#1
I have this math problem that I have to solve by tomorrow. Here's a picture of what I'm trying to solve.



The whole thing is a cake I have to bake. But then I have to cut off the four corners, throw away 2 of them, and put the remaining 2 triangles on the sides of the cake with the lengths 9. X is the length of the hypotenuses and also the length of the side that remains after I cut off the triangles. X is the main length I'm trying to find, because if I have x I can figure out the other 2 sides. Any and all help is appreciated.


Edit: sorry for the massive picture, but at least you get the idea...
Quote by forsaknazrael
You should probably mug John Frusciante or Ritchie Blackmore. They're small guys, we could take 'em.

Just look out for that other guy in the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Will Farrel. He's a tall mofo, got a long reach.



Quote by Invader Jim
I give up.

#2
Is that the chemical compound of meth?
Quote by breakdown123
Is there such a thing as a heavy riff with out chugging on the e string?
#4
Quote by CLIFF_BURTON
Is that the chemical compound of meth?



Hilarious.
Quote by forsaknazrael
You should probably mug John Frusciante or Ritchie Blackmore. They're small guys, we could take 'em.

Just look out for that other guy in the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Will Farrel. He's a tall mofo, got a long reach.



Quote by Invader Jim
I give up.

#5
Quote by VoodooCow229
I have to solve


Well why did you ask us? Solve it yourself, it's easy enough.
#7
X=(9√2)/(2+√2) or approximately 3.7279.

Edit: A more elegant exact answer is 9(√2-1), in case you're as picky as I am.

This assumes, of course, that the triangles are supposed to be isosceles.
Epiphone Riviera Jorma Kaukonen Deluxe
Orange Tiny Terror with a Mesa 2x12 Lone Star
Boss PH-3
Jekyll & Hyde Ultimate Overdrive
Dunlop Crybaby 535Q
Boss DD-20
Fender Deluxe Mexi-Jazz
Last edited by Calgone at Feb 1, 2009,
#8
> eq1:=a^2+b^2=x^2;
> eq2:=2*b+x=9;
> eq3:=2*a+y=13;
> eq4:=(2*b+x)*(2*a+y)=117;

{a = 4.089992981, b = 2.182145341, x = 4.635709317, y = 4.820014038}

This is the answer without supossing that the triangles are isosceles.
#10
I too need help.

How do i find the inverse of this problem:

f(x) = x^(3/5)

is it 3 5th Roots of x?
My last.fm
Quote by OMMad
i've always found pop to be harder to play than metal... especially shred metal... it's just really fast tremolo picking and the occasional palm mute... and the only chords you have to worry about are power chords...
#12
Quote by joshua122593
The Pit isn't the internet equivalent of Einstein.

apparently you aren't, but there are actually intelligent people who get on this forum.

albeit rare, but they exist nonetheless
My last.fm
Quote by OMMad
i've always found pop to be harder to play than metal... especially shred metal... it's just really fast tremolo picking and the occasional palm mute... and the only chords you have to worry about are power chords...
#13
Quote by Colton165
I too need help.

How do i find the inverse of this problem:

f(x) = x^(3/5)

is it 3 5th Roots of x?


im not too sure about this one but i got the cube root of x to the fifth
Fender MIM Standard lefty strat (midnight wine, sexy i know)
Vox DA15
Quote by rock.meet Slash
oh yes but do they have....THE PIT?


Quote by rickmeister
Stealing is cool again? Sweet, I'm gonna rob a Subway brb
#14
Quote by tennisace
im not too sure about this one but i got the cube root of x to the fifth

makes sense, i didnt even think about leaving the denominator part of the exponent on there.

thanks, im writing both answers down lol
My last.fm
Quote by OMMad
i've always found pop to be harder to play than metal... especially shred metal... it's just really fast tremolo picking and the occasional palm mute... and the only chords you have to worry about are power chords...