ok guys im being offered a trade a 1993 blues deville in good condition for my marshall dsl 401 that i brught used a week ago lol so what do u think?
ok then the fender has less tubes could that mean less quality of sound?
No not at all. I actually think the Fender's tone sounds more tubey than the Marshall because of its beautiful cleans and mild overdrives. Thats why if you really like to play clean and blues I would get the Fender because performs great for that, but it cant get a very hard distortion like for metal or anything. The Marshall sounds great and has a great clean and overdrives, but it depends on what you play. I, personally, would get the Marshall.
i'd keep the marshall if you play predominantly rock and metal.
I'm an idiot and I accidentally clicked the "Remove all subscriptions" button. If it seems like I'm ignoring you, I'm not, I'm just no longer subscribed to the thread. If you quote me or do the @user thing at me, hopefully it'll notify me through my notifications and I'll get back to you.
Quote by K33nbl4d3
I'll have to put the Classic T models on my to-try list. Shame the finish options there are Anachronism Gold, Nuclear Waste and Aged Clown, because in principle the plaintop is right up my alley.

Quote by K33nbl4d3
Presumably because the CCF (Combined Corksniffing Forces) of MLP and Gibson forums would rise up against them, plunging the land into war.

Quote by T00DEEPBLUE
Et tu, br00tz?
^Yea, the Fender is better for cleans and bluesy type stuff, they're very different amps.

But... are you happy with your DSL?
"Breathe, breathe in the air
Don't be afraid to care"

Fender Strat/Tokai LS80>few pedals>Orange Rocker 30