hammett11
Registered User
Join date: Aug 2005
1,014 IQ
#1
Hey, I have a question about a product such as this

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/tascam-us-1800-usb-2.0-audio-midi-interface

It may be a stupid question... it says 16 inputs and 4 outputs.
The interface I'm using now only has two inputs and I use USB to record everything to my computer. When it says 4 outputs, is that a limit on USB outputs as well?
Quote by leavesandman
i hope your children get aids


Quote by richwatkinson
Give 10 UGers a rope and ask them to pull. 4 will push, 1 will ask for buttsecks, 2 will tell you get an Ibanez and the last 3 will start complaining about Line6 Spiders.


Member Number 11 of Metallica Mensa
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#2
No. It uses USB as the output for audio tracks being recorded. The 'four outputs' refers to physical outputs on the device (e.g L-R stereo output, and two headphone outputs, or some other combination of outputs).
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
hammett11
Registered User
Join date: Aug 2005
1,014 IQ
#3
Quote by DisarmGoliath
No. It uses USB as the output for audio tracks being recorded. The 'four outputs' refers to physical outputs on the device (e.g L-R stereo output, and two headphone outputs, or some other combination of outputs).



Great. That's what I was hoping and thinking. Thank you very much.
Quote by leavesandman
i hope your children get aids


Quote by richwatkinson
Give 10 UGers a rope and ask them to pull. 4 will push, 1 will ask for buttsecks, 2 will tell you get an Ibanez and the last 3 will start complaining about Line6 Spiders.


Member Number 11 of Metallica Mensa
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#4
I dont want to be a troll or something, but if you have a PCI or PCI express slot in your computer... USE IT. I work in a music shop and if i would get a dollar for every person who is complaining about latency and USB interfaces i'd be a millionaire by now.
hammett11
Registered User
Join date: Aug 2005
1,014 IQ
#5
Quote by B&J
I dont want to be a troll or something, but if you have a PCI or PCI express slot in your computer... USE IT. I work in a music shop and if i would get a dollar for every person who is complaining about latency and USB interfaces i'd be a millionaire by now.



I don't think you're trying to troll. I appreciate opinions. I'm using a USB interface now and it's working okay. I am a little concerned about running that many at once and it affecting latency. Currently I have to rig the drum setup to record, So I'm only using two tracks at once and there's no latency.
Quote by leavesandman
i hope your children get aids


Quote by richwatkinson
Give 10 UGers a rope and ask them to pull. 4 will push, 1 will ask for buttsecks, 2 will tell you get an Ibanez and the last 3 will start complaining about Line6 Spiders.


Member Number 11 of Metallica Mensa
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#6
Quote by B&J
I dont want to be a troll or something, but if you have a PCI or PCI express slot in your computer... USE IT. I work in a music shop and if i would get a dollar for every person who is complaining about latency and USB interfaces i'd be a millionaire by now.

You'd also be getting money from stupid people, well done.

There is nothing wrong with the latency of any current generation interface provided it is well-thought out. USB is more than capable of carrying plenty of audio channels at high sample rates and if it wasn't there would not be millions and millions of happy customers, and engineers and studios using devices that connect via USB or FireWire.

You obviously haven't got a clue what you're talking about, or you are kicking up a fuss about nothing to troll/seem cool, but I'll humour you for a second. Do you realise that there are almost zero decent value PCIe-based setups out there at the entry-level, other than a few Steinberg cards. The vast majority of the rest are made by budget brands and have no reputable standards. As for PCI, that's a dead format - nothing new comes out with PCI apart from very specific gear that would be targeted at very niche markets (and usually costs far more than what TS is after).


TS, please completely ignore the advice to plug into a PCI/PCIe card - it is useless in your situation.
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#7
Quote by hammett11
I don't think you're trying to troll. I appreciate opinions. I'm using a USB interface now and it's working okay. I am a little concerned about running that many at once and it affecting latency. Currently I have to rig the drum setup to record, So I'm only using two tracks at once and there's no latency.

Wait until you add more to that list. Try some modern Vst instruments like omnisphere, or vst effects for that matter. Usb interfaces it pretty much where hardware beats software, the hardware generally can do it, but the software is pretty much not up for it.

In my studio i tried some USB interfaces and every time they dont deliver. Using Waves plugins, some vst stuff like omnisphere and stuff like that. Come to think about it, most studio's i have been in run on PCI, or firewire... but firewire is dying unfortunately
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#8
Quote by DisarmGoliath
You'd also be getting money from stupid people, well done.

There is nothing wrong with the latency of any current generation interface provided it is well-thought out. USB is more than capable of carrying plenty of audio channels at high sample rates and if it wasn't there would not be millions and millions of happy customers, and engineers and studios using devices that connect via USB or FireWire.

You obviously haven't got a clue what you're talking about, or you are kicking up a fuss about nothing to troll/seem cool, but I'll humour you for a second. Do you realise that there are almost zero decent value PCIe-based setups out there at the entry-level, other than a few Steinberg cards. The vast majority of the rest are made by budget brands and have no reputable standards. As for PCI, that's a dead format - nothing new comes out with PCI apart from very specific gear that would be targeted at very niche markets (and usually costs far more than what TS is after).


TS, please completely ignore the advice to plug into a PCI/PCIe card - it is useless in your situation.

lol... ever heard of UAD?
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#9
Quote by B&J
lol... ever heard of UAD?

UAD have various routes to use their gear, what is your point? All their latest stuff is moving to FireWire and Thunderbolt (take a look at their site yourself), but again... how is that relevant to TS? Their only currently-advertised PCIe system is for DSP... not an audio interface, and therefore is completely unrelated. It's also rather expensive, and A NICHE MARKET.

I'm not getting into an argument, if you feel you've 'won' then great - go back to your little cloud where audio interfaces aren't good enough to record proper studio sessions with and 'all the pro's use PCI' etc. I bet you're also someone who feels any place that doesn't have a Pro Tools HD system is not a proper studio?
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
KG6_Steven
Eats ponies for breakfast
Join date: Nov 2006
3,131 IQ
#10
Quote by B&J
I dont want to be a troll or something, but if you have a PCI or PCI express slot in your computer... USE IT. I work in a music shop and if i would get a dollar for every person who is complaining about latency and USB interfaces i'd be a millionaire by now.



I used to utilize a Tascam US-2000 USB interface. I didn't have any latency issues with it.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#11
Quote by DisarmGoliath
UAD have various routes to use their gear, what is your point? All their latest stuff is moving to FireWire and Thunderbolt (take a look at their site yourself), but again... how is that relevant to TS? Their only currently-advertised PCIe system is for DSP... not an audio interface, and therefore is completely unrelated. It's also rather expensive, and A NICHE MARKET.

I'm not getting into an argument, if you feel you've 'won' then great - go back to your little cloud where audio interfaces aren't good enough to record proper studio sessions with and 'all the pro's use PCI' etc. I bet you're also someone who feels any place that doesn't have a Pro Tools HD system is not a proper studio?

Nopz in fact i dont give a rats ass about your workstation. Its the person who plays the instrument who is gonna make the difference. I do however think a soundcard that actually delivers each and everytime will make your music better. And to my humble opinion an USB interface doesnt.

I wasnt sure we all had to agree with you... I'm sorry.
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#12
Quote by KG6_Steven
I used to utilize a Tascam US-2000 USB interface. I didn't have any latency issues with it.

Clearly you aren't a proper engineer then


Quote by B&J
Wait until you add more to that list. Try some modern Vst instruments like omnisphere, or vst effects for that matter. Usb interfaces it pretty much where hardware beats software, the hardware generally can do it, but the software is pretty much not up for it.

In my studio i tried some USB interfaces and every time they dont deliver. Using Waves plugins, some vst stuff like omnisphere and stuff like that. Come to think about it, most studio's i have been in run on PCI, or firewire... but firewire is dying unfortunately

I've just realised (B&J) - you seriously think that your audio interface dictates the ability of your computer to run Waves plug-ins and VST instruments?

And no, people don't have to agree with me (and me and the other mod even debate stuff and have differing opinions on stuff plenty of times and I accept that) but if you are too blinded to accept USB as a viable technology in professional studios, you are just being ignorant and I'm going to call you out on it if there is a risk that a new and relatively-inexperienced (to interfaces) user may be persuaded against a perfectly-fine choice to get into recording.
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#13
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Clearly you aren't a proper engineer then


By the way, I've just realised (B&J) - you seriously think that your audio interface dictates the ability of your computer to run Waves plug-ins and VST instruments?

Uhhm yes? Unless you like latency or you dont use a whole lot of tracks. Of course there's more stuff that comes to play but a good soundcard will make a whole lot of difference.

Especially dsp ones, since they have build in memory....
KG6_Steven
Eats ponies for breakfast
Join date: Nov 2006
3,131 IQ
#14
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Clearly you aren't a proper engineer then


LOL. Nope! That's why I'm an electronics technician. Besides, aren't engineers the guys who drive trains?
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#15
Quote by KG6_Steven
LOL. Nope! That's why I'm an electronics technician. Besides, aren't engineers the guys who drive trains?

Yep, I think so - and they laugh at all the noobs with their trains with engines that aren't made of a metal so don't deliver


Seriously though, I'm sure you were just imagining the lack of latency with your device

Quote by B&J
Uhhm yes? Unless you like latency or you dont use a whole lot of tracks. Of course there's more stuff that comes to play but a good soundcard will make a whole lot of difference.

Especially dsp ones, since they have build in memory....

So you don't realise that the RAM in your computer runs software instruments and plug-ins, in your DAW? Your computer doesn't open the plug-in, send the signal to the interface for processing, then back to the computer again to record the information (if routing to another track) and finally through the main output track back to the interface and then through D/A conversion to the interface output...

DSP for your UAD stuff is there because Universal Audio want to tie their plug-ins to hardware (reduces the likelihood of piracy) and the DSP takes the strain off your computer's RAM.

Why do you think when you open up a soft synth and load up some samples many of them have a readout at the bottom detailing how much RAM is being used? Even if the interface had to do some stage in between, the RAM would still dictate far more of the overall latency for plug-ins and soft-synths. The interface, when mixing, plays back the sound... it doesn't calculate all the stuff done in your DAW, or else you'd need a 40+ channel interface just to mix a session with that many tracks.
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#16
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Yep, I think so - and they laugh at all the noobs with their trains with engines that aren't made of a metal so don't deliver


Seriously though, I'm sure you were just imagining the lack of latency with your device


So you don't realise that the RAM in your computer runs software instruments and plug-ins, in your DAW? Your computer doesn't open the plug-in, send the signal to the interface for processing, then back to the computer again to record the information (if routing to another track) and finally through the main output track back to the interface and then through D/A conversion to the interface output...

DSP for your UAD stuff is there because Universal Audio want to tie their plug-ins to hardware (reduces the likelihood of piracy) and the DSP takes the strain off your computer's RAM.

Why do you think when you open up a soft synth and load up some samples many of them have a readout at the bottom detailing how much RAM is being used? Even if the interface had to do some stage in between, the RAM would still dictate far more of the overall latency for plug-ins and soft-synths. The interface, when mixing, plays back the sound... it doesn't calculate all the stuff done in your DAW, or else you'd need a 40+ channel interface just to mix a session with that many tracks.


With all respect, i set up studio's pretty much every day. I dont speak english in a native way so maybe that is what is causing a problem. I know ram means very much, i also know having high ram, plus a soundcard that delivers, and uses DSP makes your CPU use your DAW and the heavy load will be on your soundcard's memory. That just takes the heavy work out of your CPU.

About USB, you can love it as much as you want, but it will never be as direct as a PCI card. Its not for nothing those cards are more expensive. Sure UAD cards are not exactly cheap, in fact i use a RME hammerfall Hdspe card myself which i love .

Over time i have seen so many amateur studios having problems where they want to use, first of all, way to much plugins cuz they didnt record properly to begin with... but ok... thats another argument. Usb is just not cutting it generally.... at least that is my field experience with this.

Best thing in the world would be if ppl would understand they need a treated room.... then a usb card will work cause you dont need that much plugins to fix problems.

We agree to disagree i guess
Last edited by B&J at Feb 1, 2013,
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#17
I came across as harsh, and I apologise for that - perhaps the language barrier is part of the problem. But hopefully you understand enough to distinguish between the following:

Audio interfaces are a combination of mic preamps and A/D conversion. They typically come in USB and FireWire format because these are the most commonly available on most computers. PCI cards can be audio interfaces in the same way, but this is only another way of doing the same thing - the USB and FireWire units still perform just as well, and I'd much rather have the nice pre's and conversion of a Focusrite or Apogee interface, than having a smaller range to pick from if I went with PCI (if you're a Mac user, that also means getting a Mac Pro as the other Macs do not have PCI/PCIe ports).

UAD use PCI for something completely different - they are DSP cards, much like the way older Pro Tools HD systems ran, with an interface and DSP. The interface (as in preamps and converters) did not do any of the processing of plug-ins; the DSP cards in the interfaces were programmed to take the strain off the computers and are never part of the same signal path as the incoming audio being recorded.

I don't want to belittle your job, so instead I'll just say that perhaps you are a little behind with the current generation of audio interfaces? Even the cheapest interfaces are more than capable of running with low latency these days, and Apogee use USB for their flagship Symphony I/O which is definitely not a cheap or low-quality interface (in fact, I'd take the Apogee over 99% of the stuff on the market, excluding perhaps Lynx Aurora's [FireWire, not just PCI] and PrismSound Orpheus' [again, can run on FireWire]).
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#18
Quote by DisarmGoliath
I came across as harsh, and I apologise for that - perhaps the language barrier is part of the problem. But hopefully you understand enough to distinguish between the following:

Audio interfaces are a combination of mic preamps and A/D conversion. They typically come in USB and FireWire format because these are the most commonly available on most computers. PCI cards can be audio interfaces in the same way, but this is only another way of doing the same thing - the USB and FireWire units still perform just as well, and I'd much rather have the nice pre's and conversion of a Focusrite or Apogee interface, than having a smaller range to pick from if I went with PCI (if you're a Mac user, that also means getting a Mac Pro as the other Macs do not have PCI/PCIe ports).

UAD use PCI for something completely different - they are DSP cards, much like the way older Pro Tools HD systems ran, with an interface and DSP. The interface (as in preamps and converters) did not do any of the processing of plug-ins; the DSP cards in the interfaces were programmed to take the strain off the computers and are never part of the same signal path as the incoming audio being recorded.

I don't want to belittle your job, so instead I'll just say that perhaps you are a little behind with the current generation of audio interfaces? Even the cheapest interfaces are more than capable of running with low latency these days, and Apogee use USB for their flagship Symphony I/O which is definitely not a cheap or low-quality interface (in fact, I'd take the Apogee over 99% of the stuff on the market, excluding perhaps Lynx Aurora's [FireWire, not just PCI] and PrismSound Orpheus' [again, can run on FireWire]).


Well lets put it like this... i work in a pro audio setting i guess. I never came across a big studio that would use USB over a PCI card. Usb is a step in between, most people, especially ppl who do movie music for instance, they dont want a step in between. Most of theire projects are 50 tracks + and every track has at least 10 effects. As far as i know, an USB device wont cut that.

If i'm wrong... im indeed not up to date.
lockwolf
Recording's AdBot/Dick
Join date: Jun 2007
1,422 IQ
#19
Quote by B&J
Well lets put it like this... i work in a pro audio setting i guess. I never came across a big studio that would use USB over a PCI card. Usb is a step in between, most people, especially ppl who do movie music for instance, they dont want a step in between. Most of theire projects are 50 tracks + and every track has at least 10 effects. As far as i know, an USB device wont cut that.

If i'm wrong... im indeed not up to date.


You aren't wrong in the fact that pro studios don't use PCI/PCI-Express, its just you're talking Pro Studios with $$$$$$$$$$$$ invested into gear versus a home studio where someone wants to get setup for less than $300. As far as latency, the difference between a Pro Tools HDX setup and a USB 2.0 interface is about 7 milliseconds. Thats 7/100ths of a second difference in speed. If you can tell the difference, good for you.

PCI or USB doesn't effect how many plugins you can use, thats a PC issue. I have 2 systems I record with, my laptop with an older Core i3 processor via USB and my new desktop with a Core i5 3570k via Firewire. My i5 can handle way more tracks. Why? Because I've got more processing power to play with. Hell, it could be the other way around interface wise and I'd still be able to do more. I feel bad for all the people you've sold products to and given bad product suggestions to.
Derpy Derp Derp Herp Derp
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#20
Quote by lockwolf
You aren't wrong in the fact that pro studios don't use PCI/PCI-Express, its just you're talking Pro Studios with $$$$$$$$$$$$ invested into gear versus a home studio where someone wants to get setup for less than $300. As far as latency, the difference between a Pro Tools HDX setup and a USB 2.0 interface is about 7 milliseconds. Thats 7/100ths of a second difference in speed. If you can tell the difference, good for you.

PCI or USB doesn't effect how many plugins you can use, thats a PC issue. I have 2 systems I record with, my laptop with an older Core i3 processor via USB and my new desktop with a Core i5 3570k via Firewire. My i5 can handle way more tracks. Why? Because I've got more processing power to play with. Hell, it could be the other way around interface wise and I'd still be able to do more. I feel bad for all the people you've sold products to and given bad product suggestions to.

Lol i'm gonna stop commenting here now. This is going nowhere.
KG6_Steven
Eats ponies for breakfast
Join date: Nov 2006
3,131 IQ
#21
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Yep, I think so - and they laugh at all the noobs with their trains with engines that aren't made of a metal so don't deliver


Seriously though, I'm sure you were just imagining the lack of latency with your device


So you don't realise that the RAM in your computer runs software instruments and plug-ins, in your DAW? Your computer doesn't open the plug-in, send the signal to the interface for processing, then back to the computer again to record the information (if routing to another track) and finally through the main output track back to the interface and then through D/A conversion to the interface output...

DSP for your UAD stuff is there because Universal Audio want to tie their plug-ins to hardware (reduces the likelihood of piracy) and the DSP takes the strain off your computer's RAM.

Why do you think when you open up a soft synth and load up some samples many of them have a readout at the bottom detailing how much RAM is being used? Even if the interface had to do some stage in between, the RAM would still dictate far more of the overall latency for plug-ins and soft-synths. The interface, when mixing, plays back the sound... it doesn't calculate all the stuff done in your DAW, or else you'd need a 40+ channel interface just to mix a session with that many tracks.



To be honest, all interfaces connecting to a computer are going to have some lag. Tascam used a bit of a trick to get rid of latency. And it worked quite well. I replaced the US-2000 with a Presonus 16.4.2, which uses Firewire. I'm also impressed with its performance. For what I'm doing, I've had no problems.
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#22
Quote by B&J
Well lets put it like this... i work in a pro audio setting i guess. I never came across a big studio that would use USB over a PCI card. Usb is a step in between, most people, especially ppl who do movie music for instance, they dont want a step in between. Most of theire projects are 50 tracks + and every track has at least 10 effects. As far as i know, an USB device wont cut that.

If i'm wrong... im indeed not up to date.

Yeah, I know that a lot of pro studios still use PCI/PCIe but that is because it's sort of stuck with that format - if professional level companies bring out a new generation of their products and it is a format the pro studios don't use, they'll sell badly. And if the pro studios change to a different format, they won't be able to use their favourite gear.

It's partly why Pro Tools HD has taken so long to offer a 'native' option, where you can use the computer to do your DSP instead of the dedicated Pro Tools DSP cards. Nowadays computers are far more powerful, and able to do all the DSP for the average pro-level project (my 2008 iMac can run projects with 30-40 tracks still, and that only has 2GB RAM... I'm about to upgrade to a system with 16GB RAM, because I'm only just at the point where my computer is too slow to work at the level I need).


But yeah, I think you're misunderstanding what the audio interfaces are doing - they aren't responsible for the VST instruments or plug-ins. All the interface has to do is take incoming audio and convert it to a system the computer can work with, and then when the computer has done everything, the audio interface converts the computer signal to an analogue audio signal again and outputs it to your monitors. And because of this, USB is easily capable of running around 8 channels of audio.

And the new USB 3.0 standard is starting to end up on all the entry level computers now, which means that most interfaces have the option of moving to USB 3.0 if they ever thought USB 2.0 was too slow.
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#23
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Yeah, I know that a lot of pro studios still use PCI/PCIe but that is because it's sort of stuck with that format - if professional level companies bring out a new generation of their products and it is a format the pro studios don't use, they'll sell badly. And if the pro studios change to a different format, they won't be able to use their favourite gear.

It's partly why Pro Tools HD has taken so long to offer a 'native' option, where you can use the computer to do your DSP instead of the dedicated Pro Tools DSP cards. Nowadays computers are far more powerful, and able to do all the DSP for the average pro-level project (my 2008 iMac can run projects with 30-40 tracks still, and that only has 2GB RAM... I'm about to upgrade to a system with 16GB RAM, because I'm only just at the point where my computer is too slow to work at the level I need).


But yeah, I think you're misunderstanding what the audio interfaces are doing - they aren't responsible for the VST instruments or plug-ins. All the interface has to do is take incoming audio and convert it to a system the computer can work with, and then when the computer has done everything, the audio interface converts the computer signal to an analogue audio signal again and outputs it to your monitors. And because of this, USB is easily capable of running around 8 channels of audio.

And the new USB 3.0 standard is starting to end up on all the entry level computers now, which means that most interfaces have the option of moving to USB 3.0 if they ever thought USB 2.0 was too slow.

As far as i know,,, but well i'm 30 years in the business now. DSP is taking a lot of hard work away from your CPU, so if you have a DSP card, you leave space for the CPU to compute the DAW stuff. Thats how i learned it back in the days. I generally work with pro tools environments so yes... thats no usb there. I still find it hard to believe it can manifest the same outcome...

I would like to believe you, but my next client i will not sell an USB soundcard...

In fact i probably move to an Uad system really soon
Last edited by B&J at Feb 1, 2013,
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#24
Quote by B&J
As far as i know,,, but well i'm 30 years in the business now. DSP is taking a lot of hard work away from your CPU, so if you have a DSP card, you leave space for the CPU to compute the DAW stuff. Thats how i learned it back in the days. I generally work with pro tools environments so yes... thats no usb there. I still find it hard to believe it can manifest the same outcome...

I would like to believe you, but my next client i will not sell an USB soundcard...

Well, could you get professional results from a Pro Tools HD setup 5 years ago? The computers available for $500-750 these days have more processing power than the DSP in several of the old Pro Tools HD systems from 5 years ago.

If you could get a great mix back then with DSP, why can't you get a great mix now with the same (or more) power done in-the-box with your computer instead?
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#25
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Well, could you get professional results from a Pro Tools HD setup 5 years ago? The computers available for $500-750 these days have more processing power than the DSP in several of the old Pro Tools HD systems from 5 years ago.

If you could get a great mix back then with DSP, why can't you get a great mix now with the same (or more) power done in-the-box with your computer instead?

Because USB is not as direct.... It takes a cable... if it runs directly in a computer its always better. At least thats how we work... lol i guess i'm one of the oldbies. I'm used to using a neve console, and for the record.... that didnt run on usb In fact i still run a neve in my studio
Last edited by B&J at Feb 1, 2013,
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#26
Quote by B&J
Because USB is not as direct.... It takes a cable... if it runs directly in a computer its always better. At least thats how we work... lol i guess i'm one of the oldbies. I'm used to using a neve console, and for the record.... that didnt run on usb

Yeah, but do you know how long it takes the signal to travel along the cable? You probably couldn't even press start and stop on a stopwatch fast enough to calculate the time it would take to pass a signal from a USB cable the length of your road.

You can still use a console going into a USB interface and an interface is no different to using dedicated mic preamps, going into a dedicated A/D converter with FireWire or USB connectivity.

In time, technology moves forward very fast these days, and what computers couldn't do when Pro Tools first came around is long gone - these days you have more processing power in the smartphone in your pocket, than they had for the entire Apollo moon landing mission. Surely you can see that at some point computers won't need dedicated DSP cards (which are just extra parts of a computer anyway) to do professional work, even if you don't accept that that time has already happened?
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
B&J
Registered User
Join date: May 2010
1,062 IQ
#27
Quote by DisarmGoliath
Yeah, but do you know how long it takes the signal to travel along the cable? You probably couldn't even press start and stop on a stopwatch fast enough to calculate the time it would take to pass a signal from a USB cable the length of your road.

You can still use a console going into a USB interface and an interface is no different to using dedicated mic preamps, going into a dedicated A/D converter with FireWire or USB connectivity.

In time, technology moves forward very fast these days, and what computers couldn't do when Pro Tools first came around is long gone - these days you have more processing power in the smartphone in your pocket, than they had for the entire Apollo moon landing mission. Surely you can see that at some point computers won't need dedicated DSP cards (which are just extra parts of a computer anyway) to do professional work, even if you don't accept that that time has already happened?

Maybe... still most studio owners i meet do not want usb stuff but pci. I guess all the new cats start using usb and stuff, but we dont use it. I have been to most every major recording studio in Europe to set things up, and most of them are using old consoles.... thats for a reason. But now i'm completly off topic and talking sound.

I just havent met anyone in the pro user community who likes usb.... cant help it.
DisarmGoliath
Disarms Goliaths
Join date: Dec 2008
1,391 IQ
#28
Ok, well - you know VST plug-ins aren't supported by Pro Tools HD... and Waves and all the other major plug-in brands (excluding Universal Audio) release their plug-ins as VST's too... so if you aren't using DSP cards to run those plug-ins, why would Waves etc. release those plug-ins as VST's too, because surely they wouldn't want to release a bad product? And surely everybody would be complaining, if Waves plug-ins sounded different or didn't work the same on Pro Tools systems, as on normal computer systems with audio interfaces?


If this doesn't convince you, I'm afraid I'll just say we agree to disagree, because I can't think of anything else to say. Seriously though, you should allow yourself to take a look at the modern technology that you probably even sell, and see how it is perfectly capable of releasing professional standard records.
Hey, look. Sigs are back.
chatterbox272
Registered User
Join date: May 2011
1,237 IQ
#29
Quote by B&J
Well lets put it like this... i work in a pro audio setting i guess. I never came across a big studio that would use USB over a PCI card. Usb is a step in between, most people, especially ppl who do movie music for instance, they dont want a step in between. Most of theire projects are 50 tracks + and every track has at least 10 effects. As far as i know, an USB device wont cut that.

If i'm wrong... im indeed not up to date.

Then you are not up to date. I currently have a project on my computer, there's just under 60 REAPER tracks in it (all tracks in reaper are the same so some are folders, some have actual audio, some are virtual instruments). I have full VST drums, guitars, bass, piano, and synth on there, with some combination amp sims, equalisers, compressors, limiters, etc. on most tracks. And I can guarantee you that my interface has a zero effect on the number of tracks and plugins I have running. How? because my interface (if you can even call my DigiTech BP355s USB output an interface) is on the other side of the room, the power brick for it is still in my gig bag, and the USB cable for it is currently being used to connect an external DVD drive to my ultrabook. In other words, I am running all these synths with no interface whatsoever.

Some expensive software may include a hardware component but as a software engineering student I can tell you that unless the plugin is specifically designed to take advantage of processing power or memory that may be stored somewhere else (e.g. a PCIe card) then it is only going to be affected by the hard drive, CPU, and RAM. In those cases then yes a PCIe card will be superior to USB, but certainly not for anyone who hasn't spent a lot of money on a synth that takes advantage of something like that.
lockwolf
Recording's AdBot/Dick
Join date: Jun 2007
1,422 IQ
#30
Quote by B&J
Maybe... still most studio owners i meet do not want usb stuff but pci. I guess all the new cats start using usb and stuff, but we dont use it. I have been to most every major recording studio in Europe to set things up, and most of them are using old consoles.... thats for a reason. But now i'm completly off topic and talking sound.

I just havent met anyone in the pro user community who likes usb.... cant help it.


Once again, you're talking Pro Studios when 99% of us aren't Pro Studios, we're home studios/beginners. Not everyone has $10,000 to dump into a Pro Tools HDX system to start on. Hell, even an RME PCI Express setup starts at $550 for the card and you've still gotta buy pres & such. So, unless you buy a Behringer ADA8000, you're looking at over $1000 just to get started with a PCI setup. Considering the average beginner here doesn't want to even spend $60 on Reaper, $1000 is way too much for a beginner.

A good majority of your arguments hold up, don't get me wrong. There's no way a pro studio would be using a $300 USB interface. The problem is, you're suggesting getting a Ferrari for a first car when in all reality, he needs a Honda Civic.
Derpy Derp Derp Herp Derp