#1
so for a long time I've been thinking what gibson lp model to get
and in the process of searching, i found that sg models are generally cheaper than les pauls

is there any particular reason why??

also, how do their sounds differ in general??
I want that thick, beefy, gibson distortion sound, and I only think of les pauls when i do................. how would sg's do?
Guitars:
* Custom "does-it-all" Strat
*'12 James Tyler Studio Elite HD Burning Water (HSH)
* EVH Wolfgang Special Stealth HT
#2
physically les pauls are thicker and have a carved top, an SG has a pretty basic body.

I find the les paul to be beefier sounding and a lot more ballsy, the sg is sharper and smoother
http://www.theweekendkids.com

Gibson Les Paul Studio w/dirtyfingers pickups
Gibson Joan Jett Melody Maker
VOX ac30 head
Marshall 1960 4x12 cab
Fender Hot Rod Deville
#3
There are several reasons:

1.) Far less mahogany goes into making an SG because the body is thinner.
2.) There is no maple cap (let alone a figured maple cap) on an SG.
3.) There is far less work involved in making an SG. There is no body binding as on a Les Paul. There is no headstock binding except on the SG Custom series (and similar high-end SGs), and it is easier to mount the hardware and set it up on the flat-topped SG than on the carved-top Les Paul.

That's basically it. It isn't always the case, though. An SG Custom (usually sold as a '61 Les Paul Custom anymore) with its ebony fretboard and MOP block inlays, Les Paul Custom-style headstock and gold hardware is more expensive than several current Les Paul guitars.
"Maybe this world is another planet's hell?" - Aldous Huxley
#4
SGs generally have more treble and bite than a les paul. les pauls have a distinct fat sound, but SGs have a unique sound as well. They both have classic rock n roll tone.

A lot of your tone will depend on your amp too though, so keep that in mind.

try them both out at a store and see for yourself!

edit: i just wanted to point out that while les pauls are generally more beefy, that doesn't necessarily mean that SGs won't be fat sounding either. Just listen to tony iommi's work with black sabbath. his main guitar is an sg and he gets a huge sound
Gear:
'50s National Archtop
Squier Classic Vibe '60s Tele
Squier Affinity Strat
Gibson Melody Maker
Vox AC-15
50s Stella Parlor Acoustic

MOAR FIRST ACT
I was there
Last edited by ilikeguitar90 at May 19, 2010,
#6
Les Pauls have that really beefy tone to them, very full and powerfull sound coming from all the mahogany, and SG's don't have as much power behind the tone but they create a very rich, more distinct treble tone.

It's due to the shape and size, the SG's are quite thin while LP's have bulk to them.

I prefer SG's to any LP-shaped guitar. Idk why. I dig the tone SG's give off.
#9
Because the Les Paul is the "Gibson" guitar. It's their flagship model. More people are willing to buy the real deal, so they can price it higher to get more profit
I have a ponytail fetish.
..And a labcoat fetish. SCIENCE!
#10
Less demand compared to the Les Paul. I'm sure the other stuff plays a factor, but not as much.
(()____(Main Rig)____())>

Carvin CS4 Goldtop
PRS Santana SE
Carvin SC90
Washburn Taurus 5-string Bass
Peavey 6505
Carvin v3m
Carvin 2x12
Spider Valve Cab
Plenty of Pedals.