North Korea, AKA BEST KOREA, threatens nuclear testing targeted to the US

Page 4 of 5
#122
Well done Sam, you just killed the thread. Also, I'm gonna bet this guy lolling @liberals doesn't do it for good reasons.
#123
Quote by willT08
Well done Sam, you just killed the thread. Also, I'm gonna bet this guy lolling @liberals doesn't do it for good reasons.


As good as any other reason
#124
Quote by willT08
Well done Sam, you just killed the thread.

If you guys are going to wank over religions, then I'd rather see the thread die. We've seen that topic discussed so often on this forum, and it NEVER ends well.
#126
I thought this was about Korea and them possibly needing to get wiped out for aiming dangerous shit at us........
Knowledge is power
#127
Yeah but they're not going to shoot anything at you. The regime does need wiping out though, with whatever force necessary.
#128
In all reality we could solve this situation with not providing them aid anymore. We just need to stop. They obviously need us, and if they don't stop they're just going to kill themselves.
I can honestly say I have really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.


I don't always post on UG, but when I do, I post in the Pit. Stay thirsty my friends.
#130
Quote by IMABBALLPLAYER
In all reality we could solve this situation with a couple nukes. .



fixed.
Knowledge is power
#131
Quote by Tsar66
i so hope one of the missiles hits America

>read post
>get slightly perturbed
>notice location is Scotland
America would still be better than Scotland even with 10 nukes dropped on it.
I can honestly say I have really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.


I don't always post on UG, but when I do, I post in the Pit. Stay thirsty my friends.
#132
Quote by Tsar66
i so hope one of the missiles hits America
Yes, don't we all hope millions/hundreds of thousands (or in the case of NK, several, all in following executions) of people die, for no meaningful purpose at all
#133
Quote by IMABBALLPLAYER
In all reality we could solve this situation with not providing them aid anymore. We just need to stop. They obviously need us, and if they don't stop they're just going to kill themselves.

To my knowledge, the US hasn't been providing them with significant aid for years now...

I could be wrong though.
#134
Quote by crazysam23_Atax
To my knowledge, the US hasn't been providing them with significant aid for years now...

I could be wrong though.


The US sends relief parcels to the population of North Korea, I believe. The North Korean population is told that these aid parcels of food and medicine are devotional offerings from foreign countries to the Dear Leader, and that he benevolently gives them to his people because he loves them.
...Stapling helium to penguins since 1949.
#135
Quote by pinguinpanic
I think it is a very ignorant point of view to concider something as "responsible enough to have nuclear capability". There is no such thing as responsible use of Nuclear Weapons. It's a weapon of mass destruction solely aimed at destruction. America already has a history of irresponsible use of Nuclear Weapons because they have used them and there is no such thing as responsible use of Nuclear Weapons.

Hell the reason for the violent divison of Korea was partly due to the Cold War in which America and Russia were all like "HURR DURR I AM SO RESPONSIBLE I BETTER MAKE A LOT OF NUKES AND START RANDOM PROXY WARS TO COMPARE THE SIZE OF MY WIENER TO RUSSIA".


Ironically, nuclear weapons prevented World War III.
Quote by progdude93
my fetish is dudes with dicks small enough to pee on their own sacks.
#136
Someone perma North Korea already
Quote by Overlord
It's not hard to be nice, but it's nice to be hard
#137
Quote by Jostry
Ironically, nuclear weapons prevented World War III.


prevented? WWIII will be called WWIII whenever it happens?
sometimes I see us in a cymbal splash or in the sound of a car crash
#138
Quote by JohnnyGenzale
prevented? WWIII will be called WWIII whenever it happens?


If nuclear weapons didn't exist during the tensions between the US and USSR during the 60s and 70s, one of them would have a launched an attack on the other, thus starting WWIII with "Democracy" countries siding with the US and "Communism" countries siding with the USSR.

But since the US and USSR each had over 30,000 nukes at the time, they were both scared of the other launching nukes, so they both avoided any direct military conflict between each other. Mutually Assured Destruction.
Quote by progdude93
my fetish is dudes with dicks small enough to pee on their own sacks.
#139
Quote by Jostry
If nuclear weapons didn't exist during the tensions between the US and USSR during the 60s and 70s, one of them would have a launched an attack on the other, thus starting WWIII with "Democracy" countries siding with the US and "Communism" countries siding with the USSR.

But since the US and USSR each had over 30,000 nukes at the time, they were both scared of the other launching nukes, so they both avoided any direct military conflict between each other. Mutually Assured Destruction.


If nuclear weapons didn't exist during the 60s and 70s then there wouldn't have been a Cold War then anyway, because the war on the Eastern front would have taken a great deal longer.
...Stapling helium to penguins since 1949.
#140
Quote by Jostry
they both avoided any direct military conflict between each other. Mutually Assured Destruction.


Tell it to Readers Digest
#141
Quote by Todd Hart
If nuclear weapons didn't exist during the 60s and 70s then there wouldn't have been a Cold War then anyway, because the war on the Eastern front would have taken a great deal longer.


The tensions were starting even before WWII ended. America was scared of the spread of Communism and thought of it as pure evil and all that shit. There wouldn't have been a Cold War because there would've been an actual war sooner or later.
Quote by progdude93
my fetish is dudes with dicks small enough to pee on their own sacks.
#142
Quote by Jostry
The tensions were starting even before WWII ended. America was scared of the spread of Communism and thought of it as pure evil and all that shit. There wouldn't have been a Cold War because there would've been an actual war sooner or later.


I'm aware, but neither Russia or America could have been at each other's throats if Japan had been a constant threat to them.
...Stapling helium to penguins since 1949.
#144
Quote by Todd Hart
The US sends relief parcels to the population of North Korea, I believe. The North Korean population is told that these aid parcels of food and medicine are devotional offerings from foreign countries to the Dear Leader, and that he benevolently gives them to his people because he loves them.

Oh, well...never mind then...
#145
Quote by IMABBALLPLAYER
In all reality we could solve this situation with not providing them aid anymore. We just need to stop. They obviously need us, and if they don't stop they're just going to kill themselves.


So let thousands of people starve to death? To what end?
#146
Quote by gabcd86
So let thousands of people starve to death? To what end?



We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.
Quote by BlackVoid
Every guitar and bass forum I've visited has some people chasing some magical tone that will shoot jizzing unicorns riding on a rainbow out of their amp.
#147
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.


Two ways to answer this. A) It's not in the USA's interest to cut off ties with the world. It's not a question of love, it's being able to trade and invest all over the world. For example, US aid to N. Korea as part of peace negotiations might help avoid conflict in an already pretty tense region. US military presence there helps keep peace. B) Isolationism seems thoroughly inconsistent with the US' view of itself. The "city on the hill" needs to spread its light, etc.
#148
agreed, but i think the City on the hill view needs to go. It doesn't work and has yielded no goodwill or positive outcome. If we could only change our perspective and pull back most or all of our troops from foreign land and focused on infrastructure our money, time and lives would be much better spent. In this day and age complete isolationism doesn't work but if we adapted a mix of mostly isolationism with partial international dealing it would fair much better for America as a nation and probably the world in general.
Quote by BlackVoid
Every guitar and bass forum I've visited has some people chasing some magical tone that will shoot jizzing unicorns riding on a rainbow out of their amp.
#149
Quote by pinguinpanic
Not to be an ass but as long as the US has long distance nuclear missiles themselves they have no right to condem other countries for having them/developing them.

It's like telling someone to stop doing drugs whilr being a terrible junk yourselves.

I am much more concerened by America's possesion of nuclear weapons thn North Korea's since they don't have working ones ant time soon.


Unlike tubby over here, the US isn't unstable enough to just start firing nuclear missiles at other countries for no reason.
Quote by progdude93
my fetish is dudes with dicks small enough to pee on their own sacks.
Last edited by Jostry at Jan 24, 2013,
#150
Not a good time to be american I guess...
I'm not saying not to trust the internet, but there's an alarming discrepancy between the number of iPads I've won & the number of iPads I own.
#151
Quote by Twofly
Not a good time to be american I guess...

It's always a good time to be an American.

Just ask Craig Ferguson.
Quote by Trowzaa
I wish I was American.

~ A Rolling Potato Gathers No Moss ~
#152
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.


LOL
#153
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.

How would any of this be in America's best interests? Yes, we should stop policing the world, but the rest of it would just be stupid for continued development of America.
#154
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.


Obviously you have no idea how global economy works... And obviously you have no idea how profitable it is for america to be involved in so many conflicts haha america makes/uses/sells/owns the most weapons in the world. And also what people dont seems to realize is that every country hates each other. America gets most of the spotlight since its the topdog right now.
#155
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.


That would be wonderfull yes.


Quote by Jostry
Unlike tubby over here, the US isn't unstable enough to just start firing nuclear missiles at other countries for no reason.


Unstable or not it's still rather odd having 7,000 nukes lieing arround and bitching about another country to develop these weapons. It's a bit of a double standard.


Also, does everyone know about this:
http://kimjongillookingatthings.tumblr.com/
Guitasr:
Cort KX-Custom
ESP LTD M-200FM
Amp:
Engl Powerball
Misc:
Focusrite Scarlet 2i4
#156
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.

Calm down, Ron.
#157
Quote by zenbone
We should stop all aid and all foreign occupation completely. When you ask to What End? One only needs to read this thread to see that all our contributions to the world go with no positive outlook. I have never once read anything that didn't end up being accusatory and hateful toward America and the people that make the nation up. So, becoming isolationist seems to be a very reasonable reaction to constant berating and hate from the rest of the world. So yes, let them starve and let countries fight each other and kill... for all the love we get back from every other country that is the love we should share. If China is the new super power let THEM take the reigns and help the other nations.


Do you have any idea how much foreign goods America imports? The best fruits from Africa, electronics from China, clothing/fabric from Europe etc. Sure America does export a fair amount as well, but with the amount of original manufacturers for most international products located outside of the USA, somehow I'm sure the world will be able to survive!
I'm not saying not to trust the internet, but there's an alarming discrepancy between the number of iPads I've won & the number of iPads I own.
Last edited by Twofly at Jan 25, 2013,
#158
I thinkz we should pay china back so they become our boyz and we should fukk N. Korgina up the azz
#159
Quote by pinguinpanic
Unstable or not it's still rather odd having 7,000 nukes lieing arround and bitching about another country to develop these weapons. It's a bit of a double standard.


Don't be so hypocritical. You want the world to get rid of nuclear weapons, but if the US tries to stop a crazy dictator who is THREATENING to use them, you say it's not fair. The US is actually reducing their nuclear stockpile. We went from 50,000 during the height of the cold war, to 5,114 (and we're still getting rid of more). It's almost certain that the US won't use their nukes unless they are attacked by a nuke first, or some other extremely dire situation. It's extremely stupid that you're actually complaining about the US wanting to stop North Korea (and it's not just the US, you can add the UN and its 100+ countries to the list too, because NOBODY wants NK to get nukes). It's a world effort, the UN is placing tight sanctions on them, and are tightening them after NKs threats a few days ago.
Quote by progdude93
my fetish is dudes with dicks small enough to pee on their own sacks.
Last edited by Jostry at Jan 25, 2013,
#160
Anyone who thinks removing all nuclear weapons from a country that currently has them is a good idea is rather politically naive.
...Stapling helium to penguins since 1949.