Page 1 of 3
sage76
Registered User
Join date: Jan 2010
359 IQ
#1
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/vladimir-putin-nominated-nobel-peace-prize-article-1.1711989

WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF ??????????????????????????????????????
Quote by SlinkyBlue


The solution is simple and obvious.

We revolt against ourselves. Mass suicide. The ultimate revolution.
Dwight.Schrute
Volunteer Sheriff Deputy
Join date: Jul 2010
559 IQ
#3
It's about time. I'd also like to see an honorary one given to Mao despite his passing.
Quote by Saint78
That's forever imprinted in my brain in Dwight's voice. Seriously.

Voted UG's best threadstarter 2014.
Burgery
crack hitler
Join date: Nov 2009
3,179 IQ
#5
totally deserves it even though he's a ****
Quote by JamSessionFreak
lots of really smart stuff
Last edited by Burgery at Mar 6, 2014,
Jackal58
Pit Daddy
Join date: Mar 2007
2,486 IQ
#6
Nobody left to wage war after you kill everybody.
Quote by SomeoneYouKnew
You should be careful what you say. Some asshole will probably sig it.

Quote by Axelfox
Yup, a girl went up to me in my fursuit one time.

Quote by Xiaoxi
I can fap to this. Keep going.
TunerAddict
Real Ass Nigga
Join date: Aug 2008
1,184 IQ
#7
Quote by Jackal58
Nobody left to wage war after you kill everybody.


only way for true peace
Quote by jrcsgtpeppers

If women can be annoyed there arent any women incongress I should be allowed to be pissed off there are no members of pink floyd or the beatles in congress.
Jackal58
Pit Daddy
Join date: Mar 2007
2,486 IQ
#8
Quote by TunerAddict
only way for true peace

That's the way I see it.
Quote by SomeoneYouKnew
You should be careful what you say. Some asshole will probably sig it.

Quote by Axelfox
Yup, a girl went up to me in my fursuit one time.

Quote by Xiaoxi
I can fap to this. Keep going.
Kensai
49ers
Join date: Jul 2006
4,147 IQ
#9
Pretty funny, me and some friends were talking about the nobel peace prizes the other day, and how about just anyone seems to get them. Then we were joking saying Putin will probably get a nomination
████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#11
For helping diffuse the situation in Syria? Give me a ****ing break. If it weren't for Putin, Chemical weapons would've never been used. Had he chosen not to stand by the Assad regime for the past 3 years purely for the Russian base, this would not have escalated into the sectarian proxy war it is today (in which half the population has lost its home and a significant number of people have died under bombardment, torture or starvation used in siege tactics BY THE PEOPLE THIS GUY IS BACKING) nor would Russia have lost its base. The solution to the imminent US attack (yeah right) was yet another desperation move that did not de-escalate violence nor help with mediation between the opposition and gov't. I'm not even sure I buy that the Russians came up with the idea.


So once again, give me a ****ing break.
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Last edited by ali.guitarkid7 at Mar 6, 2014,
Dreadnought
Oceanic Mountainman
Join date: Sep 2002
5,226 IQ
#12
Give war a chance
But we little know until tried how much of the uncontrollable there is in us, urging across glaciers and torrents, and up dangerous heights, let the judgment forbid as it may.
Gantz92
Registered User
Join date: Dec 2012
108 IQ
#13
If Obama got one i can't see why Putin shouldn't.
Arby911
Finding the Pattern
Join date: Jul 2010
830 IQ
#14
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
For helping diffuse the situation in Syria? Give me a ****ing break. If it weren't for Putin, Chemical weapons would've never been used. Had he chosen not to stand by the Assad regime for the past 3 years purely for the Russian base, this would not have escalated into the sectarian proxy war it is today (in which half the population has lost its home and a significant number of people have died under bombardment, torture or starvation used in siege tactics BY THE PEOPLE THIS GUY IS BACKING) nor would Russia have lost its base. The solution to the imminent US attack (yeah right) was yet another desperation move that did not de-escalate violence nor help with mediation between the opposition and gov't. I'm not even sure I buy that the Russians came up with the idea.


So once again, give me a ****ing break.



I agree with this, excepting the desperation part. It was a calculated political maneuver.


Quote by Gantz92
If Obama got one i can't see why Putin shouldn't.



I also agree with this.
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”
Charles Darwin
Last edited by Arby911 at Mar 6, 2014,
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#15
Quote by Gantz92
If Obama got one i can't see why Putin shouldn't.

Because the use of drones isn't the ****ing same as military support, funding and training to people who execute babies at point blank?
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
gsutke503
Registered User
Join date: May 2011
111 IQ
#16
I hope he gives his acceptance speech shirtless and horseback :0
AeroRocker
I'm too old for this ****
Join date: Oct 2007
1,019 IQ
#17
Quote by Gantz92
If Obama got one i can't see why Putin shouldn't.

Because a mistake shouldn't be used to justify the degradation of the entire system's merit.
██████████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████


LET'S GO BUCKS
Arby911
Finding the Pattern
Join date: Jul 2010
830 IQ
#18
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
Because the use of drones isn't the ****ing same as military support, funding and training to people who execute babies at point blank?


No no no, the point is that neither of them deserves it to begin with.
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”
Charles Darwin
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#21
Quote by Arby911
No no no, the point is that neither of them deserves it to begin with.

Yes, but saying that accidentally killing civilians is the very same as purposely targeting those civilians is what I'm objecting to. Obama isn't even in the same league of terrible human being as Putin is. Not by a long shot. Obama's relatively a saint.
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Arby911
Finding the Pattern
Join date: Jul 2010
830 IQ
#22
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
Yes, but saying that accidentally killing civilians is the very same as purposely targeting those civilians is what I'm objecting to. Obama isn't even in the same league of terrible human being as Putin is. Not by a long shot. Obama's relatively a saint.


I'll agree with that, but did anyone actually say it? IIRC, Obama got his Norwegian Flavor-of-the-Month prize before he'd actually done anything? (Not that he's done much now, but still...)
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”
Charles Darwin
Jackal58
Pit Daddy
Join date: Mar 2007
2,486 IQ
#23
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
Yes, but saying that accidentally killing civilians is the very same as purposely targeting those civilians is what I'm objecting to. Obama isn't even in the same league of terrible human being as Putin is. Not by a long shot. Obama's relatively a saint.

Quote by SomeoneYouKnew
You should be careful what you say. Some asshole will probably sig it.

Quote by Axelfox
Yup, a girl went up to me in my fursuit one time.

Quote by Xiaoxi
I can fap to this. Keep going.
Dreadnought
Oceanic Mountainman
Join date: Sep 2002
5,226 IQ
#25
Quote by deadsmileyface
being that theres 200+ candidates, he probably won't win.

I think Snowden should win.


Amazing, I almost vomited from anger
But we little know until tried how much of the uncontrollable there is in us, urging across glaciers and torrents, and up dangerous heights, let the judgment forbid as it may.
Gantz92
Registered User
Join date: Dec 2012
108 IQ
#26
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
Because the use of drones isn't the ****ing same as military support, funding and training to people who execute babies at point blank?


Drone strikes executed without any regard to civilian casualties is just as bad as supporting war criminals. You could even say it's worse in the sense that greenlighting drone strikes is more direct.
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#27
Quote by Arby911
I'll agree with that, but did anyone actually say it? IIRC, Obama got his Norwegian Flavor-of-the-Month prize before he'd actually done anything? (Not that he's done much now, but still...)

That's usually the reason people decry the prize. The drone strikes and the Libyan strike (which the US pushed for, but was not involved in militarily). He got it for establishing a climate of co-operation between the Muslim world and the US (which I 100% agree he did, considering the decreasing prejudice against Arabs and vice versa).


This is a guy whose foreign policy beats his predecessor's and allies' to a pulp. He's done more to help US/Middle East relations (not to mention the Middle East itself, which he did with little spending) than people give him credit for.

Putin is the guy who helped the Assad regime stall any peace process for three years, and then had to play into the hands of the US when that regime went rogue on his ass. That's his reward. He can suck my peaceful brown dick.

Quote by Gantz92
Drone strikes executed without any regard to civilian casualties is just as bad as supporting war criminals. You could even say it's worse in the sense that greenlighting drone strikes is more direct.

Uh, no. The Assad regime greenlit the chemical attacks directly. They sanctioned the use of torture against children. And then they blamed it all on extremists while the world went "Really?"


That's not the same as the US army accidentally doing something they didn't want to do.

Quote by deadsmileyface
being that theres 200+ candidates, he probably won't win.

I think Snowden should win.

There's also a little girl on the list who stood up to the taliban cuz they don't allow women the right of education. She's a much better candidate, imo
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Last edited by ali.guitarkid7 at Mar 6, 2014,
Basti95
actual size
Join date: Sep 2010
2,212 IQ
#29
He gets peace credit for not nuking the world tho
deadsmileyface
jesse's dead
Join date: Dec 2011
2,011 IQ
#30
Quote by ali.guitarkid7

There's also a little girl on the list who stood up to the taliban cuz they don't allow women the right of education. She's a much better candidate, imo


I can agree with that
Dreadnought
Oceanic Mountainman
Join date: Sep 2002
5,226 IQ
#31
Quote by ali.guitarkid7

There's also a little girl on the list who stood up to the taliban cuz they don't allow women the right of education. She's a much better candidate, imo


If we're thinking of the same person, she's the goddamn best candidate.

Good for her.
But we little know until tried how much of the uncontrollable there is in us, urging across glaciers and torrents, and up dangerous heights, let the judgment forbid as it may.
Gantz92
Registered User
Join date: Dec 2012
108 IQ
#32
Quote by ali.guitarkid7



Uh, no. The Assad regime greenlit the chemical attacks directly. They sanctioned the use of torture against children. And then they blamed it all on extremists while the world went "Really?"


That's not the same as the US army accidentally doing something they didn't want to do.


Russia is allied with a regime that commits crimes against humanity. Which ofcourse is horrible but still they do not order these attacks themselves. America directly commits what should be labeled as war crimes when they fire drones based only on cell phone locations. Calling that an accident is just plain wrong.
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#33
Quote by Dreadnought
If we're thinking of the same person, she's the goddamn best candidate.

Good for her.

I think so. I'm talking 'bout Malala Yousefzai. And to me she's the only candidate here. Don't even see the need for consideration.

Quote by Gantz92
Russia is allied with a regime that commits crimes against humanity. Which ofcourse is horrible but still they do not order these attacks themselves. America directly commits what should be labeled as war crimes when they fire drones based only on cell phone locations. Calling that an accident is just plain wrong.

Yeah, my ass they don't sanction them. Russia's been Assad's biggest supplier of military, financial and diplomatic assistance. Fact is Assad is weak as **** and can't make a single move without Russia or Iran's approval. They own his ass after the help they gave him. They're not just allies.


Both are events that shouldn't have happened, but to even put Obama in the same ****ing league as Putin is just plain ignorant.
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Last edited by ali.guitarkid7 at Mar 6, 2014,
progdude93
Banned
Join date: Dec 2012
380 IQ
#34
Quote by ali.guitarkid7
That's usually the reason people decry the prize. The drone strikes and the Libyan strike (which the US pushed for, but was not involved in militarily). He got it for establishing a climate of co-operation between the Muslim world and the US (which I 100% agree he did, considering the decreasing prejudice against Arabs and vice versa).


This is a guy whose foreign policy beats his predecessor's and allies' to a pulp. He's done more to help US/Middle East relations (not to mention the Middle East itself, which he did with little spending) than people give him credit for.

Putin is the guy who helped the Assad regime stall any peace process for three years, and then had to play into the hands of the US when that regime went rogue on his ass. That's his reward. He can suck my peaceful brown dick.


Uh, no. The Assad regime greenlit the chemical attacks directly. They sanctioned the use of torture against children. And then they blamed it all on extremists while the world went "Really?"


That's not the same as the US army accidentally doing something they didn't want to do.


There's also a little girl on the list who stood up to the taliban cuz they don't allow women the right of education. She's a much better candidate, imo


Bullshit. The situation was improving well before Obama stepped into office, and all evidence indicates it's due to things like globalization rather than foreign policy. The muslim world, as a rule, reacts negatively to shitty foreign policy (no surprise there), and negatively to positive foreign policy. When we do good things, we don't get credit and even get blamed for trying to "westernize" everything (like when Nigeria said that us giving them polio vaccine was a western plot, or when we armed the Bosniak Muslims when they were being massacred by the Christian Serbs). When we do bad things, we get villified.

Size of Taliban and Al Qaeda training camps have been decreasing steadily since before the short-lived spike in recruitment from the invasion of Iraq. As early as 2003, recruitment was falling again. In fact, it seems that the radical Islamist agenda and their targeting of civilians (especially their killing of innocent Muslims) has done more to limit recruitment and improve their perception of the west than Obama's foreign policy.

edit: nobody who should be taken seriously is saying putin=obama. but whether you like it or not, they ARE in the same league in at least one respect: neither of them did anything to deserve a nobel peace prize. and that's what people were saying.
Last edited by progdude93 at Mar 6, 2014,
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#36
Quote by progdude93
Bullshit. The situation was improving well before Obama stepped into office, and all evidence indicates it's due to things like globalization rather than foreign policy. The muslim world, as a rule, reacts negatively to shitty foreign policy (no surprise there), and negatively to positive foreign policy. When we do good things, we don't get credit and even get blamed for trying to "westernize" everything (like when Nigeria said that us giving them polio vaccine was a western plot, or when we armed the Bosniak Muslims when they were being massacred by the Christian Serbs). When we do bad things, we get villified.

Size of Taliban and Al Qaeda training camps have been decreasing steadily since before the short-lived spike in recruitment from the invasion of Iraq. As early as 2003, recruitment was falling again. In fact, it seems that the radical Islamist agenda and their targeting of civilians (especially their killing of innocent Muslims) has done more to limit recruitment and improve their perception of the west than Obama's foreign policy.

edit: nobody who should be taken seriously is saying putin=obama. but whether you like it or not, they ARE in the same league in at least one respect: neither of them did anything to deserve a nobel peace prize. and that's what people were saying.

Right.


1) You can't say "the muslim world" reacts to any one thing in any one particular way. I was also talking largely about the Middle East, hence my usage of 'Arabs' instead of 'Muslims'. That'd be much harder to talk about.

2) Sure, when you do good things, you get vilified. This is definitely how the entirety of the Arab world reacts.

3) At the time of the award in 2009, most people in the Middle East saw Obama as an American hero, one who wouldn't promote the same kinds of prejudice and oppression used against Arabs since the 90s... and he hasn't. He really hasn't.

4) Obama's foreign policy doesn't rely on the kind of idealism non-Americans for some reason expected. He only wants to preserve US interests but will not get involved in unnecessary violence. So, if you were expecting him to end the crisis or stop sectarian killings peacefully or do some other type of voodoo in the ME, you'd be pretty out of touch with reality, and what he's done so far is enough. Like he laid groundwork for shitloads of peace processes over here. It's shit I don't think people were expecting to ever happen back in 2007 or 2008.

5) Globalization played a huge part in it, along with other factors (middle classes, poverty, reliance on natural resources) but you can't tell me Obama had no part in it. For a country that was seemingly at war against anything Arab (at the time), his accomplishments are pretty huge. For a region that was seemingly at war against anything American (at the time, again), it's also a pretty big accomplishment.
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Arby911
Finding the Pattern
Join date: Jul 2010
830 IQ
#37
No. Obama's foreign policy, such as it is, almost exactly mirrors the last 2 years of the Bush "carrot and stick" approach, minus any willingness to use the stick...

The only difference is a difference of perception, not reality, and one can scarcely credit Obama for that.
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.”
Charles Darwin
Last edited by Arby911 at Mar 6, 2014,
ali.guitarkid7
Gets Easier
Join date: Oct 2009
2,302 IQ
#38
Cuz he doesn't think the US cares enough to actually get it done. But the change in language, such as the condemnation of Muslims and Arabs altogether which the Bush administration never actually addressed since it fueled public opinion about the wars, is in effect what laid the groundwork. Whether he intends to achieve these goals during his term doesn't matter, as long as the people that follow don't revert back to how the ME was talked about in 2003 - 2007. There was a bias then that isn't here now, and Obama is very much partly responsible for this during his first term.


Second term, not so much
Quote by Aeolian Harmony
Ali priori / Ali posteriori
Quote by GuitarGod_92
Jesus christ Ali is a nutcase

I actually feel sorry for him, like seriously, get help
Last edited by ali.guitarkid7 at Mar 6, 2014,
progdude93
Banned
Join date: Dec 2012
380 IQ
#39
@ali: I'm not putting your shit in quotes cos it would be a pain in the ass, but you know what you said.
1) You can't say "the muslim world" reacts to any one thing in any one particular way. I was also talking largely about the Middle East, hence my usage of 'Arabs' instead of 'Muslims'. That'd be much harder to talk about.
_________________________
I mean, yeah, you can. Obviously I'm making a generalization, which is why I said "the muslim world." There are absolutely exceptions. But Islam is one of the only religions that actually owns countries (obviously there's the Vatican, and lots of Christians in lots of countries, but I don't think they count as legitimate theocracies, and the Vatican is irrelevant to this discussion.

And you were the one who said "Muslim world." It's the part of your post I bolded and took the most issue with.

2) Sure, when you do good things, you get vilified. This is definitely how the entirety of the Arab world reacts.
___________________________________
I said Muslim world, not Arab world (and so did you in the post I quoted). You're changing around who we're talking about at will, which is basically cheating at arguments. And I maybe wasn't clear enough in saying "we don't get credit and even get blamed..." I should've stuck a "sometimes" or "often" before "even get blamed."

3) At the time of the award in 2009, most people in the Middle East saw Obama as an American hero, one who wouldn't promote the same kinds of prejudice and oppression used against Arabs since the 90s... and he hasn't. He really hasn't.
___________________________________
Yeah, so you're saying they gave him an award because they were pretty confident he would do good things and not bad things?

How is it that Obama condones drone strikes that have taken out civilians and yet is all-too-ready to criticize any other country for attacking an enemy base in the middle of a civilian population?

I'm not saying "obama is a terrorist lul," but he signs off on some shit that he condemns in other people and tries to play it off like he's still doing his own distinct thing.

4) Obama's foreign policy doesn't rely on the kind of idealism non-Americans for some reason expected. He only wants to preserve US interests but will not get involved in unnecessary violence. So, if you were expecting him to end the crisis or stop sectarian killings peacefully or do some other type of voodoo in the ME, you'd be pretty out of touch with reality, and what he's done so far is enough. Like he laid groundwork for shitloads of peace processes over here. It's shit I don't think people were expecting to ever happen back in 2007 or 2008.
___________________________________
Bush was INCREDIBLY idealistic, saying, "This is wrong, we're not going to take it, and we're going to democratize the SHIT out of these people."

Whether or not you agree with his methods (I don't, and obviously you don't), that's obviously highly idealistic. As Obama was elected as the anti-Bush, I expected him to be a lot less idealistic. Didn't he run saying he'd end the engagement in Iraq? I don't see how anyone would've had those expectations.

The groundwork was laid (unintentionally) by Bush. Since he was doing it in such a way that people strongly and loudly disapproved of, doing the opposite would be immediately well received. Hell, he got the Nobel Prize for TALKING about doing the opposite. What a guy.

5) Globalization played a huge part in it, along with other factors (middle classes, poverty, reliance on natural resources) but you can't tell me Obama had no part in it. For a country that was seemingly at war against anything Arab (at the time), his accomplishments are pretty huge. For a region that was seemingly at war against anything American (at the time, again), it's also a pretty big accomplishment.
___________________________________
Shit wasn't always that way. Before the Taliban came around, Afghanistan wasn't such a shitty place. America wasn't at war with anything Arab; it was the government using its circumstances to increase its power (because THIS time, they've got it right), which is something basically every government does, including the Obama Administration. But that last part is a sidepoint and largely irrelevant.

Obama did not increase globalization, or use globalization to suit his goals. America's status as a cultural superpower did that. Obviously, American culture isn't global culture, but when any enemy culture seeps into another country, they begin to have more positive views on it in virtue of their increased exposure. That's why there are the radical Imams (since you'll probably try and nitpick, I'm going to specifically say that plenty of Imams aren't radical) who so strongly resist ALL western influence. Because once the levees start to leak a bit, you know it's only a matter of time before they go.

Islamist recruitment has been decreasing since well before Bush. I'm pretty sure it was after they beat the Soviets/Russians, but I'm not 100% on that. It spiked after the incursion into Iraq, but that was temporary. It had little to do with Obama, and a lot to do with how radical Muslims would kill innocent Muslim bystanders in the name of Jihad. They also didn't really approve of how radicals would target civilians in general, but the fact that terrorists killed their own people in the quest for Jihad REALLY made them seem dishonest and hypocritical. Murdering their own people to save their own people? Seems pretty unlegit.