Poll: Which amp?
Poll Options
View poll results: Which amp?
333xl
12 80%
Spider
3 20%
Voters: 15.
#1
My freind reckons his line 6 spider head is better then my 333xl.
Opinions on this? Personally i laughed my ass off
Sorry i'm late, but my walk has got terribly silly today
#3
i guess it depends if your going by sound quality or fire hazard
pro tools operator certified
agile in-ceptor 727
gibson:les-paul studio
fender:strat
ibanez:prestiege s2170se s520ex
esp:ec-1000vb
splawn nitro kt88s
genz-bends g-flex

Quote by Punkismygod
U sure u want a floydrose? those things will make your nerves explode
#5
Quote by theknuckster
line 6 spiders are vintage and brutal, obviously


Lol an the tone is second to none?
Seriously though he told me an i facepalmed so hard
Sorry i'm late, but my walk has got terribly silly today
#6
Is it spider or spider valve? Since the valve ones are quite possibly better, they actually sound good.
Quote by metaldood91
Hi. Can someone tell me which guitars are real 24 fret guitars and which are just 22 fret guitars with 2 extra frets added on?


http://www.youtube.com/user/Joeseffel


Quote by smcstoronto1234

So very true...
#7
People need to get over the Spider hate. Yeah, the Spider IIIs sucked, but the Spider IVs are actually pretty good.

EDIT: Ah, we we're talking about heads. Stupid me.
Quote by apple_apple
oh my god! guitarViking is a genius... respect !!!

I'm GuitarViking! Don't you forget it!
#8
you do realise this is a banned thread right?

Versus threads: Threads like, Metallica vs. Megadeth, or Gibson vs. Fender? are not allowed.
Quote by Blompcube
it's so cool to hate Gibson, even the federal Department of Justice hates them.

( )( )
( . .) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
C('')('') signature to help him gain world domination.
#9
To be fair, Bugera is a sub-division of Behringer, and I have never heard nastier amp sounds than those that came out of my Behringer starter amp. Line 6 Spiders practically sound like auditory bliss compared to them. Plus:
Quote by selkies
i guess it depends if your going by sound quality or fire hazard
#10
This is NOT a versus thread, simply trying to explain tht tubes are better then modelling
Sorry i'm late, but my walk has got terribly silly today
#11
Quote by stig354
simply trying to explain tht tubes are better then modelling

That's not always true though, surely? High-end modellings amps will be better than bottom-end tube ones.
#12
Quote by stig354
This is NOT a versus thread, simply trying to explain tht tubes are better then modelling


Nope, I see 2 amp options there.

I don't see your proposition that tubes are supposedly better than modeling anywhere in your opening thread. I see you stating 2 amp options there.

Basically, you're just peeved off that your buddy exercised his right to an opinion, and you intend to rack up as many votes as possible so you can shove it in his face.

Grow up. Everyone has a right to their own opinions.

Quote by theknuckster
That's not always true though, surely? High-end modellings amps will be better than bottom-end tube ones.


If you think that tubes > modeling... you've not heard an AxeFX, or a Line 6 Vetta.
Quote by Blompcube
it's so cool to hate Gibson, even the federal Department of Justice hates them.

( )( )
( . .) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
C('')('') signature to help him gain world domination.
Last edited by ragingkitty at Jun 6, 2011,