#1
6262,1990,333xl

which is less noisy on it's drive channel and which can do the "tiny bit off drive on my cleans thing" better ?I can not try out any off them unless I travel far away.... and i am not.
If you dont know its ok.
Please don't tell me about how bad they are I am not asking that.
#4
epic win greg.
WTLT 2014 GG&A

Quote by andersondb7
alright "king of the guitar forum"


Quote by trashedlostfdup
nope i am "GOD of the guitar forum" i think that fits me better.


Quote by andersondb7
youre just being a jerk man.



****** NEW NEW NEW!
2017-07-07 2017-07-07 Update and a Chat On Noise Constraints *** NEW FRIDAY 7/7
2017-04-13 RUN AWAY from COMPUTERS!!! TCE? RANT ALERT!!!
2017-03-02 - Guitar Philosophy 1001- Be Prepared For the Situation (Thursday 2017-03-02)
2017-02-21 How to Hot-Rod the Hell of your Stratocaster for $50! (Tuesday 2017-2-21)
Resentments and Rambling from a Guitar Junkie
---> http://trashedengineering.blogspot.com/
#5
Peavey.
Gibson LP Traditional, LP GT, LP Studio, SG Standard x2
Barber Tone Press > EHX Worm >TC Polytune > MXR Custom Badass 78 > EXH Glove > EHX East River Drive > Zoom G3 > TC Spark Mini Booster
Laney VC30
Marshall TSL602
Jet City JCA22H
.
My SoundCloud
#7
Really it will come down to the individual amps (not the series as a whole) as to which one is noisier. As far as the gritty cleans, the 1990 probably has the others on that. It is based off the JCM900, which does that whole thing pretty well.
I'm just a kickin' and a gougin' in the mud and the blood and the beer.