Hello guys!

I'm gonna buy an electric guitar and i've narrowed my choice to two guitars:

Ibanez SA120EX


Yamaha Pacifica 112V

Their price is quite similar, though the SA120 is a little more expensive (about 60$)

I'm still a beginner and I'looking for a versatile guitar that wold really help develop...
I love both guitars, but my doubt is if the diference between them is worth the diference!


Last edited by hiKen at Aug 10, 2010,
go with the ibanez, i think it will give you less problems.

Epi LP Custom EMGs
ESP H-1000
Schecter Elite 7
Jackson Dominion
Peavey Valveking Head
Jet City JCA24s
Blackstar HT20 & HTV212
MXR Pedals
Schecter Stiletto Custom
Schecter Stiletto Studio
Fender Vintage Modified
Ampeg B2RE
Fender 4x10 Cab
Include links your post!

The Ibanez has humbuckers, the Pacifica has single coils. That's the only difference. They're budget guitars. Any reason why you want a tremolo? They're not that useful for a beginner (and Les Paul users might argue not useful at all) and the extra stability you'd get from a fixed bridge would be beneficial. Get whichever one feels better to you.
Marshall amplifiers are the truest purveyors of rock and roll known to man.

"And give a man an amplifier and a synthesizer, and he doesn't become whoever, you know. He doesn't become us."

Holy crap, check this out!
you probably dont want a cheap trem.

but i'd go with the ibanez anyways
Lets jump in a pool

Last edited by I am wet : Today at 03:26 XM.
get a ibanez without trem dude..

But ALL CHEAP IBANEZ have same trem. I lıke edge3s give it a try
yes, i also suggest getting a fixed bridge if you're a beginner. you're bound to be trying new tunings and the trem will just piss you off.