I haven't tried either but the palmer seems a bit lighter. easier to carry, but maybe not as sturdy? I think pedaltrains are one of the "industry standard" pedalboards, FWIW (though as I said, I haven't tried them).
I'm an idiot and I accidentally clicked the "Remove all subscriptions" button. If it seems like I'm ignoring you, I'm not, I'm just no longer subscribed to the thread. If you quote me or do the @user thing at me, hopefully it'll notify me through my notifications and I'll get back to you.
Quote by K33nbl4d3
I'll have to put the Classic T models on my to-try list. Shame the finish options there are Anachronism Gold, Nuclear Waste and Aged Clown, because in principle the plaintop is right up my alley.

Quote by K33nbl4d3
Presumably because the CCF (Combined Corksniffing Forces) of MLP and Gibson forums would rise up against them, plunging the land into war.

Quote by T00DEEPBLUE
Et tu, br00tz?
To me the movable bars on the Palmer are unnecessary, I'd prefer the solid weld like on the PT just for simplicity.

There's not exactly a huge difference between the two, there just aren't that many parts to a pedalboard. If anything I think the dimensions would be the most important thing, measure all your pedals and figure out which board fits your rig best.