Go Back   UG Community @ Ultimate-Guitar.Com > Instruments > Guitar Gear & Accessories
User Name  

Old 11-12-2012, 12:50 PM   #1
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
JCM900 SL-X vs JCM900 Dual Reverb???

What are the major differences between these two, and why is the dual reverb rumored to be much worse? im deciding between the two, and im leaning more towards the SL-X, but they are much harder to find sooooo some information on why they are worth choosing over the dual rev would be greatly appreciated, thnx
thetobarmethod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 01:03 PM   #2
Futile Bread Machine
oneblackened's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Okay, here's the rundown on the JCM900. There are three distinct JCM900s (disregarding wattage and form factor): The Dual Reverb, MKIII, and SL-X.
The Dual Reverb is really a hybrid amp, with much of its clipping in the preamp coming from solid state components (op-amps).
The MKIII is basically a hot-rodded JCM800 (based on the 2203/2204, depending on wattage).
The SL-X is basically a higher gain MKIII (One more preamp tube).
Current Gear:
LTD MH-400 (Dimarzio D-Activators)
PRS SE Custom 24
ESP Horizon NT-7 (SD Full Shreds)
UA Apollo Twin Duo
Peavey Revalver 4

I'm a recording engineer. If you have questions or you want some work done, message me.
oneblackened is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 01:15 PM   #3
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Yea, i knew that one had some solid state clipping, i suspected it was the Dual.
thetobarmethod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 02:12 PM   #4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Yeah I've got a MKIII 100w and I love it. I've heard it's like a modded 800 but don't really know why or how.
2PtDescartes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 04:28 PM   #5
This is me now!
greeny23's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
SL-X is worth it if you can find one.
greeny23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 05:57 AM   #6
Grumpy Old Tech
Cathbard's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
The mk3 also has clipping diodes. Same clipping circuit as the much maligned jcm800 2210 actually.
The dual reverb has a shitload of op-amps and clipping diodes, many of them before v1.
The sl/x replaced the op-amps and diodes before v1. It retained op-amps for the two master volumes and the fx loop but they aren't really an issue.

Functionally, the sl/x is a single channel amp with two master volumes (one gain knob). The dual reverb is a two channel amp, neither of which hold a candle to the sl/x.
Gilchrist custom
Yamaha SBG500
Randall RM100 & RM20
Abbey Harmonic II
Marshall JTM45 clone
Marshall JCM900 4102 (modded)
Marshall 18W clone
Fender 5F1 Champ clone
Marshall 1960A
Boss GT-100

Cathbard Amplification
My band
Cathbard is online now   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Forum Archives / About / TOS / Advertise with us / Customer Support / Ultimate-Guitar.Com © 2016
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.