bagpipemetal
Registered User
Join date: Apr 2009
3,243 IQ
#1
I was just wondering what people prefer in metalcore bands, normal song structure (Intro, verse, chorus, verse, chorus, bridge,chorus outro) or the free ffom that a lot of bands use, I like a little of both but overall prefer structure.
GodofCheesecake
Master of the Machines
Join date: Apr 2006
1,404 IQ
#2
Between the Buried and Me.
My band, Escher
My progressive rock project, Mosaic

Quote by Lappo
clearly, the goal is to convert every thread into a discussion about BTBAM

BTBAM IS ALWAYS RELEVANT
Haymaker17
Registered User
Join date: Jul 2005
124 IQ
#5
chugging
breakdown
slow down the breakdown
slow it down even more
more chugging


repeat for a full album and never chug higher than the 3rd fret
Quote by handbanana
R.I.P. Shaun Hand from Metal Sucks. He leaked this album and now Jake Bannon is going to crush his skull
Last edited by Haymaker17 at Dec 2, 2009,
to45t
Registered User
Join date: Feb 2009
133 IQ
#6
Quote by Haymaker17
chugging
breakdown
slow down the breakdown
slow it down even more
more chugging


repeat for a full album and never chug higher than the 3rd fret



dont forget the required vocals:

gurgle gurgle gurgle
BRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
GURGLE


honestly though Shai Hulud has done some cool stuff using both kinds of writing. some where theres freeform style, but with certain parts repeated like a chorus would be. but theres also shit like misanthropy pure, which has a somewhat more rigid structure.
Veil Of Osiris
Registered User
Join date: Jun 2009
189 IQ
#7
I prefer free form. I think using the "verse/chorus/verse" thing is just an easy way out.

And like GodofCheesecake said, Between the Buried and Me.
ESP Viper 1000 Deluxe

Peavey Vypyr 120 Head
ValveKing 4x12 Cab

ISP Decimator
Boss AC-2
Ibanez TS-7
zezimathehero
pretentious wankstick
Join date: Oct 2008
168 IQ
#8
whatever works for the band, honestly.
Quote by seeneyj
I thought the whole idea of post-hardcore was to mix techno and hardcore.....
nashawa
Rightful HxC Emperor
Join date: Feb 2008
1,511 IQ
#10
Quote by Okeefe Is Legit
free form is more interesting. I think standard song structure is best in pop punk/alternative music

You know, you could say that free form is best suited for jazz as well.

Either will work. Whichever you're better at writing, do that.
Quote by emoboy027
Is fingering an emo chick that likes yoy and that has fallen in love with you is it wrong to you to finger her during lunch outside in front of everyone at the high school? would you not care or lol even wish it was you?

Youztoobz
MIDI Magicalness!
Okeefe Is Legit
Registered User
Join date: Sep 2008
1,415 IQ
#11
Quote by nashawa
You know, you could say that free form is best suited for jazz as well.

Either will work. Whichever you're better at writing, do that.


I meant that the only cases I think the cliche song structure is okay are songs that are the "catchy" genres, while free form is for the more "technical" genres.
nashawa
Rightful HxC Emperor
Join date: Feb 2008
1,511 IQ
#12
Quote by Okeefe Is Legit
I meant that the only cases I think the cliche song structure is okay are songs that are the "catchy" genres, while free form is for the more "technical" genres.

Cliche meaning this?
Intro
Verse x2
Chorus
Verse
Chorus
Bridge
Chorus x however many

Because then I agree.
Quote by emoboy027
Is fingering an emo chick that likes yoy and that has fallen in love with you is it wrong to you to finger her during lunch outside in front of everyone at the high school? would you not care or lol even wish it was you?

Youztoobz
MIDI Magicalness!
Okeefe Is Legit
Registered User
Join date: Sep 2008
1,415 IQ
#14
Quote by nashawa
Cliche meaning this?
Intro
Verse x2
Chorus
Verse
Chorus
Bridge
Chorus x however many

Because then I agree.


exactly. My favorite bands basically since middle school have been New Found Glory and Taking Back Sunday and they are the pop punk cliche innovators (okay not really, but you get the idea.)
Valderama
CxC
Join date: Nov 2004
1,315 IQ
#15
Quote by Haymaker17
chugging
breakdown
slow down the breakdown
slow it down even more
more chugging


repeat for a full album and never chug higher than the 3rd fret

Ah so you've heard my band? Awesome.

I'm bored of standard song structures. This sorta relates back to that "Unique Metalcore Bands" Thread a while back, every other post containing BTBAM or ABR (with the occasional Oh, Sleeper)

So to conclude, free form - defo.
NY_FootBall49
UG's White Ordell Robbie
Join date: Sep 2009
1,105 IQ
#16
Quote by Okeefe Is Legit
I meant that the only cases I think the cliche song structure is okay are songs that are the "catchy" genres, while free form is for the more "technical" genres.


Not true at all progressive bands don't usually follow your traditional song structure. Progressive and technical are to different things if that makes sense. You can be technical and still follow a structure. Protest The Hero tends to follow a set structure there technical. Anyway I prefer a well-written song no matter how it's written. Songs are supposed to build to a climax I think the verse/chorus format makes it easier to build to a climax.
AK-47. The very best there is. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes.

Quote by RU Experienced?
It's comical because you are clearly an average to below-average bear.
GodofCheesecake
Master of the Machines
Join date: Apr 2006
1,404 IQ
#17
Protest the Hero might repeat a riff or two, but I definitely wouldn't say they have a set song structure. Bloodmeat is the only song I can think of off the top of my head that has a repeating chorus, and even that's not the same each time.

Besides, that didn't really help your point considering PTH are both progressive and technical.
My band, Escher
My progressive rock project, Mosaic

Quote by Lappo
clearly, the goal is to convert every thread into a discussion about BTBAM

BTBAM IS ALWAYS RELEVANT
Valderama
CxC
Join date: Nov 2004
1,315 IQ
#18
Quote by NY_FootBall49
Songs are supposed to build to a climax

Not necessarily. Then again, it depends how you interperet a climax.

edit: ^ +1
Last edited by Valderama at Dec 3, 2009,
NY_FootBall49
UG's White Ordell Robbie
Join date: Sep 2009
1,105 IQ
#19
Quote by GodofCheesecake
Protest the Hero might repeat a riff or two, but I definitely wouldn't say they have a set song structure. Bloodmeat is the only song I can think of off the top of my head that has a repeating chorus, and even that's not the same each time.

Besides, that didn't really help your point considering PTH are both progressive and technical.


They don't have a repeating chorus or anything but they always have a couple sing along parts same effect makes the song more catchy.
AK-47. The very best there is. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes.

Quote by RU Experienced?
It's comical because you are clearly an average to below-average bear.
GodofCheesecake
Master of the Machines
Join date: Apr 2006
1,404 IQ
#20
True, but catchy =/= structured.
My band, Escher
My progressive rock project, Mosaic

Quote by Lappo
clearly, the goal is to convert every thread into a discussion about BTBAM

BTBAM IS ALWAYS RELEVANT
geoguitar
Registered User
Join date: Feb 2007
155 IQ
#21
PTH does indeed have choruses

Bloodmeat, Sequoia Throne and Palms Read all have repeating chouruses.

But that does't make them any less awesome whatsoever.

I think bands should do whatever feels right for each song, and I think most band do anyway.
+}-136-{+
Registered Text Offender
Join date: Oct 2007
211 IQ
#22
I tend to prefer more straightforward song structures because they're easier to latch onto and those songs with an obvious chorus, verse, etc. to them are often more memorable for me. Conversely though, albums packed with songs that all follow the generic structure (intro -> verse -> chorus -> verse -> chorus -> bridge -> chorus) get boring.

I don't really even care that much if a band uses atypical structures. However, I believe there must always be some sort of structure. Logical progressions, memorable, and non-meandering.

With most extreme metal bands I listen to the structure is usually lost on me. Never head that problem with other bands strangely.

And although I am generally not a fan of linear structures, I enjoy BTBAM's Colors. I think it's the fact that the sections are pretty distinct from one another and that there are always memorable climaxes to each song. It's kind of exciting actually, knowing that there won't be repeating parts. It makes you anticipate each coming section, whereas with "chorus-verse-chorus" structures that mystery and anticipation is lost. Variations using those structures can spice things up, but often bands get lazy and decide to simply sing the chorus at a slightly higher key.

Funny thing with Converge is that I could always figure out their song structures; none of it ever flew over my head and lost me. I guess that's one of the reasons why I love them so much, they deliver such extreme and intense yet memorable songs.
bagpipemetal
Registered User
Join date: Apr 2009
3,243 IQ
#23
I like it when a band will build on a melodic motif throughout a song, I really don't like the choatic style that august burns red uses.
motoko
Registered User
Join date: Nov 2009
34 IQ
#24
freeform structure usually sounds like shit in metal because there's never a link between the riffs, its just riff 1, riff 2 etc. freeform in jazz is different because its improvised, but the solos must match the harmony and the head

i personally like aaba
djims
Registered User
Join date: Nov 2009
10 IQ
#25
I think it really depends on the song but there's definitely times when a song has a really catchy bit that I wish it followed more traditional structure and went back to that.
lordofthefood1
A blank survey
Join date: Mar 2007
1,710 IQ
#26
Intro Verse Chorus (Verse/)Breakdown Outro

No need for repetition.
Lord Gold feeds from your orifices and he wants to see you sweat.
Lord Gold probes you publicly and makes your pussy wet.
Now say his name.....