Page 1 of 2
Gabuydachk
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2005
443 IQ
#1
all of a sudden I've been noticing that jazzers (not only the purists) are limiting jazz. they're saying "this is jazz, this isn't." Isn't jazz supposed to be the genre without limits?
Here's my definition: Jazz is a genre of music characterized by improvisation. All improvised music is jazz to me. Tell me if I'm wrong. So, what's your definition of jazz?

'tis life
Evil_Empire24-7
UG Freak
Join date: May 2005
3,039 IQ
#3
good theory and ^ about emotion go listen to wes montgomery or joe pass.
Quote by Jimi Hendrix
The Blues Is Easy To Play But Hard To Feel.

Quote by Chris Impellitteri
I Promise That My Solos Will Only Get Faster.

The Mahavishnu Orchestra (Greatest Rock Ensemble 1971 - 1973)

[[Practice Makes Perfect]]

[[Hell Yeah]]
HendrixEdge
absolute bastard(s)...
Join date: Jan 2005
185 IQ
#4
Quote by AllPlayDead666
music with no emotion


Shall I crucify him first or shall I leave it to the veterans of this forum?
Incisive inklings of proper piss are unsuited for the quill…
Fintann
vote regressive
Join date: Sep 2005
10 IQ
#5
Anything you want it to be.
I have signatures turned off because they are more boring than blind people playing Wheel of Fortune.
musicftm
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2005
459 IQ
#6
nah, not all music with improv is jazz, theres lots of improv in blugrass and blues and rock...
sirpsycho85
selfstyled voice o reason
Join date: Feb 2004
858 IQ
#7
Quote by HendrixEdge
Shall I crucify him first or shall I leave it to the veterans of this forum?


feel free, i think. that brilliant comment deserves whatever it gets. nothing posted on this site gets to me as much as people talking about their favorite form of music having more emotion and other styles not having it.

there are certainly aspects that make up a jazz song, from certain chords used, certain scales in soloing etc, the swing rhythm in a lot of it. obviously the improvisation being very important, as well as the fact that it's often not so climactic and resolving like blues or rock, but tries to be a little less rhytmically and harmonically predictable. it doesn't need to have all of those things, but something that's rooted around a good number of traditionally jazz ideas i would call jazz, even if its not real hot and fast.

now whether or not i would enjoy that jazz is another thing...while i personally don't like for example most fusion, or the more atmospheric stuff like some of pat metheny's stuff, it's still jazz, just not my thing.
"I see my light come shining from the west down to the east
Any day now, any day now I shall be released"

Know any good teachers in NY, especially skilled in teaching ear training? Tell me
Last edited by sirpsycho85 at Nov 15, 2005,
enfilade
Banned
Join date: Nov 2005
20 IQ
#8
"A style of American music that originated in the South, started by African Americans; it is characterized by a strong , prominent meter; improvisation; and dotted or syncopated patterns."

i think there have been times where its range is fairly limitless, all the jazzheads in the 60s went crazy for hendrix saying the experience was the best jazz band ever, cream were also a jazz band but they just didnt tell clapton, it has close relation to the blues
gothikchile13
UG Board King
Join date: Aug 2005
717 IQ
#9
Jazz - n. A type of music characterized by tons of theory and chord progressions that don't make any sense.

--Jon
Gabuydachk
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2005
443 IQ
#10
Quote by musicftm
nah, not all music with improv is jazz, theres lots of improv in blugrass and blues and rock...

my point of view is that jazz is a categorization not related to genre, like "pop" music

that's just me though

'tis life
RhoadsSRV8290
Junko Partner
Join date: Feb 2005
193 IQ
#11
Quote by HendrixEdge
Shall I crucify him first or shall I leave it to the veterans of this forum?


Behold, for you do not have to leave it to the veterans...

Thee who has pronounced jazz as unemotional has already crucified thy self.
If everyone liked what I did, I probably wouldn't be playing anything of depth.

—Joshua Redman
Steve Cropper
Blues Addict
Join date: Feb 2005
63 IQ
#12
It can be classified as a genre. You know it when you hear it. Purists are just scared that the original vision and tradition of it will be lost as some things are in the sands of time.
UG Blues Mafia
Founding Members: Forklifterer, Steve Cropper, Crzyrckgtrst28, and TNfootballfan62


Member of the Anti-Whammy-Bar-Solo Club
power freak
Counting to infinity...
Join date: Mar 2002
1,431 IQ
#13
Quote by Steve Cropper
You know it when you hear it.

Exactly!

Jazz just sounds like jazz period. You don't need to follow these rules or these rules just do whatever! Lots of people say that jazz is "complicated" this is not true in my eyes. Many of the "standards" are SO simple you wouldn't believe it but they don't get ridiculed because they don't follow the 5-1-2-6-4-9-1 progression.

For sale: Early 1985 Ibanez AH10 (Allan Holdsworth signature model) PM for details
Resiliance
Acta est fabula
Join date: Jul 2003
449 IQ
#14
^Pretty much.
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt.
He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice.


Remember: A prudent question is one half of wisdom.

Click.
TI_Bryan
Registered User
Join date: Sep 2005
168 IQ
#15
Quote by gothikchile13
Jazz - n. A type of music characterized by tons of theory and chord progressions that don't make any sense.

--Jon

Fact is, it never truly has to make sense. it's just got to sound GOOD
Shoestick
Wannabeatle
Join date: Feb 2004
239 IQ
#17
Jazz is...


wierd.

When I think of jazz, I think of beautiful music. Its like a musical painting.
TI_Bryan
Registered User
Join date: Sep 2005
168 IQ
#18
Musically, it's a form of music that's more based on controlling tension than traditional western classical music. it's also the only truly american musical genre ( meaning it originated in america)
Steve Cropper
Blues Addict
Join date: Feb 2005
63 IQ
#19
Jazz pretty much always follows a standard cadence of some kind. They have just found so many variations that you never run out of possibilities.
UG Blues Mafia
Founding Members: Forklifterer, Steve Cropper, Crzyrckgtrst28, and TNfootballfan62


Member of the Anti-Whammy-Bar-Solo Club
Siciliano
Registered User
Join date: Jun 2004
1,841 IQ
#20
The sounds your guitar makes when tuning is brilliant jazz!!
Seriously, I enjoy playing it more than listening to it. I've listened to CDs the greats playing various instruments and I often thought "this is complete crap." The only artist I really like is Thelonious Monk on the piano. He'll take you for a journey on each song.
Gabuydachk
Registered User
Join date: Oct 2005
443 IQ
#21
Quote by Steve Cropper
Jazz pretty much always follows a standard cadence of some kind. They have just found so many variations that you never run out of possibilities.

but that's where my point of view comes in. what about free-jazz? to me jazz is basically whatever you make it. if you want to be traditional, be just that. if not, then don't. it's all about perspective. take Ornette Coleman or even Fred Frith. they're nowhere near conventional jazz. it's whatever you want it to be.

'tis life
HendrixEdge
absolute bastard(s)...
Join date: Jan 2005
185 IQ
#22
Quote by RhoadsSRV8290
Behold, for you do not have to leave it to the veterans...

Thee who has pronounced jazz as unemotional has already crucified thy self.


I?m happy to hear that especially when said sentiment is combined with such biblical language.
Incisive inklings of proper piss are unsuited for the quill…
zebrahead234
Registered User
Join date: Feb 2006
352 IQ
#23
to me, jazz is kind of like a musical equilibrium

right between emotional tension and nothing

kind of like peace
Quote by Righteous
Is that Chuck Norris in your avator? I never thought of him as a shredder really... a shredder of bodies maybe.


Member: "I died a little inside when Steve Irwin died...RIP" club. Put in your sig to join

Self Proclaimed Master of Typos
VR2005
UG Addict
Join date: Jun 2005
1,507 IQ
#24
Way to revive a two and a half year old thread.
Co-Founder of the Jazz Guitarist Community. PM me or Zeppelin256 to join.

Come listen to Zeppelin256 and I jam over some jazz tunes! Unit 7
fenderfrk10
Registered User
Join date: Jan 2007
191 IQ
#25
Quote by nightwind
Jazz to me is really about losing your ego. So just dig it, vibe it, and let it exist as it is. Detach yourself from it, once it's out of you, it simply is. Whatever you create is perfect at being what it is.

hmmmm...
bassmaniac101
UG's mental bass player
Join date: Sep 2005
366 IQ
#27
Quote by AllPlayDead666
music with no emotion





Saything that jazz has no emotion is like..... Well, I really don't know. But it is full of emotion. I agree and disagree with threadstarter about improvosation. It's a major part of jazz, but not what jazz is based on, in my opionion. To me, jazz is a style of music based on 'swing'.
Member of the "On the Right Track" club. PM Michelangelo193 or raise_the_dead to see if they approve of your "On the Right Track"-ness
I am Spartikus


Tremulous name: <CD>Mustang?
fendermalmsteen
one
Join date: Jun 2004
261 IQ
#28
Quote by AllPlayDead666
music with no emotion


Quote by bassmaniac101


Saything that jazz has no emotion is like..... Well, I really don't know. But it is full of emotion. I agree and disagree with threadstarter about improvosation. It's a major part of jazz, but not what jazz is based on, in my opionion. To me, jazz is a style of music based on 'swing'.

The "emotion" is entirely in the player and the listener, never in the music.

The player feels emotion as a natural reation to what he plays. The listener feels emotion as a natural reaction to what he hears. Sometimes the two respective emotions are similar to the two respective individuals, but on the other hand, sometimes they are completly different. It all depends on your own personality. So if you complain that a particular song/artist/style/genre has "no emotion", it is entirely your fault for not percieving a reaction to it. Not that thatt's a bad thing, but you just have no right to complain.

Case in point, emotion does not exist in the music itself, but the people experiencing it. Therefore one cannot, and can never "put emotion into" music.


Now on to the topic. I guess you could define jazz as the aural art of tension and release. Anything less broad than that would surely place an unneeded and unwanted limit on the art form.
Carpe diem; Seize the day.

Just be.

Scales are notes, not shapes, boxes, or patterns.
Last edited by fendermalmsteen at Mar 22, 2007,
zebrahead234
Registered User
Join date: Feb 2006
352 IQ
#29
^ very nice
Quote by Righteous
Is that Chuck Norris in your avator? I never thought of him as a shredder really... a shredder of bodies maybe.


Member: "I died a little inside when Steve Irwin died...RIP" club. Put in your sig to join

Self Proclaimed Master of Typos
bassmaniac101
UG's mental bass player
Join date: Sep 2005
366 IQ
#30
Quote by fendermalmsteen
The "emotion" is entirely in the player and the listener, never in the music.

The player feels emotion as a natural reation to what he plays. The listener feels emotion as a natural reaction to what he hears. Sometimes the two respective emotions are similar to the two respective individuals, but on the other hand, sometimes they are completly different. It all depends on your own personality. So if you complain that a particular song/artist/style/genre has "no emotion", it is entirely your fault for not percieving a reaction to it. Not that thatt's a bad thing, but you just have no right to complain.

Case in point, emotion does not exist in the music itself, but the people experiencing it. Therefore one cannot, and can never "put emotion into" music.


Now on to the topic. I guess you could define jazz as the aural art of tension and release. Anything less broad than that would surely place an unneeded and unwanted limit on the art form.


Well said. Obviously music itself does not have emotion, as it does not have a mind and cannot think/feel emotions. But you can generally feel emotion through the artist, especially in jazz. Like the way he/she sings, the style, speed, and in what keys, help you feel the emotion.

What I was trying to get at when I said that was that in jazz music you can really feel the emotions of the artist, but not the emotions of the actuall music.
Member of the "On the Right Track" club. PM Michelangelo193 or raise_the_dead to see if they approve of your "On the Right Track"-ness
I am Spartikus


Tremulous name: <CD>Mustang?
Resiliance
Acta est fabula
Join date: Jul 2003
449 IQ
#31
Quote by bassmaniac101
Well said. Obviously music itself does not have emotion, as it does not have a mind and cannot think/feel emotions. But you can generally feel emotion through the artist, especially in jazz. Like the way he/she sings, the style, speed, and in what keys, help you feel the emotion.

What I was trying to get at when I said that was that in jazz music you can really feel the emotions of the artist, but not the emotions of the actuall music.


I disagree. Of course you're inclined to feel that way, because we all knows jazz kicks ass , but I just find it very arrogant to say something like that. You can't know the emotions of the artist. All you know is what you're given, so please, let's not assume jazz is somehow special in that you can recognise the artist's emotion more than in other forms of music... It's not.

But it does kick ass
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt.
He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice.


Remember: A prudent question is one half of wisdom.

Click.
MaltedMilk
Registered User
Join date: Mar 2007
234 IQ
#32
Does anyone know what I mean when I say that Jazz is almoost like 'pure music'. It's music that has been stripped down to the raw ingredients of harmony, melody and rhythm. I reckon if you got a bunch of people who had no musical influences and taught them to play, they would create something like Jazz.
Last edited by MaltedMilk at Mar 25, 2007,
VR2005
UG Addict
Join date: Jun 2005
1,507 IQ
#33
I have to disagree with that. I believe jazz is combination of refinement and raw emotion, but the refinement had to come from somewhere and I believe a lot of classical music influenced that and the raw emotion was from the blues. It may be "pure" music, but to me it's not in the sense. Though we can all have our own opinions and I'm not saying you're wrong I just have a different opinion on things.
Co-Founder of the Jazz Guitarist Community. PM me or Zeppelin256 to join.

Come listen to Zeppelin256 and I jam over some jazz tunes! Unit 7
"Tele" Steve
Registered User
Join date: May 2006
276 IQ
#34
Quote by AllPlayDead666
music with no emotion


No, I believe you're thinking of Yngwie Malmsteen and Steve Vai.
"Tele" Steve
Registered User
Join date: May 2006
276 IQ
#35
Quote by MaltedMilk
Does anyone know what I mean when I say that Jazz is almoost like 'pure music'. It's music that has been stripped down to the raw ingredients of harmony, melody and rhythm. I reckon if you got a bunch of people who had no musical influences and taught them to play, they would create something like Jazz.


In my opinion, the blues is even more stripped down. Jazz always seems a bit more complicated.
Resiliance
Acta est fabula
Join date: Jul 2003
449 IQ
#36
No, I believe you're thinking of Yngwie Malmsteen and Steve Vai.


Do you realize what kind of an absolutely stupid, ridiculously narrowminded statement this is?

I spit on that post, and your mindset.
"Tele" Steve
Registered User
Join date: May 2006
276 IQ
#37
I spit on guitar masturbation, fret-wanking, noodling scales, whatever you want to call it. I've listened to enough of Vai and Malmsteen's music to know how robotic it all is to my ears.
fronkpies
UG's Dirty Workman
Join date: Nov 2004
387 IQ
#38
Quote by Resiliance

I spit on that post, and your mindset.


Tears in waves, minds on fire
Nights alone by your side
fendermalmsteen
one
Join date: Jun 2004
261 IQ
#39
I spit on guitar masturbation, fret-wanking, noodling scales, whatever you want to call it. I've listened to enough of Vai and Malmsteen's music to know how robotic it all is to my ears.

You obviously haven't listened to either of them.
Carpe diem; Seize the day.

Just be.

Scales are notes, not shapes, boxes, or patterns.
Resiliance
Acta est fabula
Join date: Jul 2003
449 IQ
#40
Quote by fendermalmsteen
You obviously haven't listened to either of them.


Don't waste your time. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt.
He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice.


Remember: A prudent question is one half of wisdom.

Click.