guitar tabs / all updates / news / reviews / interviews / columns / lessons / forums / contests / ug.TV / my profile  
Ultimate-Guitar.Com - over 300,000 guitar tabs, bass tabs, guitar pro tabs and chords!
Marshall : MG50DFX review. 28 reviews, 135 votes and 83 comments total
search for: in
 
advanced + submit your tab

+ submit your review

+ submit your article
fresh tabs / 0-9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z / top 100 tabs

MG50DFX Review

manufacturer: marshall date: 05/07/2009 category: guitar amplifiers
MG50DFX
 Features:8.4
 Sound:7.9
 Reliability:8.8
 Impression:8.4
 Overall rating:
 8.4 
 Users rating:
 7 
 Comments:
 83 
 user comments vote for this amp:
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 6.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 10
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8.3
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 6
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 7
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 9.8
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 4.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
overall: 5.5
 Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
Post your comment
subscribe to
 83 
 comments posted
JohnnySlash :
Hmmm...little confusing that some people loves it but other hates it...
POSTED: 05/13/2006 - 09:08 am / quote |
Xenn99 :
The reason some people hate it is because they're jumping on the "Marshall MG Amps suck" bandwagon. I love my MG50DFX. Just because a couple people have had problems with them before doesn't mean that every amp that has "MGxxDFX" on it sucks. What happens here at UG is that one person says they have a problem with something, then, suddenly, 15 more people mysteriously have the same problem. Then, those 15 people complain about this "problem" and even more people suddenly have it.
I personally love my MG. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another. Don't be swayed by all these people who claim that all Marshall MG amps suck. Go try some for yourself and see what you think!

POSTED: 05/17/2006 - 02:52 pm / quote |
Frobert :
people say they don't like it and it is unreliable... because they've owned it and they know from experience that it is unreliable. I was playing a gig tonight, and before we even started, it kicked out. Oh wait, this is obviously a made up story because complaining about random amps makes me feel like a bigger person. Xenn99, just accept that Marshall isn't perfect.
POSTED: 06/03/2006 - 01:03 am / quote |
zirklers :
I bought a Marshall Amp (UK built) here in Australia and they only come with a 1 year warranty. Sounds fine but broke down after relatively little use and it's only 18months old so I'm stuffed with an overhyped useless box unless I spend more on it. Check the fine print of your warranty because I will never buy another Marshall product here in Oz until Marshall have the balls to back it up with a decent warranty. Shame on you Marshall for selling me expensive junk. I'm trying to make a living out of this and I'm working for repair bills now. Be warned Marshall customers. Don't be fooled by the guitar shop magazines and sellers. I play for real and the reality is this product failed to cut it out there in the gig space. Hope this reality check helps someone avoid the pain of unneccessary expense. Shop suspiciously and you'll be rocking, I'll be mopping floors !
Steve Z.

POSTED: 06/18/2006 - 09:17 pm / quote |
zirklers :
My Marshall combo packed it in in 18 months of life. Warranty here is 12 months. For a product that boasts it is the primo, that sure sucks. Never again MArshall. Have the balls to back your product with a decent warranty Marshall cause I sure Marshan't !
Steve Z (trying to make it as a pro but too busy working to repair crap.)

POSTED: 06/18/2006 - 10:04 pm / quote |
Xenn99 :
Frobert, I'm not calling you a liar. I'm just stating that a lot of people bash MG's without ever trying them. If you see a post on the forums that even MENTIONS an MG, there is a long parade of "everyone says they suck" "Most of the people on UG hate them" "I heard they're crap" etc.

I accept that Marshall isn't perfect. Believe me. If I was some blatant fanboy I would have given it a 10/10. I find that the amp does what it needs to and does it decently. That's all.

As for the whole warranty buisness, that's BS. They SHOULD have the balls to back up their product. One year? That's an insult to the buyer.

POSTED: 06/28/2006 - 10:49 pm / quote |
brandnewjunkie :
Update to my review above: about 6 months ago for no reason at all the amp became stuck on the overdrive channel. I've tried everything and I've even taken it apart and everything looks fine. It happened a little more than one year after I bought it. So I would have to change my reliablility rating to 0. The clean channel was actually the best part of this amp and now I can't use it. I've talked to several people who are electronics/amp knowledgable but they have no idea (it's definitely not just the switch). I've since got a nice tube fender and I couldn't be happier...
POSTED: 07/23/2006 - 08:46 pm / quote |
UnsignedRecords :
well, my band member plays through this, only got it about a year ago and it has already failed to work, at all i mean.

the cleans, like mentioned a few times above, are actually quite poor, and the overdrive bottoms out very easily.

i've played through an friend's mg30dfx, which is a bit older, maybe made in the 90's and it sounds fine through my modeling pedal.

but personally, i'm a crate man

POSTED: 08/20/2006 - 01:22 am / quote |
jiddy12321 :
alright im into led zeppelin and stuff like that,could anybudy tell me if this amp is good for that sort of stuff and light metal stuff
POSTED: 11/05/2006 - 12:36 pm / quote |
ChptOfDarkness :
my friend had this amp. its great for a beginner in metal and such but no good for gigs. more garage/basement band thing
POSTED: 11/07/2006 - 02:23 pm / quote |
Nathy8979 :
JohnnySlash wrote:

Hmmm...little confusing that some people loves it but other hates it...

POSTED: 12/06/2006 - 11:53 am / quote |
Nathy8979 :
im thinkin of gettin this amp so should i get it or not
POSTED: 12/06/2006 - 11:54 am / quote |
Faith No More :
I bought one umm 2 weeks ago because I borrowed the 100 watt one off a friend and liked it. An the 50 watt was all i could fit in my room.
I don't know why people hate it. It has a pretty decent overdrive/clean channel too. An to the people saying the clean is too bassy/twangy...ever heard of changing the eq? Twangy for surf(which i play alot) ppfft. An the overdrive is good.
Id probably use it for my band.
The effects are good enough, but i don't use effects much for what i play.
What else would you want for £165 ? EY!

POSTED: 12/11/2006 - 02:44 pm / quote |
Nathy8979 :
shud i get it
POSTED: 12/12/2006 - 05:32 pm / quote |
leftys rule :
Ive had 1 for a year and it is a great amp. i am a bit pissed off that ive gone through two footswitches, the first one faulty as soon as i got it the second one last a year. im pretty sure its just bad luck. MG's dont suck
POSTED: 12/13/2006 - 05:57 am / quote |
da\/e :
my band has one it's preety good i love the distortion sound
POSTED: 12/21/2006 - 10:32 am / quote |
da\/e :
got one today 10 out of 10 really it rocks its got great effects and distortion. it cost me £250 and the footswich was £18.
POSTED: 12/27/2006 - 11:51 am / quote |
Nathy8979 :
got it 4 christmas and its ****in class
POSTED: 12/29/2006 - 12:11 pm / quote |
Kunundrum :
It's a good entry level amp you may gig (but not the best). I love the clean cause i play lots of jazz, but i don't like the overdrive. You can't get in between overdrive sounds like B.B. King stuff or John Scofield or overdriven blues tones. But it sounds good for stuff with lots of gain. I borrow a Tubescreamer sometimes when i use this and that fixes the problem
POSTED: 01/07/2007 - 07:54 am / quote |
Shizzster :
i have it, its a pretty decent amp for the price although i do agree there is probably a better deal out there this amp sounds pretty good. the clean is OK not the best and the distoriion is pretty good. Its definatly loud of enough for practice and im genna b forced to gig with it so ill see how that goes. the problems i have with mine is the friggin fan it will moan for a bout a min when u first turn it on and then it finally kicks in to normal power. hasnt totally broken yet and ive had it for a year. another thing i noticed is that after playin it for a while with my friend at pretty high volumes the distorion became really fuzzy and sounded nasty. i had to live with it for a while but i finally bought a multi effects with distrotion so i use those distortions now. if it were stolen and id probably buy a cube 60 and if i had spare money something even bigger like a peavey valve king
POSTED: 01/13/2007 - 01:47 pm / quote |
Korzack :
Hmm... Had mine for about 10 months now - lol Maybe should keep an eye on it come November time hehe
Sounds good enough for me - Okay, to be fair, it could be better, but it could be a lot worse, a lot of it's just because I'm forever playing it at volume 1 or 2 so I don't annoy the neighbours. Definitely thinking for a next amp get a slightly more upmarket Marshall (looking at the DSL's) or a Hot Rod Fender - remember borrowing the Deluxe one for a gig & it sounded Damn nice.

POSTED: 03/30/2007 - 02:53 pm / quote |
anjayloo :
should I get a new one for $260 or can I get it cheaper?
POSTED: 04/02/2007 - 05:47 pm / quote |
sTx :
This amp plays like a dream, compared to my Laney. No, the Laney rules.=D
POSTED: 05/04/2007 - 01:08 pm / quote |
Gatocaster :
I bought a new MG50DFX last summer. Quite soon after it developed an annoying buzz/rattle whenever I played a bottom E. This happened on more than 1 guitar so it wasn't fret rattle or anything like that. I finally couldn't take it any more, so returned it to Marshall for a repair. 3 weeks later it came back making nothing more than an earthing screech! Luckily for me the shop where I got it from took pity and replaced it straight away, but I've got to say that I'm seriously not impressed by Marshall's service quality. At the end of the day I've got an amp that works, but can't help thinking I should have saved up some more and gone for a Fender Twin instead.
POSTED: 05/11/2007 - 05:15 am / quote |
little_green_1 :
Help me out here, i have a birthday coming up really soon and i cant decide whether to get Marshall MG50DFX or a vox AD50VTX.

POSTED: 05/30/2007 - 02:37 pm / quote |
little_green_1 :
or any other amp under £200.which one should i have to decide before the end of june (2007)
POSTED: 05/30/2007 - 03:28 pm / quote |
little_green_1 :
oops i mean which one should i get.i have to decide before the end of june (2007)

POSTED: 05/30/2007 - 03:29 pm / quote |
guitar_amateur :
im seriously considering buying this amp, i trust the place where i plan on getting it from too, but it would cost me $440(CAD)and some people are telling me to buy it from the same place I bought the reason I want a new amp
POSTED: 06/05/2007 - 05:20 pm / quote |
guitar_amateur :
the old one is a piece of shit with knobs on it called precision, you can find a review of it on ug
POSTED: 06/05/2007 - 05:27 pm / quote |
JackWhitesCool :
MG50DFX or the Fender FM 212R? I cant decide...
POSTED: 06/05/2007 - 10:45 pm / quote |
Gatocaster :
Save yourself some grief and get the Fender!
POSTED: 06/06/2007 - 06:49 am / quote |
shredder_666 :
This makes a pretty good practice amp, but not the best for stage.

POSTED: 06/11/2007 - 05:27 pm / quote |
XAkitAX :
Wow. timmEH obviously doesn't know crap about amps, when he says cleans are tinny or bassy, its called EQ idiot. I have an MG50DFX and I can get the perfect sound with any of my 8 guitars. This is a very nice amp.
POSTED: 06/15/2007 - 03:11 pm / quote |
Edgar_guitarguy :
In hermes music?? 150 dollars,euro,CAD,pesos??
POSTED: 07/27/2007 - 12:49 pm / quote |
fusion48 :
In my opinion this is a good amp, i means its not the king of the castle, but for the money i was really pleased with it. I've never heard of this MG---DFX haters or anything like that so my opinion isnt swayed.

This amp has a great distortion sound which is versatile and suits many genres of music. I personally play alot of rock blues shizzle, and sounds great. I've had my amp for over 3 years and I've had no problems what so ever with it. I just think some are lucky and some arent.

If your thinking of getting an amp for under 200 quid, go for this, but anything above, get a valve amp, god they sound nicer, im beginning to get a bit bored of the amp, and am moving on to maybe a fender hot rod deluxe

POSTED: 08/29/2007 - 03:37 pm / quote |
weiteck :
I just got an MG50DFX second hand and it sounds really awesome clean or distorted. Although my opionion is probably coloured by the huge step up in grunt and quality from my little Laney practice amp though, which offered a choice of either ice-cold cleans or mud.

I have a problem with the effects preset knob though, which isn't doing anything; the delay effect is just stuck on at a constant rate, so I can't change effects or adjust the delay rate. Anyone had this problem or any tips for fixing it?

POSTED: 09/12/2007 - 12:21 am / quote |
tftmc :
I bought this AMP for $300 total on eBay about 3 months ago. Brand New in the Marshall box. I play with a Washburn KC-20V and it just sounds so amazing. I have used other lower model Marshalls and was amazed then, but when I plugged this baby in I fell in love instantly. I can use it at home for practice or for a gig with no issues on volume, in fact it could almost handle a small venue.

The effect settings are great, and you can customize your sound for all sorts of musical styles. I suggest getting a Digitech RP50 effects pedal, with that combo and a good guitar you can sound PRO!

The MG50DFX is by far has biggest bang for it's buck. Like the Corvette of the guitar world.

Great for any level guitar player, beginner to seasoned pro.

POSTED: 09/17/2007 - 02:39 pm / quote |
Prog_On :
The Marshall mg50dfx is a great amp, i play jazz and prog metal through it and its sounds awesome. I use this amp for practice, rehearsals and even recording. I also use it for small gigs. Great amp for a great price, it all depends on what u want it for. Its rather small for larger gigs though. And plz remember... there are not such things as crappy amps, crappy guitars or crappy guitar effects... THERE ARE CRAPPY GUITAR PLAYERS¡¡¡ Keep that in mind
POSTED: 10/05/2007 - 02:53 am / quote |
jeffo46 :
The only good thing about this amp,is the clean channel.The distortion is muddy,and after owning it for only a week,the fan in the back started to make a loud grinding noise.This amp is simply put,a piece of shit.Don't waste your money on it.
POSTED: 10/25/2007 - 06:57 am / quote |
cultofthedamned :
jiddy12321 wrote:

alright im into led zeppelin and stuff like that,could anybudy tell me if this amp is good for that sort of stuff and light metal stuff
yeh it is it's good from classic rock to Light/heavy metal

POSTED: 11/09/2007 - 09:37 pm / quote |
forwhomthebells :
My plectrum which i am currently holding is 10 and red in the middle with an Alien on it.
POSTED: 11/13/2007 - 12:50 pm / quote |
trivium_rock :
im gonna get this amp for christmas. im well looking forward to it. i know how good it is and really blasts things out!!
POSTED: 11/24/2007 - 02:18 pm / quote |
Nathy8979 :
gd choice i got it last christmas, i was finkin twice bout it tho before i got it because some people liked it and others didnt, but its brilliant, has broke r anything the sounds great and it looks da part lol
POSTED: 12/09/2007 - 06:21 pm / quote |
a6l6e6x1 :
i hate how so many people say the mg series is shit when some of them have never played them, just following the crowd
i think i might get one of the soon for the overdrive

POSTED: 12/18/2007 - 02:57 am / quote |
soupdragon :
da\/e wrote:

got one today 10 out of 10 really it rocks its got great effects and distortion. it cost me £250 and the footswich was £18.


da\/e, you've have been seriously ripped off.

POSTED: 12/22/2007 - 10:03 am / quote |
Nathy8979 :
i got mine for £170 n came wif free footswitch
POSTED: 12/30/2007 - 03:10 pm / quote |
AaROn! :
Hmmm i was thinking about getting one of these, just for practising etc and i play a lot of AC/DC stuff, heavier stuff and also a bit of punk. Sould i get one of these or something else??
POSTED: 01/04/2008 - 03:02 pm / quote |
E_squared :
My friend plays one of these with an ESP guitar and it sounds AMAZING.
POSTED: 01/07/2008 - 10:07 pm / quote |
jimmywc :
I've had this amp for a few years now. At first it sounded great, but has since been VERY UNRELIABLE. First it started cutting out at gigs - v. embarrassing. I had a friend look at it and he said it was some loose connections and fixed it for me. It was ok for a while but now its messed up once again. It's got the same distortion problem that a few people have already mentioned. Also the rubber handle went a long time ago (as someone else has also mentioned!) which makes carrying it very awkward.
For Reliabilty I'd have to give this a 0.
It's a real shame as the sound was not bad.
If you are thinking about buying one - beware.

POSTED: 02/14/2008 - 04:56 am / quote |
tom_martin_123 :
wot is it with this amp every1 seems to argue about it! i liked it until i read all this n now i jus dont want to risk bein one of those ppl who will end up hating it wen i have it, so ill jus buy sumet else.
POSTED: 02/19/2008 - 05:53 pm / quote |
leviticus_22953 :
i have this amp and i love it. i really love the sound especially the clean channel. i don't have any problems with it.

POSTED: 03/19/2008 - 10:37 am / quote |
jeffo46 :
These amps suck.I bought one over a year ago,brand new.After 2 weeks,the cooling fan in the back of the amp,started making loud grinding noises.I emailed Marshall about it,and they never returned ny email.I bought it back and got a refund.Fuck Marshall,they don't care about their customers.
POSTED: 04/14/2008 - 04:40 pm / quote |
BlueSky6392 :
uhmm.. yea. i was thinking of buying this thing.. cuz my friend has it nad it sounded good... but i was thinking of buying the fender fm 212 too...they're about the same price soo.. any advice of which to buy?
POSTED: 05/08/2008 - 12:16 am / quote |
leviticus_22953 :
i forgot to put in my review that i have had the amp for more than 3 years now.
POSTED: 05/26/2008 - 07:03 am / quote |
Korzack :
To elaborate more after my review: It's still got a damned nice tone - still leans over to metal if you give it a chance, but its' all about EQ'ing it, really, and keeping the contour down, which actually gives a far nicer sound in my opinion. Had to sell the LP to keep myself afloat at university, play my Gibson SG through this, and it works nicely still - Working nice GnR tones (Although the buolt-in delay is a bit over-enthusiastic for Welcome to the Jungle), can do Crue nicely - basically, anything you can throw at it, it does well in my logic. I stand by the good review I gave it, and while I'm sure if I bought even an AVT I'd get an improvement in tone, it gives me a lot of decent sounds
POSTED: 06/15/2008 - 08:21 am / quote |
welshguitarist9 :
I've been using this amp for over a year and can't fault it. Love the tones, effects and never paid to much for it either. It's even survived alot of trips back and for to school with me, and in my school that is impressive.
POSTED: 06/19/2008 - 06:22 am / quote |
thejazzman :
Great amp for a great price. There is better, but you get what you pay for.
POSTED: 07/05/2008 - 12:49 pm / quote |
Blasphemylol :
My lead guitarist plays on one and its kickass, he's had it for more than two years, no problems. Even a pc fan gets noisy when it collects dust noobs
POSTED: 07/29/2008 - 02:59 am / quote |
thejazzman :
Try this overdrive setting (it's nice for lead guitar in blues and rock)
Gain-3
Bass-6
Contour-0
Treble-8
Volume-Any

Us e this with a bridge pikup for an ultra cool soloing tone.

POSTED: 07/31/2008 - 10:16 am / quote |
Tango616 :
i lol at the mg
POSTED: 08/18/2008 - 06:50 pm / quote |
fyrefish :
i just got this amp a week ago, and it is this weird problem where if you press the FDD switch or touch the power switch, the distortion channel suddenly becomes really quiet and crappy sounding, like when you partially unplug a speaker. The clean channel is unnaffected. jiggling the button brings t back...sometimes. has anyone else had this problem?
POSTED: 11/01/2008 - 05:08 pm / quote |
Inferrest :
I have this amp, and i love it, the only thing i hat is it's a bit big for home use i think, my tutor has a smaller Marshall amp and at lower volumes it sounds better....but if you want the volume up way loud this is a pretty good amp, especially for the money.
POSTED: 12/04/2008 - 01:30 pm / quote |
Inferrest :
Ps, small Peavey amps are worth a look.
POSTED: 12/04/2008 - 01:32 pm / quote |
thejazzman :
a great amp, quite enough for home use but loud enough to overpwer my massive school hall (it's like hogwarts lol). it easily cuts through a drummer, 90 watt bass amp and 250 watt guitar half stack and (when needed for jazz concerts ect) sax and keyboard.
POSTED: 12/12/2008 - 10:23 am / quote |
thejazzman :
thejazzman wrote:

a great amp, quite enough for home use but loud enough to overpwer my massive school hall (it's like hogwarts lol). it easily cuts through a drummer, 90 watt bass amp and 250 watt guitar half stack and (when needed for jazz concerts ect) sax and keyboard.


Did a gig with it last night in my school hall and i didn't turn the volume pas 4, it was just too loud after that! LOL.

POSTED: 12/18/2008 - 03:44 am / quote |
au_chris :
i bought one a few weeks ago, saving it for chrissy, but some of the negative reviews ive read are disturbing.

when trying instore it sounded great, although it was a 5 min play then buy haha. marshall does that to you i guess.


POSTED: 12/22/2008 - 02:10 am / quote |
*Kiwi* :
hey, just got my amp 4 €220 and i dont c what all the complaining is about....the amount of different sounds you can create is brilliant, and the sound is class
POSTED: 01/12/2009 - 12:21 pm / quote |
Oosh. :
For the first review.. All 10's? You serious?
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 01:06 pm / quote |
domiel :
this amp should get something like a 5 or a 6.
its one of the worst practice amp's ive tried.

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 01:33 pm / quote |
slayer98763 :
i've tried this amp and i have got to say, its horrible and considering that a lot of these reviews are within the 9-10 range, that just means that people really don't know how to review things properly and just throw around 10's like candy. in my opinion, if you want a good amp, save up a 2000 dollars and get one from messa boogie or something, don't cheap out. and if you are on a strict budget, go for a vox or something like the vox DA-5 only like 200 bucks but is a million times better then this amp, and have a lot more effects and distortions, its a great little practice amp, but thats all its good for, practice.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 02:03 pm / quote |
Bighair :
MG's are shit.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 03:38 pm / quote |
metal_666_man :
domiel wrote:

this amp should get something like a 5 or a 6.
its one of the worst practice amp's ive tried.

i have to agree, i was quite disappointed with it, there are much better practice amps out there then this

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 03:43 pm / quote |
deaththrashcore :
Marshall MGs have the tone of a tuning fork.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 04:25 pm / quote |
masterp666 :
its not the best, but in my opinion its solid and reliable. its never died on me, and its been everywhere i've been, which is a bunch of places. it sounds great loud. the only way it disappointed me were the somewhat sterile cleans and the fact that the distortion couldn't reach serious metal levels. But a boss bd-2 is perfect for getting nice warm cleans out of it, and for serious distortion i have the boss ml-2 metal core. with those, its a seriously awesome amp. i get fantastic tube-esque cleans, and serious distortion, and everything sounds better when its cranked up but also it sounds good when its quiet. and since its quiet hours during finals right now, i can definitely attest to that.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 05:09 pm / quote |
MasterExploder0 :
9.8,10,8.3?? Really!? I think I have better tone after a dinner at Taco Bell.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 05:51 pm / quote |
asfastasdark :
The reason these have such high rating is probably because there starter level amps that are recommended to everyone in every music store, and the people that don't know which amps are good and which are bad think "it sounds good" so they get it. But after playing for a year or so you realize that the tone sucks and you should have gotten something else.
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 06:54 pm / quote |
guitarNbass :
when it comes to practice amps... the line 6 spider 30 watt is the way to go. It sounds the best out of the spider series, and it blows away the MG's. The Vox Pathfinder is a great practice amp as well as the vox valvetronix.

But I pray to the Lord Almighty every single night that I never have to play a solid-state amplifier again in my life. TUBE FOR LIFE.

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 08:14 pm / quote |
higherworlds :
if you know good equipment and good tone, then you know this sucks, not loud, bad tone, reverb sucks, and its a solid state, enough said!
POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 09:54 pm / quote |
Faux~Affliction :
The MG Series is the worst amp I've ever played.
And I've played a HUGE selection of amps.
Complete waste of money, you can do WAY better for the price.

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 10:33 pm / quote |
Rogue Hermit :
this is a great sounding amp if you're used to low-end solid state amps. when i first heard a tube amp, it blew away this cheesy mg series amp.

there's a reason why professional musicians avoid solid state for the most part...

POSTED: 05/07/2009 - 11:15 pm / quote |
calger14 :
i have a MG30DFX and i think its ok but it cant get a good sound for what i play.
POSTED: 05/08/2009 - 02:22 am / quote |
jesussowns :
deaththrashcore wrote:

Marshall MGs have the tone of a tuning fork.


Fuckin' spot on mate.

POSTED: 05/08/2009 - 04:08 am / quote |
dgargett95 :
these amps r awesome, heaps of people diss them, but with a few fx pedals and a bit of a fiddle with the settings they sound great!!! Also, a lot of the tone and sound comes from your technique and feeling!!!
POSTED: 10/13/2009 - 05:14 am / quote |
Comment tools:    Post your comment (please login or register first):
biu
   quote
smilies =)
  

About

Help/FAQ

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

RSS Feeds  

Site Map

Link To Us

Tell A Friend

Advertising Info

Job Opportunities

Contact Us

Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2009