#1
I'm deciding which one of these these I want. I'd likely swap the stock Valveking speaker with a Celestion 30 Vintage speaker.

I play just about everything, including metal (mostly thrash, but not much that's ridiculously extreme). So I want enough gain but want decent cleans too for other types of music, and I've heard that the 6505+ 112 combo doesn't have the best cleans, but how does that compare to the Valveking 112 combo cleans (stock and w/ mods)?

Looking for an amp for home practice, jamming w/ full band, but also with enough low end to help somewhat sub for a bass player when I jam/practice metal just with my drummer buddy (which is often).

note: my budget is up to about $1000 but obviously the less the better!
Last edited by Barricade_28 at Dec 10, 2012,
#2
Valveking has way better cleans. But it's not a metal amp. You have to compromise somewhere.
Spin 'round carousel when your horse isn't screwed in.

My band:
Fractured Instinct
(For fans of Death/Groove/Prog Metal)

Ibanez RGA42E
Ibanez S420
LTD H-301
Ibanez RG520
Peavey Predator USA
Douglas Grendel 725
Line 6 Pod HD500X
#3
Quote by Offworld92
Valveking has way better cleans. But it's not a metal amp. You have to compromise somewhere.

Pretty much that.

The VK can do Thrash just fine with an OD and EQ pedal. That is after the crap speaker is removed. For the VK - I'd actually go with a warehouseguitarspeaker.com Veteran 30 (V30 clone of the Celestion).

But for low end and versatility I like the Vypyr 60 even better.

Better yet, there is Sticky that might help you craft a better 'What Amp' thread.
#4
I use it for metal all the time. You can check out my band where i use the Valveking as my main amp. I don't play modern metal, but it has a decent amount of gain. The cleans are really nice IMO but I'm no clean tone aficionado.
Gear:

Fender Strat
PRS SE Custom 24
Agile AL-3100

Jet City JCA50H
Randall 2x12 wV30s
#5
The 6505 doesn't have bad cleans when dialed in properly. I don't know why so many people dislike its cleans so much. The vlavekings cleans are most likely better though.

Do you have to choose between those two? Maybe take a look at the peavey XXX/JSX? Much more versatile IMO.
Main Rig
ESP LTD MH-350NT
Korg Pitchblack > Digitech Bad Monkey
Peavey 6505+ 112 w/ 2x12 (Celestion Vintage 30 and WGS Veteran 30)
[Effects Loop] Boss GE-7 > Boss CE-5 > TC Electronic Flashback
Last edited by Carl21221 at Dec 10, 2012,
#6
Quote by Carl21221
The 6505 doesn't have bad cleans when foaled in properly. I don't know why so many people dislike its cleans so much. The vlavekings cleans are most likely better though.

Do you have to choose between those two? Maybe take a look at the peavey XXX/JSX? Much more versatile IMO.


6505's cleans are far inferior to the valveking.

however i agree that an XXX or JSX would do you much better. one of them comes into a combo if you are looking for that, but i don't remember which one or if both did.

the right tubes are a big thing and peavey's speakers are terrible. as 311 said be prepared to swap.

for a little bit more money i would look for a 5150 2x12" combo again if not looking for head/cab setup.
WTLT 2014 GG&A

Quote by andersondb7
alright "king of the guitar forum"


Quote by trashedlostfdup
nope i am "GOD of the guitar forum" i think that fits me better.


Quote by andersondb7
youre just being a jerk man.


2017-03-18 - 2017-03-18 Time to Get De-laid... (**NEW** Saturday 2017-03-18)
2017-03-02 - Guitar Philosophy 1001- Be Prepared For the Situation (Thursday 2017-03-02)
2017-02-27 How Much Do You Actually Need? RANT GET IN ON IT! (Monday 2017-02-27)
2017-02-21 How to Hot-Rod the Hell of your Stratocaster for $50! (Tuesday 2017-2-21)
Resentments and Rambling from a Guitar Junkie
---> http://trashedengineering.blogspot.com/
#7
I assume a JSX is out of your budget, but if not go for that. Cleans absolutely destroy the ValveKing and the 6505, and the quality of the dirt is on par with the 6505 - it just has a quite different character. It's be way more suited to what I assume you want to do, actually.

The combos are relatively hard to find though.
Spin 'round carousel when your horse isn't screwed in.

My band:
Fractured Instinct
(For fans of Death/Groove/Prog Metal)

Ibanez RGA42E
Ibanez S420
LTD H-301
Ibanez RG520
Peavey Predator USA
Douglas Grendel 725
Line 6 Pod HD500X
#8
Quote by Offworld92
I assume a JSX is out of your budget, but if not go for that. Cleans absolutely destroy the ValveKing and the 6505, and the quality of the dirt is on par with the 6505 - it just has a quite different character. It's be way more suited to what I assume you want to do, actually.

The combos are relatively hard to find though.


Thanks for the advice everyone. The XXX/JSX are not made anymore right? Are they the exact same amp (inside)? I'm worried that the 120w head is a bit of overkill for me, since most of the time I probably wouldn't have the amp volume above solo basement practice or band jam levels. Would my tone/distortion/bass sound good at lower volume levels? I could just go for a 2x12 cab.

p.s. a closed-back cab will likely increase/improve my low end, correct?
Last edited by Barricade_28 at Dec 10, 2012,
#9
Used jsx should get you what you want from an amp. A used jsx should be in the same range as a new valveking/used 5150.

Edit. The 6505/Jsx/valceking are all going to be loud as hell if your concerened about volume levels that much I would look at the vyper tube 60 because of the headphone inputs.
Quote by joshua garcia
I was incredibly drunk and only really remember writing a fanfic where ESP was getting porked by a pony.

Quote by guitar0player
I'd honestly fap to anything with a set of genitals as long as I find it aesthetically appealing.
Last edited by losing battle at Dec 10, 2012,
#10
The JSX and XXX are different. The JSX is a modified XXX, basically. It has a way better clean channel (it's designed to be close to the Peavey Classic), and the crunch and ultra channels are both less abrasive (smoother). It also has a built in noise gate which is kind of nice just as an extra.

I haven't spent a lot of time with the XXX, but one of the main reasons I got my JSX is that it sounds excellent at bedroom volumes, which most tube amps don't. I've owned a 5150 in the past, and it is definitely not a bedroom amp in any traditional sense. It's loud as balls.

I agree that the Vypyr 60 would be a better overall option if this is a bedroom amp. It is obviously far more versatile, and sounds quite good in it's own right, while maintaining a consistent tone regardless of volume, whisper to venue.


Oh, also the JSX is the same amp as the XXX II, and the XXX is the same amp as the 3120. Don't ask why they did that, I don't know.
Spin 'round carousel when your horse isn't screwed in.

My band:
Fractured Instinct
(For fans of Death/Groove/Prog Metal)

Ibanez RGA42E
Ibanez S420
LTD H-301
Ibanez RG520
Peavey Predator USA
Douglas Grendel 725
Line 6 Pod HD500X
Last edited by Offworld92 at Dec 10, 2012,
#11
Quote by Offworld92
Oh, also the JSX is the same amp as the XXX II, and the XXX is the same amp as the 3120. Don't ask why they did that, I don't know.


Satch is with marshall now, so they took his moniker off the amps. Same thing that happened to the 5150 when EVH switched to Soldano (I think it was to soldano, either way hes with Fender now).
I don't give a shit if you listen to me or not
#12
I understand why they changed the name, I'm saying I don't understand why they renamed the JSX the XXX II, but renamed the XXX the 3120. It's just confusing. It would have been smart to name the XXX the 3120, and then named the JSX the 3122 or something like that.
Spin 'round carousel when your horse isn't screwed in.

My band:
Fractured Instinct
(For fans of Death/Groove/Prog Metal)

Ibanez RGA42E
Ibanez S420
LTD H-301
Ibanez RG520
Peavey Predator USA
Douglas Grendel 725
Line 6 Pod HD500X
#13
Random question, why did they name it the 3120? I know XXX is a stupid name but what's the meaning behind the new one?
Gear:

Fender Strat
PRS SE Custom 24
Agile AL-3100

Jet City JCA50H
Randall 2x12 wV30s
#14
Quote by Offworld92
Valveking has way better cleans. But it's not a metal amp. You have to compromise somewhere.


+1

also a v30 wouldn't be my choice if i wanted nice cleans.
Quote by crownegamers
I saw in a couple of pictures that on Bucketheads Les Paul (only some pictures) that his neck pickup is painted in white. Can anyone explain to me why he would do this, and if there are any pros and cons.

Quote by dspellman
The guy wears a KFC Bucket and a white mask during performances, and you're interested in the color of his pickup covers?

#15
Quote by evmac
Random question, why did they name it the 3120? I know XXX is a stupid name but what's the meaning behind the new one?


three channel and 120 watts maybe.
WTLT 2014 GG&A

Quote by andersondb7
alright "king of the guitar forum"


Quote by trashedlostfdup
nope i am "GOD of the guitar forum" i think that fits me better.


Quote by andersondb7
youre just being a jerk man.


2017-03-18 - 2017-03-18 Time to Get De-laid... (**NEW** Saturday 2017-03-18)
2017-03-02 - Guitar Philosophy 1001- Be Prepared For the Situation (Thursday 2017-03-02)
2017-02-27 How Much Do You Actually Need? RANT GET IN ON IT! (Monday 2017-02-27)
2017-02-21 How to Hot-Rod the Hell of your Stratocaster for $50! (Tuesday 2017-2-21)
Resentments and Rambling from a Guitar Junkie
---> http://trashedengineering.blogspot.com/
#17
I'm naming the first amp I make the 1234.

1 channel, 234 watts. duh.

I second/third the JSX. I prefer their distortion over the 6505, it's not as dry and I suppose it has more character if you will. cleans rape 6505 cleans too. and crunch doesn't start at Van Halen
#18
Quote by trashedlostfdup
three channel and 120 watts maybe.



6505 = six channel, 505 watt brutz amp
Gear:

Fender Strat
PRS SE Custom 24
Agile AL-3100

Jet City JCA50H
Randall 2x12 wV30s