guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Marshall : MG250DFX review. 9 reviews, 122 votes and 45 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

MG250DFX Review

manufacturer: marshall date: 09/04/2008 category: guitar amplifiers
MG250DFX
 Features:8.7
 Sound:9.3
 Reliability:9.4
 Impression:9.3
 Overall rating:
 9.2 
 Users rating:
 7.1 
 Comments:
 45 
 user comments vote for this amp:
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 45 
 comments posted, 1 removed | this article is 98% spam-free
cointurtlemoose :
I wish I would've waited longer before posting my review... At the deal I got mine for, the amp is strictly OK, but at the retail price, it's a ripoff. The overdrive with the gain and contour past midway breaks up and sounds like bumblebees when the volume is past 4. Save up more and buy a better amp. I'm lucky my Parker Nitefly makes actually improves the tone of the amp...
POSTED: 05/17/2006 - 05:42 pm / quote |
sixstringlach :
great amp, really great. It's a tank too, it's been dropped off trucks and out vans (much to my dismay), and is still in perfect working order. Happy Day, Au Revoir
POSTED: 05/23/2006 - 08:06 pm / quote |
Johnny Blade :
I owned one of these but I have to be honest I didn't like it much. I traded it with a mate for a Laney GH50L and 4x12 cabinet. Which is worth like twice as much.
POSTED: 06/07/2006 - 02:04 pm / quote |
Johnny Blade :
I had one of these. To be honest I didn't like it much. I traded it for a Laney GH50L & 4x12 cabinet, which is worth alot more.
POSTED: 06/07/2006 - 02:50 pm / quote |
Johnny Blade :
I had one of these. Swapped it for a Laney GH50l and 4x12 cabinet which is worth alot more. Works better!
POSTED: 06/13/2006 - 01:49 am / quote |
Shredlet :
Jesus we get it johnny blade u dont like it
POSTED: 06/24/2006 - 10:50 am / quote |
Johnny Blade :
i don't know what the hell happened there!
POSTED: 07/07/2006 - 05:30 pm / quote |
chomieMan59 :
As i am still a student, it is half impossible for me to buy decent gear with my salary. I bought this amp after my fender blew the morning of a band practice. At first yes, the overdrive didnt cut it and i wasnt impressed. But when i ran my DigiTech Metal Master through it, it promptly tore my singer's balls off. This amp is a beast with the right pedals. And it sounds fine clean, i dont know what you guys have against this amp.
POSTED: 07/11/2006 - 08:48 pm / quote |
Klayy :
Ive played through that amp for two hours and didnt find a good sound. But it is good for people who have never played through a GOOD amp (like JCM800 etc)
POSTED: 09/14/2006 - 11:42 am / quote |
tormentedbyu :
johnny blade's a phuckin thesoraus!!! lol

imo marshall sucks, you can get so much more for the money - i dont think ill ever buy this amp

POSTED: 09/14/2006 - 01:09 pm / quote |
Preid :
MG is a pos, Marshalls biggest mistake!
POSTED: 09/14/2006 - 03:51 pm / quote |
Warheart1188 :
I played the half version of the MG100dfx. This amp( MG250dfx) is the same thing but with two speakers. The MG100dfx half stack has an awesome tone, but it leaves you wanting more.
POSTED: 09/14/2006 - 07:18 pm / quote |
badguitarist13 :
its a rip, plain and simple. this amp is ok but if i had my choice, i wouldnt have one. the price is kinda extreme and the sound can give it too much of a buz effect when u dont want it. my rating: 3
POSTED: 09/14/2006 - 08:05 pm / quote |
selloutpunx :
if you actually do own these you can at least sleep at night by telling yourself "thank god i didn't buy the half stack"
POSTED: 09/15/2006 - 12:13 am / quote |
 
 m 
  :
Checked.
POSTED: 09/15/2006 - 04:27 am / quote |
WhiteLightning :
I think Marshall is over rated... if your gonna use a pedal on this amp why get it? you could buy any other amp with a great distortion and switch it to clean andput the pedal through it and sound the same as before.
POSTED: 11/06/2006 - 10:02 am / quote |
OttovanZanten :
does this sound as bad as the smaller MG's? I assume it has the same distortion, i HATE it..

maybe this 1 is better, hope so

POSTED: 12/22/2006 - 05:54 pm / quote |
SOAD_GOD :
i have this amp. it will please people with no/not that much experience with tone. i have experience. it is really not very good tone: the clean is lifeless, the distortion is wayyyyy too fizzy, and if you use an EQ pedal to get rid of the fizz, it sounds very weak, weaker than it did before, and that was weak on it's own. with high gain settings, it feeds back like crazy, and is uncontrollable. you have to change channels to avoid it.
it hasmore power than the smaller MG's and is louder, which does make it better as you can get a more crushing tone. but not crushing enough.
i'm upgrading to a valve amp, because, as someone has said, it leaves you wanting more. i might get the Orange tiny terror.... real valve tone at a volume that doesn't destroy your ears!!!

POSTED: 02/20/2007 - 08:15 am / quote |
HAMMETTOWNS :
Pretty good for blues and classic rock. For heavy metal it is not the greatest, it can dohair metal pretty good also. The best thing about this amp is the leads those I found to be quite amazing, so I run both my Marshall 8100 and this, 8100 for rythums, mg for leads.
POSTED: 04/16/2007 - 02:15 pm / quote |
mikedirnt96 :
SOAD_GOD wrote:

i have this amp. it will please people with no/not that much experience with tone. i have experience. it is really not very good tone: the clean is lifeless, the distortion is wayyyyy too fizzy, and if you use an EQ pedal to get rid of the fizz, it sounds very weak, weaker than it did before, and that was weak on it's own. with high gain settings, it feeds back like crazy, and is uncontrollable. you have to change channels to avoid it.
it hasmore power than the smaller MG's and is louder, which does make it better as you can get a more crushing tone. but not crushing enough.
i'm upgrading to a valve amp, because, as someone has said, it leaves you wanting more. i might get the Orange tiny terror.... real valve tone at a volume that doesn't destroy your ears!!!


well why get 250 watts if you dnt wnt it 2 be loud????

POSTED: 06/11/2007 - 12:13 pm / quote |
rhcpfan118 :
i had this for one day, bought it used for... 350 i believe, and didn't even play it and took it back to guitar center and bought a fender fm 212r for a little more... new. i think i made the right choice, seeing as this amp is about 500 new... i had heard bad things about it anyway. go me. btw... the fender is great if you wanted to know, loud, a little sensitive on the knobs but you get used to it.
POSTED: 06/20/2007 - 06:14 am / quote |
rhcpfan118 :
btw... the fm 212r doesn't come with any effects (get the 212dsp for that) but it does come with a decent spring reverb (i just read the mg has digital...) and overdrive.
POSTED: 06/20/2007 - 06:15 am / quote |
Run.to.the.hill :
"At the moment I am using an Epiphone gibson sg with two seymour duncan humbuckers, so i know what great tone sounds like"

LOL man you made my day, lol omg i might need surgery from this
Try a GIBSON GIBSON LES PAUL with two GIBSON pickups and an amp with some VALVES and then we can talk about great tone


POSTED: 01/25/2008 - 01:07 am / quote |
uvq :
I've noticed people say they are getting feedback when they turn it up.. thats cause their guitars are crap, cause the amp doesnt do it with my mg250dfx...
if they something which was better than a squier or epiphone this wouldnt happen..

POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 03:01 am / quote |
uvq :
Run.to.the.hill wrote:

"At the moment I am using an Epiphone gibson sg with two seymour duncan humbuckers, so i know what great tone sounds like"

LOL man you made my day, lol omg i might need surgery from this
Try a GIBSON GIBSON LES PAUL with two GIBSON pickups and an amp with some VALVES and then we can talk about great tone



i agree haha

POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 03:03 am / quote |
uvq :
[quote]mikedirnt96 wrote:

SOAD_GOD wrote:

i have this amp. it will please people with no/not that much experience with tone. i have experience. it is really not very good tone: the clean is lifeless, the distortion is wayyyyy too fizzy, and if you use an EQ pedal to get rid of the fizz, it sounds very weak, weaker than it did before, and that was weak on it's own. with high gain settings, it feeds back like crazy, and is uncontrollable. you have to change channels to avoid it.
it hasmore power than the smaller MG's and is louder, which does make it better as you can get a more crushing tone. but not crushing enough.
i'm upgrading to a valve amp, because, as someone has said, it leaves you wanting more. i might get the Orange tiny terror.... real valve tone at a volume that doesn't destroy your ears!!!
[quote]
if its too fizzy, why dont you try turning the treble down?
and turn the distortion down instead of hiding behind it,
when the amp is above say 1 on the master volume, do you know how much distortion you have?
and the reason it is feedbacking uncontrollably is because you're... a shit guitarist.

POSTED: 01/28/2008 - 03:06 am / quote |
millynell14 :
uvq wrote:

[quote]mikedirnt96 wrote:

SOAD_GOD wrote:

i have this amp. it will please people with no/not that much experience with tone. i have experience. it is really not very good tone: the clean is lifeless, the distortion is wayyyyy too fizzy, and if you use an EQ pedal to get rid of the fizz, it sounds very weak, weaker than it did before, and that was weak on it's own. with high gain settings, it feeds back like crazy, and is uncontrollable. you have to change channels to avoid it.
it hasmore power than the smaller MG's and is louder, which does make it better as you can get a more crushing tone. but not crushing enough.
i'm upgrading to a valve amp, because, as someone has said, it leaves you wanting more. i might get the Orange tiny terror.... real valve tone at a volume that doesn't destroy your ears!!!
[quote]
if its too fizzy, why dont you try turning the treble down?
and turn the distortion down instead of hiding behind it,
when the amp is above say 1 on the master volume, do you know how much distortion you have?
and the reason it is feedbacking uncontrollably is because you're... a shit guitarist.


haha well said my friend!

POSTED: 04/12/2008 - 09:41 am / quote |
millynell14 :
woo i just got 1 for £150 bargain! haha
POSTED: 06/01/2008 - 07:50 pm / quote |
jr1960 :
You guys buying guitars at Walmart? If you are serious about music spend some coin & buy a decent axe. This amp sounds great. Try a REAL Fender or a REAL Gibson & see. IF cash is a problem the PRS SE models are a bargain @$550, I have a Taylor Solid Body & get any sound or tone I need, I use it live weekly ( or more) & it has not let me down yet - I will say if you must have that annoying metal sound - get a pedal - feedback a problem ? nonono - dont stand 2" in front of it with pos pick ups - I use a MFX Processor only, and usually stand 8-10 feet away master set at 1/4-which is pretty loud & have no trouble at all, I have been playing almost 40 years - I know tone - if you are having issues with tone play with those knobs & see what happens
POSTED: 06/14/2008 - 10:19 am / quote |
High_o :
wow, 40 years of experience and you're recommending a pos amp with pedals to get the tone you want.
spend most of your money on a good amp, then less on a decent guitar - but keep in mind your amp is going to make up most of your tone. and dont get an inappropriate amp and then try to get the tone you want with pedals

POSTED: 06/18/2008 - 05:41 am / quote |
jr1960 :
High_o wrote:

wow, 40 years of experience and you're recommending a pos amp with pedals to get the tone you want.
spend most of your money on a good amp, then less on a decent guitar - but keep in mind your amp is going to make up most of your tone. and dont get an inappropriate amp and then try to get the tone you want with pedals

POSTED: 06/18/2008 - 04:11 pm / quote |
jr1960 :
Actually I agree on buying a good amp / also agree that is where your tones are being shaped. but with a crappy guitar you're spinnin your wheels. I only recommended the pedal for that heavy dist for metal, this amp won't get you there without it. However - distortion in my opinion is not a tone - it is an effect - tone is sweetness or fullness - call it whatever - you'll not get tone with a $150 guitar thru a $5000 amp - be better off with a $500 amp and a $1000 guitar. I also have a Rivera tube amp 212 combo, the Marshall sounds better a 1/4 the price. I value your opinion, but do not agree it is a POS amp. Pedals will not shape your tone unless it is designed to do so, think of mod. effects - thats all that do. WIthout a starting point (guitar) even the most expensive mod effects sound cheap
POSTED: 06/18/2008 - 04:29 pm / quote |
penguinsarecool :
what is pos?..
POSTED: 09/27/2008 - 08:28 am / quote |
oneblackened :
penguinsarecool wrote:

what is pos?..

Piece Of Sh*t. And that's what MG's are. They don't sound good. They're notoriously unreliable, and break easily.

POSTED: 10/08/2008 - 09:44 pm / quote |
Clutch32192 :
my friend is offering me his for $300...so everybodys saying to not get it
POSTED: 10/28/2008 - 02:55 pm / quote |
Inferrest :
'I wish I chose another amp at the time though because the majority of UGers despise these MGs with a passion that makes me feel queezy. However, for the price I paid, it was good I suppose. // 8' DOUCHE.
POSTED: 12/04/2008 - 01:35 pm / quote |
MGuitar24 :
uvq wrote:

I've noticed people say they are getting feedback when they turn it up.. thats cause their guitars are crap, cause the amp doesnt do it with my mg250dfx...
if they something which was better than a squier or epiphone this wouldnt happen..


I agree dude i use this amp with 75% gain and high 60% contour. I play at about 60% volume and dodn't have a problem with feed back. Although you can get that with any guitar just being to close with too much volume. My guitar (esp ltd ec 1000) with seymour duncan buckers doesn't seem to have this problem.

POSTED: 12/06/2008 - 03:20 pm / quote |
uvq :
OttovanZanten wrote:

does this sound as bad as the smaller MG's? I assume it has the same distortion, i HATE it..

maybe this 1 is better, hope so


Yep its different.

POSTED: 12/08/2008 - 08:39 pm / quote |
dazfli :
This thing is awesome, i get a real good metal tone out of it.
POSTED: 01/03/2009 - 12:10 pm / quote |
Humanbean :
Are These things still in production? because I dont see any around.
POSTED: 03/31/2009 - 02:55 am / quote |
uvq :
Humanbean wrote:

Are These things still in production? because I dont see any around.


Yepp

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 12:33 pm / quote |
MGB2 :
this is an awesome amp, if you have the funds, consider buying this
POSTED: 05/19/2009 - 11:02 am / quote |
KingChris :
i like this amp but i have to admit the distortion..well at first it sounded ok but then it just sounded like a pos so i decided to go and by a distortion pedal (Boss Ml-2 and yes i know people dont like this pedal to!) but this does the job for me now
POSTED: 06/19/2009 - 07:33 am / quote |
KingChris :
mikedirnt96 wrote:

well why get 250 watts if you dnt wnt it 2 be loud????


Its not 250 watts dude its 2 50watt speakers. I thought the same thing at first....then i read the manual! lol!!

POSTED: 06/19/2009 - 07:35 am / quote |
The^Unforgiven :
Run.to.the.hill wrote:

"At the moment I am using an Epiphone gibson sg with two seymour duncan humbuckers, so i know what great tone sounds like"
I'd have ANY pair of Seymour Duncans instead of Gibson stocks. IMO Gibson guitars are over-priced and
LOL man you made my day, lol omg i might need surgery from this
Try a GIBSON GIBSON LES PAUL with two GIBSON pickups and an amp with some VALVES and then we can talk about great tone



I'd take any pair of Seymour Duncans instead of Gibson stocks. IMO Gibson guitars are over-priced and overrated, anyway.

POSTED: 09/10/2009 - 03:09 pm / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009