Bocob
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2006
1,531 IQ
#1
So we're about to start recording an album and the one thing we're tossing up before we go in to do it is whether we want to record the guitars through an interface, Focusrite Scarlet 2i4, or just a Rocksmith cable.

We have used the Rocksmith cable for the majority of the pre-production work and have found it to be great. The reason why we haven't used the Scarlet is due to the working laptop not recognizing the usb device. The signal we get from the Rocksmith sounds great, we haven't been able to fault it, but I'm just wanting some more perspective on the matter, whether people have done the same method and had different results etc.

So what's your experiences recording between the two different methods? Any story is a good story.
guitarpro2play
Tab Contributor
Join date: Apr 2011
781 IQ
#2
Quote by Bocob
So we're about to start recording an album and the one thing we're tossing up before we go in to do it is whether we want to record the guitars through an interface, Focusrite Scarlet 2i4, or just a Rocksmith cable.

We have used the Rocksmith cable for the majority of the pre-production work and have found it to be great. The reason why we haven't used the Scarlet is due to the working laptop not recognizing the usb device. The signal we get from the Rocksmith sounds great, we haven't been able to fault it, but I'm just wanting some more perspective on the matter, whether people have done the same method and had different results etc.

So what's your experiences recording between the two different methods? Any story is a good story.


No way you'll get a better sound with just a cable, than with an interface. And as far as I know, scarlet interfaces are pretty good!
GaryBillington
Last of a Dyin' Breed
Join date: Nov 2001
1,309 IQ
#3
If you can't get your interface working, ask for help.

Seriously, anything you do with the rocksmith cable will be terrible in comparison to what you can do with a proper interface.
.
Gibson LP Traditional, LP Studio, SG Standard x2
Barber Tone Press > EHX Worm > TC Polytune > MXR Custom Badass 78 > EXH Glove > EHX East River Drive > Zoom G3 > TC Spark Mini Booster
Laney VC30
Marshall TSL602
Jet City JCA22H

My SoundCloud
Spambot_2
UG's rum aficionado
Join date: Jan 2013
1,824 IQ
#4
The rocksmith cable is an audio interface.
Of modest quality indeed, but so are the pre's and converters in any scarlett.

If you already have the scarlett try and find drivers that work.
If you don't have that already and you only need to track direct guitar, stick to that.
Name's Luca.

Quote by OliOsbourne
I don't know anything about this topic, but I just clicked on this thread because of your username :O
Quote by Cajundaddy
Clue: amplifiers amplify so don't turn it on if you need quiet.
Quote by chrismendiola
I guess spambots are now capable of reading minds.
Bocob
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2006
1,531 IQ
#5
Quote by Spambot_2
The rocksmith cable is an audio interface.
Of modest quality indeed, but so are the pre's and converters in any scarlett.

If you already have the scarlett try and find drivers that work.
If you don't have that already and you only need to track direct guitar, stick to that.

That's right, the Rocksmith cable already has a built in interface. So for guitars/bass would you say that it's not too different in terms of quality? Because going direct would be our method of recording them.
Spambot_2
UG's rum aficionado
Join date: Jan 2013
1,824 IQ
#6
^ unless you go for really good stuff, say an apogee one or duet, guitars processed with amp modelers and all these funny effects will not noticeably improve in sound.
Name's Luca.

Quote by OliOsbourne
I don't know anything about this topic, but I just clicked on this thread because of your username :O
Quote by Cajundaddy
Clue: amplifiers amplify so don't turn it on if you need quiet.
Quote by chrismendiola
I guess spambots are now capable of reading minds.
Bocob
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2006
1,531 IQ
#7
Quote by Spambot_2
^ unless you go for really good stuff, say an apogee one or duet, guitars processed with amp modelers and all these funny effects will not noticeably improve in sound.

Right on, so what we'll be doing is recording for the sake of getting a clean signal and then re-amping the guitars once the takes are right, so in that case will it really matter too much?
Spambot_2
UG's rum aficionado
Join date: Jan 2013
1,824 IQ
#8
Just about the same as before in my opinion.
Name's Luca.

Quote by OliOsbourne
I don't know anything about this topic, but I just clicked on this thread because of your username :O
Quote by Cajundaddy
Clue: amplifiers amplify so don't turn it on if you need quiet.
Quote by chrismendiola
I guess spambots are now capable of reading minds.
Spambot_2
UG's rum aficionado
Join date: Jan 2013
1,824 IQ
#10
Though, wait, you need a re amping box to reamp a guitar.

Some people say using the line out from an interface works just fine but my experience tells me otherwise.
My audio interface sucks though so that may be the problem.

Also if you want to record reamped guitars you'll also need a mic, a mic stand and an audio interface that has a mic input, so you'll need one if you don't have it already.

The best thing that does everything of these things (apart from the reamping, but again maybe you'll be able to use the interface and get nice results) is, imo, the mackie onyx blackjack for the money.
Name's Luca.

Quote by OliOsbourne
I don't know anything about this topic, but I just clicked on this thread because of your username :O
Quote by Cajundaddy
Clue: amplifiers amplify so don't turn it on if you need quiet.
Quote by chrismendiola
I guess spambots are now capable of reading minds.
Bocob
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2006
1,531 IQ
#11
Quote by Spambot_2
Though, wait, you need a re amping box to reamp a guitar.

Some people say using the line out from an interface works just fine but my experience tells me otherwise.
My audio interface sucks though so that may be the problem.

Also if you want to record reamped guitars you'll also need a mic, a mic stand and an audio interface that has a mic input, so you'll need one if you don't have it already.

The best thing that does everything of these things (apart from the reamping, but again maybe you'll be able to use the interface and get nice results) is, imo, the mackie onyx blackjack for the money.

Thanks for the heads up! However, our friend who is a bit of an audio engineer is the guy who will be re-amping our tracks. He has done it in the past with great results, though I don't remember the kind of interface he used on it. Check this out, this is using the same method of re-amping, recorded about a year ago. http://awakenedinferno.bandcamp.com/

But either way, this is a good heads up for when/if we want to head towards doing that side of recording ourselves.
mayhemguitars12
Registered User
Join date: Jan 2014
434 IQ
#12
Are you having any latency problems with the Rocksmith, I tried mine the other day and I couldn't get rid of the latency in Reaper. I tried about everything any tips?
From Your Grave
bampersand
Join date: Jan 2010
604 IQ
#13
Quote by mayhemguitars12
Are you having any latency problems with the Rocksmith, I tried mine the other day and I couldn't get rid of the latency in Reaper. I tried about everything any tips?


If you do not have ASIO4ALL, download and install it. Then change the settings of it so that it's working with the rocksmith cable. If you have it already then I do not know