#2
google
Lord Gold feeds from your orifices and he wants to see you sweat.
Lord Gold probes you publicly and makes your pussy wet.
Now say his name.....
#4
Why would you want to? WMAs are bigger in terms of file size.
Quote by Mudmen190
If loving ham makes me gay, I'm Rob Halford.


Quote by musiclover2399
MyNameIsLame just nailed it (actually both his statements did some nailing).


Quote by Oroborous
This is honestly the best first post I've ever seen


^^ Directed at me. E-peen wankery sigs ftw.

My Last.FM
#5
GOOOOOOOOOOGGGGGGGLLLLLLLEEEE

damn beaten to it...but I do love that cake avatar
#25 for top 100 UGer of 2009
UG's 2nd Funniest UGer and 3rd most likely to be a Serial Killer of 2009, 2nd of 2011
#8
Quote by MyNameIsLame
Why would you want to? WMAs are bigger in terms of file size.


Because MP3 quality sucks. WMA is really good audio quality, and MP3 is a compressed version. Dumb ass.
#9
Quote by greennblue10
Because MP3 quality sucks. WMA is really good audio quality, and MP3 is a compressed version. Dumb ass.

you sucks if you want quality than convert to .flac dumb ass
duhh
Lord Gold feeds from your orifices and he wants to see you sweat.
Lord Gold probes you publicly and makes your pussy wet.
Now say his name.....
#10
You can't improve the quality from the source file...
The below is false.
The above is true.

*world implodes*
#11
Quote by greennblue10
Because MP3 quality sucks. WMA is really good audio quality, and MP3 is a compressed version. Dumb ass.




gb2school. you can't 'improve' anything just by changing the file type.