Which do you think is better?

I went to two different places (Sam Ash and my local music store) and asked about amps, I have an Epi Les Paul standard with EMG 81/85's and I play metal and punk mostly, these are the 2 amps in my price range that I was recomended, and I will be gigging with them!



What do you think, and dont worry about the effects on either I have pedals for that
valveking....mg is a box of bees!
also pedals...what pedals we talking..tube amps + cheap digital modellers sound bad
where as the mg sounds rough as is :P
Valveking. MG=Flaming tonal Crap.
Current Gear:
LTD MH-400
PRS SE Custom 24 (Suhr SSH+/SSV)
Ibanez RG3120 Prestige (Dimarzio Titans)
Squier Vintage Modified 70s Jazz V
Audient iD22 interface
Peavey Revalver 4, UAD Friedman BE100/DS40
Adam S3A monitors
Quote by Anonden
You CAN play anything with anything....but some guitars sound right for some things, and not for others. Single coils sound retarded for metal, though those who are apeshit about harpsichord probably beg to differ.
Quote by gstacey1
dont go with the mg!!
and the valve king isnt as awesome as some people on these forums make you believe try this http://guitars.musiciansfriend.com/product/B52-60Watt-1x12-Tube-Combo?sku=480046

I actually second that.

Also, maybe a Randall RG50?

The MG is not total crap. The models past 30 watts are. 30 and under is perfectly fine, for practice.

But its between the RG50 and the B52. Some people think the Valveking is a little tinny; I'm one of them

How do you say "I'm okay" to an answering machine?