#1
Ok, so we've written this song, though I have no recording, and I'm a bit confused about the structure..it's what came naturally, but it seems abnormal.

I want to know if it's anything normal, and if it has a name.

It's like this:

Intro

Intro (whole band)

Little bridge

Verse 1

Clean bridge

Verse 2

Same bridge as before but distorted

Chorus

Interlude 1

Interlude 2

Chorus

Outro


Basically to me it seems a bit weird.

Mostly 'cause the intro doesn't repeat even once, the two verses are attached and there's no verse after the chorus..I don't know.

Someone help?
Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise
#2
I completely fail to see this as a problem.
What does it matter if the structure isn't "normal"?
And I don't see why you would want a name on it.
As long as it comes natural, which you said it did, it's completely fine.
Stop worrying and go have fun playing your song!
#4
Quote by Myshadow46_2
Interlude 2 needs more flanger. Other than that you're all good.

This.
But boys will be boys and girls have those eyes
that'll cut you to ribbons, sometimes
and all you can do is just wait by the moon
and bleed if it's what she says you ought to do
#6
-prog.
Quote by ChemicalFire
You get my first ever lolstack






The image in my head is just too funny for words at this point


Aw yeah.
#7
Quote by TheNameOfNoone
-prog.

This.

Dream Theater has been writing stuff like this for years and it's worked out pretty well for them.
Quote by Geldin
Junior's usually at least a little terse, but he knows his stuff. I've always read his posts in a grouchy grandfather voice, a grouchy grandfather with a huge stiffy for alternate picking.
Besides that, he's right this time. As usual.
#8
Quote by jazz_rock_feel
Yeah seriously, if you add flanger to interlude 2 it's basically a sonata form.

Does an effect really make a difference to a structure?


Quote by TheNameOfNoone
-prog.

No way, for sure?

I always considered prog to be over 11 minute long songs with long intrumental breaks and stuff..


Anyway, the main reason I'm asking is that..yeah it doesn't sound bad, it allc ame naturally, and it does flow, but it flows in a kind of..chaotic way, as if no thought whatsoever was given to the song

But anyway, thanks guys.
Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise
#11
I like this form. It's a hell of a lot more interesting than verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge/solo-chrous (not that there's anything wrong with that, just that its used a lot).
#12
Quote by TheNameOfNoone
-prog.

Mhmmm!


TS, "abnormal" song structures is just another way of saying, "This song is better than the average tune".
#13
Quote by crazysam23_Atax

TS, "abnormal" song structures is just another way of saying, "This song is better than the average tune".

wat
But boys will be boys and girls have those eyes
that'll cut you to ribbons, sometimes
and all you can do is just wait by the moon
and bleed if it's what she says you ought to do
#14
intro
bridge
material A
bridge
material A
bridge
material B
bridge 2
bridge 3
material B
coda

You can simplify it down to that. There's not really a chorus since there's no context for it. It doesn't really have or need a name. I guess if you consider that there is 2 core material, A and B, it's some kind of complex binary like most conventional songs, just without the conventional order.

...modes and scales are still useless.


Quote by PhoenixGRM
Hey guys could you spare a minute to Vote for my band. Go to the site Search our band Listana with CTRL+F for quick and vote Thank you .
Quote by sam b
Voted for Patron Çıldırdı.

Thanks
Quote by PhoenixGRM
But our Band is Listana
#15
Quote by Krieger91
it's what came naturally
That's what matters. If it flows, it's good.
Only play what you hear. If you don’t hear anything, don’t play anything.
-Chick Corea
#16
Why should you use a common structure in your song? I mean, it's just good that not every song sounds the same. There are no rules with music. If it sounds good, it's good. But if it doesn't, changing the structure is easy. I don't see any problems with it. Just change the structure to verse chorus stuff if you want. But really don't. Just leave it as it is, there are more than enough songs with the verse-chorus-verse-chorus structure.
Quote by AlanHB
Just remember that there are no boring scales, just boring players.

Gear

Bach Stradivarius 37G
Charvel So Cal
Hartke HyDrive 210c
Ibanez BL70
Laney VC30
Tokai TB48
Yamaha FG720S-12
Yamaha P115
#17
Quote by Krieger91
No way, for sure?

I always considered prog to be over 11 minute long songs with long intrumental breaks and stuff..


Because the "prog rock" today is clished to be just "11 minute long songs with long instrumental breaks and stuff", the true progressive rock would break that pattern.

Progress - creating something new.
Quote by ChemicalFire
You get my first ever lolstack






The image in my head is just too funny for words at this point


Aw yeah.
#18
Quote by Krieger91
Ok, so we've written this song, though I have no recording, and I'm a bit confused about the structure..it's what came naturally, but it seems abnormal.

I want to know if it's anything normal, and if it has a name.

It's like this:

Intro

Intro (whole band)

Little bridge

Verse 1

Clean bridge

Verse 2

Same bridge as before but distorted

Chorus

Interlude 1

Interlude 2

Chorus

Outro


Basically to me it seems a bit weird.

Mostly 'cause the intro doesn't repeat even once, the two verses are attached and there's no verse after the chorus..I don't know.

Someone help?


yes. it's very normal. i would simplify it even further than xiaoxi did, so here's your structure:

intro

verse 1

verse 2

chorus

bridge

chorus

outro

it's just a very small modification on the song structure that is the herpes of modern music. everything you call "bridges" are best analyzed as transitional passages, and likely don't serve much function in the form.

Quote by macashmack
I like this form. It's a hell of a lot more interesting than verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge/solo-chrous (not that there's anything wrong with that, just that its used a lot).


Anfangen ist leicht, Beharren eine Kunst.
#19
if you can put a name on a structure, it's probably gonna come out as shitty and/or unoriginal

you can make a 10 minute song off one motif, and a 2 minute song off a hundred parts. as long as it sounds natural, how you'd break down a form is secondary to its cohesion unless you're just trying to plug riffs together (which is probably the case)
Quote by theogonia777
Hail killed MT

Quote by jongtr
I want to be Hail when I grow up.