#1
What are the differences between these two pickups? This is for the neck position. I'm trying to decide on which to put in my les paul. I listen to stuff like Phish, Allmans, Grateful dead, Trucks, Zeppelin, Yes, Clapton, Jeff beck.
Last edited by unk0wn at Jun 9, 2010,
#2
IMHO the 59s sound pretty dead and nothing like a vintage paf to me...
You might also want oto consider a DiMarzio Paf Pro
#3
I've heard GIbson pickups aren't that great either. Check out some of the more boutique manufacturers E.g. RockMonkey, Bareknuckle, Wolfetone, Shed Pickups.

BTW Shed pickups does a Zeppeling set - http://www.shedpickups.com/viewpickup.asp?puid=76
Quote by Kensai
You'll find whisky very different, but try it and you'll grow into it, soon you and whisky are one, but still two, lovers dancing across a frozen lake under moonlight, wrapped in honey and warmth.


Sums up whisky perfectly
#4
For aftermarket pickups you can't go wrong with SD, imo, due to their availability, low cost, and general overall good tone. Don't really know much about DiMarzio so I can't say anything positive or negative about them but there are a lot of people that like them.

As far as Gibson pickups, they are pretty mediocre for the price. Normally for the same price that you'd pay for a Gibson pickup you can get a hand-wired pickup from a company like Bare Knuckles or Rock Monkey, which sound much better than Gibsons, imo.
#5
i think (iirc) the gibson one might have a slightly softer edge to the tone. The '59 has a hardish edge to the tone which can be good or bad depending on what you're after.
I'm an idiot and I accidentally clicked the "Remove all subscriptions" button. If it seems like I'm ignoring you, I'm not, I'm just no longer subscribed to the thread. If you quote me or do the @user thing at me, hopefully it'll notify me through my notifications and I'll get back to you.
Quote by K33nbl4d3
I'll have to put the Classic T models on my to-try list. Shame the finish options there are Anachronism Gold, Nuclear Waste and Aged Clown, because in principle the plaintop is right up my alley.

Quote by K33nbl4d3
Presumably because the CCF (Combined Corksniffing Forces) of MLP and Gibson forums would rise up against them, plunging the land into war.

Quote by T00DEEPBLUE
Et tu, br00tz?
#6
Quote by EyeHatePunks
IMHO the 59s sound pretty dead and nothing like a vintage paf to me...
You might also want oto consider a DiMarzio Paf Pro
ironic because the paf pro sounds nothing like a paf to me. the '59s are wound on the old gibson winders, use the right plain enamel wire and short a5 magnets consistent with late PAFs, so they do hit the range pretty well if you ask me. They sound better unpotted, Seymour Duncan sells a "custom" unpotted set through specialty guitars for a little extra. They sound much better than the potted versions. They work great for the Jimmy Page kind of tone.

'57 classics are a little bit softer on top and are more compressed. Its a matter of what you want. I like the Duncan '59s. They do the Page thing pretty well. A set that is a little more expensive than the '57 classic set though are Wolfetone Marshallhead Mk IIs. I'd look into those as well if you are looking at Shed Zeppelins. Or normal Marshallheads for that matter. It depends if you want something overwound (hotter, more mids) or something tamer...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRAJqdZcz5k

starting at 0:56 Marshallheads. They do a great early Page sound.
Last edited by al112987 at Jun 16, 2010,
#7
yeah, i mean i've never tried a vintage paf, but the '59 sounds more vintage to me than a paf pro, that's for sure.

sounds like you agree with me on the 57s versus the 59, too (it's so long since I've tried a 57 I forget what it was really like, i just remember it was pretty vintage and soft)

I'm an idiot and I accidentally clicked the "Remove all subscriptions" button. If it seems like I'm ignoring you, I'm not, I'm just no longer subscribed to the thread. If you quote me or do the @user thing at me, hopefully it'll notify me through my notifications and I'll get back to you.
Quote by K33nbl4d3
I'll have to put the Classic T models on my to-try list. Shame the finish options there are Anachronism Gold, Nuclear Waste and Aged Clown, because in principle the plaintop is right up my alley.

Quote by K33nbl4d3
Presumably because the CCF (Combined Corksniffing Forces) of MLP and Gibson forums would rise up against them, plunging the land into war.

Quote by T00DEEPBLUE
Et tu, br00tz?
#8
the 57' has Alnico 2 magnets and the 59' has Alnico 5 magnets. the 57' will sound softer and the 59' will sound punchier. u choose
Guitars
Fender American Standard Strat 2008
Burny late 1980's Super Grade RLG-70 Les Paul
Sterling by Musicman JP50
Fender Classic Series 60's tele
Yamaha FS720S
Amp
Roland Microcube
Fender Blues Junior III Humholdt