#3
The problem the cops had was not that the kids were having sex, but that they took photos of them doing it and emailed them to each other.

BTW, the judge is a dumbass.
Quote by Judge James Wolf
one motive for revealing the photos is profit


He actually thinks that they would sell the pics to child pornographers!
Quote by Kai-7
You are the greatest. Wow. CaptainWow

Bumblebee of the Mighty Autobots. PM Kankuro to join.
UG Irish Clan - Póg mo thóin
Metals Fetishist of the"Please Sir, I want GORE" Club - UG Horror Fans and Gorehounds Unite!
#5
Quote by CaptainWow
The problem the cops had was not that the kids were having sex, but that they took photos of them doing it and emailed them to each other.

BTW, the judge is a dumbass.


He actually thinks that they would sell the pics to child pornographers!


So what? It's not the cops' fucking business. Don't they have some real criminals to catch? Or some donuts to eat?

I mean, rapists and murderers are running free, but God forbid a couple teenagers make whoopee and email pictures to eachother.

I hate cops. Fucking pigs.
Last edited by Pacifica112J at Feb 12, 2007,
#6
The parents are dumbasses too. They turned the kids in...

What's really sad is that both of them are going to end up on those sexual offenders lists - for their own protection.

People = idiots.
My Last.fm Account

My Band

Quote by Jackal58
JoHNNERz you sir are my hero of the moment.
#7
Never keep pics of you having sex on your computer. If they had known that (Can't blame them, bullshit law), this would have never happened.
#8
someone wrote this story is worthless without pics! i bet it was a uger.
#9
This makes me so pissed off. The ****ing American legal system is a joke. A pathetic, terrible joke. The country has among the highest murder and assault charges, but they would rather prosecute two YOUNG ADULTS for having naked photographs of each other on their PRIVATE COMPUTERS. ****ing ridiculous. They are getting charged because "the computers could have been hacked"??? Now, I've never been to law school, but how the **** is it that you can get charged for the potential of being the victim of a crime? Don't wear a gold watch, you might get robbed! Then the watch might be sold! Then you'd be supporting the black market! Lets make watches illegal!

And how the **** can you get charged for child pornography when the pictures are OF YOURSELF? Should we arrest all parents with pictures of their newborn babies? I've seen commercials with infant asses in them, quick arrest Pampers! This is so ****ing ridiculous it makes me sick. They may have shown the pictures to their friends?? SO WHAT? If the kids are ****ing old enough to ****, they are old enough to see pictures of themselves doing it. Jesus H Christ, Judge Buddy Whatshis**** even says that she was to immature and reckless to have sound judgment, which according to law, alleviates her from guilt. Now, I may be wrong, but is it not the purpose of anti-child pornography laws to protect the CHILDREN from be abused? What kind of backwards, backwoods log cabin courtroom could possibly be so bucktoothed stupid to make a ruling like this? If I want to photocopy my penis, and tape the pictures to my wall, ITS MY CONSTITUTIONAL ****ING RIGHT to do so.

I'm sorry, what was that Judge Pindlewhothe****, did you just say "the statute was intended to protect minors like appellant and her co-defendant from their own lack of judgment"? Thats odd, I could of sworn subjective lack of judgment wasn't a federal-**** crime.

Appellant was simply too young to make an intelligent decision about engaging in sexual conduct and memorializing it. Mere production of these videos or pictures may also result in psychological trauma to the teenagers involved.

No, dumbass, you know what causes psychological trauma? GETTING YOUR ASS DRAGGED INTO COURT FOR GIVING YOUR BOYFRIEND A ****ING BLOWJOB AND TAKING A PICTURE FOR THE MONEYSHOT. Oh, did I say moneyshot? Because I'm not suggesting that they intended to sell the photos, like this judge is, BECAUSE THATS RETARDED. So, let me get this straight. This has nothing to do with child pornography (WHICH IS ONLY THE BUTT****ING CHARGE), it's about this judge's personal conviction that seventeen (SEVEN-****ING-TEEN) is too young to have sex, and that MEMORIALIZING it is a bad thing. Oh, so apparently His Honour Johhny Dinglenuts the Judge doesn't like kinky sex. Oh, well thank our lucky stars thats not a crime and we won't find ourselves being charged for it..... OH WAIT, PSYCH, they'll just slap child porn charges on you now.

While they're at it, Why not give "Jeremy" a charge of child molestation. I mean its only ****ing LOGICAL that if it is child pornography, the ADULT ABUSING THE CHILD should be charged. Oh, but wait - not only are they the same age, THEY BOTH CONSENTED, GOD DAMNIT! In any non theistic country in the world this case would be laughed out of court before "Jeremy" had time to brick in "Amber's" underage face.

If I lived in ****ing Flordia, I'd be on the first dingy over the Cuba.
Quote by BeefWellington

what's the point in being "philiosophical"?

Interesting question...
Last edited by Vornik at Feb 12, 2007,
#10
^
How long did it take you to write that?
Quote by Kai-7
You are the greatest. Wow. CaptainWow

Bumblebee of the Mighty Autobots. PM Kankuro to join.
UG Irish Clan - Póg mo thóin
Metals Fetishist of the"Please Sir, I want GORE" Club - UG Horror Fans and Gorehounds Unite!
#11
Quote by CaptainWow
^
How long did it take you to write that?

Seven minutes, after I picked my jaw out of my crotch and blinked a few times.
Quote by BeefWellington

what's the point in being "philiosophical"?

Interesting question...
#12
However long it took... it was worth it.

Summed it up nicely, and also angrily...
My Last.fm Account

My Band

Quote by Jackal58
JoHNNERz you sir are my hero of the moment.
#13
Why do these articles never show pictures of the "violators"?
#15
Quote by yawn
Why do these articles never show pictures of the "violators"?

young offenders protection act.
Quote by BeefWellington

what's the point in being "philiosophical"?

Interesting question...
#16
Quote by Vornik
young offenders protection act.


Yep, if you're under 18, they can't show your face or give your real name to the media.
Quote by Kai-7
You are the greatest. Wow. CaptainWow

Bumblebee of the Mighty Autobots. PM Kankuro to join.
UG Irish Clan - Póg mo thóin
Metals Fetishist of the"Please Sir, I want GORE" Club - UG Horror Fans and Gorehounds Unite!
#17
vornik has absolutely hit the nail on the head!

this is beyond stupid! i cant really post anything that wasnt said by vornik, but stories like this make me so freaking mad....
Quote by Machanix
We play guitar.... we're automatically on top of the world.

Life Is A Lemon And I Want My Money Back!

A Wasted Youth
Is Better By Far
Than A Wise And Productive Old Age

Good Girls Go To Heaven, But The Bad Girls Go Everywhere!
#18
wonderful
Millie, my Peavey Grind Fiver
Peavey BAM 210 350w combo amp
Sansamp Bass Driver DI
Modded Ernie Ball VP Jr.
Monster Bass Cable, 21'

Quote by NakedBassist
Welcome to bass, you'll f*cking love it
#20
Hardly 'justice.'

They think these kids are 'hardened criminals?'

Don't they have better things to do? Like...eat donuts, for example?
Last.fm

WE ARE THE MUSIC MAKERS
AND WE ARE THE DREAMERS OF THE DREAMS
#22
Quote by Dirtydeeds468
Hardly 'justice.'

They think these kids are 'hardened criminals?'

Don't they have better things to do? Like...eat donuts, for example?





Holy frickin cow...


*drools*
#23
Quote by Vornik
This makes me so pissed off. The ****ing American legal system is a joke. A pathetic, terrible joke. The country has among the highest murder and assault charges, but they would rather prosecute two YOUNG ADULTS for having naked photographs of each other on their PRIVATE COMPUTERS. ****ing ridiculous. They are getting charged because "the computers could have been hacked"??? Now, I've never been to law school, but how the **** is it that you can get charged for the potential of being the victim of a crime? Don't wear a gold watch, you might get robbed! Then the watch might be sold! Then you'd be supporting the black market! Lets make watches illegal!

And how the **** can you get charged for child pornography when the pictures are OF YOURSELF? Should we arrest all parents with pictures of their newborn babies? I've seen commercials with infant asses in them, quick arrest Pampers! This is so ****ing ridiculous it makes me sick. They may have shown the pictures to their friends?? SO WHAT? If the kids are ****ing old enough to ****, they are old enough to see pictures of themselves doing it. Jesus H Christ, Judge Buddy Whatshis**** even says that she was to immature and reckless to have sound judgment, which according to law, alleviates her from guilt. Now, I may be wrong, but is it not the purpose of anti-child pornography laws to protect the CHILDREN from be abused? What kind of backwards, backwoods log cabin courtroom could possibly be so bucktoothed stupid to make a ruling like this? If I want to photocopy my penis, and tape the pictures to my wall, ITS MY CONSTITUTIONAL ****ING RIGHT to do so.

I'm sorry, what was that Judge Pindlewhothe****, did you just say "the statute was intended to protect minors like appellant and her co-defendant from their own lack of judgment"? Thats odd, I could of sworn subjective lack of judgment wasn't a federal-**** crime.

No, dumbass, you know what causes psychological trauma? GETTING YOUR ASS DRAGGED INTO COURT FOR GIVING YOUR BOYFRIEND A ****ING BLOWJOB AND TAKING A PICTURE FOR THE MONEYSHOT. Oh, did I say moneyshot? Because I'm not suggesting that they intended to sell the photos, like this judge is, BECAUSE THATS RETARDED. So, let me get this straight. This has nothing to do with child pornography (WHICH IS ONLY THE BUTT****ING CHARGE), it's about this judge's personal conviction that seventeen (SEVEN-****ING-TEEN) is too young to have sex, and that MEMORIALIZING it is a bad thing. Oh, so apparently His Honour Johhny Dinglenuts the Judge doesn't like kinky sex. Oh, well thank our lucky stars thats not a crime and we won't find ourselves being charged for it..... OH WAIT, PSYCH, they'll just slap child porn charges on you now.

While they're at it, Why not give "Jeremy" a charge of child molestation. I mean its only ****ing LOGICAL that if it is child pornography, the ADULT ABUSING THE CHILD should be charged. Oh, but wait - not only are they the same age, THEY BOTH CONSENTED, GOD DAMNIT! In any non theistic country in the world this case would be laughed out of court before "Jeremy" had time to brick in "Amber's" underage face.

If I lived in ****ing Flordia, I'd be on the first dingy over the Cuba.


Dude, send this shit to that court. Clean up the language, maybe, but you hit it spot-on.
Last.fm

WE ARE THE MUSIC MAKERS
AND WE ARE THE DREAMERS OF THE DREAMS
#24
Quote by yawn




Holy shit. I just about creamed my pants after I saw that thing.

GODDAMN IT. NOW I WANT FUCKING DUNKIN DONUTS.

Fuck you, yawn. Fuck you.
Last.fm

WE ARE THE MUSIC MAKERS
AND WE ARE THE DREAMERS OF THE DREAMS
#25
Quote by Dirtydeeds468
Holy shit. I just about creamed my pants after I saw that thing.

GODDAMN IT. NOW I WANT FUCKING DUNKIN DONUTS.

Fuck you, yawn. Fuck you.
Hey, I'm just as much a victim as you are.


I WANT DONUTS SO BADLY