#1
Hey guys, just wanna take a survey here. Half the people I've asked have said Line 6, the other half have said Randall. But I've only asked about 6 people. So here's a little survey. Which is better?

Line 6 Spider II

or

Randall RG series?

#4
Randall definetely. I hear those Spiders suck arse.

I have both a podxt and a variax though and I love them both, so Line 6 isn't THAT bad
Huzzah! It is I, S0ulja, the Duke Of Swiss, 3rd member of the Royal order of cheese!

PM Soulfly_freak or sock_demon to join
#5
Line 6. they are definately alot more versatile. And they have the most distortion out of any other amp i've heard. I played on a Randall at a gig once and it sounded like ****. I would have used my Spider II head but the asshole was rushing us to play.
The Adults Are Talking.
#6
Quote by demonspeeding05
And they have the most distortion out of any other amp i've heard.

You need to get out more...
#7
heh, well personally, i kinda like randall better. i think its more suited to my style (metallica-esque). i feel as though the gain is quite saturated and a tight enough for a good punch in the face kinda tone. never really played a line 6, but i hear it's alright.
#8
Line 6 amps are good for dropping out of planes to watch them go boom.
"Chuck-E-Cheese called. They want their band back."
#10
Randall. Just in case you didn't read that, Randall.
I've heard(and experienced) that the RG100 is better than the 75, so keep that in mind.
#12
Randall. To to the gear forum if you wanna talk to people that are passionate about hating the Spider II
Gibson SG Standard
Orange Rocker 30 combo
Fulltone OCD
EH Holy Grail