I'm not jumping on the bandwagon like everybody else and talking shit on this amp because its not a tube amp, or its not really a Marshall, etc. I own this amp, I've played it for over a year and have had 0 problems with it. I got the full stack used for 400 bucks, and its been worth every penny. I've gigged with it several times, no problems and it holds its own against much more expensive amps, including tube models. All I can say is try one out, if you like it, BUY IT. I'm a firm believer that the musician makes the gear, not the other way around.
POSTED: 12/01/2008 - 03:13 pm / quote |
Salamandyk :
Im debating between this amp or an ibanez TBX150H.....i know marshall is the bigger and more popular brand for amps and whatnot...but what ive seen on sound reviews it doesnt seem like the marshall has a good heavy metal/progressive metal sound. What do u think?
POSTED: 12/12/2008 - 05:29 pm / quote |
tr_shredder :
i got this yrs back. on musicians friend. for a little over $550. in less than a yr it blew.
what do i mean "blew"? i'll tell ya.
i was in the middle of playing, with the gain set around 5 and the max volume around 4 and it made this popping sound then this really loud screeching noise. i turned it off and it wouldn't turn back on.
Apperently because marshal didn't know why it blew it wasn't covered under warrenty. after hearing that i had someone take it apart. they put in a new power supply, fuse, and new transistors or something.. and they turned it on and got power to it for a few seconds then the fuse popped and the power supply went bad. the guy went through 2 power supplies from marshall and a handful of fuses.. i didn't have $150 for the parts let alone more money to try more and to play him. so i just gave it to him. as far as i know he still can't get it to work.

i didn't really like the amp all that much anyway.. both clean and distortion channels were nice at low levels but muddy with any decent amount of volume.
the effects were alright but nothing too great. the distortion channel actually was horrible if you had too much gain..
i later got myself a last minute head for $200 because i was low on money and my band was supposed to play a show in a few days.
that head was much better.

POSTED: 12/14/2008 - 10:37 pm / quote |
opeth222 :
what are some of these people talking about with the amp feeding back?

you probably need to get yourselves some decent pickups that are properly wax potted and don't stand so close to the amp.

if your playing live, you can turn it up a bit to hear over the drums, but let the PA do the work. i can imagine some of the stage volumes people are playing at. makes for a rough night.


POSTED: 01/02/2009 - 09:20 am / quote |
Megdidar :
Marshall MG100HDFX 599.99 for head and cab set, or Peavey Windsor 100watt all tube half stack 499.99 for head and cab. It's been said time and time again, there are better amps out there that are much cheaper. And really, you DON'T need a halfstack.
POSTED: 01/10/2009 - 10:45 pm / quote |
tonedeafidiot :
How can you like the sound of this amp? I played a chord on it in GC after EQing it and turned it off it was so horrid.
POSTED: 01/11/2009 - 02:39 pm / quote |
Carcinogenic :
sam1618 wrote:

Thanks SULLYvin for being a voice of reason here. If you have money for a tubehead, and a better cab, get it, and don't come back here saying how it makes the mg sound like crap. If all you do is post about how amps (that you do not own) suck, then you need to find yourself a girl, mate.
I played next to one of these boys for more than a year, the fullstack. It isn't bad, and it holds up very well unless you don't treat your equipment well. If you spend more than half a second on your tones, you'll find what you're looking for, as long as you're not in some industrial "find the wierdest sh** you can" band. Then you can fu** yourself. If your amp broke down within "like 3 hours after I got home" or "right after I cranked it to whatever," then chances are you're not smart enough to try out your stuff IN the store, for more than half an hour.
TRY BEFORE YOU BUY! Retailers don't get the rad equipment guarantees we do, so they will do all they can to pawn off shoddy stuff on you (not all, but some will).
I will say, the head is probably not as good of a piece of equipment as the cab. If you have some extra change, upgrade your head and keep the cab. It performs very well under other heads. I personally like it under the ValveKing, but its all your personal preference, and I'm sure under some heads it doesn't sound quite right. Don't put the head on a better Marshall cab though. I promise it isn't that great.

PS none of you are Zack Wylde or Kerry King so why are you so worried about what they play?


+1

POSTED: 01/12/2009 - 08:25 pm / quote |
GunslingerG20 :
I came here trying to find reviews on equipment by experienced musicians. For the most part, all I see is a bunch of high-school geeks who haven't been playing long enough to have any clue. And who is going to give legitimacy to a review by someone who can't even spell correctly??? This is a SS amp guys --- it's pointless to compare it with tube amps. Both types have there place in the grand scheme of things, and both have thier supporters and detractors. While I generally prefer a good tube amp for the sound I desire, for some applications a solid state amp is better, and they are definitely more reliable. You know, there IS a reason why no one uses tubes in any form of electronics anymore except amps (I can just see these little gamer types trying to play Halo on a tube computer!!!lol). tube amps are great, but you can pretty much do the same things with solid state equipment IF you know what you are doing. I've been playing for 36 years now and have played through literally hundreds of different types and brands of amps, and I'll take a good Randall ss amp over MOST tube amps (the major exception being the JCM800, which is the benchmark for rock n' roll amps)any time. I've also got to laugh at these guys that want to get a good JCM800 or 900 head, and then ruin the tone by using some silly effects pedals. What's the point? The ultimate electric guitar sound is simply taking a well seasoned LesPaul and plug it straight into a JCM (well, OK, I admit I may put a cry baby in line also) and crank it. Nothing on this planet can match that tone!!! For any other sound, solid state equipment is just fine, and is much more reliable.

Just my $.02 worth!!!

POSTED: 02/11/2009 - 04:26 am / quote |
tmfiore :
Don't listen to my review, my opinion changed. It is not worth buying.
POSTED: 02/20/2009 - 06:55 pm / quote |
[R]ocker.4.life :
mine buzzes alot when i crank it up. anyone know any ways to reduce that?
POSTED: 03/03/2009 - 08:30 pm / quote |
Bob_Sagget :
First why would you need a ss amp for gigs? (Tube) I mean this isn't rocket science. And whats the purpose of having a half stack in your bedroom. Thats like driving a mack truck around like a car, wtf is wrong with u ppl? I have a 2 Kustom 12watt tube amps and I can beat the MG series by a mile with both set on 5. I've acctually been able to drown out my drummers dbl bass set with them on 7. Heres the funny thing they're about $100 an amp and they're extremely solid.
POSTED: 03/25/2009 - 12:03 pm / quote |
duzit89 :
my band just financed this amp.. with a Warranty you can't go wrong with it.. even if it does mess up at some point you get a new one anyway.. and i have to laugh about the kids on here reviewing it.. "Never gigged with it but uhh ..Yah its Cool" Lmao Sh!!!t..
POSTED: 03/31/2009 - 12:00 pm / quote |
UneasyxKarma :
This is a pretty amazing amp ( now i was using a fender frontman 15G which blew hard core) its a little complicated but the tone that i get out of it is amazing. the only problem is the channel light wont go out but the channels will change, but that isnt a real big deal because the product that counts still works like a charm . Does any one else have a problem with the channel light?
POSTED: 04/16/2009 - 07:57 am / quote |
bigman07 :
this amp has the worst distortion ever but with a great pedal it sound pretty go to me but i play on kranks sooo hahah
POSTED: 04/24/2009 - 09:31 am / quote |
OXL :
Gonna get it next month because I can't spend a lot of money on an amp. The band I'm playing is giging again (after a 5 year hiatus) and I need something to play on. In the past I always borrowed our bass player's Peavy tube amp. But since he's not in the band anymore and also the tubes need to be exchanged (otherwhise I could borrow it if I wanted) I need something cheap for gigs. Fortunately my girlfriend withholds me from spending all my money on equipment, if that wasn't the case, I probably would starve to death ;

I never played live without a PA and most of the time the sound dude is wining about turning the volume down so I guess this one will do just fine in a live situation.
If you play gigs mainly without PA, then it's about ****in time that you start looking for something more then playing in your friends garage/garden!

PS: My band plays metal and my experience (yes, I have played plenty other amps over the past 20 years)is that SS amps do just fine for this kind of music.

POSTED: 04/28/2009 - 09:47 am / quote |
JustMeMark :
Ok so I don't play punk and heavy metal where a guy who can't play needs to hide behind all of this distortion crap. I've played this amp consistently for a year now and never once had I come up with a complaint about it. I play country/country rock primarily and my American Std. Tele sounds EXCELLENT through it. I've played venues of 50 to 1200 people. When you go to big venues, that's why you mic your amp guys!

Also, for those who think valve amps are the be all, end all. Hmmm....think about all of your "CD's" and your amplifiers in your cars. Everything is digital, even your recordings. Marshall did a fantastic job of creating a digital copy of any valve amp! That, along with the lighter weight of a digital amplifier and it's high reliability and ruggedness, you can't go wrong if your a working musician.

When I see all these comments about Zakk Wylde, what he plays and what that guy plays, it's all because they have very lucrative contracts with gear manufacturers. They don't have to pay a dime. That in turn creates the demand cycle for these types of products and OILA, the price goes up!

Sure when I first brought my Marshall to my first gig, it was like dude, that's a cheap ass's amplifier, get a real one, until I proceeded to blow them away on my Tele. It plays razor thin on the clean channel, just the way a Tele should sound. On the distortion side, if you are a real player, you're not gonna need but a slight amount of distortion and this stays true throughout any volume. The only drawback was getting used to the effects knobs...no problem anymore with that.

Basic stuff here guys.

POSTED: 04/29/2009 - 04:47 pm / quote |
OXL :
Recently purchased this amp because it's cheap. The distortion, to my liking, sucks. A digitech metal master pedal fixed that problem, the overall soyund now is much better and there's a better balance between mid and high tones. It's not the best sounding amp in the world (that's impossible for such a price) but it's certainly okay.

If someone would comment on it that it's a cheap amp and I had to buy a "real one" I would call him a gear snob and tell him to **** off ;

POSTED: 06/02/2009 - 09:28 am / quote |
pete_190290 :
i had my garage broken into the other day and had all my gear stolen. I'm now getting one of these off the insurance and really looking forward to it.

Everyone on here that just says "it's f*ckin shit don't buy it but tubes' is a twat. fair does tubes do sound infinately better than solid state, but not all of us can afford itm or even afford to replace the tubes when they blow every five mins. If i had the money yeah i'd save up and get myself an old JCM900, but i don't, so i'm settling with this for now.

Can't see the point in these dicks that just say 'it's ****in shit don't buy it' don't let it put you off, for the price i reckon it's pretty good.

POSTED: 06/08/2009 - 05:58 am / quote |
mileo@ug :
My name is Michael, I live in Philadelphia, and have a love for Punk; Blues; and Classic Rock...

I recently decided to but three particular items: The Boss ME-70, The Marshall MG100HDFX and Cab, and the Epiphone Lucille copy... if someone could tell me how they feel about these three items in particular it sould really help me and my pockets... e-mail at mileo100890@aol.com or im me at mileo2wolf

Thank you

POSTED: 06/16/2009 - 02:35 pm / quote |
mileo@ug :
I dont have a lot of cash and i want to my music seriously as a guitarist... So please be helpful
POSTED: 06/16/2009 - 02:37 pm / quote |
sikguitarist07 :
damn after reading these reviews i think i made a mistake on putting this amp on layaway at guitarcenter =[ it seemed good when i played it at the store. maybe ill sell it and buy a vox combo. =D
POSTED: 07/04/2009 - 04:13 am / quote |
KidsHussla :
StuC wrote:

thunderinblack wrote:

zakk wylde sometimes uses it

No he doesn't, that would be daft. Why would he play an MG over his old JCM800's? Oh and just because marshall say he uses mg's doesn't mean he does.

he does use MG's in a lot of instructional video's and on the tour bus.
and YES, he did use this amp but i cant remember when, it was on the tour bus i think...

POSTED: 07/08/2009 - 02:43 pm / quote |
SG-Burchett :
no offense to any guiater players who have commented on this album and said its shit and said : buy a £1000 tube amp. ok of course those amps are better.its like going on to review for a yamaha pacifica and saying its shit, buy a gibson les paul studio instead.buts thats ridiculous-yes they rubbish-but not THAT rubbish compared to other stacks in its price range.not everybody has money poring out of their ears and not everybody can just borrow a 100 watt tube amp.
POSTED: 07/30/2009 - 06:14 am / quote |
SG-Burchett :
sorry-not album-amp.btw -i also didnt make it clear that i have tryed this amp. i was really disapointed by the overdrive.-awesome clean channel though but i felt that it wasnt what i was looking for.the main thing of all i have to say is TRY THIS AMP. then you can make your own opinions but unless you try it-you cant because some people love this amp where as others dont so TRY IT.
POSTED: 08/13/2009 - 05:29 am / quote |
SG-Burchett :
mileo@ug wrote:

My name is Michael, I live in Philadelphia, and have a love for Punk; Blues; and Classic Rock...

I recently decided to but three particular items: The Boss ME-70, The Marshall MG100HDFX and Cab, and the Epiphone Lucille copy... if someone could tell me how they feel about these three items in particular it sould really help me and my pockets... e-mail at mileo100890@aol.com or im me at mileo2wolf

Thank you


the boss me-70 is AWESOME btw

POSTED: 08/13/2009 - 05:31 am / quote |
tele_god :
this amp is garbage...im glad i sold it...i got my knucklehead reverb and never looked back..imo..dont waste your time or money...wait till you can get the amp you want...this is a disgrace to the marshall name
POSTED: 09/06/2009 - 01:05 am / quote |
hadookin :
they are okay, they get slated way too much for what they are, however, ive had mine for a while in the stack form, and sometimes, the volume just goes and takes some of the tone with it on the overdrive channel!
but if i smack the side of it, it comes back... i dont mind doing it haha but playing live? the amp can be a bit of a worry, im not quite sure why this happens but its very annoying, but they do get slated too much, its a great beginner amp if you're not looking to spend much.

POSTED: 10/04/2009 - 04:53 pm / quote |
Viking_Swede666 :
Pat_s1t wrote:

Is this amp any good for metal and metalcore? I'm no where near a music store and i plan to be getting an ESP LTD Alexi 600 this summer in ottawa, so i just wanted some insight on how this performs with stuff like Children of Bodom, Bullet For My Valentine, Avenged Sevenfold, etc.


I wouldn't get it. If you're planing on spending the money on a good guitar (LTD Alexi 600), than I would save up a little bit more for a decent amp.

it will NOT give you a good CoB sound.

just my 2 cents.

POSTED: 10/13/2009 - 11:39 am / quote |
AreaSamuel :
THIS AMP WILL NOT DISAPOINT

if you want a good looking, great sounding stack that won't cost too much, this amp is perfect. I got mine for £300 give or take.. and to be honest you can't get better. The sound is perfect for my band and the volume is great.. you get plentyof head room which is great on this as it doesn't sound sh*t when you crank it up.

!! WARNING !!
it WILL hurt your ears. If I stand a foot away, 1or2 10ths of the master volume shakes the floor. You need to wear ear protection - you only get one set of ears so look after them.

POSTED: 11/04/2009 - 01:34 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009